PPQ.pdf

PDF 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Long Beach Airport RWY 30 ILS Replacement. Long Beach, CA
Solicitation number
DTFASA-17-R-00164
Issued by

About this file

PPQ (pdf)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFO.pdf PDF
Specifications.PDF PDF
Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Davis Bacon.pdf PDF
Drawings.pdf PDF
Amendment 2.pdf PDF
Business Declaration.doc DOC document
SF-1413.pdf PDF
PPQ.pdf PDF
Drawings.pdf PDF
Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Business Declaration.doc DOC document
Davis Bacon.pdf PDF
SF-1413.pdf PDF
RFO.pdf PDF
Specifications.PDF PDF
Davis Bacon.pdf PDF
PPQ.pdf PDF
RFO.pdf PDF
Drawings.pdf PDF
SF-1413.pdf PDF
Specifications.PDF PDF
Business Declaration.doc DOC document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY (PAGE 1 OF 2)

DTFASA-17-R-00164: Long Beach

SECTION 1 -- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR AND PROVIDED TO THE CUSTOMER REFERENCE

Name of Firm Being Evaluated: ______________________________________________

Project Title & Location: ____________________________________________________

Project Dollar Value:_________________________________________________________

Year Completed: _________________ Project Manager: _________________________

SECTION 2 -- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CUSTOMER REFERENCE AND MAILED, HAND-DELIVERED OR

EMAILED DIRECTLY TO: Forms submitted by other than the customer (i.e., by the offeror), will not be considered.

FAA

Attn: Darren Odegard, AAQ-530 OR darren,Odegard@faa.gov

1601 Lind Ave SW

Renton, WA 98057

OVERVIEW: The firm shown above has submitted a proposal on a Federal Aviation Administration solicitation and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the firm's past performance. Your input is important to us and responses are required by 4:00 PM on February 6, 2017 for inclusion in this evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

In blocks below, please indicate your overall level of satisfaction with work performed by the firm shown in Section 1. Mark Not

Applicable (N/A) for any areas that do not apply. Provide any additional comments on page 2.

On this project, the firm: Satisfaction

Low High N/A

1. Kept You Informed & Treated You as Important Member of the Team 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Displayed Flexibility in Responding to Your Needs 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Displayed Initiative in Problem Solving 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Resolved Your Concerns 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Completed Your Project Milestones on Time 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Managed the Project Effectively (including adequate Cost Controls) 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Managed their Work Force Effectively (including Subcontractors) 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

8. Maintained an Effective Quality Control Program 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

9. Provided Warranty Support 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

10. Maintained Operational Continuity at Existing Facility During Project 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

11. Minimized Adverse Construction Impacts on Ongoing Operations 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

12. Your OVERALL Level of Customer Satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

13. Was payment withheld or liquidated damages assessed? (If yes, please describe below). Yes......No......N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY (PAGE 2 OF 2)

DTFANM-15-R-00159

14. REMARKS: (Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the firm)

Your Name: ____________________________________ Phone Number: ______________________

Firm Name: ________________________________________________________

Relationship to this Project: ___________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .