DRAFT PPQ.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES (BOS), AVON PARK Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA481421R0002
About this file
This document contains a draft past performance questionnaire and a notice of a forthcoming federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a template for evaluating an offeror's performance on previous contracts and includes sections to rate quality of service, management, quality, schedule, price, communications, safety, environmental performance, and overall project execution.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for base operations support services at Avon Park Air Force Range in Florida. The Department of the Air Force intends to issue a request for proposal around May 14, 2021 with a pre-proposal conference on May 25. The contract will have a one-year base period and six one-year options and is set aside entirely for 8(a) small businesses. The contractor will provide personnel, equipment, tools and materials except for government-furnished property to perform functions including range maintenance, target construction and maintenance, civil engineering, roads and grounds maintenance, infrastructure maintenance, preventive maintenance, refuse collection, custodial services, administrative support, supply and fuels support, communications support, transportation services, environmental program support, and hazardous waste management. The North American Industry Classification code is 561210 and the small business size standard is $41.5 million.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Being Evaluated: To Be Completed by Offeror
Performance Task Area:
Performance Rating:
Performance Task Description:
Performance Location:
Contract Title Performance was Accomplished Under:
Contract/Project # Performance was Accomplished Under:
Contract Award Cost:
Contract Award Date:
Contract Completion Date:
Prime Contractor:
Customer Rep Name:
Customer Rep phone #:
Customer Rep email:
Past Performance : To Be Completed by Customer
Customer Rep Name:
Customer Rep phone #:
Customer Rep email:
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Not Satisfactory |
Quality of Service
(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship
(2) The Contractor provided full staffing with qualified personnel appropriate to the effort performed
(3) The Contractor provided equipment, and materials that were appropriate to the effort performed
Overall Quality of Service Rating
Management
The Contractor had control of the work site and his subcontractor at all times
The Contractors on site manager ensured all his the activities were well managed and met Gov Standards
The Contractors Site manager addressed any issues in a timely manner
The Contractor was cooperative in addressing issues and worked well with the government, subcontractors, other contractors not under his/her control, and customers.
Overall Management Rating
Quality
The Contractor followed his companies Quality Control (QC) plan
The Contractor had the design drawing/specifications on hand at the job site
The Contractor followed the design drawing/specifications or formally requested a deviation in writing before using an alternate approach
The Contractor ensured all work was accomplished to industry standard or better
The Contractor self-identified work that did not meet standard and corrected it without government direction
Overall Quality Rating
Schedule
The Contractor met the schedule to design and construct the project
Overall Schedule Rating
Price
The Contractor did not submit extraneous claims for additional compensation
The Contractor fairly priced any modifications
Overall Price Rating
Communications
The Contractor outlined his schedule in advance and kept the customer and inspector updated on activities
The Contractor identified any foreseeable issues with the customer and the government in advance
The Contractor was open and honest in communications
The Contractor answered questions in a timely manner
Overall Communications Rating
Safety
The Contractor carefully followed all safety regulations
The Contractor kept a clean and organized work site
Overall Safety Rating
Environmental
The Contractor ensured his work was conducted in accordance with all environmental laws and regulations
Overall Project Execution Rating
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .