Amendment_5.DOL-MSH-16-R-00004_.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT ~ CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 5

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCFil~SE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT N0. (IfapplicableJ

000005 06/15/2016

6. ISSUED BY CODE MS HA BECKLEY 7. ADMINISTERED BY (lfotherthan Item 6) CODE

US Department of Labor 1301 Airport Rd Beaver WV 25813

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., sheet, county, State and ZIP Code) ~X~ 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION N0.

DOL—MSH-16—R-00004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05/13/2016

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

108. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

ll. 1 ~11J 11 CM VIVLT H!'!'LIGJ 1 V XMCIVUMCIV 1 J OF SVLIt~I IAl IUNJ

~ The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers ❑ is e~Rended. ~ is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amendetl , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solidtation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted ,such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the ooenina hour and date soedfied.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLYAPPLIES TO MODIFICATION OFCONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER N0. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Spedfyauthority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in ,paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

D. OTHER

E. IMPORTANT: Contredor ❑ is not. ❑ is required to sign this doament and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCFsech'on headings, including solicitafioNcontractsu6jectmatterwhere feasible.)

The purpose of Amendment #5 is to revise FAR Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial

Items, adding the below language to Factor III - Price:

The offeror's price proposal shall include a breakout of how the prices were calculated, including the rates for each labor category, supplies, G&A, overhead, and profit. The price proposal shall include an acknowledgement of the Collective Bargaining Agreement contained herein and a certification that the proposed labor rates meet or exceed those required by the Service Contract Act.

Contract Specialist: Rhonda Sizemore, 304-256-3538; Sizemore. Rhonda@dol.gov

Continued ...

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Deborah W. Worrells

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 1 NIT D STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signatwe o/person aulhaizetl (o sign) (Signature of Conhading 0/ficei)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 S IANDAKU FOhiM 30 (RhV. 10-93)

Previous edition unusable Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

CONTINUATION

SHEETIREFERENCE N0.OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE Oi

DOL-MSH-16-R-00004/000005 I2 5

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

ITEM N0. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (E)

Section 4: Provision, 52.212-2, is incorporated as follows:

52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items. (OCT

2014)

Basis for Award:

Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the

Government as determined by the evaluations described in this section. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the low price offeror or offeror with the highest merit rating after consideration of all factors.

Relevant Order of Importance: Technical is more important than Past Performance. All sub-factors under Technical are equally important. All non-price factors are more important that price.

Price will become more important as non-price factors approach equality.

FACTOR I. TECHNICAL:

Subfactor 1- UNDERSTANDING OF THE REQUIREMENT -

The Government will evaluate the offeror's understanding of the work to be performed in accordance with the PWS. The offeror shall submit a proposal that demonstrates its understanding of the work described in Part 5 of the PWS and the extent to which potential risks are identified and mitigated.

Subfactor 2 - CORPORATE EXPERIENCE - The

Government will evaluate work experience submitted by the offeror of a similar nature, scope, complexity, and difficulty to that which will be performed under the prospective contract contemplated by this solicitation.

Subfactor 3- START-UP PLAN-PHASE-OUT-PLAN - The

Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed

Start-Up Plan which contains a reasonable, realistic approach for assuming full contractual responsibility within thirty (30) days of contract award without disruption or degradation of performance. The plan sha11 identify risk, propose appropriate mitigation strategies, and

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8087 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (486)

Sponsored 6y GSA

FAR (48 CFRI 53.110

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE N0.OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AGE OF

DOL-MSH-16-R-00004/000005 3 ~ 5

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

ITEM N0. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CA) (B) CC) (D) CE) CF)

propose a realistic, achievable and affordable start-up schedule. The plan shall include a staffing plan including resumes of key personnel.

The Government will evaluation the experience and qualifications of proposed key personnel in accordance with the skills and qualifications outlined in the PWS. The staffing plan shall outline the number of employees anticipated for each job category, the key functions each will perform, the shift to be worked, and the average number of hours to be worked per week. The plan shall ensure sufficient resources are on hand and available to begin work under this requirement.

A Collective Bargaining Agreement is in effect for the employees working under this requirement.

The job categories in the Collective Bargaining

Agreement are: 1) Lead Guard 2) Security Guard and, 3) Secretary. The On-Site Supervisor is not part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

The government will evaluate the Phase-Out Plan submitted by the offeror based on how it demonstrates the offeror's ability to enable a smooth transition to replacement services when the contract period of performance ends. The plan shall provide phase-in support for up to 90 days to the selected contractor if the incumbent contractor is not selected herein.

Subfactor 4 - QUALITY CONTROL PLAN - The Government will evaluate the offeror's Quality Control Plan (QCP) on its demonstration of how they intend to monitor, inspect, and correct deficiencies for the requirements of the PWS.

FACTOR II. PAST PERFORMANCE:

The Government will evaluate past performance of current or previous contracts for relevancy performed within the past 3 years based on how well the contractor performed on projects of similar dollar value, scope, and complexity.

Offerors are advised that the Government may use past performance information obtained from centralized past performance databases and sources other than those identified by the offeror and the information obtained may be used for both the responsibility determination and the best value decision. The absence of past Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8087 OPTIONAL FORM 338 (48B)

Sponsoretl by GSA

FAR !48 CFRI 53.110

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE N0.OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AGE OF

DOL-MSH-16-R-00004/000005 4 ~ 5

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CA) (B) CC) CD) (E) CF)

performance data will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Contracts listed may include those entered into with Government agencies or private sectors. For contractors with no relevant corporate past performance, the

Government may take into account information regarding the past performance of predecessor companies, key personnel with relevant past performance, or subcontractors that will perform key aspects of the requirement. The Government will evaluate the Past Performance Elements specified in the Past Performance Questionnaire

FACTOR III - PRICE' The offeror's price proposal shall include a breakout of how the prices were calculated, including the rates for each labor category, supplies, G&A, overhead, and profit.

The price proposal shall include an acknowledgement of the Collective Bargaining

Agreement contained herein and a certification that the proposed labor rates meet or exceed those required by the Service Contract Act. The

Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total of all CLIN prices, including all options to ensure that pricing is not unbalanced. Price will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness using the techniques in EAR 15.404-1(b) (2). Price will become significantly more important as technical ratings approach equality. No adjectival ratings will be used to evaluate Price

Adjectival Ratings. Proposals will be adjectivally rated against each of the evaluation factors set forth in this plan and in the solicitation. Adjectival ratings for Factors I, Technical (see table 1), will be: "Excellent,"

Very Good", "Good", "Fair", and "Poor."

Adjectival ratings for Factor II (see table 2), Past Performance will be: "Low Risk, Moderate

Risk, High Risk, and Unknown Risk. No adjectival ratings will be used to evaluate

Factor III Price

ADJECTIVAL

Table 1

DEFINITION

Excellent A comprehensive and thorough proposal

Continued ...

NSN 7540-07-152-8087 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-88)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

CONTINUATION

SHEETIREFERENCE NO.OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED — AGE OF

DOL-MSH-16-R-00004/000005 5 5

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

ITEM N0.

(A)

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

QUANTITY

(C)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(E) of exceptional merit with one or more significant strengths. No deficiency or significant weakness exists.

Very Good A proposal having no deficiency and which demonstrates over-all competence. One or more significant strengths have been found, and strengths outbalance any weaknesses that exist.

Good A proposal having no deficiency and which shows a reasonably sound response. There may be strengths or weaknesses, or both. As a whole, weaknesses not off-set by strengths do not significantly detract from the offeror's response.

Fair A proposal having no deficiency and which has One or more weaknesses. Weaknesses outbalance any strengths

Poor A proposal that has one or more deficiencies or significant weaknesses that demonstrate a lack of overall competence or would require a major proposal revision to correct.

ADJECTIVAL

Table 2

DESCRIPTION

Low Risk Little doubt exists, based on the Offeror's performance record, that the Offeror can perform the proposed effort.

Moderate Risk Some doubt exists, based on the Offeror's performance record, that the Offeror can perform the proposed effort.

High Risk Significant doubt exists, based on the Offeror's performance record, that the Offeror can perform the proposed effort.

Unknown Risk Little or no relevant performance record identifiable; equates to an unknown risk rating having no favorable or unfavorable evaluation significance.

NSN 7540-01.152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 338 (488)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFRI 53.110