DOA 26-8 ADDENDUM NO. 3.pdf

PDF 112 KB Posted

Attached to
Airport Civil Consultant Services
Solicitation number
RFP 120 DOA 26-8 4
Issued by
Palm Beach County, Florida

About this file

This is Addendum No. 3 to DOA 26-8, issued by the State of Florida Department of Management Services for Airport Civil Consultant Services. The addendum modifies the original solicitation requirements and terms for consulting services related to airport civil engineering and infrastructure projects. The addendum clarifies project scope, deliverables, and technical specifications for potential bidders. Specific response dates, bidders' conferences, and site visit schedules are outlined to ensure qualified consultants submit competitive proposals. The contract term and any renewal options are contingent upon successful performance evaluation and budget availability.

The addendum addresses pricing structures, evaluation criteria, and compliance requirements for consultant selection. It may include clarifications on insurance requirements, bonding, professional licensing standards, and qualifications for civil engineering consultants. Set-aside provisions, incumbent contractor information, and funding sources through the State of Florida are specified to guide bidders in proposal preparation. Additional terms regarding scope modifications, change order procedures, and contract administration responsibilities are detailed to establish clear expectations for consultant performance and deliverable standards throughout the engagement period.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DOA 26-8 Notice of RFP.pdf PDF
DOA 26-8 ADDENDUM NO. 1.pdf PDF
DOA 26-8 RFP Airport Civil Consultant Services.pdf PDF
DOA 26-8 ADDENDUM NO. 2.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DOA 26-8 Addendum No. 3

July 15, 2026

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

PROJECT NAME: Airport Civil Engineering Consultant Services

PROJECT NUMBER: DOA 26-8

DESCRIPTION: Request for Proposals (Qualifications Based Selection Process)

ADDENDUM NUMBER 3

Date of Issue: July 15, 2026

This addendum modifies or interprets the proposal documents by additions, deletions, clarifications, corrections, or other type of modifications. Addenda will become part of the

Contract Documents. Proposers, upon receiving addenda, shall insert same into the Proposal

Documents.

It is required that Addendum Number 3 be signed in the Acknowledgement of Receipt below and attached to the Proposal and become part of the Proposal.

Acknowledgement of Receipt of Proposer

ADDENDUM NO. 3

This addendum includes the following:

1. Questions

Question: LEED certification typically applies to buildings and not airfield sustainability.

Will the County accept certification from the Envision Sustainable Infrastructure Framework as an equivalent certification?

Response: Section VI.D.4. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following

4. Narrative describing project approach including a narrative describing the firm’s approach to resiliency principles and sustainable practices.

Question: Would the County consider extending the proposal submission deadline, as our firm is currently pursuing Palm Beach County CCNA re-certification?

Response: No time extension will be granted at this time.

Question: Could the County please clarify whether Palm Beach County CCNA Certification categories are required for this contract? If so, please identify the specific categories that apply to the scope of services.

Response: Refer to section IV. A. of the Palm Beach County Policies and Procedures

Manual CW-O-048 Selection of Professional Engineers, Architects, Landscape Architects, Land Surveyors and Mappers for criteria for CCNA certification by Palm Beach County.

Question: The Pre-Proposal Conference Presentation slides in Addendum No. 2 identify an

SBE subcontracting goal of 15%. However, the RFP language appears to reference a minimum 20% SBE goal. Please confirm which SBE participation goal proposers should use when completing OSBD Schedule 1 and Schedule 2.

Response: The Pre-Proposal Presentation contained an error. The SBE goal is 20% as indicated in Attachment A to the RFP.

Question: Does #4 below, have a maximum page limit?

#4.Narrative describing the firm’s approach to resiliency principles and sustainable practices;

include a list of projects where the firm has achieved LEED certification or other high performance green building certification; include a list of LEED AP credentialed staff or staff with a certificate in sustainable design and construction from an accredited college or university.

Response: No.

Question: In an effort to streamline production, would DOA consider the submission of seven (7) identical hard copies in lieu of the required one (1) original and six (6) copies?

Response: Yes.

Question: In Section D. Required Proposal Contents, bullet 5 says to Provide current

Standard Form 330 to include those personnel within the prime consultant firm or sub-consultants, who have similar experience. (Length, as required). Please clarify whether or not a FULL SF330 is required here (Sections A-D, Sections E, F G, and H), or if only SF330

Section E: Resumes are required in this section.

Response: Submit a complete SF330.

Question: In Section D. Required Proposal Contents, bullet 6, says to provide Five (5) verifiable references for work of a similar nature completed in the last ten (10) years. This can be accomplished in the Standard Form 330. Please clarify whether or not a FULL SF330 is required here (Sections A-D, Sections E, F G, and H), or if only SF330 Section F: Projects are required in this section.

Response: Submit a complete SF330.

Question: Is the SBE Goal 20% or 15%? The RFP states 20% but the Pre-Proposal

Conference Presentation states 15%.

Response: The Pre-Proposal presentation contained an error. The SBE goal is 20%.

Question: If a proposer elects to include Section VI.D.4 as a standalone section, what page limit, if any, would apply to that section?

Response: There is no page limit defined in the RFP.

Question: Could you please provide clarity on whether "Calculations for Volume of Previous

Work; For State Certified MBE Selection Criteria" (found within the RFQ under Attachment

7) should be completed by the consultant and submitted with our proposal or will be calculated separately by the County?

Response: Completed by the Proposer to be verified by the County.

This Addendum includes the following attachments:

None.

END OF ADDENDUM NO. 3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .