CN-550000-CAV40-00030000.pdf

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TASK WORK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

375-030-25

PROCUREMENT

08/21

Consultant:

Address:

Date:

9/30/2025

*Limiting or Estimating/Budgeted Amount.

Distribution:

Task Work Order No.:

Contract No.: Payment FM No.:

CAV40 45624611201

$305,176.00

(name) (title) Signature

Tim Smith, P.E. Director of Transportation Development

Other Notes:

An independent assessment of the staff hours and quantities for the proposed services has been performed, and found to be fair, reasonable, and competitive.

(LS2) Lump sum paid based on % of completion

Page 1 Total

Page 2 thru 6 Subtotal

Total

Basic Services LS-2

HDR Engineering, Inc.

25 West Cedar Street, Suite 200, Pensacola, FL 32502

(To be entered upon execution of T.W.O.)

Brief Task Description:

In accordance with the above referenced contract, you are authorized to perform the tasks detailed in attached Exhibit A (Scope of Services).

Compensation elements are as follows:

Element Description Amount Estimate/LimitMethod of Compensation

The total amount or the limiting amount of the compensation will be:

All services required under this Task Work Order will be completed on or before:

$280,200.00

$280,200.00 Limit

Transportation Systems Planning Consultant – Passing Lane Study on SR 20 in Walton County. (See Attached Scope)

Signature

Consultant PM-Casey Johns Jared Kirkland Mark Brock PSU-L. Richards Financial Services

$280,200.00

$0.00

(name) (title)

$280,200.00

Remaining Balance: $25,024.00

Total authorizations to date (including this one):

Departmental Approval:

Consultant Acceptance:

Docusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Jeff Arms Vice President

02/13/2025

Scope of Services Page A-1 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

FOR

PASSING LANE FEASIBILITY STUDY

SR 20 from the Okaloosa County Line to SR 83 (US 331)

FDOT District 3

Walton County

This Scope of Services is an attachment which is incorporated into the agreement between the State of Florida Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT or FDOT) and HDR Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT) relative to the transportation facility described as follows:

Financial Project ID: 456246-1-12-01 Federal Aid Project No.: N/A ETDM No.: N/A County Section No.: 60030000 Project Description: Prepare Feasibility Study for passing lanes on

SR 20 in Walton County from the Okaloosa County Line to SR 83 (US 331)

Bridge Nos.: 600085, 600910, 600095, 600096, 600104, 600920 Railroad Crossing No.: N/A Project Type: Feasibility Study Lead Agency: Florida Department of Transportation Federal Funding: N/A Anticipated Class of Action: TBD

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-2 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

Table of Contents

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES PURPOSE _________________________________________ 4

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES ______________________________ 4

2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________ 4

2.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK ________________ 5

2.2.1 Governing Regulations ______________________________________________ 6

2.2.2 Liaison Office _____________________________________________________ 7

2.2.3 Personnel _________________________________________________________ 7

2.2.4 Sub-Consultants ___________________________________________________ 8

2.2.5 Lead Agency, Cooperating Agencies and Participating Agencies _____________ 8

2.2.6 Meetings and Presentations___________________________________________ 8

2.2.7 Communication ____________________________________________________ 9

2.2.8 Quality Control ____________________________________________________ 9

2.2.9 Schedule ________________________________________________________ 10

2.2.10 Submittals _______________________________________________________ 11

2.2.11 Project White Paper _______________________________________________ 12

2.2.12 Computer Automation _____________________________________________ 12

2.2.13 Conflict of Interest ________________________________________________ 12

2.3 COORDINATION WITH OTHER CONSULTANTS AND ENTITIES __________ 13

2.4 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT _________________________________________ 13

2.5 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE DEPARTMENT _________________ 13

2.6 OPTIONAL SERVICES _______________________________________________ 14

3.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ______________________________________________ 14

3.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT – N/A ________________________________________ 14

3.1.1 Public Involvement Data Collection ____________ Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.2 SCHEDULED PUBLIC MEETINGS – N/A ________________________________ 14

3.3 ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT REQUIREMENTS – N/A ___________ 14

3.4 CORRESPONDENCE _________________________________________________ 14

4.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY ________________________________________________ 15

4.1 ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND CONSIDERATIONS ____________________ 15

4.1.1 Review of Previous Studies _________________________________________ 15

4.1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis ________________________________________ 15

4.1.3 Traffic Analysis __________________________________________________ 16

4.1.4 Safety __________________________________________________________ 18

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-3 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

4.1.5 Utilities and Railroad _________________________________________________ 19

4.1.6 Roadway Analysis ________________________________________________ 19

4.1.7 Cost Estimates ____________________________________________________ 20

4.1.8 Preliminary Concept Plans __________________________________________ 20

4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES AND CONSIDERATIONS _________________ 20

4.2.1 Sociocultural Effects _______________________________________________ 21

4.2.2 Cultural Resources ________________________________________________ 21

4.2.3 Natural Resources ________________________________________________ 22

4.2.4 Physical Effect ___________________________________________________ 22

4.3 FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION ______________________________ 22

5.0 METHOD OF COMPENSATION _________________________________________ 22

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-4 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES PURPOSE

The Scope of Services describes the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT or DEPARTMENT) when conducting Feasibility Studies necessary to comply with DEPARTMENT procedures and underlying laws and regulations and to obtain FL Department of Transportation approval of the Environmental Document, as applicable.

Activities encompassed by this Scope of Services include:

Major work groups include: 2.0, 3.2 Minor work groups include: 3.1, 6.1, 13.5

The Project development process and the tasks identified in this Scope of Services must follow the guidance provided in the DEPARTMENT's current version of the PD&E Manual and FDOT Design Manual (FDM). As discussed in Part 1, Chapter 1, of the PD&E Manual, the PD&E Manual satisfies state and federal processes and incorporates the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); federal law, regulations, and Executive Orders included in the FHWA Federal-Aid Policy Guide; and applicable state laws and regulations including Section 339.155 of the Florida Statutes and Rule Chapter 14 of the Florida Administrative Code. As such, Project documents prepared by the CONSULTANT must comply with applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and Executive Orders.

The Scope of Services defines the Project tasks to be performed consistent with the PD&E Manual and other pertinent manuals as specifically prescribed in Section 2. The Scope of Services also outlines work activities that will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and / or the DEPARTMENT.

The CONSULTANT must demonstrate good project management practices while working on this Project, including effective communication with the DEPARTMENT and others as necessary, effective management of time and resources, and quality of documentation. Throughout the Feasibility Study, the CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain a contract file in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures.

The CONSULTANT and any sub-CONSULTANTS are expected to know the laws and rules governing their profession and are expected to provide professional services in accordance with current and applicable regulations, codes, ordinances, and standards.

The DEPARTMENT will provide contract administration and management, as well as technical reviews of work associated with the development of this Project and performed under this Scope of Services. The DEPARTMENT's technical reviews will focus on high-level conformance and are not meant to substitute CONSULTANT quality reviews of deliverables. The CONSULTANT is fully responsible for the work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services. The DEPARTMENT may provide task-specific information as outlined in this Scope of Services.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES

2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The CONSULTANT is to conduct a Feasibility Study to Identify potential locations for adding Passing Lanes on SR 20 in Walton County from the Okaloosa County Line to SR 83 (US 331).

o Roadway ID: 60030000 (Walton County)

BMP: 0.000

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-5 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

EMP: 17.743

Project limits may be adjusted based on the findings of the Feasibility Study.

The Feasibility Study is to provide documented information necessary to determine fatal flaws, logical termini, purpose and need, and corridors or alternatives that meet performance metrics identified in the purpose and need.

The CONSULTANT will analyze and assess the Project's impact on the social, economic, cultural, natural, and physical environment, in order to advance the project to the next phase of develop and achieve Location and Design Concept Acceptance (LDCA) in accordance with FDOT policy, procedures, and requirements.

The CONSULTANT shall review and become familiar with Project documents and materials that have been prepared prior to the Feasibility study. The CONSULTANT will review the previous StateWide Environmental Project Tracker (SWEPT) project file for FPID 220635-2-22-01, including Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process (ETDM) Final Programming Screen Summary Report #14302 (August 2020), and the SR 20 Feasibility Study (August 2019) including comments received from the Environmental Technical Advisory Team (ETAT), Lead Agency, and / or any responses from the DEPARTMENT pertaining to this Project. The CONSULTANT shall also review concepts and reports (e.g., typical sections, alignments, planning reports) developed from prior planning studies. The CONSULTANT shall use resource agencies' comments to assess the level of effort for work activities required to adequately address potential resources of concern to this Project.

2.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK

The CONSULTANT will conduct the appropriate level of engineering and environmental analyses related to the anticipated Class of Action for this Project, as outlined in the PD&E Manual, the FDM, and directed by the Project objectives. The level of analysis depends on complexity of the Project, level of controversy, potential for significant impacts, and degree and quality of information / data available. If the Class of Action for the Project was not determined during ETDM screening, the Lead Agency will determine it after completion of the environmental analyses.

The CONSULTANT upon direction from DEPARTMENT will assist with updating data, technical studies or the Environmental Document to verify compliance with NEPA, other federal laws, regulations and Executive Orders.

The CONSULTANT will maximize the use of existing information available from State, regional, local agencies, private sources, and its own files. Examples include the Programming Screen Summary Report, Concept Reports, previously completed planning products, listed species reports, Florida Department of Environmental Protection OCULUS Electronic Document Management System, and other sources as appropriate.

The DEPARTMENT will allow the CONSULTANT to use the DEPARTMENT’s computer facilities upon proper authorization as described in DEPARTMENT Procedure No. 325-060- 401.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-6 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

The CONSULTANT will research the work program to identify any planned or current, studies and design projects along the SR 20 corridor study area.

2.2.1 Governing Regulations

Services performed by the CONSULTANT must comply with applicable DEPARTMENT Manuals and Guidelines. The CONSULTANT will use the latest editions of the following Manuals and Guidelines to perform work for this Project.

Florida Statutes Florida Administrative Codes Applicable Federal Regulations, U.S. Codes, and Technical Advisories PD&E Manual Florida Design Manual ETDM Manual SocioCultural Effects Evaluation Handbook Public Involvement Handbook FDOT Design Manual Interchange Handbook (525-030-160) Design Standards (625-010-003) Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board (TRB)) Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance Streets and

Highways (Florida Greenbook) (625-000-015) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Pedestrian Facilities (AASHTO) Florida Pedestrian Facilities Planning & Design Handbook Location Survey Manual (550-030-101) Highway Safety Manual (AASHTO) Right of way Mapping Handbook (550-030-015) Right of way Procedures Manual (575-000-000) Survey and Mapping Handbook Soils and Foundation Handbook Electronic Field Book (EFB) User Handbook Outline Specifications - Aerial Surveys/Photogrammetry Drainage Manual Stormwater Management Facility Handbook Exfiltration Handbook Hydrology Handbook Structures Design Guidelines (625-020-154) CADD Manual (625-050-001) CADD Production Criteria Handbook FDOT Quality / Level of Service Standards Handbook Software and Tables K-Factor Estimation Process Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook & Project Traffic Forecasting Procedure 525-

030-120

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-7 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

Traffic Analysis Handbook Florida Highway Landscape Guide Basis of Estimates Manual Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Rail Administration (FRA)

Program Guidance Project Management Handbook FDOT Traffic Engineering Manual FDOT Intersection Design Guide Statewide TSM&O Strategic Plan FDOT Context Classification Document

2.2.2 Liaison Office

The DEPARTMENT and the CONSULTANT will designate their respective Liaison Offices for this Project.

2.2.3 Personnel

The DEPARTMENT will designate a Project Manager to represent the DEPARTMENT for this Project. The DEPARTMENT Project Manager shall be responsible for coordination with the CONSULTANT pertaining to contractual matters, invoicing and reporting. The DEPARTMENT Project Manager shall also be responsible for approval of any additional staffing to be provided including additional consultant staff (approval must be coordinated with the Procurement Office), and shall give approval of all products and services. The CONSULTANT will assign a Project Manager who will communicate regularly with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager regarding development of this Project. Final direction on all matters of this Project remains with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager.

The CONSULTANT must maintain staffing levels and personnel qualifications necessary to complete the required activities for this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT's work must be performed to DEPARTMENT standards and procedures by personnel identified in the contract. Any changes in the identified personnel will be subject to review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. To the extent possible, the CONSULTANT must minimize the DEPARTMENT's need to apply its own resources to the Scope of Services activities unless otherwise identified.

The CONSULTANT shall assign only competent technical and professional personnel qualified by the necessary experience and education to perform assigned work. The CONSULTANT is responsible for ensuring that staff assigned to work under this Agreement has the training established by the DEPARTMENT as a prerequisite for CONSULTANT staff to perform work. If the required training is such that it can be applied by the trainee to work on other contracts, (regardless of whether or not the trainee would work on other agreements), the cost of the trainee's time and expenses associated with the training is not directly billable to the DEPARTMENT on this contract, and shall only be recoverable through overhead for the CONSULTANT firm.

The CONSULTANT must request approval from the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager and Procurement for any modifications or additions to the list of available staff prior to

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-8 FPID: 456246-1-12-01 the initiation of any work by that individual. If applicable, new job classifications may be added to the contract via contract amendment. The CONSULTANT shall submit a copy of the resume and payroll register before new staff can be added.

The CONSULTANT must have a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida to sign and seal all engineering reports, documents, technical special provisions, and plans as required by DEPARTMENT standards.

The CONSULTANT and its employees, agents, representatives, or sub-CONSULTANTS are not employees of the DEPARTMENT and are not entitled to the benefits of State of Florida employees. Except to the extent expressly authorized herein, CONSULTANT and its employees, agents, representatives, or sub-CONSULTANTS are not agents of the DEPARTMENT or the State for any purpose or authority such as to bind or represent the interests thereof, and shall not represent that it is an agent or that it is acting on the behalf of the DEPARTMENT or the State. The DEPARTMENT shall not be bound by any unauthorized acts or conduct of CONSULTANT.

2.2.4 Sub-Consultants

Services assigned to any sub-CONSULTANTS must be approved in writing and in advance by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager, Procurement Office, and the CONSULTANT Project Manager in accordance with this Scope of Services. All sub- CONSULTANTS must be technically qualified by the DEPARTMENT to perform all work assigned to them. Additional sub-CONSULTANTS with specialized areas of expertise may be required to complete specific assignments. Any sub-CONSULTANTS to be hired and all work assignments to be performed, and all rates of compensation shall be agreed to by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager, Procurement Office and the CONSULTANT Project Manager and documented in the contract file prior to any work being performed by the sub-CONSULTANTS.

2.2.5 Lead Agency, Cooperating Agencies and Participating Agencies

The CONSULTANT Project Manager will support the DEPARTMENT Project Manager in coordination with the Lead Agency, Cooperating Agencies and Participating Agencies.

The Lead Agency for this Project is Florida Department of Transportation.

The following will be engaged as a Participating Agency(s) or key stakeholders:

Walton County City of Freeport Okaloosa-Walton Transportation Planning Organization / Emerald Coast

Regional Council Eglin Air Force Base

2.2.6 Meetings and Presentations

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-9 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

Led by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager, the CONSULTANT will attend the Notice to Proceed Meeting, where DEPARTMENT representatives will outline relevant contract and Project information provided by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager.

The CONSULTANT shall attend meetings (virtual or in-person) necessary to undertake the activities of this Scope of Services. This includes meetings with DEPARTMENT staff and /or resources agency staff, other consultants, or other miscellaneous meetings.

Frequency of regular progress meetings will be determined by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager.

Meetings with internal District Three FDOT Staff will occur during the study to provide project related information and receive DEPARTMENT input. The DEPARTMENT Project Manager will provide list of District attendees and meeting objectives.

The CONSULTANT will attend meetings or make presentations at the request of the DEPARTMENT with at least five (5) business days' notice. The CONSULTANT will prepare meeting notes for all meetings identified in this Exhibit and submit within five

(5) working days to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager for review.

Deliverable: Meeting minutes

2.2.7 Communication

The DEPARTMENT Project Manager will be the representative of the DEPARTMENT for the Project. The CONSULTANT must regularly communicate with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager to discuss and resolve issues or solicit opinions regarding this Project. The CONSULTANT must include the DEPARTMENT when seeking and receiving advice from various State, regional, local agencies, and citizen groups. The final direction on all matters for this Project remains with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager.

Written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this Project must be reviewed and approved by the DEPARTMENT. The CONSULTANT must respond to information requests relative to the Feasibility Study from third parties at the direction, and with the approval, of the DEPARTMENT. The CONSULTANT will assist the DEPARTMENT in preparing the content of the letters from DEPARTMENT personnel to other agencies, public officials, and others as needed or requested.

Deliverable: Public response letters (none anticipated)

2.2.8 Quality Control

The DEPARTMENT requires that all Project documents, technical studies, calculations, maps, reports, conceptual plans, design, and the Environmental Document are correct and complete, appropriate for the intended purposes, and conform to requirements of this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT is responsible for the quality of all (including the sub-CONSULTANTS) deliverables. The CONSULTANT will independently and

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-10 FPID: 456246-1-12-01 continually review deliverables for accuracy and completeness. The CONSULTANT must develop and follow an internal Quality Control (QC) process. The QC process is intended to verify that quality is achieved through checking, reviewing, and verifying work activities and deliverables by qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work.

Within twenty (20) business days from the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT must submit its QC Plan to the DEPARTMENT Project Manager for approval. The QC Plan will identify the deliverables, the personnel to perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. The QC Plan will be signed by the CONSULTANT Project Manager and the CONSULTANT QC Manager.

The CONSULTANT must include document reviews and written resolution of comments with each submittal or deliverable to show the QC process was followed. At a minimum, a quality review checklist must be provided and should include letters, exhibits, technical studies, reports, design calculations, Environmental Document or any documents used or referenced in the QC Plan. The CONSULTANT must maintain documentation which show the QC Plan process was followed. The DEPARTMENT Project Manager may request from the CONSULTANT document reviews and written resolution of comments at any time during the Feasibility Study.

Deliverable: Quality Control Plan

2.2.9 Schedule

Within ten (10) business days after the Notice to Proceed, and prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work, the DEPARTMENT shall provide a detailed Project activity / event schedule to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULANT will review and update activities, original duration, start date, finish date and total float as necessary to meet project specific criteria. The schedule must be based on the DEPARTMENT's expected production date and must be approved by the DEPARTMENT. The schedule must be based upon consideration of the Project's environmental issues (social, cultural, natural and physical resources) and regulatory requirements, and in coordination with the DEPARTMENT's District Environmental Management Office (DEMO).

The schedule must be accompanied by an anticipated payout and fiscal progress curve.

For the purpose of scheduling, the CONSULTANT shall allow for a review period of at least 20 business days for each INITIAL technical report or memorandum submitted for review and 20 business days for each FINAL document review.

In developing the schedule for this Project, the CONSULTANT, in coordination with the DEPARTMENT, must include adequate time to meet regulatory reviews and formal consultations timeframes.

Periodically, throughout the life of the contract, the CONSULTANT must review the project schedule, payout, and fiscal progress curves with the DEPARTMENT and adjust as necessary to incorporate changes in the Scope of Services and progress to date.

The approved monthly updated project schedule and schedule status report, along with progress and payout curves, shall be submitted with the monthly progress report to the

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-11 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

DEPARTMENT’s Project Manager. The CONSULTANT will be required to submit monthly schedule updates for tasks assigned to the CONSULTANT in FDOT Project Suite Enterprise Edition (PSEE). Schedule updates are due the last Friday of each month.

The Initial and revised schedules shall be submitted electronically in *.pdf, Word, or Excel format.

Additional information, the PSEE link, and schedule update training can be found at http://www.fdot.gov/designsupport/Districts/D3/default.shtm.

Deliverables: Project Schedule, Project Payout Curve, Monthly PSEE Schedule Update

2.2.10 Submittals

The CONSULTANT will compile and transmit the documents identified in this Scope of Services to the DEPARTMENT for review.

The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the DEPARTMENT’s Project Manager to determine the submittal delivery method.

The CONSULTANT shall provide a *.kmz file of the project with each submittal. The *.kmz file must include the layers necessary to compare proposed alternatives and review concept plan features.

The DEPARTMENT’s Electronic Review and Comment (ERC) system will be used for project reviews. Upon Notice to Proceed, the DEPARTMENT’s Project Manager will coordinate with the CONSULTANT to provide the required access into the ERC system.

Provisions for Work:

Quality Control Plan Project Schedule, Project Payout Curve, Monthly PSEE Schedule Update Progress Meeting Minutes Project White Paper Invoices and Progress Reports Weekly Updates in MS Teams

Public Involvement (none):

The scope of this Feasibility Study does not provide for public involvement.

Feasibility:

Feasibility Report Construction Cost Estimate Right of Way Cost Estimate

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-12 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

Upon completion of the Project, the CONSULTANT will transfer to the DEPARTMENT, in an organized manner, project electronic files, data, maps, sketches, worksheets, and other materials used or generated during the Feasibility in an acceptable portable storage drive.

2.2.11 Project White Paper

The CONSULTANT will be required to submit a Project White Paper to the DEPARTMENT utilizing the DEPARTMENT’s template. The White Paper shall be updated quarterly to incorporate status updates.

Deliverable: Project White Paper with quarterly updates

2.2.12 Computer Automation

The CONSULTANT shall develop concept plans and alternative designs utilizing Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) systems. The DEPARTMENT makes software available to help assure quality and conformance with the policy and procedures regarding CADD. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to meet the CADD production requirements in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT must submit final documents and files as described in the FDOT CADD Manual. Additional related information is found in the FDM. Concept plans and alternatives designs shall also be displayed using Google Earth-ready KMZ files. The concept plans must have both existing and proposed engineering and environmental features.

Upon DEPARTMENT approval, the CONSULTANT may also use computer tools and software to conduct some of the engineering and environmental analyses. Prior to using these tools, the CONSULTANT must agree to provide original electronic files in a format and standard consistent with the DEPARTMENT's policies and procedures.

Electronic files must be scanned for viruses prior to submitting to the DEPARTMENT.

Failure to scan for viruses may result in a lower CONSULTANT work performance evaluation.

Computer-generated renderings are not within the scope of this Feasibility Study.

2.2.13 Conflict of Interest

The CONSULTANT or any affiliate is not eligible to pursue advertised work in the CONSULTANT's area of oversight or any project for which the CONSULTANT developed the Scope of Services. Sub-CONSULTANTS are also ineligible to pursue projects where they participated in the development of the Scope of Services, or have an oversight responsibility. The term "affiliate" is defined in FDOT Procedure No. 375- 030-006, Conflict of Interest Procedure for Department Contracts.

The CONSULTANT and its Sub-CONSULTANTS will not enter into another contract during the term of the Contract for this Project which would create or involve a conflict of interest with the services herein. The CONSULTANT and its Sub-CONSULTANTS

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-13 FPID: 456246-1-12-01 must comply with FDOT Procedure No. 375-030-006, Conflict of Interest Procedure for Department Contracts.

2.3 COORDINATION WITH OTHER CONSULTANTS AND ENTITIES

The CONSULTANT will coordinate work activities with any ongoing and / or planned DEPARTMENT projects that may affect this Project. The DEPARTMENT and CONSULTANT shall coordinate with local governmental entities to verify Project concepts are compatible with local improvements and right of way activities. The CONSULTANT will inform the DEPARTMENT Project Manager of coordination activities with other agencies or entities prior to holding such activities. The DEPARTMENT Project Manager shall be included in all such coordination activities.

COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS: This project should be coordinated with adjacent Military, County, State or private projects, including the following known projects:

To be identified during the study

2.4 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

The CONSULTANT is responsible for maintaining Project files, including copies of submittals and underlying data, calculations, information and supporting project documentation. The CONSULTANT is responsible for preparing monthly progress reports and schedule updates.

Progress reports will be delivered to the DEPARTMENT in a format prescribed by the DEPARTMENT Project Manager with the corresponding invoice.

The CONSULTANT will regularly communicate the status of the project with the DEPARTMENT while managing sub-CONSULTANT efforts and executing sub- CONSULTANT agreements.

2.5 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE DEPARTMENT

The DEPARTMENT will provide the following services and materials:

Lead and participate in coordination efforts with the Public Transit Office, Office of Environmental Management, Federal Transit Administration, environmental resource and regulatory agencies, the public, and other stakeholders, as appropriate.

Provide project data currently on file and available from study partners, such as:

o Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Planning Summary Report o Recently completed roadway studies for the study area including PD&E studies, access management, intersection plans, design files, and capacity improvements;

o All available information in the possession of the DEPARTMENT pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction;

o All future information that is in possession or may become available to the

DEPARTMENT pertaining to subdivision plans, so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right of way;

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-14 FPID: 456246-1-12-01 o Existing FDOT right of way maps and information on existing surplus right of way under ownership by the DEPARTMENT or participating local agency (counties and cities partnering with FDOT for the Feasibility Study);

o FDOT crash data;

o Available traffic and planning data;

o All applicable DEPARTMENT agreements with Utility Agency Owners;

o Letters of authorization designating the CONSULTANT as an agent of the

DEPARTMENT to enter lands, waters, and premises of another in the performance of duties in accordance with Section 337.274, F.S.;

o Reviews of technical reports and Environmental Documents

2.6 OPTIONAL SERVICES

At the DEPARTMENT'S option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide professional services not explicitly outlined in this Exhibit. These services may include but are not limited to re-evaluation of previous PD&E Studies, environmental analysis not specifically listed in this Scope of Services, Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study, design services, survey services, expert witness services for right of way acquisition, additional design analysis, and design plan preparation for utilities review. CONSULTANT may also be requested to provide services for Request for Proposal (RFP) development for Design-Build Procurement and / or support the DEPARTMENT in the acquisition of a Design-Build contract. The fee for such services shall be negotiated in accordance with the terms detailed in Exhibit B, method of compensation, for a fair, competitive and reasonable cost, considering the scope and complexity of the project. A supplemental agreement for the optional services shall be executed in accordance with Section 2 of the Standard Professional Services Agreement Terms.

3.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT – N/A

The DEPARTMENT will convene at least one meeting (in-person or virtual) with key stakeholders identified in Section 2.2.5. No public involvement is provided in this Scope. The CONSULTANT will participate in and support the DEPARTMENT the stakeholder coordination meeting preparation, execution, and follow-up.

3.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT – N/A

3.2 SCHEDULED PUBLIC MEETINGS – N/A

3.3 ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT REQUIREMENTS – N/A

3.4 CORRESPONDENCE – N/A

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-15 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

4.0 FEASIBILITY STUDY

The CONSULTANT is to conduct a Feasibility Study to provide analysis and documentation necessary to determine fatal flaws, and corridors or alternatives that meet performance metrics identified within the project’s purpose and need, confirm logical termini and, if warranted identify those feasible alternatives that may be carried into the next phase of project development. During the Feasibility Study, the study team will identify passing lane locations that best accommodate the purpose and need of the project while minimizing potential environmental impacts. A secondary objective of the Feasibility Study is to provide more specific information about potential environmental impacts, engineering challenges, and project costs that may be used in the next phase of project development.

The Consultant will provide the following approach to the services under this Feasibility Study:

Evaluate the feasibility of adding capacity for Passing Lanes at locations to be determined (description of project limits).

Develop preliminary concept plans for the Passing Lanes.

Obtain Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) traffic data from FDOT Traffic Online (FTO) along the (project corridor) corridor project limits.

Analyze the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) existing traffic segments between major crossroads.

Perform a Level of Service (LOS) analysis (Generalized Service Volume Tables or HCS).

Collect Crash data and perform safety analysis of (project corridor) Corridor limits.

Coordinate with FDOT’s Planning Office to identify potential funding sources (project corridor) Passing Lanes can fall under. (i.e. Freight, Carbon, etc.)

The CONSULTANT shall establish and document the purpose and need for the project based on the applicable elements of the criteria as described in Part 2, Chapter 1 of the PD&E Manual.

4.1 ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND CONSIDERATIONS

4.1.1 Review of Previous Studies

The CONSULTANT shall review and summarize previous completed (or concurrent) planning studies and other studies that are related to this Project and appropriately incorporate their results in the analysis of the Project as described in the PD&E Manual. Reference Section 2.3 for additional information.

4.1.2 Existing Conditions Analysis

The CONSULTANT will conduct a field observation to review existing field conditions, verify desktop data, and obtain additional data required to understand the Project area, assess Project needs, identify physical and environmental constraints, develop and analyze Project alternatives, and assess constructability issues. The intent of this analysis is to discover fatal flaws or for performance evaluation.

The CONSULTANT will analyze existing conditions to identify and verify current transportation deficiencies as they relate to the needs and objectives of this Project.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-16 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

4.1.3 Traffic Analysis

The CONSULTANT will review existing traffic data to carry out traffic analysis for this Project and determine whether additional data may be needed.

The CONSULTANT must collect additional data for the Study Area if there are identified data gaps. 4.1.3.1 Traffic Analysis Methodology – N/A

The CONSULTANT will perform traffic analysis in accordance with guidance from the PD&E Manual, Traffic Analysis Handbook, and Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook.

The CONSULTANT will prepare a forecast and analysis methodology which must be agreed upon by the DEPARTMENT prior to beginning any analysis. The methodology must state the type of documentation, Project Study Area to be analyzed, and method and assumptions that will be used to analyze existing and future traffic conditions. The development of future forecast data must use the currently adopted version of the Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) travel demand model. If a TPO does not use the regional travel demand model, then a rationale must be provided and future travel data will be developed in accordance with guidance from Chapter 4 of the Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook. Otherwise, the CONSULTANT will validate the travel demand model at a subarea level.

Capacity analysis will be based on the latest Highway Capacity Manual procedures. If CORSIM/VISSIM is anticipated to be used, Calibration and Validation is required.

Calibration of the microsimulation model should be consistent with the FHWA Traffic Analysis Toolbox. Traffic Operational Analysis Procedures and Estimation of Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) shall also be documented. Data should be gathered in accordance with the Traffic Analysis Handbook.

Traffic analysis methodology will include an approach or procedure to evaluate safety performance of the project alternatives.

All traffic analysis documentation must be written in plain language and in a format that can be easily followed. The CONSULTANT must submit all traffic analysis files for assumptions, inputs, outputs, network data, calculations, and results to the DEPARTMENT.

Deliverable: Traffic Analysis Methodology Technical Memorandum

4.1.3.2 Traffic Counts

The CONSULTANT will collect the following traffic data:

Obtain Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data from FDOT Traffic Online (FTO) along the S.R. 20 corridor project limits.

4.1.3.3 Vehicle Classification Counts on Roadway Segments and Ramps

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-17 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

The CONSULTANT will review the DEPARTMENT’s existing Classification counts for completeness and coordinate with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager if additional counts are needed. The CONSULTANT will collect the following existing classification data.

Current corridor traffic counts 72-hour traffic machine counts – N/A Use FTO to Acquire AADT and Truck Traffic. Format to usable data in report for traffic discussions; Determine and apply growth factors to segments of (project corridor) using existing AADT from FTO website. Perform LOS analysis on (project corridor) Segments using LOS tables or HCS.

4.1.3.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Other Multimodal Data – N/A

The CONSULTANT will review the DEPARTMENT’s existing multimodal data for completeness and coordinate with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager if additional data is needed. The CONSULTANT will collect the following additional existing traffic data.

Pedestrian Counts – N/A Bicycle Counts – N/A Transit data – N/A Freight movement

4.1.3.5 Calibration and Validation Data Collection – N/A

4.1.3.6 Existing Traffic Operational Analysis

The CONSULTANT will conduct an existing (base year) traffic operational analysis and report segment LOS using Generalized Service Volume Tables or HCS for one analysis period. The analysis must include bicycle, pedestrian, and transit (if applicable) operations.

The count data will be used to obtain the existing design hourly volumes using historical and seasonal adjustments as appropriate. All existing design hourly volumes must be balanced before being used in the analysis. Oversaturated conditions and locations with complex geometry or operations will require microsimulation.

4.1.3.7 Model Calibration and Validation – N/A

4.1.3.8 Future Demand Forecasting

No Build Volumes: The CONSULTANT will develop opening year and design year segment volumes for the No Build Alternative in accordance with the Project Traffic Forecasting Procedure, Topic No. 525-030-120 using a growth rate.

Build Alternatives Volumes: The CONSULTANT will develop opening year and design year segment volumes only for selected Build Alternatives using a growth rate.

4.1.3.9 No Build Analysis

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-18 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

The CONSULTANT will analyze the operational performance of the No Build Alternative for the analysis years using Generalized Service Volume Tables or HCS for one analysis period for roadway segments to identify deficiencies related to the purpose and need for the project. The CONSULTANT will evaluate the operational effectiveness of the No Build Alternative using agreed upon performance measures of effectiveness (MOEs). The analysis should include multimodal evaluation for pedestrian, bicycle, freight, and transit modes, as appropriate.

4.1.3.10 Operational Evaluation of Build Alternatives

The CONSULTANT will analyze the operational performance of viable or feasible alternative(s) for opening and design years using Generalized Service Volume Tables or HCS for one analysis period for roadway segments. The analysis must include multimodal evaluation for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes as appropriate. The CONSULTANT will evaluate the operational effectiveness of Build Alternatives using agreed upon performance MOEs.

4.1.3.11 Development and Screening of Alternatives

Project goals, objectives, and evaluation criteria will be defined by the DEPARTMENT and be applied to the alternative corridors and segments to measure the relative performance of each corridor/segment as it relates to their merits as well as their potential impacts.

Based on DEPARTMENT input, the CONSULTANT may revise the purpose and need statement originally developed for the project in order to best align with project goals and objectives. The results of the analysis will be documented within the final Feasibility Report. The CONSULTANT will recommend appropriate performance metrics for evaluating alternatives that are consistent with the project’s purpose and need.

The CONSULTANT will also develop a screening procedure to be approved by the DEPARTMENT in order to determine the passing lane locations that best meet the project’s purpose and need. Segments not deemed to be viable will be removed from further consideration, and the logic and reasons for removing these alternatives will be documented in the Feasibility Study report.

4.1.3.12 Project Traffic Analysis Report – N/A

As described in Part 2, Chapters 2 and 3 of the PD&E Manual, the CONSULTANT will prepare the Project Traffic Analysis Report (PTAR) to document results of the traffic analysis for No Build and Build Alternatives, which includes the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian analysis. The results must be shown on diagrams for each alternative and discussed in the report. The PTAR will also summarize the comparison of the operational and safety performance of alternatives evaluated in detail and how they perform against each other.

Deliverable: Project Traffic Analysis Report

4.1.4 Safety

4.1.4.1 Crash Data

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-19 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

The CONSULTANT will obtain the most recent five (5) years of available data from the DEPARTMENT's crash database and other local sources for this Project. The crash data will include the number and type of crashes, crash locations, number of fatalities and injuries, and estimates of property damage and economic loss.

4.1.4.2 Safety Analysis

The CONSULTANT will perform safety analysis in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 2 of the PD&E Manual. Based on the information obtained from the crash data, the CONSULTANT will identify project safety needs associated with the existing and future conditions. The CONSULTANT will use the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) procedures to estimate the safety performance of the Project alternatives.

4.1.4.3 Documentation of Safety Analysis

The CONSULTANT will document the results of the safety analysis in the Feasibility Report.

4.1.5 Utilities and Railroad

The CONSULTANT will obtain information regarding utilities and railroad in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E Manual.

The CONSULTANT shall identify major existing and proposed utility locations and railroads within the study corridor that may affect the feasibility of the project. This shall include utility services such as water supply, sanitary sewers, gas, storm water drainage, power, and telephone, as well as overhead transmission lines and towers, and bridge attachments.

4.1.6 Roadway Analysis

The CONSULTANT will prepare design controls and criteria for developing Project alternatives and designing initial alignments and typical sections according to the DEPARTMENT standards.

The design of Project alternatives must consider environmental constraints, physical constraints, Context Sensitive Solutions, Complete Streets approaches and the needs of project users, and any additional information, as required.

The CONSULTANT will use Project traffic data and results of traffic analysis to design appropriate roadway elements. See Part 2, Chapter 3 of the PD&E Manual for more engineering and design considerations.

The CONSULTANT will consider freight, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit in the development and evaluation of Project alternatives commensurate with the context with a goal of improving overall mobility, access, connectivity, safety and efficiency. Multimodal accommodation may include analysis of on-street parking and loading zone modifications and/or removal, park and ride needs, as necessary.

The CONSULTANT will collect the existing structures data to develop typical section options for bridges within the study limits. These will include the DEPARTMENT’s standard typical sections, and any typical sections that may result in minimizing right of way and environmental impacts. Coordination with the District’s Structures Design Engineer is required.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9C3FC9C5-A885-462A-8D58-3E29B3E3675FDocusign Envelope ID: 9A090F0D-85FF-4D1C-81A3-530DD434B7B3

Scope of Services Page A-20 FPID: 456246-1-12-01

The CONSULTANT shall review stormwater permit requirements, and provide a summary-level write-up for feasibility study on these requirements. The CONSULTANT will list any additional existing drainage conditions concerns in Feasibility Study. Additional assessment of pond siting, size or detention/retention is not needed for Feasibility.

4.1.7 Cost Estimates

4.1.7.1 Construction Cost Estimate

The CONSULTANT will develop initial construction cost…