CM_RFSI_Addendum No. 4 8.10.26.pdf
PDF 465 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Proposals - Pre-Construction Management Services Regency Furniture Stadium Improvements
- Solicitation number
- BPM058075
- Issued by
- Maryland
About this file
This is Addendum No. 4 to a Request for Proposals issued by Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) for pre-construction management services related to Regency Furniture Stadium Improvements, dated August 10, 2026. The addendum clarifies requirements and responses to bidder questions regarding the scope of preconstruction services, which include design phase cost estimating and budgeting, scheduling, project phasing and site logistics, constructability reviews, value management, quality assurance, trade contractor capacity analysis, scope definitions, and procurement strategy. The anticipated MDE permit approval is expected in April 2027, subject to change based on the review process. Offerors are required to acknowledge all addenda in their Technical Proposal and submit all tabs included in the Financial Proposal attachment. The RFP requests that offerors provide their own CPM schedule for all phases based on the scope of services, and general conditions should be based on the durations proposed by the offeror rather than the estimated schedule previously issued.
Key clarifications from the addendum include confirmation that supplemental geotechnical exploration has been performed by the design team with additional reports anticipated in the future, field verification of underground utility locations will be the CM's responsibility prior to commencing field work, and the design team has not yet identified a preferred turf manufacturer. MSA has confirmed that a formal long-lead procurement matrix will be requested as part of the selected CM's preconstruction deliverables. The submission deadline remains unchanged despite the site visit postponement, and offerors should base their general conditions and cost proposals on their independently developed project schedules and durations rather than the preliminary schedule provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CM_RFSI_Addendum No2 7.30.26.pdf | ||
| CM RFSI 7.28.26.pdf | ||
| CM RFSI Addendum No. 3 8.4.26.pdf | ||
| RFP_CM-RFSI_7.22.2026.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum No. 4
To Offerors: Request for Proposals Pre-Construction Management Services Regency Furniture Stadium Improvements
Date Issued: August 10, 2026
This addendum is hereby made part of the Request for Proposals (“RFP”) dated July 22, 2026, as amended, on the subject work as though originally included therein.
Please read this addendum carefully, and in its entirety. The following amendments, additions, and/or corrections shall govern this solicitation.
1. A copy of the questions submitted along with their respective answers, is attached hereto.
Note: Offeror must acknowledge all addenda in its Technical Proposal.
for
Christian Kramer Procurement Officer
Request for Proposals Preconstruction Management Services
Regency Furniture Stadium Improvements Questions & Answers
Addendum No. 4
Action Item
Question Answer
1. The Financial Proposal (Attachment F) includes multiple tabs. Please indicate which tabs are required with the Financial Proposal submission.
All tabs are required.
2. Addendum No. 2 provided an estimated schedule; however, it did not provide any anticipated permit dates. Please provide anticipated date for MDE permit.
We are currently holding April 2027 as the anticipated MDE permit approval. However, this is subject to change based on the review process.
3. Have all existing underground utility locations been verified through recent investigation, or should additional subsurface utility engineering (SUE) services be anticipated during design development?
Existing underground utility locations is performed through the design team. The CM will be responsible for field verification prior to commencing any field work.
4. Does MSA anticipate any supplemental geotechnical exploration prior to Design Development to further evaluate existing fill conditions and reduce foundation related contingencies?
Existing geotechnical exploration has been performed through the design team. Please reference the report include in the 100% SD narrative issued in Addendum No. 3. The design team anticipates sharing additional geotechnical reports in the future.
5. Has the design team identified a preferred turf manufacturer or approval process for evaluating turf systems during design development?
No. This is still being analyzed however a preliminary turf analysis is included in the 100% SD narrative issued in Addendum No. 3.
6. Does MSA anticipate requesting a formal long-lead procurement matrix as part of the selected CM’s preconstruction deliverables?
Confirmed.
7. Please confirm our general conditions should be based on a June 1, 2027 construction NTP and April 1, 2028 substantial completion.
The anticipated project schedule issued in Addendum No. 2 was issued without CM input and as an estimated basis. Section 4.2.6.C of the RFP requests the Offeror to submit a CPM schedule for all phases based on the Scope of Services. The Offeror’s General Conditions should be based on the durations they provide in their proposal.
8. Should Offerors expect any adjustment to the overall submission deadline based on the site visit postponement?
No.
End of Q&A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .