CI_Init_AZDA_Salt_River_Horse_Herd_Mgmt_07-22-25.pdf

Page 1 of 2 SPO Form 101 Standard Work (Rev 10.17.23)

Standard Work

Owner

Form Number Version

Process

No. Action Action Detail/Key Points

State Procurement Office, Compliance Unit

SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Authorization Revised 10/17/23

Standard Work/Instructions for completion and submittal of the SPO 101 form. The form is available on the

1 State Governmental Unit Name of the requesting State Governmental Unit (SGU; agency, board, or commission)

2 Requestor Name of the requestor 3 Email Email of the requestor 4 Title Job title of the requestor 5 Telephone Telephone number of the requestor

6 Service(s)/Material(s) Description of service(s)/material(s) or Contract title (eProcurement Label) 7 Supplier Name of supplier(s) 8 Contract ID eProcurement contract number (if available)

9 CI Type Select applicable option:

- Authorization Request for a new CI

- Modification pursuant to R2-7-E303(E) for a CI modification

SPO website: For Agencies > Resources > Standard Forms and Documents

Form Completion Process

SECTION I - State Governmental Unit Request

Sections I through III to be completed by the requesting State Governmental Unit:

SECTION II - Background

Page 2 of 2 SPO Form 101 Standard Work (Rev 10.17.23)

10 Requesting Term Specify contract term or extension period, as applicable, based on the CI 11 Estimated Cost Forecasted expenditures for the duration of the CI term

12 Rationale

Select applicable option in accordance with A.A.C R2-7-E303(A):

- Compliance with A.R.S. §§ 41-2533, 41-2534, 41-2538, or 41-2578 is impracticable

- Compliance with A.R.S. §§ 41-2533, 41-2534, 41-2538, or 41-2578 is unnecessary

- Compliance with A.R.S. §§ 41-2533, 41-2534, 41-2538, or 41-2578 is contrary to public interest

- Documented lack of suppliers

- Procurement requires an open and continuous availability of offerors

Provide details of the procurement need, reason for the competition impracticable, and how the proposed procurement is advantageous to the State

Detail information regarding the rationale selected in the previous section;

State Governmental Unit use of the material(s) or service(s); if mandatory state contracts were explored; the limitation which led to the competition impracticable, and how the State would benefit from the procurement. If there is previous contract which requires modification pursuant to R2-7-E303(E) or contract that reached beyond the maximum 5-year term, provide the contract number and copy of that CI.

Describe the procurement process, strategy to promote competition, and determination that the price is fair and reasonable

Detail strategy for the proposed procurement, considered competition, reason for selecting specific supplier, and negotiations strategy.

I have conducted research and determined that no mandatory state contract is available for the service(s)/material(s)

Check the box confirming research was conducted. If the CI pertains to a modification pursuant to R2-7-E303(E), leave field empty.

If needed, I have attached additional documents/clarifications/explanations to the request

Check the box to indicate that there are additional documents attached to the request. Either as separate documents in the original email request or attached directly to the PDF submitted.

17 Signature Signature of the authorized requestor 18 Date of Request Specify the date of request

19 Determination

Select applicable option in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-E303(D):

- Request Authorized Pursuant to R2-7-E303

- Request Authorized with Conditions/Restrictions R2-7-E303

- Request Returned for Additional Information

- Request Denied

20 Approved Expiration Date Specify the date or term of expiration

21 Comments, conditions, or restrictions (as applicable) Complete as needed

22 Print Name Printed name of the approver 23 Title Job title of the approver 24 Signature Signature of the approving authority 25 Date of Approval Specify the date of approval

Use section as necessary (or attach additional information and check box 16)

Used by any party in case the fields within the form were insufficient

SECTION III - Justification

SECTION IV - Approval

Section IV to be completed by the Procurement Authority:

"STATE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT NOTICE: This is an official written determination in response to a procurement authorization request.

A copy of the form shall be maintained by the State Governmental Unit and the State Procurement Office.

Upon completion, Requestor shall forward the signed form to the Contract Owner.

Contract Owner shall upload the signed approval version of this form in the eProcurement system.

If anticipated expenditure is above State Governmental Unit's delegation, forward document to SPOCompliance@azdoa.gov."

Page 1 of 4 SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Procurement Authorization (Rev 10.17.23)

Procurement Determination:

Competition Impracticable Authorization A.A.C. R2-7-E303

SECTIONS I THROUGH III MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE REQUESTOR

USE ADDITIONAL PAGE AS NECESSARY

SECTION I - State Governmental Unit Request

SECTION II - Background

1. State Governmental Unit

2. Requestor 3. Email

4. Title 5. Telephone

6. Service(s)/Material(s)

7. Supplier

8. Contract ID

9. CI Type

10. Requesting Term 11. Estimated Cost

Arizona Department of Agriculture

Douglas Marsh dmarsh@azsal.gov

Lab Director / CPO 602.744.4924

Until the signing of a new contract currently in RFP $0.00

- Authorization Request for a new CI

Page 2 of 4 SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Procurement Authorization (Rev 10.17.23)

SECTION III - Justification

12. Rationale

13. Provide details of the procurement need, reason for the competition impracticable, and how the proposed procurement is advantageous to the State

- Compliance with A.R.S. §§ 41-2533, 41-2534, 41-2538, or 41-2578 is impracticable

Page 3 of 4 SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Procurement Authorization (Rev 10.17.23)

14. Describe the procurement process, strategy to promote competition, and determination that the price is fair and reasonable

15. I have conducted research and determined that no mandatory state contract is available for the service(s)/material(s)

16. If needed, I have attached additional documents/clarifications/explanations to the request

17. Signature 18. Date of Request

In accordance with the Procurement Rules, the Arizona Uniform Terms and Conditions must be made a part of all Contracts. If you will be required to sign a software licensing agreement or sign any other agreement containing terms and conditions, these will need additional review to ensure that the terms and conditions do not invalidate the Arizona Uniform Terms and Conditions. Approval of this request does not allow for agencies to exceed their dollar acquisition amount of delegated authority.

7/21/2025

Page 4 of 4 SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Procurement Authorization (Rev 10.17.23)

TO BE COMPLETED BY PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY

SECTION IV - Approval

19. Determination

20. Approved Expiration Date

21. Comments, conditions, or restrictions (as applicable)

22. Print Name 23. Title

24. Signature 25. Date of Approval

STATE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT NOTICE: This is an official written determination in response to a procurement authorization request.

A copy of the form shall be maintained by the State Governmental Unit and the State Procurement Office.

Upon completion, Requestor shall forward the signed form to the Contract Owner.

Contract Owner shall upload the signed approval version of this form in the eProcurement system.

If anticipated expenditure is above State Governmental Unit's delegation, forward document to SPOCompliance@azdoa.gov.

12/31/2025

David Steuber State Procurement Administrator

David Steuber (Jul 22, 2025 08:32 PDT)

- Request Authorized Pursuant to R2-7-E303

07/22/2025 https://na1.documents.adobe.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3CrbU3Iixy_2rexnmJrWX0giFkdKr6wY

Page 5 of 4 SPO Form 101 - Competition Impracticable Procurement Authorization (Rev 10.17.23)

26. Use section as necessary (or attach additional information and check box 16)

IV0000012846

Care and management of the Salt River Horse Herd must continue. Currently, the SRHH is surviving on hay and water provided by the non-profit contract holder. Without the continued provision of hay and water, the health of the SRHH would immediately be in danger. Further, this expiring contract provides for veterinary and other care necessary for the SRHH due to emergency circumstances. The State does not have the resources to care for the horses without the contract.

The proposal is to establish a new, temporary contract with the existing vendor listed above to continue providing for the SRHH until successful completion of the an RFP solicitation process establishes a new contract. This CI will end with the beginning of its replacement.

All provisions of the expiring contract, CTR044476, will remain in effect with the only change being the new contract end date.

Text12: On May 11, 2016, Governor Ducey signed H.B. 2340 (Laws 2016, 2nd Regular Session, Chapter 136), which amends Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S) to add A.R.S. § 3-1491, that protects the Salt River horse herd. The Arizona Department of Agriculture was given authority to carry out the above regulations. Under Section F. (This state may enter into an agreement with a private entity to address any issue relating to the Salt river horse herd), AZDA performed a competitive RFP solicitation process, resulting in a contract with on May 24, 2018. That contract has been renewed the maximum times allowable. It is also important to note, this is a $0 contract and the State has not expended any funds to the vendor for execution of this contract.

AZDA is ready to publish a new version of the RFP solicitation and hopes to be able to award a new contract within 120 days.