Attchment 4 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bldg 90758 Upgrade Electric, Safety and Security
- Solicitation number
- FA441721R0014
About this file
This document contains a past/present performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for building upgrades at Hurlburt Field, Florida. The performance questionnaire requests ratings and commentary on an incumbent's quality, schedule, management, small business utilization, regulatory compliance, and liquidated damages on a prior contract. It must be returned by the closing date of the opportunity solicitation. The related opportunity is a HUBZone set-aside to upgrade electric, safety and security systems in Building 90758 over 180 calendar days. The award value is estimated between $500,000-$1,000,000. A site visit is scheduled for June 8th and questions are due by June 5th. Proposals must be delivered by the established due date after coordinating security access in advance. The soliciting agency is the Air Force Special Operations Command.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Past/Present Performance Questionnaire
FA441721R00014
ATTACHMENT 4
7 May 2021
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
5. Project Title:
Project Number:
6. Brief Project Description:
7. Period of Performance:
Start Date:
End Date:
SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:
| Contract Specialist: |
| Branden Cunningham |
| Email: |
| Branden.cunningham.1@us.af.mil |
| Contracting Officer: |
| Richard Beaty |
| Email: |
| richard.beaty.3@us.af.mil |
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.
SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Exceptional (Outstanding) Very Good (Above Average)
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Available |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented |
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
1. QUALITY: Access conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of Good Workmanship. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
2. SCHEDULE: Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the established schedule.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
3. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
4. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS: Contractor complied with terms and conditions for Small Business Participation. Achieved Small Business Goals.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.
Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. Paid subcontractors in a timely manner Contractor had an adequate safety plan and it was implemented properly. No safety discrepancies were noted.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
6. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? ☐YES ☐NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
7. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .