Attachment+9+-+Amd+1+-+Cost+Proposal.docx

DOCX document 188 KB Posted

Attached to
Data Breach & Credit Monitoring (NASPO)
Contract number
166
Issued by
North Dakota

About this file

This document is a Cost Proposal attachment for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the State of Idaho for Information Security Services, specifically focused on Credit Monitoring Services. The solicitation is associated with NASPO ValuePoint, a cooperative purchasing program, and appears to be seeking a master contract for credit monitoring and notification services across multiple jurisdictions.

The proposal outlines tiered pricing for notification services, call center support, and credit monitoring based on the size of a breach event. Pricing is structured in progressive brackets ranging from 0-10,000 individuals to 5,000,001+ individuals, with per-individual costs decreasing as the number of affected persons increases. The contract offers both single-bureau and triple-bureau credit monitoring/identity theft protection options, with costs ranging from $1.59 to $4.99 per individual depending on the number of active participants. Additional services include a "Codes Only" reduced scope service at $3.50 per PIN issued. The pricing is inclusive of all fees, expenses, and the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee, and represents maximum not-to-exceed rates for participating entities.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Request for Proposals for

[PORTFOLIO NAME]

Issued by the State of [Lead State] Solicitation Number: [#######]

Request for Proposals for INFORMATION SECURITY SERVICES: Credit Monitoring Services Issued by the State of Idaho Solicitation Number RFP Event 25 Attachment 9

COST PROPOSAL

Amendment 1

(ME) Offeror must complete all unshaded fields this Cost Proposal. The format and structure of the Cost Proposal is intended to allow for a fair evaluation of like costs among Offerors. Deviation from the format or structure of this Cost Proposal may result in Offeror’s proposal being deemed non-responsive.

Offeror is wholly responsible for ensuring figures and calculations submitted in Offeror’s completed Cost Proposal are accurate, even if formulas have been provided by the Lead State as a courtesy.

Bidder must enter $0 in the LUMA line item. Bidder must submit costs in Attachment 9, Cost Proposal as an attachment in their RFP response.

Inclusion of cost or pricing information in any document other than this Cost Proposal may result in Offeror’s proposal being deemed non-responsive.

Proposed Costs Offeror’s Cost must be inclusive of all profit, expenses, fees, and charges, including but not limited to fees or charges for shipping, delivery, credit card payments, and personnel. All costs proposed by Offeror must also be inclusive of the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee. Proposed costs incorporated into a Master Agreement resulting from this RFP represent not-to-exceed pricing and minimum discounts, where applicable. Except as permitted below, pricing offered to Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities must be no higher than pricing set forth in the Master Agreement.

A Participating Addendum may also require payment of an additional administrative fee by Contractors to a Participating Entity based on sales to Purchasing Entities within the jurisdiction of the Participating Entity. Unless otherwise negotiated by the Participating Entity, Contractor may adjust the Master Agreement pricing incorporated into the Participating Entity’s Participating Addendum by an amount not to exceed the Participating Entity’s fee. Such adjustments will have no effect on the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee, pricing in the Master Agreement, or pricing offered to Purchasing Entities outside the jurisdiction of the Participating Entity.

If you wish to propose any Value-Added Services related to Notification and Credit Monitoring Services, please attach a detailed description and pricing for each. The pricing for Value-Added Services related to Notification and Credit Monitoring Services will not be factored in the evaluation of Cost Proposals for Notification and Credit Monitoring Services.

Size of Breach Event (Number of Eligible Persons) Cost Per Notification*

0 – 10,000
$ 1.49
10,001 – 100,000
$ 1.29
100,001 – 500,000
$ 0.99
500,001 – 1,000,000
$ 0.89
1,000,001 – 5,000,000
$ 0.79
5,000,001+
$ 0.75

*Cost must include single page (duplex) notification, #10 envelope, and first-class postage.

Size of Breach Event (Number of Eligible Persons) General Call Center Cost Per Affected Individual

0 – 10,000
$ 1.99
10,001 – 100,000
$ 1.49
100,001 – 500,000
$ 0.99
500,001 – 1,000,000
$ 0.79
1,000,001 – 5,000,000
$ 0.59
5,000,001+
$ 0.39
Number of Active Participants
One Year Single-Bureau Credit Monitoring/Identity Theft

Protection Cost Per Affected Individual

0 – 1,500
$ 2.99
1,501 – 15,000
$ 2.39
15,001 – 75,000
$ 2.29
75,001 – 150,000
$ 2.09
150,001 – 750,000
$ 1.95
750,000+
$ 1.59
Number of Active Participants
One Year Triple-Bureau Credit Monitoring/Identity Theft

Protection Cost Per Affected Individual

0 – 1,500
$ 4.99
1,501 – 15,000
$ 3.99
15,001 – 75,000
$ 3.79
75,001 – 150,000
$ 3.39
150,001 – 750,000
$ 3.19
750,000+
$ 2.59
“Codes Only” Reduced Scope Service
Fee Per PIN Issued
1 year of service, 3-bureau
$ 3.50

Page 2 of 9 – Attachment [X], RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Attachment 9, COST PROPOSAL image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .