Attachment J5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
BIL Funded - Eugene Airport (EUG) ATCT Elevator Modernization
Solicitation number
1EUG
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation survey template for use in evaluating contractors for an elevator modernization project at the Eugene Airport in Oregon. The survey requests information on a contractor's previous projects including quality of work, timeliness, project management, elevator performance, and compliance with requirements. Respondents are asked to provide ratings in these areas on a scale of unsatisfactory to outstanding, and to provide call back numbers for the first six months and first year after any modernization work. The related federal contract opportunity notices a solicitation for bids to modernize the elevator that services the airport traffic control tower at Eugene Airport. The elevator was installed in 1986 and requires replacement of aging components to meet current codes, ensuring continued safe operation. The federal agency involved is the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION SURVEY

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Contractor Point of Contact (Name and Title):

C. Phone number (including area code):

D. Contract No.:

E. Project Title:

Description of the Work Performed (Modernization, Full Service Maintenance, Multiple Elevators, etc.): NOTE THAT THE CONTRACT MUST INCLUDE COMPLETED MODERNIZATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED RELEVANT F. Description of Criticality (Hospital, FAA, Government Facility, Military Facility, etc.):

G. Project Award Date: ___________________ Completion Date (Modernization Must Be Completed within the last three years):_________________

H. Project Award Amount: __________________ Final Project Amount: _________________

(Must be at least $150K to be considered Relevant) I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor

J. Respondent Information:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email:

K. Authorization is hereby granted to the respondent listed above in section J to provide the information requested in Section B of this survey.

(Signature)

(Name & Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent) *Note: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

LESS FAVORABLE

MORE FAVORABLE

U
M
S
A
O
Unsatisfactory (Negative)
Marginal (Negative)
Satisfactory
Above Average
Outstanding

EVALUATION AREAS

(Circle the appropriate response – if Not Applicable insert N/A next to the statement)

1. Quality

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures which resulted in a quality performance.

b. Contractor completed all modernization work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

2. Timeliness of Performance

a. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the modernization on time, as scheduled.

b. The contractor met expected elevator maintenance response times.

U
M
S
A
O

3. Project Management

a. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication.

c. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

U
M
S
A
O

4. Elevator Performance

a. Elevator performed/operated in accordance with the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

5. Compliance

a. Contractor’s performance was in accordance with all applicable Elevator, Safety, Health, and Security requirements and the requirements of the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

Overall Past Performance Rating

U
M
S
A
O

Call Backs: Please provide the number of unscheduled maintenance call-backs in the first six (6) months of refurbishment and in the first year of refurbishment, to assist the FAA in award evaluation.

· First Six (6) Months: ___________

· First Year: _________

Comments:

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .