Attachment III Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
NOAA Oscar Elton Sette Aft Deck Crane
Solicitation number
1305M220QNMAN0158
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors on a NOAA solicitation. The solicitation is for an aft deck crane for the Oscar Elton Sette and responses are due to Contract Specialist Chris Meconnahey by May 15, 2020 at 4:00 pm Eastern Time. The questionnaire contains ratings and definitions to evaluate contractor performance on quality of service, schedule, and management for a referenced past contract. Raters are asked to provide comments for each category in addition to their name, signature, and date. The purpose is to assess contractors' past performance on similar work for the NOAA solicitation for an aft deck crane.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ 1305M220QNMAN0158 5-21.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0005 5-21.pdf PDF
RFQ 1305M220QNMAN0158 5-19.docx DOCX document
Attachment I Crane SOW 5-19.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0004 5-19.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment I Crane SOW 5-6.docx DOCX document
RFQ 1305M220QNMAN0158.docx DOCX document
0606- Standards for Lifting Appliances on NOAA Ships.doc DOC document
Attachment I Crane SOW 5-1.docx DOCX document
0606-01 - Shipboard Lifting Appliance Certification and Inspections.doc DOC document
Attachment II Past Performance Information Form.rtf RTF text file
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M220QNMAN0158 Attachment: III

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey no later than May 15, 2020 4:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey, no later than May 15 4:00 pm Eastern Time:

Chris. Meconnahey@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .