Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
N041--659-22-104: AHU Replacement (VA-22-00011507) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24622R0004
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for federal contractors. It requests a performance review of an unnamed contractor from a previous project reference. The questionnaire seeks evaluation on quality, timely performance, management effectiveness, and safety compliance for a contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6. Reviewers are asked to provide ratings in these areas as well as comments on the contractor's overall strengths, weaknesses, willingness for re-award, and other similar project references. The completed questionnaire must be returned directly to Sean Cosby and Marty Bost by the upcoming proposal due date.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to N041--659-22-104: AHU Replacement (VA-22-00011507), newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24622R0004_6.docx DOCX document
site visit pt1_.pdf PDF
RFI _ AHU (002)_.pdf PDF
site visit pt2_.pdf PDF
36C24622R0004_5.docx DOCX document
36C24622R0004_4.docx DOCX document
RFI _ AHU_.pdf PDF
AHU Part 1.pdf PDF
AHU Part 2.pdf PDF
AHU Part 3.pdf PDF
36C24622R0004_3.docx DOCX document
Attachment D - Base Proposal Item Price Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B -wage determination.pdf PDF
36C24622R0004_2.docx DOCX document
00-Salisbury AHU Final CD Specifications 210920.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT A : PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRRE REQUEST LETTER

FROM:

Sean Cosby Network Contracting Office 6 - RPO EAST 1601 Brenner Ave Salisbury, NC 28144

SUBJECT: Request for Past/Present Performance Information

1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of ______________________________________. This firm is currently being considered for a contract at the W.G. Hefner VA Medical Center located in Salisbury, NC.

2. Your prompt attention to this survey will be greatly appreciated. Please be sure to e-mail the completed worksheet directly to Sean Cosby at sean.cosby@va.gov and Marty Bost at marty.bost@va.gov NLT proposal due date.

Questionnaires shall not be sent back to the Contractor. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this request, please contact Sean Cosby by email at sean.cosby@va.gov or Marty Bost at marty.bost@va.gov.

Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION A.1: Contractor and Project Information (to be completed by the contractor (offeror) prior to sending to references.

A. Contractor’s name and address: _________________________________________

B. Project Owner -POC: _________________________________________

C. Phone:_________________________________________
D. Email Address:_________________________________________

D. Contract Number: _________________________________________ E. Project Title/Desc of Work: _________________________________________

_________________________________________
F. Contract Type:_________________________________________
G. Project Award Date: ______________Scheduled Completion Date: ________________

Current/Final Completion Date: ________________

H. Project Award Amount: ____________ Current/Final Project Amount: ________________

I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Supplier

A.2: EVALUATED BY: (to be completed by Project Owner)

(Signature) (Date)

_____________________________________ Address: _____________________________ (Typed or Printed Name) _____________________________________ (Title)

(Phone/Fax/Email)

A
B
C
D

NA

Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No

Confidence

Unknown Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.

No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no rating can be reasonably assigned.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Quality A B C D NA

1.
Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedules.
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor thoroughly reviewed drawings and specifications for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements.
□
□
□
□

II. Timely Performance A B C D NA

1.
Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if liquidated damages were assessed.)
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor provided submittals on time as required.
□
□
□
□
6.
Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required and scheduled
□
□
□
□
7.
Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.
□
□
□
□

III. Management Effectiveness A B C D NA

1.
Contractor provided experienced qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor hired, maintained, and replaces as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.
□
□
□
□
6.
Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.
□
□
□
□
7.
Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.
□
□
□
□

IV. Compliance with Safety Standards A B C D NA

1.
Adequacy of Safety Plan
□
□
□
□
2.
Implementation of Safety Plan
□
□
□
□

V. Overall Performance A B C D NA

1.
Please rate the contractor’s overall performance
□
□
□
□

Additional Information:

(1) Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.

(2) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

(3) Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.

(4) Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.

(If more comment space is needed, please attach pages.)

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .