Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

21ST CONTRACTING SQUADRON PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment 4 In response to RFQ: FA2517-21-Q-0001

The 21st Contracting Squadron is conducting a competitive competition. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist in our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email in PDF format no later than 12:00pm Mountain Time on 2 November 2020 to the Contracting Officer, sheri.burks@us.af.mil and Contract Specialist, jessica.frindt@us.af.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Number of FTEs:

(Labor Category) FTEs:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Please refer to the following table for definitions to assess the Relevancy of the Contractor’s performance:

Relevant - This contractor performed Ground Aircraft Operations and Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Management with a total value of at least $500K+ annually.

Somewhat Relevant – This contractor performed either Ground Aircraft Operations or Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) with a total value of at least $300K-$499K annually.

Not Relevant – This contractor performed neither Ground Aircraft Operations nor Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) requirements with a total value of at least $300K annually.

Relevancy Rating

Please rate the relevancy of this contract using the definitions identified above

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The contractor’s Past Performance submission meets contractual requirements and exceeds performance requirements.

(S) Satisfactory - The contractor’s Past Performance submission meets contractual requirements and meets performance requirements.

(M) Marginal - The contractor’s Past Performance submission does not meet some contractual requirements and reflects serious problems under performance requirements.

(U) Unsatisfactory - The contractor’s Past Performance submission does not meet contractual requirements.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to provide a rating.

Provide Ground Aircraft Operations

Did the contractor adequately manage fluctuating workloads in order to maintain uninterrupted Ground Aircraft Operations services?

Did the contractor employ qualified personnel for Ground Aircraft Operations services (for example, experience in military and/or fighter aircraft, or A&P certified technicians)?

Did the contractor adequately plan and perform all Ground Aircraft Operations, to include Emergency Services?

If other than Yes or “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Provide Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Management

Did the contractor adequately staff and maintain AGE, to include experienced and/or certified personnel?

Did the contractor adequately maintain Aerospace Ground Equipment by providing periodic preventative maintenance and inspections?

If other than Yes or “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Other Programs (training requirements)

Did the contractor provide adequate training to ensure personnel can carry out daily operations, such as tool control, deicing airplanes, ordering and purchasing parts, calibrate Test Measurement Diagnostic Equipment, Foreign Object Damage Prevention, and Document management?

Did the contractor ensure personnel completed and maintained required Government Furnished Training?

Did the contractor ensure all personnel were adequately trained in safety and accident prevention, incident reporting procedures, and environmental protection?

If other than Yes or “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

Page | 5