Attachment 2 - MSSPIX Assessment and ALPA Experimentation Sppt Srvcs Sample PWS.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

MANEUVER SUPPORT, SUSTAINMENT, AND PROTECTION INTEGRATION

EXPERIMENTS (MSSPIX) ASSESSMENT AND ARMY LIVE PROTOTYPE

ASSESSMENT (ALPA) EXPERIMENTATION SUPPORT SERVICES

ARMY FUTURES COMMAND (AFC),

SUSTAINMENT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT AND

INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE (SCDID),

SUSTAINMENT BATTLE LAB (SBL) FORT LEE, VA

1.0. Introduction/Objectives. U.S Army Futures Command (AFC), Sustainment Capabilities Development Integration Directorate (SCDID), SBL, is tasked to support the Army Concept Development and Experimentation Plan and the Sustainment community by researching and evaluating existing and emerging logistics processes, developing future concepts, force designs and organizational relationships, evaluating existing and emerging logistics technologies and facilities to support these activities. The SBL participates in Joint, Army, and other service processes, experiments, and war-games in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Contractor shall provide the analytical and technical support to the SBL and Combined Arms Support Command (CASCOM) directorates for Army Concept Development and Experimentation Plan and Future Force initiatives.

The Contractor shall support the Government by designing and supporting all forms of prototype experimentation and assessment in order to enable the study of current, modular, and future warfare concepts and technologies. The Contractor shall use scenarios containing multiple potential logistical lines of investigation spanning the range of military operations to develop scenario dilemmas at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of conflict, throughout the joint phases of operation assessing technologies that potentially solve capability gaps associated with Army and Joint concepts and ideas.

1.1. Scope of Work. PRIMARY TASK AREA 2: Functional

Analysis/Experimentation Support: The Contractor shall perform event coordination functions, conduct detailed literature reviews, and develop and update experimentation documents in support of the conduct of live prototype assessments and experimentation.

Additionally, the Contractor shall provide sustainment subject matter expertise required to design and conduct a series of experiments. The Contractor shall evaluate outcomes and lessons learned to provide insights and findings informing the development of Army Functional Concepts or appropriate Capabilities Based Assessments (CBA) and Functional Based Assessments (FBA), that will plan for providing Army and Joint sustainment across Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) for current and future forces.

1.2. Period of Performance (PoP). The PoP shall consist of a one (1) 12-month period from 1 March 2022 – 28 February 2023.

1.3. Place of Performance. This task order is performed primarily at Fort Lee, Virginia and its associated military training installations (i.e. Fort AP Hill, VA and Fort Pickett, VA), and Fort Story, VA. Temporary travel to Fort Leonard Wood, MO; Fort Benning, GA and Fort Bliss, TX may be required as identified by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

1.4. Hours of Operation. In accordance with base contract, paragraph 1.7.3., the Contractor is responsible for conducting business between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) over a standard five-day work period, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays (including those authorized by Executive Order of the President) or when the Government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government directed facility closings.

However, the hours of operation and days may vary based on mission requirements. The Contractor shall be required to work the schedule of the events and experiments that they are supporting as required by the mission. The Government will strive to provide ten (10) days’ notice to the Contractor prior to a schedule change. Extenuating circumstances may necessitate last minute schedule changes/adjustments. Hence, a mix of hours may be required to meet mission needs outside of the normal operating schedule.

1.5. Identification of Contractor Employees. Identification of Contractor employees shall be in accordance with base contract, paragraph 1.7.8.

1.6. Data Rights and Information Protection. The U.S. Government shall have rights and ownership in documents/materials produced under this Task Order as defined in the Base Contract, PWS paragraph 1.7.10. All materials prepared for, or used in connection with, task order performance must comply with applicable classification and/or sensitive unclassified information (aka controlled unclassified information (CUI)) protection requirements. Information and material prepared for or used in connection with task order performance shall not be shared outside of the Contractor’s organization without written consent of the Contracting Officer.

1.7. Security Requirements. Security requirements shall be in accordance with the base contract, paragraphs 1.8.1. through 1.8.1.10.2.; paragraphs 1.8.2. through 1.8.2.2.;

paragraphs 1.8.2.4. through 1.8.2.12. A SECRET security clearance is required to perform services on this task order.

1.7.1. The Contractor must treat all unclassified draft and final deliverables under this task order as controlled unclassified information and shall apply "Controlled Unclassified Information" (CUI) cover sheets to all unclassified draft and final deliverables under this task order. This requirement does not exempt the Contractor from additional applicable (through this Task Order/Base Contract or by law) information protection/marking requirements.

1.7.2. Contractor personnel shall review AR 25-2, Information Assurance, prior to using Government-furnished telecommunications and electronic communications systems and equipment.

1.9. Travel. Travel requirements shall be in accordance with the base contract, paragraph 1.7.9. The Contractor shall travel to meetings, conferences, workshops, in-progress reviews, and seminars as authorized by the COR. During the course of this task order, it is anticipated that there will be travel requirements in support of Army Expeditionary Warfighting Experiment (AEWE) execution, MSSPIX execution, and two

(2) trips each quarter in support of other Army Futures Command (AFC) Live Prototype Assessment (ALPA) events; most with a duration of one (1) week or less. For planning purposes, travel to and from each event will require one (1) half day each way, for each person attending, conducted the day prior and after the event, unless prior coordination has been made with the COR. Travel is anticipated under this task order in the Continental United States (CONUS). The potential travel locations include, but are not limited to, Fort Leonard Wood, MO; Fort Benning, GA; and Fort Bliss, TX. The COR will provide written notification/authorization to the Contractor at least two (2) weeks, if at all possible, prior to travel being required. Payment will not be authorized for travel if not approved in advance by the COR.

1.9.1. Travel Costs. Travel costs are reimbursable expenses. The Contractor shall invoice for all allowable actual costs incurred and any associated allowable handling fee.

Travel shall be reviewed by and approved in writing by the COR prior to the Contractor incurring any billable expenses. Unapproved travel expenses are not a billable expense.

2.0. ACRONYMS. For acronyms not defined within this PWS, the Contractor shall refer to the base contract, section 2. Following are the acronyms pertinent to this task order:

AAR After Action Review AEWE Army Expeditionary Warfighting Experiment ALPA Army Live Prototype Assessment ARI Army Research Institute ARL Army Research Lab ATEC Army Test and Evaluation Command CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention EXFOR Experimental Force FBA Functional Based Assessments HRED Human Research and Engineering Directorate JMC Joint Modernization Command JWA Joint Warfighter Assessment MFIX Maneuver Fires Integration Exercise MoE Measure of Effectiveness MoP Measure of Performance MSSPIX Maneuver Support, Sustainment, and Protection Integration

Experiments

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PC Project Convergence POAM Plan of Action and Milestones PoP Period of Performance PWG Planning Working Group RFI Request for Information RFMSS Range Facilities Management Scheduling System TBD To Be Determined

3.0. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES. Government

furnished items and services shall be utilized in accordance with the base contract requirements, Section 3. In addition to the Government furnished items and services detailed in the base contract, the Government will also make the following available:

3.1. The Government will provide the Contractor, Battle Lab Collaborative Simulation Environment (BLCSE) facility and network access and establish a test bed for scheduled tests and verification and validation events to conduct experimentation planning, coordination and execution as required.

4.0. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. Except for those items and services specifically stated to be Government furnished in Section 3. of the base contract and Section 3.0. of this task order, the Contractor shall furnish everything required to perform this task order.

4.1. Contractor furnished items and responsibilities shall be in accordance with Section 4.

of the base contract.

4.2. The Contractor shall ensure that Contractor personnel have and wear facemasks IAW the most current guidelines provided by Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the military installation.

5.0. SPECIFIC TASKS:

5.1. Qualification Requirements.

5.1.1. Functional Analyst Support. Contractor personnel performing services on this task order shall meet the qualifications as specified in the base contract, Section 5.1.2.

5.2. Specific Tasks.

5.2.1. ALPA Live Prototype Experimentation Integration Support. Contractor personnel performing the tasks in this Section (Paragraphs 5.2.1.1 – 5.2.1.5) shall meet the Functional Analyst IV Support qualifications IAW Section 5.1.2.1. of the base contract.

5.2.1.1. The Contractor shall recommend potential sustainment technologies for live prototype experiments and participate in Planning Working Group (PWG) meetings by attending, taking notes and compiling the Executive Summary from the Sustainment perspective necessary to coordinate, synchronize, and integrate approved sustainment warfighter priorities into the Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment (AEWE), Maneuver Fire Integration Exercise (MFIX), Maneuver Support, Sustainment, Protection Integration Exercise (MSSPIX), Cyber Quest, the Joint Warfighter Assessment (JWA) and Project Convergence (PC) events in accordance with the FCC/Joint Modernization Command (JMC) Live Prototype Assessment (ALPA) Planning Guidance.

5.2.1.2. The Contractor shall develop a plan of action and milestones (POAM) that identifies all required actions to support planning, coordinating, executing, and evaluating annual MSSPIX ALPA event within sixty (60) days of the start of the period of performance. The POAM shall include all activities necessary to support the development and selection of experiment objectives, administrative support to include receipt and packaging prototype technologies proposals for review, selection and preparation of experiment locations, identification of support and training requirements, development of data collection plan, preparation of experiment reports, and other actions that may be deemed necessary to support ALPA execution and demonstration of systems, subsystems, or prototypes in a relevant field environment.

5.2.1.3. The Contractor shall perform event coordination functions, conduct detailed literature reviews, and develop and update experimentation documents. The support the Contractor shall provide includes, but is not limited to, research and review of appropriate and applicable literature and documents; technical analysis, technical writing, preparing and updating experimentation documents; preparation of the initial draft for briefings and experimentation related presentations; attendance at and participation in meetings, conferences and working sessions; and conducting In Progress Reviews (IPRs).

The Contractor shall provide expertise/support required to design and conduct a series of experiments; evaluate outcomes and lessons learned in order to provide insights and Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) recommendations to assess military utility.

5.2.1.4. The Contractor shall identify potential sustainment technologies for possible participation in annual JWA and PC experiments and provide recommendations to the COR and the Live Experimentation Team Chief in coordination with the COR for final approval. The Contractor shall coordinate, synchronize, and integrate submission of technology requests for information (RFIs) required to gain final approval for JWA/PC participation in coordination with AFC-SCDID through the COR.

5.2.1.5. It is anticipated that the Contractor shall provide support during the planning and execution of the following events, at a minimum. The following list is pre-decisional and subject to change:

Prototype Experiment

Type of Experiment

Location Method Dates Length

MSSPIX 22,

Planning and Execution

Prototype Assessment

Fort Lee (planning);

Fort Pickett, VA (execution)

Onsite 24 APR – 7

MAY 22

No more than two (2) weeks

AEWE FY21

Execution

Prototype Assessment

Fort Benning, GA Onsite TBD No more than two (2) days

Project Convergence 22

Prototype Assessment

White Sands, NM Distributed OCT 22 none

Joint Warfighter Assessment 21

Prototype Assessment

Fort Bliss, TX, Germany

Distributed JUN 22 none

MSSPIX FY23

Planning

Experiment

PWG

Fort Lee, VA or Fort Leonard Wood, MO

Onsite TBD No more than two (2) days

5.2.2. MSSPIX Execution Support. A minimum of 66% of the Contractor personnel performing the tasks in this Section (Paragraphs 5.2.2 1 -5.2.2.4.10.2) shall meet the Functional Analyst IV Support qualifications IAW Section 5.1.2.1. of the base contract.

A minimum of 34% of the Contractor personnel performing the tasks in this Section (Paragraphs 5.2.2 – 5.2.2.4.10.2) shall meet the Functional Analyst III Support qualifications IAW Section 5.1.2.2. of the base contract.

5.2.2.1. The Contractor shall develop a work plan that identifies all required actions to support the future planning, execution, and evaluation of MSSPIX events. The work plan shall include activities related to supporting the development of experimentation objectives, prototype technology administrative support to include receipt and packaging prototype technologies proposals for review, experiment location selection and preparation, identification of experiment support and training requirements, data collection to support experiment execution and evaluation, experiment report summaries.

5.2.2.2. For each MSSPIX related live prototype assessment, experiment, demonstration, or study, the Contractor shall support the creation of the required operational environment products and provide input to the experiment project lead through the COR for the following: (1) Experiment Directive; (2) manning requirements (3) Event Design Document; (4) operational scenario for the experiment, including tactical orders and planning products that may be provided to military role players for implementation IAW concepts or doctrine, tactics and procedures; (5) surveys to be administered during the conduct of the experiment; and (6) experiment schedule, milestones, and event Battle Rhythm.

5.2.2.3. As part of each MSSPIX related experiment, the Contractor shall develop, based on COR provided templates, the following documents: Experiment Integration Plan, the Experiment Validation Plan, Experimentation Training Plan, the Experiment Battle Rhythm, and the Experiment Execution Plan for all Pilot and Record Runs. Additionally, the Contractor shall support the Government Project Lead in conducting experiment surveys, After Action Reviews (AARs) and Hot Washes. During experiment execution, the Contractor shall also capture and compile daily summaries. The Contractor shall execute Experimentation In-Processing Activities, as required for visiting personnel.

5.2.2.3.1. The Contractor shall document reports with staffed findings and recommendations that fully support the assessment objectives. The Contractor shall compile for each technology being assessed an executive summary in a formal report to the COR. Each assessment report must be fully supported by analytics, based on COR provided templates, and be grammatically correct.

5.2.2.3.2. The Contractor shall participate in the assessment development process. The Contractor shall be responsible for executing the assessment IAW the Functional Support Agreement/Vendor Demonstration Agreement between the assessment sponsor and the Director, AFC-SCDID. In the case of AFC directed events, the Contractor shall conduct assessments IAW AFC directives, taskings, and resource worksheets.

5.2.2.3.3. The Contractor shall participate in various forums related to assessment efforts by attending, providing input and taking notes. These forums include, but are not limited to, the following: Integrated Concept Teams; Integrated Product Teams; working groups;

technology assessment seminars; and Initial, mid, and final coordination working groups.

5.2.2.3.4. The Contractor shall support the planning, coordinating, executing, analyzing, and documenting/reporting of the MSSPIX Campaign. MSSPIX generally has three events in the planning, execution and documentation phase simultaneously.

5.2.2.4. The Contractor shall perform operational analyses utilizing Government-approved models, threat characteristics, and deployment and employment protocols IAW applicable Army doctrine. Analytical study processes vary according to the task at hand and each experimentation event will require a unique set of planning, execution and reporting documents. The Contractor shall support all aspects of experiment design, planning, preparation, execution, and post-experiment reporting.

5.2.2.4.1. The Contractor shall conduct background research and front-end analysis to construct problem statements, proposition statements and identify study objectives.

5.2.2.4.2. The Contractor shall define the measurement space and develop an analytically sound evaluation plan to detect differences in performance and effectiveness. The evaluation plan shall also address the impact of constraints, limitations and assumptions on the experiment.

5.2.2.4.3. The Contractor shall support scenario development and develop time-sequenced or event-driven activities required to stimulate participants in human-in-the-loop events to facilitate an assessment by collecting and documenting the data.

5.2.2.4.4. The Contractor shall develop a data collection plan for all assessments. The data collection plan shall capture all study issues and describe when, where and how data shall be collected and archived. Study issues shall be decomposed into Measure of Effectiveness (MoE) and Measures of Performance (MoP).

5.2.2.4.5. The Contractor shall support development, validation, and maintenance of data collection instruments and an assessment database. Both electronic and manual systems shall be used to support data collection. The assessment database must facilitate populating, retrieving, mining and storing data for future reference.

5.2.2.4.6. The Contractor shall prepare and conduct data collector training which includes facilitating orientation to the process.

5.2.2.4.7. The Contractor shall process data from the collection instruments, perform data reduction, and interpret data into meaningful results that form the foundation of the experimentation report. The Contractor shall translate analytical results into operational terms.

5.2.2.4.8. In coordination with the COR, the Contractor shall interface and coordinate with other AFC CDIDs and agencies such as the JMC, The Research and Analysis Center (TRAC), Army Research Institute (ARI), Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC), Army Research Lab (ARL), Human Research and Engineering Directorate (HRED), and other analytical organizations as required to support planning and execution of MSSPIX.

5.2.2.4.9. The Contractor shall coordinate preparations for MSSPIX 22 related live prototype assessments executed at Fort Pickett, VA and for MSSPIX 23 at Fort Lee, Virginia and its associated military training installations (i.e. Fort AP Hill, VA and Fort Pickett, VA) or Fort Leonard Wood, MO. Additionally, the Contractor shall coordinate AFC-SCDID live prototype assessment requirements for assessments executed at Fort Leonard Wood, MO with the AFC-Maneuver Support CDID/Ft Leonard Wood.

5.2.2.4.9.1. The Contractor shall identify and coordinate AFC-SCDID prototype assessment range requirements with appropriate Range Operations personnel for all MSSPIX assessments.

5.2.2.4.9.2. The Contractor shall coordinate the logistical, operational, and network support for MSSPIX 22 related live prototype assessments executed at Fort Pickett, VA and for MSSPIX 23, if held at Fort Lee, VA and its associated military training installations (i.e. Fort AP Hill, VA and Fort Pickett, VA).

5.2.2.4.9.3. The Contractor shall plan and coordinate site occupation with respective Range Operations/Range Control facilities and ensure that the assessment site is prepared and ready to execute upon the arrival of the organization conducting the assessment or training.

5.2.2.4.10. The Contractor shall serve as the experiment operational support administrative liaison between SBL and all Government and non-Governmental agencies for experimentation coordination and execution.

5.2.2.4.10.1 The Contractor shall coordinate operational functions for the SBL, such as support personnel, ammunition, training area, ranges, operational briefings, tasking support, Experimental Force (EXFOR) control and visitors.

5.2.2.4.10.2. The Contractor shall operate the Range Facilities Management Scheduling System (RFMSS) to schedule ranges and terrain for experiments.

5.3. DELIVERABLES

5.3.1. All deliverables shall be submitted to the COR in electronic media. Transmission by email is acceptable for draft documents.

5.3.2. Significant Activities (SIGACTs). The Contractor shall submit weekly SIGACTs in accordance with the base contract, paragraph 5.3.2.1.1.

5.3.3. The Contractor shall develop and assemble and package technology proposal submissions in support of JWA and ALPA prototyping venues as required for Government review and decision making to integrate sustainment related technologies into the appropriate ALPA venue.

5.3.4. Monthly Status Reports (MSRs). The Contractor shall submit MSRs in accordance with the base contract, paragraph 5.3.2.2. containing a brief description of current requirements; a brief summary of accomplishments during the reporting period;

the progress on deliverable products; current or anticipated problems; and a summary of activities planned for the next reporting period.

5.3.5. Monthly Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) Invoices. The Contractor shall submit Monthly WAWF Invoices in accordance with the base contract, paragraph 5.3.2.4.

5.3.6. Service Contract Reporting (SCR). The Contractor shall complete SCR IAW in accordance with the base contract, paragraph 5.3.2.5.

5.3.7. The COR is the only Government representative that has the authority to inspect and accept or reject deliverables. The acceptance of deliverables and satisfactory performance required herein shall be based on the timeliness and accuracy of the service requested by the COR.

DELIVERABLES TARGET DUE DATE

5.2.1.2. MSSPIX Plan of Action and

Milestone (POAM)

Within sixty (60) days from start of the period of performance, and updated as changes occur.

5.2.2.2. Sustainment priorities and

technologies for integration into ALPA events.

Four (4) weeks prior to start of

PWG

5.2.2.3. System documentation, and

system training plan

As specified in approved

MSSPIX POAM

5.2.2.3.1. Assessment reports Four (4) weeks upon

completion of assessment

5.2.2.4.4. Data collection plan Eight (8) weeks prior to start of Live prototype assessment

5.2.2.4.9. Coordinated Range facilities, equipment, IAW provided safety plans

As specified in approved

MSSPIX POAM

5.3.2. Weekly Significant Activity

Reports (SIGACTS)

Weekly

5.3.3. JWA/ALPA technology

proposal

As specified in JWA and ALPA POAMs

5.3.4. Monthly Status/Summary Report NLT five (5) business days of the calendar month

5.3.5. Monthly WAWF Invoices NLT five (5) business days

after the end of each calendar month

5.3.6. Service Contract Reporting NLT October 31 of each

calendar year

5.4. Historical Workload Data. The Contractor shall provide sufficient personnel to provide services IAW Section 5.0 of this PWS. Historically, the level of effort in supporting the specific tasks delineated in this PWS has been approximately 7,840 total hours over a 12-month period (1960 hours for a Functional Analyst III Support and 5,880 hours for Functional Analyst IV Support).

6.0. Applicable Publications.

6.1. Publications required to perform services/tasks under this task order are referenced in Section 6. of the base contract.

7.0. TECHNICAL EXHIBITS

7.1. Technical Exhibit One (1) – Performance Requirements Summary (PRS)

7.2. Technical Exhibit Two (2) – Qualification Verification Form (QVF)

7.1. Technical Exhibit One (1) – Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

ARMY FUTURES COMMAND (AFC),

SUSTAINMENT CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT &

INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE (SCDID),

SUSTAINMENT BATTLE LAB (SBL)

MANEUVER SUPPORT, SUSTAINMENT, AND PROTECTION INTEGRATION

EXPERIMENTS (MSSPIX) ASSESSMENT AND ARMY LIVE PROTOTYPE

ASSESSMENT (ALPA) EXPERIMENTATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

Performance Objective (PO)

PWS

Performance Standards

Surveillance Measurement Method

Allowable Performance Deviation

Monthly Remedy Amount

PO1: Recruit & retain qualified Personnel for uninterrupted performance of all tasks to successfully support AFC, S- CDID, Sustainment Battle Lab Experimentation, Analysis and Prototyping Plan.

Base Contract:

1.7.7 thru 1.7.7.1.3 1.8.1.1

1.8.2 thru 1.8.2.12 5.1

Task Order:

1.1.

1.7.

5.0.

The Contractor must at all times maintain an adequate, qualified workforce that meets labor category requirements as documented in the PWS for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within the PWS without augmentation from Government personnel (military or civilian).

100% Inspection of all Qualification Verification Forms (QVFs).

COR will verify required qualifications of all personnel defined in the PWS thru the QVF. COR will compare event schedules against weekly SIGACTs/Event EXSUMs to determine if support was executed.

A defect is a total of a ten (10) business day period of interrupted service in a calendar month.

Interrupted service also includes performance that must be augmented by the Government (military or civilian).

11-15 business days = 3% loss

16+ business days = 5% loss

PO2: Recruit & retain qualified Personnel for uninterrupted performance of all formal events to successfully support

AFC, S-CDID,

Sustainment Battle Lab Experimentation, Analysis and Prototyping Plan.

Base Contract:

1.7.7 thru 1.7.7.1.3 1.8.1.1

1.8.2 thru 1.8.2.12 5.1

Task Order:

1.1.

The Contractor must at all times maintain an adequate, qualified workforce that meets labor category requirements as documented in the PWS for the uninterrupted performance of all formal events including, but are not limited to, formal

100% Inspection of all QVFs.

COR will verify required qualifications of all personnel defined in the PWS thru the QVF. COR will compare event schedules against weekly SIGACTs/Event

A defect is 20% of interrupted service per formal event in a calendar month.

Interrupted service also includes performance that must be augmented by the Government (military or civilian).

See Note 2 below.

Any loss of services/support that results in the SBL’s inability to participate in a scheduled formal event (experiment, M&S technical integration exchange) will result in a loss of 5% per event

1.7.

5.0.

functions, exercises, workshops, experiments, and support of technical integrations. The events will be specified in the individual TOs.

Uninterrupted performance of all formal events will be conducted without augmentation from Government personnel (military or civilian).

EXSUMs to determine if support was executed.

PO3: Receipt of Contract Deliverables

Base Contract:

5.2.

5.3.

Task Order:

5.2.

5.3.

a) The Contractor shall submit deliverables as required in the PWS, on time and with a minimum number of defects.

100% Inspection

COR conducts 100% surveillance of Task Order deliverables.

Two (2) business days from the due date.

Deliverables three (3) or more business days late will result in a 1% loss per business day until the COR acknowledges receipt of an acceptable deliverable.

PO4: Quality of Deliverables.

Base Contract:

5.2.

5.3.

Task Order:

5.2.

5.3.

The Contractor shall provide all deliverables IAW PWS requirements.

All deliverables shall be accurate in terms of content, grammatically correct, and free of spelling and punctuation errors.

100% Inspection

COR conducts 100% surveillance of Task Order deliverables.

A deviation is five

(5) defects.

A defect is defined as a significant error in final content, such as misstatement of fact or an incorrect calculation, but does not include typographical or grammar mistakes that do not significantly affect meaning. When applicable, the COR will allow the contractor a reasonable amount of time to resolve any defects prior to a final deliverable.

Deliverables with 6+ errors will result in being documented in COR monthly reports and annual Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS).

PO5: Professional Conduct of Contractor Personnel

Base Contract:

1.7.1 thru 1.7.1.1 1.7.14

Task Order:

5.2.

The Contractor shall perform in a professional and business-like manner, with a minimum number of unresolved personnel complaints.

Customer Feedback and 100% Inspection by review of all violations of the standards and validated, unresolved customer complaints.

COR will discuss all complaints with the Contractor Point of Contact at the time of occurrence or receipt of initial complaint.

Complaints include, but are not limited to, violations of the standards and validated, unresolved customer complaints

If the failures in professional conduct continues the COR in coordination with SBL leadership may bring to the attention of the KO for further action.

NOTES:

1. For defects to be determined and measured, the COR will provide the actual percentage and conclude on how defects are detailed and measured in the individual Task Order PWS. The COR will monitor the defect by the following surveillance methods:

100% surveillance and or Customer Feedback.

2. Performance Objective (PO) 2: An allowable performance deviation is defined as a defect of 20% of interrupted service per formal event in a calendar month. For example, if a formal event is scheduled for five (5) business days, the allowable performance deviation of 20% is one (1) business day.

7.2. Technical Exhibit Two (2) – Qualification Verification Form (QVF)

Qualification Verification Form (QVF)

Sustainment Battle Lab (SBL)

Maneuver Support, Sustainment, and Protection Integration Experiments (MSSPIX) Assessment and Army Live Prototype Assessment (ALPA)

Experimentation Support Services

Candidate________________ Position: ____________________

Qualifications of Contractor personnel must be verified PRIOR to starting work on this task order. Completion of this form including PM signature verifies that the Contractor employee has the minimum qualifications stated in the PWS. The Qualification Verification Form (QVF) and supporting documentation shall be furnished to the COR one (1) business day prior to the Contractor personnel’s in-processing appointment.

(Task Order paragraph 1.7.; Base Contract paragraph 1.7.1.1) All Contractor personnel shall:

_____Possess and maintain a SECRET security clearance while performing services under this task order.

(Task Order paragraph 5.1.1.; Base Contract paragraphs 5.1.2.1. – 5.1.2.1.2.)

Functional Analyst IV shall:

_____ Possess a minimum of a master’s degree from an accredited college or university and at least twenty (20) years of experience serving in a U.S. military agency as military or civilian in progressively responsible command and staff positions. A minimum of two

(2) years of experimentation experience serving in a Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) or AFC Battle Lab as military or civilian can be substituted for five (5) years of the U.S. military agency experience.

_____ Possess the minimum experience identified below in at least two (2) of the following:

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience with service or joint doctrine, to include combat, combat support, and combat service support operations.

_____Minimum of six (6) years’ experience with service or joint staffs organization, functions and procedures.

_____Minimum of six (6) years’ experience with service or joint organizations, operations, and exercises at levels comparable to Army Corps.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in the preparation and conduct of seminars, study groups and map exercises for general and senior field grade officers.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in conducting instruction in both small and large group formats.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in conducting post exercise effectiveness analysis and evaluations.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in the compilation and presentation, in both written and oral formats, of lessons learned and after action review material.

(Task Order paragraph 5.1.1.; Base Contract paragraphs 5.1.2.2. – 5.1.2.2.2.)

Functional Analyst III shall:

_____ Possess a minimum of a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university and at least fifteen (15) years of experience serving in a U.S. military agency as military or civilian in progressively responsible command and staff positions. A minimum of two (2) years of experimentation experience serving in a TRADOC or AFC Battle Lab as military or civilian can be substituted for five (5) years of U.S. military agency experience.

_____ Possess the minimum experience identified below in at least two (2) of the following:

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience with service or joint doctrine, to include combat, combat support and combat service support operations.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience with service or joint staffs organization, functions and procedures.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience with service or joint organizations, operations, and exercises at levels comparable to Army Corps.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in the preparation and conduct of seminars, study groups and map exercises for general and senior field grade officers.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in conducting instruction in both small and large group formats.

_____Minimum of three (3) years’ experience in the compilation and presentation, in both written and oral formats, of lessons learned and after action review material.

CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURE DATE