Attach 5a - Det 7 (AETC) CM4 Chiller Approval Memo_signed.pdf
PDF 422 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B530 Chiller Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA303021QA001
About this file
This memorandum from the Air Force Civil Engineer Center approves the selection of single manufacturers for HVAC chiller systems at various Air Force installations. Trane Inc. is approved for Altus AFB, Goodfellow AFB, and Maxwell AFB. Daikin Industries, Ltd. (McQuay International) is approved for Columbus AFB. Carrier Corp. is approved for Luke AFB and Holloman AFB. The comprehensive inventory analysis selecting these manufacturers is to be repeated every five years to confirm standardization progress and consider any changes.
The related solicitation seeks a contractor to remove and replace chillers and VFDs at Building 530. The work includes removing one existing air cooled chiller and repairing another, installing one new Trane air cooled chiller, removing two existing VFDs and installing two new "Teco" or equivalent VFDs. This is a Women-Owned Small Business set aside opportunity for the Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combo - FA303021QA001 - QA Amended.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - Bldg 530 Chiller SOW 30 July.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - Bldg 530 Chiller SOW 30 July.pdf | ||
| Attach 6 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - TE-4 Trane Pictures.pdf | ||
| Combo - FA303021QA001 - Final.pdf | ||
| Combo - FA303021QA001 - Final.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 - Form 66 Submittal Schedule B530 0.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach 2 - SOW B530.pdf | ||
| Attach 4 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - TE-2 Chiller Controls Diagram.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - Bldg 530 Chiller SOW.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 - DoD Contractor Guide B530.pdf | ||
| Attach 5 - HVAC Chiller System Justification and Approval.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 - TE-1 B530 - DWG.pdf | ||
| Combo - FA303021QA001 - Final.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 - DoD Contractor Guide B530.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach 2 - TE-3 Photos.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attach 1 - Form 66 Submittal Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM FOR DET 7 /CE
FROM: AFCEC/CO
139 Barnes Drive, STE 1 Tyndall AFB, FL 32403-5319
SUBJECT: HV AC Chiller System Standardization, Single Manufacturer Selection
References: (a) AFCEC/CL Memo, 16 May 2019, Air Force Policy Memorandum Mandatory Standardization of HVAC Systems
(b) AFCEC/CO Memo, 3 May 2019, Air Force Guidance Memorandum HVAC Chiller System Standardization, Single Manufacturer Selection
15 Mar 21
· 1. The Air Force Civil Engineer Center Director (AFCEC/CL) serves as the Air Force Category Manager (CM) for the Facilities and Construction Category and has mandated the standardization of HV AC chiller systems to a single manufacturer at the installation level. The AFCEC/CL has further delegated the authority and responsibility of administering the single manufacturer approval process to the AFCEC Operations Directorate (AFCEC/CO).
2. This memorandum serves as AFCEC/CO's official communication approving the selection of a single manufacturer for HVAC chiller systems respective to the following installations:
Installation: Unit: Manufacturer:
Altus AFB 97CES Trane Inc.
Columbus AFB 14 CES Daikin Industries, Ltd.
(McQuay International) Goodfellow AFB 17 CES Trane Inc.
Holloman AFB 49 CES Carrier Corp.
Laughlin AFB 47 CES Trane Inc.
Luke AFB 56 CES Carrier Corp.
Maxwell AFB 42 CES Trane Inc.
Sheppard AFB 82 CES Trane Inc.
3. The comprehensive inventory analysis is to be repeated after five years from the date of this memorandum. The purpose of this secondary analysis is to document the installation's progress in standardizing HV AC chiller systems, consider any changes in the decision facts, and confirm no external factors exist that may drive a reconsideration of the approved single manufacturer.
Should the BCE determine that a change in single manufacturer is required, a new Memorandum of Request (MOR) and analysis will be accomplished.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .