Att0005_PastPerformanceQuestionaire.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Detonation Cord Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W52P1J21R0065
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Joint Munitions Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing detonating cord under solicitation number W52P1J-21-R-0065 issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Joint Munitions Command. The questionnaire requests information on a contractor's past performance on delivery schedule, requests for deviation and engineering changes, first article and lot acceptance testing, contract terminations, failure analysis reports, critical failures impacting schedule, quality, responsiveness, and contractor/customer relationship. Responses are due by April 6, 2022 and should be submitted to the email address provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Detonation Cord, newest first.
File Type Posted
B08 - ATT 0002-PRICING MATRIX.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - W52P1J-21-R-0065 0002.pdf PDF
B08 - W52P1J-21-R-0065 0001.pdf PDF
CDRL_16_SAMPLE OPSEC PLAN.pdf PDF
Att0002_Price Matrix_protected.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_17_format_PROGRESS REPORT.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
Att0008_QuestionsTemplate.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att0007_SmallBusinessParticipationPlan.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
W52P1J21R0065.pdf PDF
Att0006_PastPerformanceLetterofConsent.docx DOCX document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire Detonating Cord Solicitation W52P1J-21-R-0065

The Army Contracting Command, Rock Island, appreciates your input on the below by taking a few moments to provide past performance information on the contract /purchase order you have been identified as POC.

Your time and effort is greatly appreciated. Please submit the completed survey to the nathanial.s.tutor.civ@army.mil. If you have any questions with regard to this request, please don’t hesitate to contact Nate Tutor at email above or 309-782-4972.

Survey is being completed for Contractor:

Name of Company/Government Agency completing Survey:

Contract/Purchase Order Number:

Name, title, and phone number of person completing Survey:

Length of time your firm/agency has been involved with the Contractor:

PLEASE SUBMIT PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY BY 6 APRIL 2022 TO:

nathanial.s.tutor.civ@army.mil

1. Did the contractor meet the original contract delivery schedule? Yes ___ No ____

0. If no, was it contractor or government caused delay?

0. If contractor, why?

0. How many times was the delivery schedule revised due to contractor delay?

0. If yes, was the contractor ahead of schedule and what benefit did it provide to the USG?

1. Throughout the course of your contract:

1. Requests for Deviation (RFDs) and/or Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs): How would you rate the timeliness and quality of these submissions?

1. Did the contractor have any First Article Test or Lot Acceptance Test successes/failures? Please specify how impacted USG (benefit/detriment)

1. Was the contract terminated for any reason? Please specify

1. Critical characteristic failures: How would you rate the timeliness and quality of Failure Analysis Corrective Action Reports (FACARs)?

2. How many critical characteristic failures did the Contractor have?

2. Did the Critical Failures cause a major delay in schedule, if so how many times?

5. How would describe the overall quality of the contractor? WHY?

6. Was the contractor responsiveness to requests for information? WHY?

7. How would you describe the contractor/customer relationship for this contract? WHY?

8. Any other comments regarding Quality, Delivery Schedule Performance/On-Time Delivery or about the contractor’s past performance in general?

Signature of person submitting Survey Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .