Cline_Property.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
HM - Noontime Demolition Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-569R-S-14-0040
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service R9-Eastern Region

About this file

Attachment 6 - Cline Site

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to HM - Noontime Demolition Project, newest first.
File Type Posted
Hess.pdf PDF
Experience_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Fountain.pdf PDF
Noontime_Maps.pdf PDF
AG-569R-S-14-0040.rtf RTF text file
Allen.pdf PDF
Ahlborn.pdf PDF
05-2271.txt TXT text file
Noontime_Pictures.docx DOCX document
Oakey_Report_doc.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

07-07-10

Agency:

Huron-Manistee National Forest

Attn: Russ Sutton, P.E., Facilities

Engineer

1755 South Mitchell Street

Cadillac, MI 49601

Regarding: Pre-Demo Survey

Structure: Vacant Residential Property

Location: Mio, Michigan

Former Cline Residence

Project No: 063010-3

Project Date: 06-30-10

Dear Client:

In accordance with our agreement, Compli√Chek Environmental Compliance, LLC (C√C) has conducted a pre-demolition asbestos survey and comprehensive paint testing at the above property. This survey was conducted on 06-30-10 by Burt Russell, a Michigan-licensed asbestos inspector (No. A5519), and Lead Risk Assessor (No. P00187).

Compli√Chek appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental services on this project.

Should you need additional services on this or any other project, please feel free to call us.

Respectfully submitted, Compli√Chek, LLC

Burt Russell

Project Specialist

PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

and LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

Vacant Residential Property

Mio, Michigan

Former Cline Residence

PREPARED FOR: Huron-Manistee National Forest

1755 South Mitchell Street

Cadillac, MI 49601

PREPARED BY: Compli-Chek ASSESSOR: Burt Russell 2709 Geert Court MI No. P-0187 Lansing, MI 48910

PROJECT DATE: 06-30-10 REPORT DATE: 07-07-10

Burt R. Russell

MI Asbestos Inspector # AA5519

MI Lead Risk Assessor # P00187

COMPLIa CHEK LLC 2709 GEERT COURT LANSING, MI 48910 (517) 507-2547 C-C Project No. 063010-3

Table of Contents

Report Section

Project Summary

Interpretation of Results and Regulatory Guidelines

Space / Material Inventory

Material Sampling / Asbestos Content

Laboratory Analytical Reports

Asbestos Sampling and Analytical Procedures

Inspector and Laboratory Certification

Schematic Drawing

Paint Testing by X-Ray Florescence

PROJECT SUMMARY

SECTION 1

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW

Compli√Chek, LLC (C√C) has conducted a Pre-Demolition Survey at Mio, Michigan, GGG. The survey performed at the subject site encompassed all interior / exterior spaces and identified all building components with respect to asbestos and lead-based paint. The inspector performed a space-by space survey of materials and their locations, employing destructive methods in order to locate and sample concealed materials. Section 1 of the report summarizes the findings of the asbestos survey. Section 2 details steps to comply with NESHAPs requirements (defined below).

Section 3 locates and quantifies all materials within designated spaces. Section 4 identifies asbestos sample locations and summarizes analytical results with all laboratory findings following in Section 5.

Compli√Chek uses assessment, sampling and analytical procedures standardized in 1987 by the EPA

Asbestos Hazards Emergency Response Act, (40 CFR 763 Subpart M; AHERA). These methodologies are summarized in Section 6. The Michigan–licensed inspector on this project was

Burt Russell; copies of all accreditation are located in Section 7. A Schematic drawing of the structures located on the property is located at Section 8. Additional X-Ray florescence testing of all painted components found on the property is located at Section 9.

1.2 PROJECT SCOPE

The requirements for performing a pre-demolition or pre-renovation survey are found in Federal

Standard Number 40 CFR 61, entitled: National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP). The NESHAP standards require that, prior to a renovation or demolition activity, all materials which could potentially contain asbestos must be designated as one of the following:

• NACM (Nonasbestos-Containing Material)

1. materials containing less than 1% asbestos

• RACM (Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials)

� Friable ACM

� Category 1 ACM that has become friable or will be subject to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading

� Category 2 ACM that is likely to or has become crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by renovation or demolition activities.

RACM must always be removed from the structure before demolition or, if it will be disturbed, before renovation. This is further clarified in Section 2 of the report.

• NCAT-1 (NESHAP CATegory- 1 non-friable material)

� gaskets, packings, flooring, asphalt roofing products containing more than 1% asbestos).

Some NCAT-1 materials may remain in the structure during a demolition if they are not friable prior to the demolition. This is further clarified in Section 2 of the report.

• NCAT-2 (NESHAP CATegory- 2 non-friable material)

� Any ACM, excluding Category 1, containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Some NCAT-2 materials may remain in the structure during a demolition if they are not friable prior to the demolition. This is further clarified in Section 2 of the report.

RESULTS AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES

SECTION 2

A material is considered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Michigan, Department of Labor and Economic Growth to be an asbestos-containing material (ACM) if at least one analysis from a collected sample yields a result greater than 1% asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, tremolite, crocidolite), or, if a material is assumed to contain asbestos based on the knowledge and observation of the licensed inspector. The client may, at any time, choose to rebut a positive assumption with confirmatory analysis of three samples of the material, stopping further analysis on the first positive sample. The client must treat any ACM material as an assumed asbestos-containing material and forego any analysis.

2A Non-regulated materials identified during survey testing <1% 2A

(Detailed in Sub-Sections 3A/4A)

Regulatory Guidelines Analytical results, along with observations made by the licensed inspector during this asbestos survey, indicate that ACMs are present within the project area. These ACMs are subject to one or more compliance requirements associated with the NESHAPs:

MDLEG Notification:

< 10 Linear Feet or 15 Square Feet (Notification not required; OSHA regulations still apply)

> 10 Linear Feet or 15 Square Feet (10-Calendar-day notification; OSHA regulations apply)

Floor tile and mastic

NESHAP (DEQ) Notification:

< 260 Lin Ft or 160 Sq Ft (Notification required; no further NESHAP requirements)

>/= 260 Lin Ft or 160 Sq Ft (10-Working day notification required; NESHAP requirements apply)

Floor tile and mastic

For all RACM, NCAT-1 and NCAT-2 ACM identified during the survey, the following regulatory requirements are applicable.

2B NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials (RACM) 2B

(None observed)

2C NCAT-1 & NCAT-2 Materials That May Become Friable During Demo/Reno 2C

(None observed)

2D NCAT-1 / NCAT-2 Materials That May Remain in Building During Demo/Reno 2D

(Detailed in Sub-Sections 3D/4D)

• The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) does not require the removal of

NCAT-1& 2 materials prior to demolition if it can be reasonably expected that the material will not be crumbled, pulverized or otherwise reduced to powder. It is unlikely that this will occur, because the structural matrix of the NCAT-1 material(s) listed above was observed to be intact. With consideration to the above statement, these material(s) may remain with the structure during demolition. Roofing materials are assumed to contain asbestos, including flashings, bituminous, asphalt mastics and built-up roofing. Roofing was observed to be intact and pliable and unlikely to become friable during demolition.

• If these materials will become friable during R/D activities, the use of licensed abatement personnel to conduct removal prior to R/D is required and all NESHAP rules will apply. (See RACM above).

• The contractor is required to submit a Notice of Intent to Demolish to the Michigan Department of

Environmental Quality at least 10 working days prior to demolition and also to the Michigan

Department of Labor and Economic Growth at least 10 calendar days prior to the demolition when quantities being demolished, renovated or encapsulated exceed 10 linear or 15 square feet.

• At least one individual trained in the provisions of the NESHAP must be present during any R/D activity that is likely to disturb asbestos-containing material.

2E OSHA/MIOSHA Requirements for Demolitions 2E

The NESHAPs rules were promulgated to protect the environment. Worker protection, work practices and hazard communication concerns are regulated by MIOSHA under the authority of

Michigan Public Act 154. OSHA/MIOSHA compliance except for notification requirements are not addressed and not acknowledged by the inspector to be within the scope of this project, however, a brief overview is provided for the client’s guidance:

(1).Thermal system and Surfacing ACM:

• Must be removed by a licensed abatement contractor. There is an exception: a licensed trade group (residential builder or maintenance and alteration contractor may remove small quantities without holding an abatement contractor’s license.

• Project notification if greater than 10 Linear / 15 Square feet

• 40-Hour-trained Competent Person must be licensed, present and annually trained

• 32- hour worker training and license required with annual refresher (excludes residential

10 units or less)

• Regulated area required

• Personal air monitoring until negative exposure assessment is established for each individual task associated with demolition.

• Wet methods

• Decon unit with shower

• Respirators and respiratory protection program

• Medical Surveillance

• Protective clothing

• Waste disposal (sealed impermeable containers)and waste hauling restrictions

• Engineering controls for partial interior demo (isolation / containment)

• Engineering controls for buildings where ACM remains in place without removal

(2). Demo when leaving 1 Non-Intact Class II ACM:

(roofing, flooring, mastics, siding materials, ceiling tiles, transite)

• If the material is currently friable the demo contractor must be a licensed abatement contractor. There is an exception: a licensed trade group (residential builder or maintenance and alteration contractor may remove small quantities without holding an abatement contractor’s license.

• Project notification if greater than 10 Linear / 15 Square feet

• 40-Hour-trained Competent Person must be licensed, present and annually trained.

• Demo personnel must be 8-Hour-trained with annual refreshers

• Regulated area required

• Personal air monitoring until negative exposure assessment is established for each individual task associated with demolition.

• Wet methods

• Decon unit (drop cloth and HEPA vacuum) if no NEA

• Respirators and respiratory protection program

• Medical Surveillance

• Protective clothing

• Waste disposal (sealed impermeable containers)

• Waste hauling restrictions (if friable)

(3). Demo when leaving more than 1 Non-Intact Class II ACM:

(roofing, flooring, mastics, siding materials, ceiling tiles, transite)

• If the material is currently friable the demo contractor must be a licensed abatement contractor. There is an exception: a licensed trade group (residential builder or maintenance and alteration contractor may remove small quantities without holding an abatement contractor’s license.

• Project notification if greater than 10 Linear / 15 Square feet

• 40-Hour-trained Competent Person must be licensed, present and annually trained.

• 32- hour worker training and license required with annual refresher on friable projects

(excludes residential 10 units or less and exterior ACM projects)

• 8- hour worker training and license required with annual refresher on non-friable projects (excludes residential 10 units or less and exterior ACM projects)

• Regulated area required

• Personal air monitoring until negative exposure assessment is established for each individual task associated with demolition.

• Wet methods

• Decon unit (drop cloth and HEPA vacuum) if no NEA

• Respirators and respiratory protection program

• Medical Surveillance

• Protective clothing

• Waste disposal (sealed impermeable containers)

• Waste hauling restrictions (if friable)

2F Building Owner and Employer/Contractor Responsibilities 2F

The MIOSHA Asbestos Standards for Construction, Part 602, requires pre-1981 building owners to conduct a thorough asbestos building survey. This survey must identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos-containing material (ACM) and/or presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) within the building. Once the building has been determined to have

ACM/PACM, a contractor working in the facility must assess whether their work may require them to disturb or remove these materials during renovation/demolition activities. If so, they must comply with applicable work practices and procedures in Part 602. Contractors removing or encapsulating friable ACM/PACM may require licensing under the Michigan Asbestos Abatement

Contractor Licensing Act (Act 135, P.A. 1986, as amended).

2G Asbestos Regulations Overview 2G

MIOSHA Regulations Part 602:

• Requires an asbestos building/facility inspection in pre-1981 buildings.

• Obligates the building/facility owner to notify immediate employees and contractors working in facility of asbestos building/facility survey results.

• If the building survey is not available, obligates contractors/employers to presume suspect materials contain asbestos until a proper rebuttal through material sampling/analysis is performed.

• Specifies required work practices, protective equipment and procedures for employees removing and/or disturbing ACM and/or PACM.

• Requires asbestos awareness training for employees who may contact but not disturb ACM and/or PACM. Training focuses on building materials that may contain asbestos to help assure that the building survey identified these materials and to prevent unintended disturbances.

Michigan Public Act 440 of 1988 (as amended), Asbestos Workers Accreditation Act:

• Requires persons who perform asbestos-related work in schools, school buildings, and public and commercial buildings to be properly trained and accredited through the DLEG Asbestos

Program, before performing the work (i.e., asbestos abatement workers, contractor/supervisors, building inspectors, management planners, and project designers).

• Requires trainers who train asbestos abatement workers, contractor/supervisors, building inspectors, management planners, and project designers in Michigan to be approved by the

DLEG Asbestos Program before providing the training.

• Authorizes penalties and fines for violations of the Act.

• Authorizes the suspension, revocation, or denial of accreditation and trainer approval al.

SPACE / MATERIAL INVENTORY

SECTION 3

S P A C E

N U M B

R

SPACE DESCRIPTION

M A T E R

IA

L

M B

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

A T E R

T Y

A T E R

O N D

IT

IO

S H

T E G O

R C E

B E S T

F /N

Q

A N T

IT

IT

A S U

3A NACM: Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials (Testing <1%) 3A

3B RACM: NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Materials 3B

3C NCAT-1 & NCAT-2 Materials That May Become Friable During Demo/Reno 3C

3D NCAT-1 & NCAT-2 Materials That May Remain in Building During Demo/Reno 3D

1 BACK PORCH NO SUSPECT MATERIALS OBSERVED

2 LIVING RM / KITCHEN 1 WHITE 9"X9" FLOOR TILE MM FAIR NCAT 3% NF 322 SF

2 LIVING RM / KITCHEN 3 FLOOR MASTIC MM FAIR NCAT 5% NF 322 SF

2 LIVING RM / KITCHEN 4 WOOD FIBERBOARD CEILING MM FAIR NA ND F 322 SF

3 FIRST BEDROOM 1 WHITE 9"X9" FLOOR TILE MM FAIR NCAT 3% NF 90 SF

3 FIRST BEDROOM 3 FLOOR MASTIC MM FAIR NCAT 5% NF 90 SF

4 SECOND BEDROOM 1 WHITE 9"X9" FLOOR TILE MM FAIR NCAT 3% NF 90 SF

4 SECOND BEDROOM 3 FLOOR MASTIC MM FAIR NCAT 5% NF 90 SF

5 TOILET 2 BROWN 9"X9" FLOOR TILE MM FAIR NA ND NF 20 SF

5 TOILET 3 FLOOR MASTIC MM FAIR NCAT 5% NF 20 SF

5 TOILET 6 1'X1' FIBERBOARD CEILING MM FAIR NA ND F 20 SF

6 HALL 1 WHITE 9"X9" FLOOR TILE MM FAIR NCAT 3% NF 70 SF

6 HALL 3 FLOOR MASTIC MM FAIR NCAT 5% NF 70 SF

ROOF SHINGLES ARE POST-1981 FIBERGLASS REPLACEMENTS

MATERIAL SAMPLING

SECTION 4

MATERIAL #1: WHITE 9"X9" FLOOR TILE

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

01 A ENTRY AT BACK PORCH 3% CHRYSOTILE

01 B HALL AT ENTRY NOT ANALYZED NA

01 C HALL AT TOILET NOT ANALYZED NA

MATERIAL #2: BROWN 9"X9" FLOOR TILE

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

02 A TOILET NONE DETECTED NA

MATERIAL #3: FLOOR MASTIC

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

03 A ENTRY AT BACK PORCH 5% CHRYSOTILE

03 B HALL AT ENTRY NOT ANALYZED NA

03 C TOILET NOT ANALYZED NA

MATERIAL #4: WOOD FIBERBOARD CEILING

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

04 A LIVING ROOM NONE DETECTED NA

MATERIAL #5: WINDOW GLAZING COMPOUND

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

05 A KITCHEN SIDE A <1% CHRYSOTILE

05 B LIVING RM SIDE C <1% CHRYSOTILE

05 C SECOND BEDROOM SIDE C <1% CHRYSOTILE

MATERIAL #6: 1'X1' FIBERBOARD CEILING

SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ASBESTOS PRESENT ? TYPE

06 A TOILET NONE DETECTED NA

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

SECTION 5

������ !"#$%&'#()*+,%-.#/)%,0##1*2'3#(0##42,5)'62%+0#78#9���9###########################################################################################:;<=>?@=A>BACDCEFGHC:;<=>?@=A>B?C##(IJK#81($1LM1#184NJ$#8O8JP1Q1#1I448/P#############################################################################################RSTU ������V��W�

XYUZT![�!�!\������

�������] ZTTSTR�ŜR̂RTZTŜR̂RTZTŜR̂RTZT_�

̀�ab�c ����d ���� ed_��� �����f�d_��� ����g���d_��� ��f���d����g��dL$1h184NJ$#i hJQ$OL#184NJ$#Qjk#l/M11#j$1h/QNLQMO $1LQ48L$jm#81($1LM1 OMO#81($1LM1m#nQ($/1 OMO#nQ(/MI1m#48L$/Q8J1������d������ b�ĉ edZ Z� o����

��]� �m#h6-.&)'253 USp

R Zc N)&2'2q3#1')r s Z�

N)&2'2q3#1')r

X R� c��t�

��]� m#h6-.&)'253 Uup u s� c��v �w��V� � O8j UYpRp ����x��V� y sc c��v �w��V�

S s� c��v �w��V�

Y X� c��t� z�{��V O8j RpUYp

U u�

��tw�� |�m#h6-.&)'253 ZTTp

ZT uc

��tw�� |�m#h6-.&)'253 ZTTp

�̀�w�]� bx�]

TR�

RTZT f�W� Z �z R}~������~���~�~���������~�����~�����������������������������������������~������������������������������~�����}~������������� �¡¢£¤¢¥¥���¦����¥££¤§�f��yTT̂�X�YR�TRT� _�v

ZUYR̈�

vx����� �f� �����w z�� ����]V�V �z �V{�V��V {x��w��W _���v��wd w���v��w {���t��� w���v��w �z �����w §��������W �����d Zp �V{�V��V̈�

���VV

z�{�� �V ����]ª�w z�� «x����] v������ ��v�����wV v�x��

������V��VV���

���v���� ��v��Vv��] z�� ��������V ��Wx����w �f� ���¬�f

���VV���

����w��wV z�� ¬�ª��w�xV f���x����V̈ ��wz�x�w v������

��VV

���v��� §ZTp̈ �V{�V��V f�����ª�w ��W�� ��v��Vv��] §f�� �̈ c��� V�� �v�V z�� �ww������� z��� ���V �������xV� �����wxv�w �av��� zx�� t��� �z �����W�� �v� ��v� ���V ��V� ������V ����§V̈ ��V��w�����f ��w�d

RTTSUX�T

J$l$Oj ��_®�� �V{�V��V _���v��w� �����®������x�� b�®b���� �����x�w̄

°/3q23±3,#(.#8*'6)-2²3,#12³+%')-.́### µ¶·̧¹º»¼·̧½¹¾¿¹¿¶·»ÀÁ¹Â¶ÀÃÀ̧»ÄŽ¹Æ¼ÇÀÁ¼ÅÀÁȹɻÁ¶ÊÅÀÁË̶ÍÀ·̧¹µ¼·̧½¹¿¶·»ÀÁ¹Â¶ÀÃÀ̧»Äʹ¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹

������ !"#$%&'#()*+,%-.#/)%,0##1*2'3#(0##42,5)'62%+0#78#9���9###########################################################################################:;<=>?@=A>BACDCEFGHC:;<=>?@=A>B?C##(IJK#81($1LM1#184NJ$#8O8JP1Q1#1I448/P#############################################################################################RSTU ������V��W�

XYUZT![�!�!\������

�������] ZTTSTR�ŜR̂RTZTŜR̂RTZTŜR̂RTZT_�

̀�ab�c ����d ���� ed_��� �����f�d_��� ����g���d_��� ��f���d����g��dL$1h184NJ$#i hJQ$OL#184NJ$#Qjk#l/M11#j$1h/QNLQMO $1LQ48L$jm#81($1LM1 OMO#81($1LM1m#nQ($/1 OMO#nQ(/MI1m#48L$/Q8J1������d������ b�ĉ edZZ o�

��pq�� r�m#h6-.&)'253 ZTTs

ZR t� g����p u�v��V O8j RsUYs ����w��V�

L)'%5#1%xy53&zJ%.3-&#8+%5.{3,|�!�̀�q�]� bw�]

TR�

RTZT f�W� R �u R}~������~���~�~���������~�����~�����������������������������������������~������������������������������~�����}~������������� �¡¢£¤¢¥¥���¦����¥££¤§�f��tTT̂�X�YR�TRT�

ZUYR©�

̈w����� ª� �f� �����q u�� ����]V�V �u �Vv�V��V vw��q��W _���̈��qd q���̈��q v���p��� q���̈��q �u �����q §��������W �����d Zs �Vv�V��V©�

���VV

u�v�� �V ����]«�q u�� ¬w����] v��� � ��̈�����qV v] ̈�w��

������V��VV���

��̈��V̈��] u�� ��������V ��Ww����q v] �f� ����f

���VV���

����q��qV u�� �«��q�wV f���w����V© ��qu�w�q

��VV

§®ZTs© �Vv�V��V v] f�����«�q ��W�� ��̈��V̈��] §f��©� c��� V�� �̈�V ����v�� u�� �qq������� u��� ���V �������wV� v� �����qẅ�q �ä��� uw�� p��� �u �����W�� ���V ��V� ������V ����§V© ��V��q�����f ��v ��q�d

RTTSUX�T

J$l$Oj ��_̄ �� �Vv�V��V _���̈��q� �����̄������w�� b�̄b���� �����w�q°

±/3²23³3,#(.#8*'6)-2{3,#12́+%')-.|### µ¶·̧¹º»¼·̧½¹¾¿¹¿¶·»ÀÁ¹Â¶ÀÃÀ̧»ÄŽ¹Æ¼ÇÀÁ¼ÅÀÁȹɻÁ¶ÊÅÀÁË̶ÍÀ·̧¹µ¼·̧½¹¿¶·»ÀÁ¹Â¶ÀÃÀ̧»Äʹ¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹

SAMPLING, ASSESSMENT, ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

SECTION 6

Sampling Methodology

A minimum of three representative bulk samples were collected for each homogeneous material.

Each homogeneous material was assigned a number (1,2,3,etc.) and each sample for the material was assigned an alpha designation (A,B,C, etc.). Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:

• Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.)

• Application (sprayed-on, troweled-on, assembly into a system, etc.)

• Material function (Thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system, etc.)

Assessment Methodology

Material condition was assessed in order to categorize each material in accordance with the National

Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP; 40 CFR Part 61). The NESHAP

Standard is the federal regulation governing the proper handling and disposal of ACMs(ACM) during demolition and renovation activities.

PLM Analysis Methodology

Laboratory Services were provided by:

Triangle Environmental Service Center (TESC)

15549 Fox Cove Circle

Mosely, VA 23120, TESC is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) certified laboratory.

Samples were analyzed consecutively by alpha designation until a positive result was recorded for that material, at which time further analyses for that material were halted and the material was then identified by the laboratory as positive. If the analyst received a negative result, all samples in that alpha series were analyzed and the material was then designated as negative for asbestos content.

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), as well as fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

Physical or Other Limitations

Some areas were not accessed during the on-site investigation. These areas are described as follows:

• Trenches, voids, crocks below grade (would require demolition for access)

INSPECTOR AND LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

SECTION 7

C-C appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services on this project and we look forward to working with you again in the future. C-C provides additional consulting services, which include abatement project planning and lead/asbestos post-abatement clearance, asbestos and lead inspection/assessment services and environmental audit consultation. If you have any questions please feel free to call us at

517-507-2547 to discuss this project or any of the services listed above.

SECTION 8

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

Prepared By:

Compli√Chek Environmental 2709 Geert Ct Lansing, MI 48910

KITCHEN AND DINING ROOM

LIVING ROOM

BEDROOM

ENTRY AREA

SITE:

GARAGE ASPHALT WALL SHINGLE

RECENT WINDOW GLAZING

FIBERBOARD CEILING

ORIGINAL WINDOW GLAZING

GARAGE ROOF SHINGLE

HOUSE ROOF SHINGLE

Prepared For:

Vacant Property

Former Aline Residence

Huron Manistee National Forest 1755 SouthMitchell Street Cadillac, Michigan 49601

CC Project No. Date

063010-2 30-Jun-10

Mio, Michigan

GARAGE

Room / Space Equivalents

1 4

C

D B

A

Materials Sampled for Asbestos

N S

E

W

SECTION 8

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM

PAINT TESTING

SECTION 9

PAINT TESTING: Scope and Limitations The methodology used in this project for lead-based paint identification is detailed in the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing Chapter 7 : Lead-Based Paint Inspection (1997 Revision). The XRF unit currently in use by the inspector is an RMD LPA-1, Serial No. 1053. The unit is operated in accordance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) included in section K of this report. The LPA-1 does not require substrate correction when operated in standard mode with the exception of metal substrates which are read in quick mode in accordance with the PCS sheet. XRF technology uses low- level radiation to induce energy in lead atoms within a painted surface, which the XRF unit is able to analyze. The device then displays the direct-reading results in milligrams of lead per square centimeter of surface area tested (mg/cm

), and is able to determine if LBP is present. LBP is defined by State and Federal regulations as surface coatings that contain 1.0 mg/cm of lead, or greater.

M B

BUILDING DESCRIPTION ROOM EQUIVALENT

ID

B S T R A

COMPONENT

E A D

IN

G

S / N

G

NA CALIBRATE: 1.0 NIST BLOCK NA NA WOOD NA 1.0 NA

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD HOUSE WALL 0.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR B WOOD HOUSE WALL 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD HOUSE WALL 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR D WOOD HOUSE WALL 1.5 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD KITCHEN WINDOW CASING 1.3 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD KITCHEN WINDOW SASH 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD LIVING RM WINDOW CASING 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.2 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR A WOOD HOUSE SOFFIT 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR B WOOD LIVING RM WINDOW CASING 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR B WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.3 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR B WOOD PORCH SCREEN FRAMING 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD PORCH LEDGE 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD SCREEN DOOR CASING 1.2 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD SCREEN DOOR 1.2 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WINDOW CASING 1.3 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WINDOW CASING 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.2 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD LIVING RM WNDW SASH 1.4 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD HOUSE SOFFIT 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD PORCH SOFFIT 1.1 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD BACK DOOR CASING 1.0 NEG

EX1 CLINE PROPERTY HOUSE EXTERIOR C WOOD BACK DOOR THRESHOLD 1.0 NEG

6 CLINE PROPERTY HALLWAY A WOOD SCREEN DOOR CASING 1.1 NEG

6 CLINE PROPERTY HALLWAY A WOOD ENTRY DOOR EXTERIOR 1.3 NEG

6 CLINE PROPERTY HALLWAY A WOOD SCREEN DOOR STOP 1.2 NEG

6 CLINE PROPERTY HALLWAY A WOOD ENTRY THRESHOLD 1.2 NEG

3 CLINE PROPERTY FIRST BEDROOM C WOOD WNDW SASH 1.4 NEG

4 CLINE PROPERTY SECOND BEDROOM C WOOD WINDOW TROUGH 1.3 NEG

4 CLINE PROPERTY SECOND BEDROOM D WOOD WINDOW TROUGH 1.1 NEG

5 CLINE PROPERTY TOILET A WOOD WINDOW SASH 1.1 NEG

5 CLINE PROPERTY TOILET A WOOD WINDOW TROUGH 1.2 NEG

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .