Annex 1 FORSATY Global Performance Final.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- 7200AA20APS00006-ADDENDUM-ISEDMS-MOROCCO
About this file
Annex 1 FORSATY Global Performance Final
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Annex 5 UK and Netherlands additions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Annex 4 the FORSATY Mode.docx | DOCX document | |
| Annex 3 FORSATY RUSI hypothesis table.docx | DOCX document | |
| Annex 2 FORSATY other results.docx | DOCX document | |
| FORSATY final report.docx | DOCX document | |
| CSSP final report.docx | DOCX document | |
| Systems Workshop Notes.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum MS Morocco to STIP APS - Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| Addendum MS Morocco to STIP APS - Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| Appendix II - Concept Note Budget Template Inclusive Socio-Economic Development in MS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Appendix I - Concept Note Template Inclusive Socio-Economic Development in MS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum MS Morocco to STIP APS.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FORSATY Global Performance FY2013 to FY2019
Global Objective: Marginalized youth are integrated, productive citizens
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
POI.1 % of marginalized youth who, after exposure to project, are productively engaged m/f
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 60% |
| 53% |
| 60% |
| 53% |
| POI. 2: % of target youth who improve their score on the project Internal asset self-assessment (m/f) |
| 42% |
youth with negative perception
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 75% |
| 70% |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 75% |
| 38% |
| 73% |
| 54% |
| POI. 3: Proportion of target population reporting increased agreement with the concept that males and females should have equal access to social, economic and political opportunities |
| 59% |
Youth with positive perception
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 50% |
| 77% |
| 50% |
| 77% |
Sub-Purpose 1: Youth are full-fledged citizens in their neighborhoods and cities Outcome 1.1 Neighborhoods empower and bond youth
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.1 # of community improvement actions implemented by FORSATY implementing partners in collaboration with CBOs in target neighborhoods as a result of program support. |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 4 |
| 50 |
| 4 |
| 24 |
| 29 |
| 47 |
| 35 |
| 75 |
| 18 |
| 73 |
| 90 |
| 269 |
1.1.1 Youth are empowered through organized activities
| OTP.1 # of community youth leaders in target neighborhoods who participate in project supported training activities. (m/f) performance indicator for PPR starting FY18 |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 75 |
| 0 |
| 90 |
| 117 |
(24F; 26M)
| 105 |
| 134 |
(32F, 102M)
| 150 |
| 126 (44F, 82M) |
| 150 |
| 161 (58F, 103M) |
| 570 |
| 538 (158F, 380M) |
1.1.2 Youth have access to relevant opportunities and services
| OTP.2 # of target youth participating in community activities organized by FORSATY implementing partners who receive orientation, referral, counseling or and placement services. (m/f) (newly added starting FY17) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 150 |
| 298 |
(51F, 247M)
| 200 |
| 281 (53F, 288M) |
| 100 |
| 152 (09F, 143M) |
| 450 |
| 731 (113F, 618M) |
Outcome 1.2 Youth are engaged in their social and political environment
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.2 # of advocacy actions in favor of marginalized youth needs carried out by project supported community youth leaders |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 10 |
| 13 |
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 15 |
| 22 |
| 4 |
| 2 |
| 49 |
| 53 |
1.2.1 Disadvantaged youth develop a positive sense of belonging to their neighborhood and their city
1.2.2 Youth leaders take initiatives within the neighborhood
| OTP.3 # of youth who participate in community improvement actions and youth council outreach activities implemented with/by FORSATY implementing partners in collaboration with CBOs target neighborhoods. (m/f) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 150 |
| 704 |
(15F; 689M)
| 150 |
| 815 |
(113F; 702M)
| 620 |
| 1697 |
(421F, 1276M)
| 900 |
| 3699 (817F, 2882M) |
| 900 |
| 3048 (455F, 2593M) |
| 1820 |
| 9963 |
(455F, 2593M)
1.2.3 Youth councils maintain a dialogue with the authorities
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.2
Outcome 1.3 Powerholders are responsive to youth needs and proposals
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.3 # of policies created, modified or implemented taking into consideration community youth input. |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 11 |
| 8 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 22 |
| 13 |
1.3.1 Powerholders communicate and consult youth
1.3.2 Powerholders are committed to youth integration
| OTP.4 # of elected officials and local authorities who participate in project supported capacity building programs and public events |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 13 |
(03F, 10M)
| 25 |
| 10 (10M) |
| 25 |
| 56 (17F, 39M) |
| 15 |
| 26 (06F, 20M) |
| 100 |
| 105 |
(26F, 79M)
Sub-Purpose 2: CSOs are stronger, more efficient, improve methods, measure, communicate, develop partnerships and increasingly mobilize local resources Outcome 2.1 CSOs improve their organizational and technical capacities
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.4 # of FORSATY CSO implementing partners who improve their overall score in the Organizational Capacity Assessment (OCA) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 6 |
| 3 |
| 6 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
Consult report for OSSs OCA scores No OCA held in 2019 For FY15 and FY16 OSSs achieved more than 50% of their OCA plans this did not necessarily reflect on their overall score. The indicator was worded different lent back in 2015-2016
2.1.1 CSOs improve their organizational capacities
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.4
2.1.2 CSOs improve their technical capacities
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.4
2.1.3 CSOs better manage information, assess their performance and communicate regularly
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.4
Outcome 2.2 Marginalized youth are listened to, referred and accompanied by CSOs
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
OTC.5# of FORSATY CSO implementing partners who establish effective referral and orientation services (newly added starting FY17)
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
2.2.1 CSOs better identify, counsel, refer and accompany marginalized youth
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.5
2.2.2 CSOs network to provide an efficient referral system to youth
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by OTC.5
2.2.3 Youth have access to psycho-social services in the neighborhood
| OTP.5 # of youth who receive psycho-social services offered by FORSATY implementing partners (newly added starting FY17) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 1000 |
| 998 (511F, 487M) |
| 800 |
| 1390 (762F, 628M) |
| 400 |
| 664 (363F, 301M) |
| 2200 |
| 3052 (1636, 1416M) |
Outcome 2.3 CSOs actions are more sustainable
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.6 # of FORSATY CSO implementing partners who diversify their sources of funding for core project activities. |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 17 |
| 21 |
2.3.1 CSOs work closely with public services and private sector
2.3.2 CSOs increasingly mobilize public and private resources
| OTP.6 # of partnerships and/or agreements formed by FORSATY CSO implementing partners with the private and public sectors to reinforce services for at-risk youth (newly added starting FY17) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| NA |
| 4 |
| 12 |
| 4 |
| 26 |
| 2 |
| 27 |
| 10 |
| 65 |
Sub-Purpose 3: Schools retain and prepare marginalized youth for integration Outcome 3.1 Marginalized youth are better integrated in school
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.7 % of at-risk in-school youth having participated in project supported after school tutoring program whose grades improve (m/f) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 75% |
| 64% |
(Primary: 75%) (Secondary: 52%)
| 75% |
| 82% |
(Primary: 85%) (Secondary: 78%)
| 75% |
| 77% |
(Primary: 75% Secondary: 80%)
| 75% |
| 72% |
(Primary: 68% Secondary: 75%)
| 75% |
| 66% |
(Primary: 66% Secondary: 66%)
| 75% |
| 72% (Primary: 74% |
Secondary: 70%)
| OTP.7 # of CSO education staff, school administration and faculty and members of PTAs who receive training from the project m/f |
| 0 |
| 320 |
| 362 (98F, 264M) |
| 61 |
| 113 |
(31F, 82M)
| 71 |
| 150 |
(31F; 119M)
| 96 |
| 193 |
(73F, 120M)
| 106 |
| 273 (59F, 214M) |
| 30 |
| 248 (49F, 199M) |
| 684 |
| 1339 (341F, 998M) |
OTP.8 # of at-risk, in-school youth who attend FORSATY CSO implementing partners’ after school tutoring programs (m/f
| Primary: 5,24/10 Secondary 9,36/20 |
| 1600 |
| 2674 (1310F, 1364M) * |
| 1260 |
| 1779 |
(863F; 916M)
| 1375 |
| 1433 |
(714F; 719M)
| 1510 |
| 1183 |
(581F, 602M)
| 1310 |
| 2011 (1035F, 976M) |
| 1310 |
| 1338 (723F, 615M) |
| 8365 |
| 10 418 (5226F, 5191M) |
| OTP.9 # of school initiatives organized by target schools, PTAs, or other parent-involved school governance committees in partnership with FORSATY CSO implementing partners |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 29 |
| 42 |
| 38 |
| 170 |
| 55 |
| 124 |
| 60 |
| 77 |
| 20 |
| 51 |
| 202 |
| 464 |
Outcome 3.2 Schools and CSOs promote fulfillment and personal growth
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
3.2.1 Schools and CSOs offer opportunities for students with difficulties to express themselves and exchange
| OTP.10 # of teachers in target schools trained by project on “passport to success” life skills methodology m/f |
| 0 |
| NA |
| 48 |
(12F; 36M)
| 75 |
| 52 (18F; 34M) |
| 86 |
| 32 |
(12F; 20M)
| 32 |
| 21 |
(9F, 12M)
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 193 |
| 153 |
(51F, 102M)
3.2.2 Schools and CSOs strengthen students’ soft skills
| OTP.11 # of after school clubs that implement at least 6 life skills modules |
| 0 |
| NA |
| 19 |
| 35 |
| 30 |
| 57 |
| 27 |
| 27 |
| 31 |
| 30 |
| Unavailable |
| 30 |
| Unavailable |
| 179 |
| 107 |
3.2.3 Schools and CSOs build civic values
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving this output will be measured by POI 2
Sub-Purpose 4: Marginalized youth are trained and have access to decent jobs Outcome 4.1 Vocational initiation and training are better adapted to the needs of marginalized youth
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.8 # of target youth who are employed, self-employed or undertaking an internship |
| 0 |
| 400 |
| 476 (181F; |
295M)*
| 690 |
| 1 006 (379F; |
627M)*
| 759 |
| 1678 |
(580F; 1098M)
| 1130 |
| 1418 |
(447F, 971M)
| 900 |
| 1237 (369F, 868M) |
| 450 |
| 502 (190F, 312M) |
| 4329 |
| 6317 |
(2146F, 4171M)
4.1.1 Youth benefit from information, counseling and referral from CSOs and public services
| OTP.12 # of target youth who participate in FORSATY supported CSO and training center vocational orientation or job placement services. (m/f) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 2100 |
| 2299 (812F; 1487M) |
| 2310 |
| 3192 |
(1028F; 2164M)
| 3156 |
| 4122 |
(1474F, 2648M)
| 3000 |
| 5175 (2115F, 3060M) |
| 1500 |
| 3356 (1469F, 1887M) |
| 12066 |
| 18144 (6898F, 11246M) |
4.1.2 Youth benefit from appropriate training methods and develop their soft skills
| OTP.13 # of target youth participate in work readiness activities, life skills development programs, or/and entrepreneurship training programs. (m/f) |
| 0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| 425 |
| 1333 (517F; 816M)* |
| 470 |
| 2271 |
(793F; 1478M)
| 820 |
| 2011 |
(693F, 1318M)
| 686 |
| 1491 (552F, 939M) |
| 343 |
| 2040 (967F, 1073M) |
| 2744 |
| 9146 |
(3522F, 5624M)
4.1.3 Youth are accompanied through their training program and professional integration
| OTP. 14 # of target youth who complete a project supported vocational training program. (m/f) performance indicator for PPR |
| 0 |
| 320 |
| 374 (231F; 143M)* |
| 704 |
| 718 (447F; 271M)* |
| 774 |
| 978 |
(327F; 651M)
| 1113 |
| 932 (257F, 675M) |
| 800 |
| 658 (188F, 470M) |
| 400 |
| 557 (172F, 385M) |
| 4111 |
| 4217 |
(1622F; 2595M)
| OTP. 15# of CSO personnel and other training center trainers and other personnel who participate in project supported training, forums or round table meetings. |
| 0 |
| NA |
| 102 |
| 70 |
| 200 |
| 120 |
| 411 |
| 150 |
| 265 |
| 200 |
| 201 |
| 100 |
| 279 |
| 640 |
| 1458 |
Outcome 4.2 The private sector is engaged in favor of marginalized youth
| Indicator |
| Baseline |
| FY 14 |
| FY 15 |
| FY 16 |
| FY 17 |
| FY 18 |
| FY 19 |
| Global |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| T |
| A |
| OTC.9 # % of project supported training programs that form partnerships with employers (m/f) |
| 0 |
| 25 |
| 15 |
| 03 |
| 12 |
| 05 |
| 30 |
| 12 |
| 26 |
| 09 |
| 18 |
| 02 |
| 24 |
| 56 |
| 125 |
4.2.1 The private sector works closely with CSOs and contributes to their programs
4.2.2 Marginalized youth increasingly have access to decent jobs
No separate indicator proposed. Performance achieving these outputs will be measured by OTC. 6 and OTC.9
*NB: the gender disaggregation in marked indicators (*) was calculated based on the gender ratio extracted from the gender disaggregation reported by partner OSSs concerning enrolled youth. This methods was adopted because certain associations were still struggling with reporting exact gender disaggregation for marked indicators
10 FORSATY Global Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it.