9 - RFP CMc K Wing Addition _ Renovations Scoring Sheets.pdf

Page 1 of 1 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – Selection Criteria Interview Sheet

DELTA COLLEGE – K WING ADDITION & RENOVATIONS

Selection Criteria Interview Sheet (If interviews are required)

Rating Weight Score

1. Related project experience – firm 1

2. Related project experience – individuals 1

3. Compatibility of team (experience together) 1

4. Knowledge of local construction market 1

5. Project delivery 1

Management approach

Quality control

Schedule control

Innovation and flexibility

Interaction with Delta

6. LEED and commissioning methods and experience 1

7. Cost control methods and experience 1

8. Team capacity and availability to perform services 1

9. Viewer’s opinion of overall quality of Construction 3

Management services offered.

TOTAL SCORE

Potential Maximum Score = 55

The College reserves the right to revise the total score if, in our sole opinion, we believe that the results of one or more areas of review will impact the potential of the team effort beyond the weight given to those particular issues.

Scoring shall range from 1 = Unacceptable to 5 = Highly Qualified or Highly Acceptable

Total scores and references will both be reviewed. It is at the sole discretion of the selection committee to judge the perceived quality of services. All cost proposals will be opened and the College will choose to negotiate with one of the firms. If no agreement can be reached the College will negotiate with the next most satisfactory firm until a firm is selected.

Page 1 of 1 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – Technical Proposal Scoring Sheet

Technical Proposal Scoring Sheet

Rating Weight Score

A. Project Team

1. General history of working together successfully 1

2. Viewers overall impression of team capabilities 1

B. Firm Experience as Shown by Direct Experience of Individual Team Members

1. Construction, construction management experience 1 and capabilities

2. Cost estimating experience and capabilities 1

3. LEED and commissioning experience 1

C. Project Delivery

1. Cost control approach 1

2. Preconstruction phase approach 1

3. Continuity of team throughout project and 1 division of work

D. Team capacity 1

E. Litigation history 1

TOTAL SCORE

Potential Maximum Score = 50

The College reserves the right to revise the total score if, in our sole opinion, we believe that the results of one or more areas of review will impact the potential of the team effort beyond the weight given to those particular issues.

Page 1 of 2 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – CMc Selection Criteria for Scoring Sheets

CMc Selection Criteria for Scoring Sheets

General Scoring Range (all items scored on a scale of 1 to 5)

5 Highly Qualified

4 Qualified

3 Adequate

2 Minimally Acceptable

1 Not Acceptable

Item Specific Scoring Ranges

A. Project Team

General history:

5 Majority of team worked on many examples

3 Majority of team worked on a few examples

1 Majority of team worked on 0 – 1 examples

B. Firm Experience

Construction, construction management experience:

5 Several successful examples with same team

3 A few successful examples with same team members

1 Limited expertise

Cost estimating:

5 Excellent history, fully dedicated staff

3 History, staff dedicated part-time

1 Limited expertise and/or history with problems

LEED and Commissioning Experience:

5 Several successful examples with same team

3 A few successful examples with same team members

1 Limited expertise

Page 2 of 2 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – CMc Selection Criteria for Scoring Sheets

C. Project Delivery

Cost control:

5 Excellent plan, well trained staff, cost control efforts that work

3 Good plan, well trained staff

1 Limited plan and/or new staff or devoted part-time

Preconstruction phase approach and deliverables:

5 Excellent plan, deliverables well defined and of high quality

3 Good plan, weakness perceived in an area

1 Plan and deliverables are lacking in definition

Continuity of team:

5 All team members, expert consultants and individuals retained throughout most of project

3 Key individuals retained throughout the initial phases of the project

1 No assurance of key player retention

D. Team Capacity

5 All team members, expert consultants and individuals available for project assignments.

3 Key individuals available for specific assignments

1 No assurance of key individual’s availability

E. Litigation history:

5 Legal difficulties with clients in last five (5) years either nonexistent or not troubling in nature

3 Minor legal difficulties existed

1 Evidence of any pattern of legal difficulties or an issue of a more serious nature exists.

Page 1 of 2 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – Reference Rating Sheets

Reference Rating Sheet

Date

CMc Firm Reviewer’s Initials

Project Name/Description

Project Size/Cost

Project Completion Date

Owner

Contact Position

Telephone Number

5 4 3 2 1

Exc Good Avg Fair Poor

Does reference project have strong similarities to our project or a portion of our project? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Is age of project appropriate for reference? (Complete and used is best, but not too old.) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Were team members the same as proposed team members? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Key players (firms and individuals):

Were you satisfied with the key individuals assigned to your job? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Did the contractor do an outstanding job in trying to keep the project on schedule? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Page 2 of 2 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – Reference Rating Sheets

5 4 3 2 1

Exc Good Avg Fair Poor

Were budget and cost controls well planned and on target? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

What is your overall impression of the CMc’s work on this project? Did they respond well to your needs and requests? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Did the individuals work well with others and communicate openly? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Did the CMc, or individuals, cooperate well or were many issues turned into "extras"? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

What is your overall evaluation of the CMc’s work on this project? ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

AVERAGE SCORE

Page 1 of 1 – Delta College – K Wing Addition & Renovations – Final Rating Sheets

Final Rating Sheet

Score

Interview Rating (If Required – Maximum Score 55)

Technical Proposal Rating (Maximum Score 55)

Reference Rating – Average Score x 14 =

(Maximum Score 70)

(Each reference contact to be rated from 1 to 5, with 1 being acceptable and 5 being highly pleased with applicant’s efforts and proved to be highly relevant)

TOTAL SCORE:

Maximum Score: 180

Both Total Scores and Cost Proposals will be reviewed. It is at the sole discretion of the Steering

Committee to judge the perceived value of services offered versus cost. While quality of services will be most important, both aspects will be considered when choosing a Construction Manager as

Constructor with whom to negotiate a contract.

FINAL RATING

Total

CMc Total Score Score Rank Total Cost

Final Rank