70RCSA21R00000003-3-Past Performance Questionnaire 06252021.pdf
PDF 227 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70RCSA21R00000003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing Priority Services Scientific, Engineering, and Technical Assistance to the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The questionnaire solicits ratings on quality of service, timeliness of performance, business relations, and cost control for an incumbent contractor. Respondents are to evaluate the contractor's compliance, personnel capabilities, reliability, flexibility, and other performance metrics using a scale of outstanding, good, acceptable, and unsatisfactory. Comments are requested to support very high or very low ratings. The completed questionnaire must be returned by July 25, 2021 to aid in the evaluation of proposal number 70RCSA21R00000003 for PS-SETA services.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3: Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP 70RCSA21R00000003
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PRIORITY SERVICES SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
(PS-SETA)
Please complete the following questionnaire and return to the attention of:
Karen Ma Contract Specialist Phone: (202) 447-0203 Email: Karen.Ma@hq.dhs.gov
No later than 10:00 AM Eastern Time on July 25, 2021.
This survey pertains to:
Contractor Information:
Contractor Name:
Contract Number (#):
Contract Type:
Contract Period of Performance this Survey Covers:
Contract Total (including all Option Periods):
General description of products/services required under the contract:
Survey Filler Information:
Name of Person Completing Survey:
Your Role in this Contract:
Your Company/Agency:
Address:
Telephone:
mailto:Karen.Ma@hq.dhs.gov
Date of Survey Completion:
Signature of Survey Filler:
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support very high or very low rating should be noted on page 4.
Assign each area a rating of, 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), and 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Overall quality of service
1 2 3 4 N/A
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. Reliability
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Responsive to technical direction
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Effective management, including subcontracts
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Notification of problems
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Flexibility
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Pro-active vs reactive
COST CONTROL
1. Current, accurate and complete billings
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Cost efficiencies
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction.
a. Contractor Management Personnel
Yes No (circle one)
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel
Yes No (circle one)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Rating Guidelines
QUALITY OFPRODUCT
OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL TIMELINESS OF
PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4 - Outstanding Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective
3 - Good Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
2 - Acceptable Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedules
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
1 - Unsatisfactory Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .