RFP Questions Mobile X-Ray inspection van consolidated.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mobile X-Ray Van Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70B03C21R00000072
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70B03C21R00000072 A00002Final.pdf | ||
| 70B03C21R00000072 A00001Final.pdf | ||
| Mobile X-Ray Inspection Van Appendix A .pdf | ||
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 70B03C21R00000072.pdf | ||
| 70B03C21R00000072 Mobile X-Ray Van SOW.pdf | ||
| 70B03C21R00000072 Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 70B03C21R00000072
| Document | Paragraph | |||||
| No. | Page | |||||
| No.(s) | Question Category | |||||
| (Contracts or Technical) | Question/Comment | Responses | ||||
| Statement of Work | 3.1.1 - Row 28 | 11 of 62 | Technical | "System shall be branded in accordance with US CBP Branding Guidelines". Will the vehicle branding be provided by CBP or by Contractor? | Guidelines will be provided,not the actual branding. | |
| Statement of Work | 3.1.1 - Row 28 | 11 of 62 | Technical | Please provide a copy of the US CBP Branding Guidelines. | CBP will provide guidelines. | |
| Statement of Work | DID A007 Operator Training | 53 of 62 | Technical | Would CBP accept access to online eLearning in lieu of an "Operator Training Video" DVD's? This allows Contractor to provide CBP with continuously updated material.Also, CBP field offices have communicated that they often don't have DVD drives onsite anymore. | Yes. To be discussed following award. | |
| Statement of Work | DID A007 Operator Training | 53 of 62 | Technical | Please confirm that the Operator and Instructor training will be conducted during the same Training session. | To be discussed after award. | |
| SOW | Technical | Would the government consider a general 5% or 10% increase in the weight/dimension requirements or do mission critical needs exist which would make any system that is larger/heavier than outlined in the SOW unfit for use? | No. | |||
| SOW | 1) Gross Vehicle Weight Rating: Not to exceed 9,500 lbs | 10 | Technical | Gross vehicle weight rating of 9500 lbs. Would a gross vehicle weight of 11,500 lbs be acceptable or are there mission critical needs requiring a weight of 9500 lbs? | No- we are maintaining the threshold of 9,500 lbs. | |
| RFP | 1) Offerors must provide objective evidence, including a video submission, that the proposed |
system meets each of the above conditions, and is currently ready, deployable and will not
| require additional engineering development effort | technical | These systems are "made to order" and, therefore, producing videos is somewhat of a challenge. Would pictures be acceptable instead of a video? | Video is required. | |||
| SOW | Technical | What does the government intend to screen with these systems? Assuming it will be personal effects, baggage, etc., will the 24mm of steel penetration be adequate? | See Purpose Section of the SOW: "Passenger baggage and parcels." | |||
| SOW | Assuming all characterisctics outlined in the SOW are met, would the government consider a truck as opposed to a van? | Truck is acceptable if it meets dimensions requirements. | ||||
| RFP | Technical | Would the government consider extending the 19 August due date realizing the Q&A will impact our bid/no-bid decision? | The submission due date remains unchaned. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .