WI_ERFO_2016-1(4)_-_Design_Scoping_Report_-_Signed_Redacted.pdf

WI ERFO FS 2016-1(4)

DESIGN SCOPING REPORT

for

Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Sawyer, Ashland, and Bayfield Counties Wisconsin

United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service

Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division

Sterling, Virginia June, 2017

DESIGN SCOPING REPORT

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Purpose and Need for the Project

1. General Project Description and Nature of Work (see attached Location Map):

Summary:

Heavy rains on July 11, 2016 resulted in numerous roadway, culvert, and bridge washouts on roadways within the Chequamegon – Nicolet National Forest (CNNF) in Bayfield, Ashland, and Sawyer counties in Wisconsin. Temporary repair work for many of these roads has been performed by the Forest and local municipalities. Damage Survey Reports (DSR) from an Emergency Relief of Federally Owned Roads (ERFO) were performed by FHWA and the Forest in August of 2016 and a Scoping Field Trip was performed in June of 2017. Several sites were identified within the DSRs and were broken into four separate projects. This project consists of roadway repair work such as aggregate resurfacing, ditch repair, and small culvert replacement that requires minimal design and can be delivered in an expedited manner.

For sites latitude and longitude coordinates, see the attached Scoping Cost Estimates.

Within the DSR names, individual damage sites are identified using the following convention for the first character: B = Bridge, C = Culvert, S = Stream, large drainage structure, T = Trail, and W = Washout.

The following DSR descriptions include all the sites from the original DSRs at which work is still required as of June 2016. Sites which work has been completed, partially completed, or found unnecessary are also included:

1) DSR W2/W3/W60/W61/C38/C5/S2-FS187-C

2) DSR C33/W1B/W42/W2B/W3B/C32/W4B/W5B/W6B/W7B/W12B/W13B/W14B/W15B-

FS390-E (Determined W3B, W5B(pipe), W12B, W14B, W15B, C32(pipe), and C33(pipe) work was completed by the FS during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

3) DSR W103-FS185-D

4) DSR W40-FS387-B

5) DSR W4-FS188-B

6) DSR W52-FS1383-D (Determined no work required during June 2017 Scoping Field

Trip)

7) DSR C41/C18/C19-FS196-C (Determined C18, and C19 work was completed by the FS during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

8) DSR W1-FS184-B

9) DSR C42/W34-FS253-C

10) DSR W8B/W68/W9B/W10B/W11B-FS604-E (Determined ALL work was completed by the FS at all sites except ditch reconditioning during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

11) DSR C24-FS204-D (Determined no work required during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

12) DSR W11A/W12A/W51/W15A/W16A/C29-FS378-H

13) DSR W1A/W2A/W3A/W4A/W5A/W35-FS376-H

14) DSR W36/W6A/W7A/W8A/W9A/W10A/B3/W7C/W8C/C6C/W9C-FS377-H

(Determined all work were completed by the FS during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip, except W9A, C6C, and W9C)

15) DSR W11/W12/W13/C15/C16-FS194-C

16) DSR W25/W26-FS207-B (Determined no work required during June 2017 Scoping Field

Trip)

17) DSR W39-FS383-D (FS 383 may be decommissioned by the FS)

18) DSR W95-FS371-D

19) DSR W96-FS373-D (Determined no work required during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

20) DSR T1/T2-Trail D Northeast of Drummond and West of FS811

21) DSR W31-FS228-D

22) DSR W48/W49-FS396-D

23) DSR W33-FS231-C

24) DSR S8/W22/S9/C23A-FS202-H (During June 2017 Scoping Field Trip, FS said work at

S8 will be completed prior to October 31, 2017)

25) DSR S5/W9/W10-FS192-H (Damage Survey Report: W10 work had been completed)

26) DSR C30/C31/W37-FR379E (Work removed from this project)

27) DSR C1C/W4C/C2C/C3C/W5C/C4C/W6C/W81/C5C-FS384-E

28) DSR C25/W30/W29/W28/W13A/W27/W14A-FS213-H (Determined C25 work was completed by the FS during June 2017 Scoping Field Trip)

29) DSR W44-FS392-C

30) DSR C37-FS1730-D (Work removed from this project)

Objective:

Repair/replace all major washouts of roadways and culverts not yet worked on by the Forest or local municipalities. Provide preventative solutions at certain sites such as roadway realignment, walls, and placed riprap, to prevent future roadway washouts. Provide additional aggregate surface course, embankment, ditch reconditioning, and culvert installation to those roadways to provide permanent solutions to those roadways that have already received temporary repairs.

Scope of Work

The following DSR scopes of work only include all the sites from the original DSRs at which work is still required as of June 2016. Sites which work has been completed or found unnecessary are not included:

1) DSR FS187-C (W2/W3/W60/W61/C38/C5/S2) Small stream culvert replacement, roadway asphalt and aggregate base, roadway culvert replacement/cleaning, shoulder/ditch washout repair, and additional aggregate surface: Replace, clean, and add riprap to existing roadway culverts, repair shoulder/ditch washouts, and add additional aggregate surface as directed by the CO.

2) DSR FS390-E (C33/W1B/W42/W2B/C32/W4B/W5B/W6B/W7B/W13B) Most roadway washouts temporarily fixed. Jack hammer rock from travelway at site C32. Replace, clean, and add riprap to existing roadway culverts, repair shoulder/ditch washouts, and add additional embankment and aggregate surface as directed by the CO.3)

3) DSR FS185-D (W103) Potter Lake Access Road: Roadway culvert replacement/cleaning, shoulder/ditch washout repair, and additional aggregate surface: Replace, clean, and add riprap to existing roadway culverts, repair shoulder/ditch washouts, and add additional embankment and aggregate surface as directed by the CO.

4) DSR FS387-B (W40) Most roadway washouts already fixed by Forest and/or local municipalities. Repair shoulder/ditch washouts and add additional aggregate surface course and riprap at culvert outlets as directed by the CO.

5) DSR FS188-B (W4) Most roadway washouts already fixed by Forest and/or local municipalities. Repair shoulder/ditch washouts and add additional aggregate surface course and riprap at culvert outlets as directed by the CO.

6) DSR FS196-C (Milepost 0.2) Roadway culvert removal and replacement and additional aggregate surface course as directed by the CO.

7) DSR FS184-B (W1) Add additional aggregate surface as directed by the CO. Some minor shoulder/ditch washout work.

8) DSR FS253-C (C42/W34) Provide roadway culvert cleaning and additional riprap. Add aggregate surface course and embankment, and perform ditch reconditioning as directed by the CO.

9) DSR FS604-E (W8B/W68/W9B/W10B/W11B) Provide ditch reconditioning and erosion control as directed by the CO.

10) DSR FS378-H (W11A/W12A/W51/W15A/W16A/C29) Roadway pipe culvert replacement, riprap placement, excavation and embankment, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

11) DSR FS376-H (W1A/W2A/W3A/W4A/W5A/W35) Roadway excavation and embankment, roadbed reconditioning, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

12) DSR FS377-H (W9A/C6C/W9C) New pipe culvert installation at roadway low point (W9A), existing pipe culvert cleaning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

13) DSR FS194-C (W11/W12/W13/C15/C16) Roadway pipe culvert replacement and riprap placement, existing pipe culvert cleaning, excavation and embankment, roadbed reconditioning, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

14) DSR FS371-D (W95) Roadway excavation and embankment, roadbed reconditioning, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the

CO.

15) DSR TRAIL D (T1/T2) Trail pipe culvert replacement, riprap placement, excavation and embankment, roadbed reconditioning, slope stabilization, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

16) DSR FS228-D (W31) Roadbed reconditioning and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

17) DSR FS396-D (W48/W49) Roadway excavation and embankment, roadbed reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

18) DSR FS231-C (W33) Repair shoulder washouts.

19) DSR FS202-H (W22/S9/C23A) Roadway pipe culvert replacements and riprap placements, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

20) DSR FS192-H (S5/W9) Roadway pipe culvert replacement (W9), asphalt pavement patch reconstruction (S5 and W9), ditch reconditioning (W9), and riprap placement on roadway sideslope (S5).

21) DSR FS384-E (C1C/W4C/C2C/C3C/W5C/C4C/W6C/W81/C5C) Pipe culvert cleaning, riprap placement, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

22) DSR FS213-H (W30/W29/W28/W13A/W27/W14A) Roadway pipe culvert replacement, pipe culvert cleaning, riprap placement, ditch reconditioning, and 6-inch aggregate surface course placement as directed by the CO.

23) DSR FS392-C (W44) Place 6-inch aggregate surface course as directed by the CO.

Alternatives None required.

2. Major Issues and Concerns:

1) The construction season is limited from May 1 to December 3. We are also anticipating trout stream restrictions from September 15 to May 15.

2) Several roads within the forest are closed. The forest itself is in a remote area.

Considering these two factors, the contractor’s project construction scheduling and sequencing will be very important in order to complete all work within the Forest in the shortest amount of time.

3. Relevant Project History

See Summary in I.A.1.

B. Project Identification

Type: 3R, ERFO Repairs Award Fiscal Year: 2018 Partner Agency: Forest Service Maintaining Agency: Forest Service and Towns Unit Name: Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Counties: Ashland, Bayfield, and Sawyer State: Wisconsin Region: Northeast

Road Name and Route ID Number: Numerous Forest Service (FS) roads, see I.A.1. Summary above.

GPS Coordinates START: Numerous Forest Service (FS) roads, see I.A.1. Scope of Work above.

GPS Coordinates END: Numerous Forest Service (FS) roads, see I.A.1. Scope of Work above.

Length: Approximately 15 miles Functional Classification: LEVEL 4 System Designation: FS

Road is ON NOT ON the NHS.

Design Speed: 45 mph

Source: Forest Personnel Special Use: Trails restrict highway vehicles. Some less traveled roads are for seasonal use only.

Terrain: Flat Rolling Mountainous Number of Lanes: [Roads = 2, Trails = 1], Divided Undivided Shoulders: Full Partial None Shoulder Type: Paved Unpaved Turf N/A Major Intersecting Roads: Numerous Forest Service (FS) roads, see I.A.1. Summary above

II. PROJECT FUNDING

A. Basis of Funding: ERFO

Check all that apply:

Partner Estimate Available Funds EFLHD Preliminary Design Estimate Programmed Estimate Engineering Study Report

B. Breakdown/Comparison of Funding (see attached Scoping Review Engineering Estimates)

III. AVAILABLE DATA

A. As-Builts/Reports

1. As-Builts exist? YES NO

2. Final Construction Report? YES NO

3. Bridge Inspection Report? YES NO

4. Right-of-Way Plans? YES NO

5. Engineering Study Report? YES NO

6. LiDar Data? YES NO

7. Aerial Mapping? YES NO

Date: TBD Source: Forest Service

8. Utility Mapping? YES NO

9. Other Associated Reports/Studies/Plans?

YES NO

Report Title/Description: Drainage Area

.shp Files Date:

Source:

Report Title/Description:

Date:

Source:

B. Traffic Data

1. Roadways and Incidental Roads Posted Speed Limit: Speed limit not posted on most roads. 45 mph where posted.

Operating Speed: 45 mph: Observed Anticipated Reported Recent ADT: Varies, estimated range of 5-100 veh/day Design ADT: 9-180 veh/day (2047) Source(s): Forest Service Estimate, per 6/28/17 teleconference

2. Are there existing or proposed/relocated Traffic Count Stations within the limits of the project?

3. Crash Data available? YES NO

Comparative Rate Available? YES NO

C. Type of Survey: Roadway Stationing Ground Survey Aerial Mapping SUE Cadastral Survey

D. Photographs taken? YES (see attached) NO

Source: EFL Highway Design

E. Is Road Inventory Program data (video, etc.) available? YES NO

F. Quad Map: Ashland East and Ashland West (Wisconsin)

Source: USGS

IV. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS

A. Roadway Alignment/Typical Sections

1. Any realignment or grade changes?

YES NO?

2. Typical Sections (see attached)

Road Name and Route ID Number:

Numerous Forest Service (FS) roads, see I.A.1. Summary above.

Is lane widening required?

B. Special Purpose Use/Areas

1. Attractions/Other Developments of Concerns:

Are there any roadside developments such as point of attractions, visitor centers, motorist facilities, lodging, private property access, or other notable development that might affect design decisions?

YES NO

2. Off-Street and Pull-Off Parking Areas

Are existing parking layouts and configurations in need of improvement?

3. Visitor Amenities

Will any picnic areas, entrance gates, concession areas, rest areas, bus shelters, etc. be required?

4. Accommodation for the Disabled

Are additional improvements needed to meet US Access Board standards (street crossings, wheelchair accessible ramps, truncated domes, pedestrian signals, trail access, etc.)?

C. Safety

1. Traffic Compliance

Are there reports of traffic not obeying with signs and other traffic regulations?

There are reports of vehicles traveling beyond “road closed” signs.

Are there reports of traffic speeding?

Forest personnel observe many vehicles speeding.

2. Seasonal Traffic

Is the project in a high recurring or seasonal traffic area?

YES NO

Peak seasonal traffic in the Forest is between mid-summer to late fall, for the color tour and hunting season. However, ADT is still expected to be well below 400 vehicles per day which is the threshold for the application of the AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads.

3. Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodation

Are there pedestrian/bicycle activities?

There are pedestrian and bicycle activities, but not enough to require accommodation.

Are there any concerns with the interaction between vehicles and pedestrian/bicyclists?

Pedestrians/hikers should be able to walk around work on trails.

4. Roadside Safety

Are clear zone guidelines met along all roadways within the project limits, for adjacent and opposing traffic?

Per the AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads, the minimum clear zone is 0-6 feet on low volume roads.

Are roadside/median barriers and sign supports that are located within the clear zone crashworthy?

Per the Forest, the guardrail does not meet standards but is not within the scope of an ERFO project to replace them. Per the Forest, sign supports located within the clear zone are the breakaway type and are therefore crashworthy.

5. Sight Distances

Are there adequate stopping sight distances along the roadway?

YES NO

While there were several locations observed that likely do not meet stopping sight distance requirements, improvements are outside the scope of ERFO-funded work.

Are there safe opportunities for vehicle passing; are passing sight distances adequate?

All roads observed during the scoping trip were very low volume roads with no centerline markings.

Vehicle passing marking improvements are not appropriate for these roads and are outside the scope of ERFO-funded work.

Are there adequate sight distances (stopping, decision, approaching and departing) at intersections?

While there were several locations observed that likely do not meet intersection sight distance requirements, improvements are outside the scope of ERFO-funded work.

6. Traffic Control Devices/Barriers

Are existing traffic control devices adequate, properly located, and visible? Are they functionally meeting current and anticipated traffic conditions?

YES NO

If the scope of the project is 3-R and the profile of the roadway(s) is raised, will the height of roadside and median barriers need to be corrected?

YES NO

Is the guardrail height less than 27 inches?

7. Pavement Edge Are existing pavement edge drop-offs, and future drop-offs created by the project, less than 2-inches in height?

YES NO

8. Railroad Crossings

Are there any railroad crossings along the route?

YES NO

There is a railroad crossing along FS184. However, no work is anticipated along or adjacent to the railroad crossing.

D. Historical, Natural, Architectural, or Aesthetic Controlling Features:

1. Historical Features Any existing historic structures and features that must be considered in this project? (attach photos)

YES NO

An archaeological monitor will be required to monitor for archaeological impacts during construction.

The Forest has requested that these services be included in the construction contracts as a pay item.

2. Natural Features Any existing unique natural features (e.g., vistas, view shed, vegetation) outside the limits of pavement, that define the context of the roadway environment that should be preserved or avoided? (attach photos)

YES NO

3. Architectural/Aesthetic

Any special architectural, decorative or aesthetic aspects to be incorporated in the design (e.g. stone masonry guardwall, stone curb)?

YES NO

The Forest stated that while they have an aesthetic preference for rounded river rock rip rap, they understand and accept using an angular rip rap for this project because angular rip rap is a more effective stabilization material.

E. Permanent Traffic Management

Describe any special permanent signing considerations, special signs, sign supports, traffic signal requirements, or changes in traffic patterns

None required.

F. Temporary Traffic Management

1. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic

Can the roadway(s) be closed to traffic?

YES NO

Most roads can be closed for a short period if warranted by cost or schedule savings. Contractor is responsible for proposing detour to Forest at least two weeks in advance so that the Forest can coordinate bus and timber routes accordingly. Roads that are closed due to impassible conditions at the time of construction may remain closed

Are lane closures required to perform the work?

Lane closures will be utilized as appropriate during construction.

Will the road(s) be open to all types of traffic without restrictions of use?

Project contractor must coordinate with timber sales contractors to phase and schedule work.

Will work be restricted by time/day to accommodate traffic, e.g., rush hours, weekends and holidays?

Work will not be allowed on holidays. Work will generally be allowed at night and on the weekends.

The Forest may identify weekend work restrictions for certain roads during the peak visitor season.

Are traffic detours necessary?

Detours will only be required for roads that are not currently closed to traffic and that require a full closure of more than 24 hours.

2. Transportation Management during Construction

What type of Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will the project include? (traffic control strategies/operational improvements/public information) be required to address traffic operations and/or travel recreation affected during construction?)

Basic Intermediate Significant All repair sites within the projects are along rural, low-volume roads. The TMPs for the projects are anticipated to be basic.

2.1 Where is the project located?

Rural and/or remote area (See 2.2) Urban (See table below and identify TMP type based on ADT)

2.2 Is there a commuter road within the project limits and/or residential or commercial development near the site?

YES (See table below) NO (Then a basic TMP is sufficient)

G. Adjacent/Previous/Future Projects

1. Current Projects Is this project part of a series of projects or a completion of a defaulted Contract?

YES NO

This Design Scoping Report is intended to cover project 1(4) derived from the Damage Survey Reports (DSRs) identified in the ERFO Program of Projects (POP) for the WI ERFO 2016 event.

Are there any other current projects, under design or construction, by any agency, which may affect or be affected by this project?

YES NO

The Forest and the local towns have already completed some of the work that was initially requested in the ERFO POP. There is a chance that some of the remaining work may be completed by another entity prior to starting construction on these projects.

2. Previous Projects

Have there been any construction problems on previous or similar projects?

3. Future Projects

Are there any future projects or connections to be made by others, which will affect or be affected by traffic patterns or operations associated with this project?

H. Work Limitations

1. Time Restrictions

Would there be any construction activity or time/sequence restrictions (e.g. no blasting on weekends, or must complete project in phases)?

YES NO

There is a possibility, although unlikely, of blasting at a location on FS390 where there is exposed bedrock in the travelway.

2. Access/Staging

Any access or staging restrictions for construction equipment?

YES NO

Stockpiling materials in old Forest Service gravel pits will not be allowed due to concerns for the wood turtle habitat. Stockpiling materials will not be allowed in wetlands.

Provide locations of borrow pits, stone quarries or any other material sources, and describe any access restrictions to them.

Commercial borrow pits and quarries are available outside of the Forest. Forest Service normally pays about $30/CY for aggregate.

Any partner/owner restrictions or preferences regarding the location of staging areas or project engineer’s field office?

Is the partner agency able to provide office space for the project engineer?

Office space for the project engineer may be available either in Hayward or Glidden. Project Engineer to make a trip several weeks in advance of the project start for a “dry run” to ensure that all information systems (phones, internet, DOT network access) work properly.

I. Geotechnical

1. Drilling Access:

Do we have drilling access to the project?

Will existing roads or trails provide access?

Can tree clearing for drilling access be avoided?

Is drilling allowed without any permits, agreements, or easements?

YES to all of the above NO to any of the above

2. Geological Features Are there any obvious geological features on the project (sinkholes, slides, bogs or muck, standing water, wetlands, etc.)?

YES NO

Wetlands were observed in the field. Wetlands delineation surveys will be conducted at appropriate locations.

J. Pavements

Section deleted, nearly all roads are aggregate.

K. Structures

1. Describe any existing structures (retaining walls, tunnels etc.) on the project (attach photos).

None.

2. Describe any existing bridges or box culverts over water, over roadways, or over something else.

3. Is there existing abutment, pier or channel scour (attach photos)?

4. Describe any bridges that will need to have the substructure constructed or replaced or rehabilitated. Can bridge(s) be replaced on existing foundations? Give approximate length and width of the bridge(s), number of foundations (existing and/or proposed). Any special structural features, unusual loads or unusual span lengths anticipated?

5. Will any miscellaneous structures (tunnels, box culverts, building, etc.) be required? Will retaining walls be required?

YES NO

None.

L. Hydraulics

1. Any existing drainage problems or needed improvements (attach photos)?

YES NO

Washouts will be replaced in kind to current standard.

2. Any extensive channel stabilization required? Existing unstable stream banks (fallen trees, exposed, sloughing banks etc.)? (attach photos)

YES NO

Some locations may require riprap channel stabilization but nothing extensive.

3. Any floodplain(s) regulated by FEMA?

Floodplain encroached by roadway fill?

Will the existing profile grade be raised within a floodplain?

YES to any NO to all

4. Any overriding (i.e. superseding our design manual) local or state requirements on bridge overtopping, backwater, freeboard, design floods, hydrologic methods, erosion control, or floodplain regulations known?

YES NO

Forest prefers use of erosion control rolls rather than silt fence.

Identify state erosion control specifications and manuals.

The FS has E&SC supplements to the FP03.

5. Is a water quality monitoring program necessary?

[Describe your answer in detail and cite your sources]

Are permanent Storm Water Quality or Storm Water Quantity treatments required?

M. Environmental

1. Environmental task and requirements are identified in the following table:

TASK REQUIRED?

COMPLETED

BY:

CONTACT PERSON

(Provide full contact info in

Section S)

NEPA Document

Type of NEPA Document Anticipated:

EA

(decommissi oned roads, Marengo River

Stabilization , others)

CE (all other locations)

EFLHD

FS

Determined by:

Lisa Landers EFLHD / Environmental Specialist

Ginger Molitor FS Environmental Specialist

FWS - Section 7 Concurrence

Are there any threatened/endangered species in the project area?

Is a Biological Assessment required?

TBD

EFLHD for work covered under EA, FS for work covered under

CE

Lisa Landers EFLHD / Environmental Specialist

Ginger Molitor FS Environmental Specialist

SHPO - 106 Concurrence

Are any sites/properties within the project area on or eligible for listing on the National Historic Register?

Is a Cultural Resource Survey required (Will the project impact previously undisturbed land)?

EFLHD for work covered under

EA, FS for work covered under

CE

Lisa Landers EFLHD / Environmental Specialist

Ginger Molitor FS Environmental Specialist

TASK REQUIRED?

COMPLETED

BY:

CONTACT PERSON

(Provide full contact info in

Section S)

Floodplains, Waters of the U.S., and Wetlands

Is any work occurring in a 100-year floodplain?

Is any work occurring in a stream or river?

Is the stream or river utilized for boating?

Will there be any work in wetlands?

Yes

EFLHD with assistance from

FS

Kevin Rose

Team Lead

Erosion and Sediment Control Will more than 1 acre of ground be disturbed?

Stormwater Are we adding any new impervious areas (pavement) or changing the existing roadway drainage (e.g. adding curb where curb did not previously exist)?

Other Concerns

Are there any seasonal construction restrictions due to trout waters, nesting seasons, hunting seasons, visitation, etc.?

Are there any recent environmental documents that we can use for reference?

Yes, See I.A.2

No

Hazardous Waste

Is there any known or possible hazardous waste on the project? (lead paint, asbestos, underground storage tanks, unidentified 55 gallon barrels, abandoned buildings, etc.)

No

Section 4(f) Is the road/facility on, adjacent to, or providing access to Federal lands?

Yes FS land EFLHD

2. Initiation and implementation of sustainable practices are listed in the attached Sustainability Checklist.

N. Right-of-Way/Federal Lands Transfer

ROW contact person(s) is listed in Section S.

1. Are right-of-ways or easements needed?

Do ROW plans need to be prepared?

2. Is a RR Permit or Special Highway Occupancy Permit required for the project?

O. Utilities

Utility contact person(s) listed in Section S.

1. List existing utilities:

Ditching and culvert replacement may impact existing utilities. Utility locations to be added as project progresses.

2. Does the partner have an agreement in place with a locating service to locate underground utilities?

YES NO One Call is required prior to ground disturbing activities.

Will any utilities need to be relocated or avoided?

Any special considerations regarding utilities (i.e. any hazardous or environmentally-sensitive situations, any time restrictions on the interruption of utility service, any security-sensitive utilities, etc.)?

Any existing utility agreements between the roadway owner and utility owner? Who has prior rights?

YES NO To be determined during design.

P. Applicable Design Standards/Regulations

1. For each roadway, identify the applicable highway design standard in accordance with Section 4.4 and 9.1.2 of the FLH Project Development and Design Manual.

AASHTO “Green Book” (2011)

MUTCD (2009)

AASHTO Roadside Design Guide (2011) AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT < or equal to 400) (2001)

2. Will local or state design procedures be used on this project?

Q. Technology Delivery (TD)

1. Identify or recommend potential highway engineering (e.g., methods, materials) TD items to be incorporated in this project. Are any items or products eligible for funding under the Coordinated Technology Implementation Program (CTIP)?

N/A

2. Identify or recommend potential highway operational (e.g., ITS technologies) TD items to be incorporated in this project. Are any items or products eligible for funding under the Coordinated Technology Implementation Program (CTIP) or other special category funding, e.g., PRP Category III?

N/A

EDC INITIATIVE

www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/

CONSIDERED

FOR THIS

PROJECT

(Check if applicable)

NOT CONSIDERED

(provide reasoning)

EDC INITIATIVE

www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/

CONSIDERED

FOR THIS

PROJECT

(Check if applicable)

NOT CONSIDERED

(provide reasoning)

Innovative Bridge Design and Construction

Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil – Integrated Bridge System

Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems

Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Slide-in Bridge Construction Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Ultra High Performance Concrete Connections for PBES

Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Intersection and Interchange Geometrics

Displaced Left Turns/Variations Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Roundabouts or Mini Roundabouts Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Diverging Diamond Interchange Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Innovative Pavement Methods

Intelligent Compaction Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

High Friction Surface Treatment Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Safety Edge Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Warm Mix Asphalt

Other

Three-Dimensional Modeling Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Programmatic Agreements Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Implementing Quality Environmental Documentation

Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Geospatial Data Collaboration Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Innovative Contracting

Construction Manager/General Contractor Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Design Build Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

Alternative Technical Concepts Not applicable to project scope or ERFO funding

V. RISK MANAGEMENT

See attached Risk Management Register

VI. PRINCIPAL CONTACTS

Project Role: Forest Engineer (Utility) Contact and Title: Mark Beuning Agency: Forest Service Phone Number: 715-661-0116 Email Address: mbeuning@fs.fed.us

Project Role: Bridge Program Manager Contact and Title: Patrick Hampston Agency: Forest Service Phone Number: 715-762-5134 Email Address: phampston@fs.fed.us

Project Role: Civil Engineering Technician Contact and Title: Eric Lynch Agency: Forest Service Phone Number: 715-762-5137 Email Address: emlynch@fs.fed.us

Project Role: District NEPA Planner Contact and Title: N. Ginger Molitor Agency: Forest Service Phone Number: 715-634-3769 x2327 Email Address: nicolegmolitor@fs.fed.us

VII. CERTIFICATION

Prepared by: Bob Beucler Date: 11/13/2017 Highway Engineer

Recommended by: Michael Tessitore Date: 11/14/17 Project Manager

Approved by:

Project Management Engineer

SCOTT R

WHITTEMORE

Digitally signed by SCOTT R WHITTEMORE DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DOT FHWASterlingVA, ou=FHWA FHWASterlingVA, cn=SCOTT R WHITTEMORE Date: 2018.02.07 11:58:55 -05'00'

8/11/2017

No. Qty Unit Unit Cost Item Cost 1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 160 Lnft 5 900 Lnft 6 170 Lnft 7 3,000 Ton 8 950 Ton 9 700 Ton

10 1,000 Lnft 11 800 yd³ 12 100 yd³ 13 4,650 Ton 14 105 Lnft 15 30 Lnft 16 6 Each 17 2 Each 18 70 Lnft 19 100 yd² 20 100 yd² 21 100 yd² 22 All Lpsm 23 1 Each

Aggregate base, grading C or D ACP,Gyra. mix, 3/8"nmsa,<0.3 esal,pg 67-22,ruf type IV

Subtotal Cost = Rounded Total =

Rolled erosion control product, type 2C Temporary traffic control Field office

Cleaning culverts in place

24-Inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

End section for 24-inch equivalent pipe culvert

Roadway excavation

Removal of pipe culvert

Ditch reconditioning

Embankment construction

30-Inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

LOCATION: W2 (Lat 46.2946, Lon -90.8126), W3 (Lat 46.3057, Lon -90.8344), Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence Soil erosion control, fiber roll

Turf establishment

End section for 30-inch equivalent pipe culvert

4-inch depth

W60 (Lat 46.3202, Lon -90.8600), W61 (Lat 46.3160, Lon -90.8607) C38(Lat 46.3075,Lon -90.8584),C5(Lat 46.3036,Lon -90.8112),S2(Lat 46.3369,Lon -90.8595)

Aggregate surface course

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

REPLACE CULVERT AND REPAIR OF DITCH WASHOUTS, ROUTE 187

DSR REPORT: W2, W3, W60, W61, C38, C5, S2-FS 187-C

2016-1(2), FS187, Site W3: Pave hill and armor ditches.

2016-1(2), FS187, Site W60/W61: Reshape and rockline 245-foot long ditch.

2016-1(2), FS187, , Site W60/W61: Reshape and rockline 245-foot long ditch.

2016-1(2), FS187, Site S2: .

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 300 Lnft 5 2,000 Lnft 6 100 Ton 7 16 Hour 8 6,900 Sqyd 9 3,000 Lnft 10 1,450 Ton 11 100 yd³ 12 25 Lnft 13 100 yd² 14 100 yd² 15 50 yd² 16 All Lpsm 17 1 Each

W7B (Lat 46.329, Lon -90.748), W12B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.753), W13B (Lat 46.329, Lon -90.755) W14B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.759), W15B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.768)

Embankment construction

4-inch depth Turf establishment

Temporary traffic control Field office

Soil erosion control, fiber roll Placed riprap, method A, class 3 Air hammer (Jack Hammer exposed rock) Surface reconditioning (reestablish roadway crown) Ditch reconditioning

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing

Rolled erosion control product, type 2C

SITES W3B, W5B(pipe), W12B, W14B, W15B, C32(pipe), and C33(pipe):WORK ALREADY COMPLETE

Soil erosion control, silt fence

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

REPLACE SMALL CULVERTS, DITCH RECONDITIONING, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 390

DSR REPORT: C33, W1B, W42, W2B, W3B, C32, W4B thru W7B, W12B thru W15B-FS 390-E LOCATION: C33 (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.695), W1B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.699)

W42 (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.703), W3B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.712), C32 (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.721)

Cleaning culverts in place

W4B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.728), W5B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.737), W6B (Lat 46.328, Lon -90.743)

Aggregate surface course

Subtotal Cost = Rounded Total =

2016-1(4), FS390, West of Site C32: Use jack hammer to remove rock from travelway.

2016-1(4), FS390, Shoulder / Ditch reconditioning.

No. Qty Unit 1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 200 Lnft 5 190 Ton 6 1,000 Lnft 7 200 yd² 8 400 Ton 9 120 Lnft 10 50 Lnft 11 100 yd² 12 100 yd²

Ditch reconditioning

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

CLEAN AND INSTALL SMALL CULVERTS, AGGREGATE SURFACE, DITCH RECON., ROUTE 185

DSR REPORT: W103-FS 185-D

LOCATION: W103 (Lat 46.2954, Lon -90.8022)

15-Inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert Cleaning culverts in place

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking

Soil erosion control, silt fence

Roadbed reconditioning

Contractor testing

Su Rou

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

Aggregate surface course

4-inch depth Turf establishment

2016-1(4), FS185, Potter Lake Access Road: Add aggregate surface course. Superelevate travelway to drain.

2016-1(4), FS185, Potter Lake Access Road: Add aggregate surface course. Superelevate travelway to drain.

2016-1(4), FS185, Potter Lake Access Road: Add aggregate surface course and recondition ditches.

2016-1(4), FS185, Potter Lake Access Road: Add aggregate surface course and recondition ditches.

8/14/2017

No. Qty Unit 1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 100 Lnft 5 500 Lnft 6 10 Ton 7 500 Lnft 8 3,000 Sqyd 9 140 Ton 10 100 yd² 11 100 yd² 12 All LpsmTemporary traffic control

Su Rou

4-inch depth Turf establishment

Soil erosion control, fiber roll

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 387

DSR REPORT: W40-FS 387-B

LOCATION: W40 (Lat 46.2950, Lon -90.8845)

Placed riprap, method A, class 3 Ditch reconditioning Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

2016-1(4), FS387, Site W40: Typical roadway washout and culvert replacement. Add aggregate surface course.

2016-1(4), FS387, Site W40: Typical roadway washout and culvert replacement. Add aggregate surface course.

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 100 Lnft 5 500 Lnft 6 26 Lnft 7 10 Ton 8 1,000 Lnft 9 100 Ton 10 26 Lnft 11 2 Each 12 100 yd² 13 100 yd² 14 All Lpsm 15 1 Each

S Ro

4-inch depth Turf establishment Temporary traffic control Field office

End section for 24-inch equivalent pipe culvert

Ditch reconditioning Aggregate surface course 24-Inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

Removal of pipe culvert Placed riprap, method A, class 3

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence Soil erosion control, fiber roll

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

DITCH RECONDITIONING, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 188

DSR REPORT: W4-FS 188-B

LOCATION: W4 (Lat 46.3043, Lon -90.8112)

Sheet No: 2 of 5

DSR No:

Disaster No:

Applicant: County: Ashland County State:

Facility Name: Mile Post:

Figure 1: Washout shoulder

Figure 2: Washout shoulder

Wisconsin

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, Federal Lands Highway

DAMAGE SURVEY REPORT (Supplemental Sheet) W4-FS188-B

(Title 23, Federal-Aid System/Federal Domain) WI2016-1-FS

FR-188

Chequamegon Nicolet National Forest

Sheet No: 2 of 5

DSR No:

Disaster No:

Applicant: County: Ashland County State:

Facility Name: Mile Post:

Figure 3: Washout road section

Figure 4: Washout road section

FR-188 0

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, Federal Lands Highway

DAMAGE SURVEY REPORT (Supplemental Sheet) W4-FS188-B

(Title 23, Federal-Aid System/Federal Domain) WI2016-1-FS

Chequamegon Nicolet National Forest Wisconsin

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 100 Lnft 5 500 Lnft 6 60 Lnft 7 10 Ton 8 194 Ton 9 60 Lnft 10 2 Each 11 100 yd² 12 100 yd² 13 38 yd² 14 All Lpsm 15 1 EachField office

S

4-inch depth Turf establishment Rolled erosion control product, type 2C Temporary traffic control

Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

Ro

C19 (no work required), MP 0.20 (Lat 46.2574, Lon 90.8456)

Item Mobilization

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

REPLACE SMALL CULVERT AT MP 0.20, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 196

DSR REPORT: C41, C18, C19-FS 196-C

LOCATION: C41 (not found), C18 (no work required)

Soil erosion control, fiber roll Removal of pipe culvert

Aggregate surface course 30-Inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert End section for 30-inch equivalent pipe culvert

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

2016-1(4), FS196: Failed shoulder and culvert.

2016-1(4), FS196: Aggregate surface course and ditch reconditioning required.

2016-1(4), FS196: Failed culvert.

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 100 Lnft 5 500 Lnft 6 10 Ton 7 500 Lnft 8 380 Sqyd 9 385 Ton 10 200 yd² 11 200 yd² 12 All Lpsm

Ro

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

DITCH RECONDITIONING, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 184

DSR REPORT: W1-FS 184-B

LOCATION: W1 (Lat 46.2702, Lon -90.7319)

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence Soil erosion control, fiber roll Placed riprap, method A, class 3 Ditch reconditioning Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course

4-inch depth Turf establishment Temporary traffic control

S

1 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 100 Lnft 5 500 Lnft 6 5 Ton 7 yd3 8 160 Lnft 9 70 Sqyd 10 40 Ton 11 70 Lnft 12 25 yd² 13 25 yd² 14 All Lpsm 15 All Lpsm

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

S Ro

Turf establishment

Cleaning culverts in place

Embankment construction

Temporary traffic control

Mobilization Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence Soil erosion control, fiber roll

Field office

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

Ditch reconditioning Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course

4-inch depth

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

RIPRAP/CLEAN CULVERTS, DITCH RECONDITIONING, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 253

DSR REPORT: C42, W34-FS 253-C

LOCATION: C42 (Lat 46.3611, Lon -90.9174), W34 (Lat 46.3690, Lon -90.9027)

Item

2016-1(4), FS253: Culvert failure.

8/15/2017

1 All Lpsm 2 2,555 Lnft 3 2,555 Lnft

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST

DITCH RECONDITIONING, EMBANKMENT, AGGREGATE SURFACE, ROUTE 604

DSR REPORT: W8B, W68, W9B, W10B, W11B-FS 604-E

LOCATION: W8B (Lat 46.3117, Lon 90.7374), W68 (Lat 46.3187, Lon 90.7406)

W9B (Lat 46.3209, Lon 90.7396), W10B (Lat 46.3220, Lon 90.7400), W11B (Lat 46.3251, Lon 90.7424)

Item Mobilization

ALL SITES: ALL WORK ALREADY COMPLETED EXCEPT DITCH RECONDITIONING

Ditch reconditioning

Su Rou

Soil erosion control, fiber roll

2016-1(4). FS604:, Site W8B: ditch reconditioning.

2016-1(4). FS604:, Site W6B: ditch reconditioning.

2016-1(4), FS604, Site W9B: Ditch reconditioning.

2016-1(4), FS604, Site W10B: Ditch reconditioning.

8/10/2017

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 40 Lnft 5 45 Lnft 6 2,240 Lnft 7 380 yd³ 8 10 Ton 9 940 yd²

10 1,710 Ton 11 2,610 Lnft 12 45 Lnft 13 2 Each 14 40 yd² 15 40 yd² 16 All Lpsm 17 1 Each

24-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert End section for 24-inch equivalent pipe culvert

REPAIR ON WISCO ROAD, ROUTE FR 378

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

Soil erosion control, fiber roll

Soil erosion control, silt fence Removal of pipe culvert

Temporary traffic control (signs, barricades, etc.)

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

W51 (Lat 46.43100, Lon -91.02100), W15A (Lat 46.30400, Lon -91.03100) W16A (Lat 46.30800, Lon -91.03900), C29 (Lat 46.31100, Lon -91.04500) C29 and C29a REMOVED FROM PROJECT

Item Mobilization

Contractor testing Construction survey and staking

LOCATION: W11A (Lat 46.32500, Lon -91.04000), W12A (Lat 46.32200, Lon -91.04300)

DSR REPORT: W11A W12A W51 W15A W16A C29-FS378-H

Embankment construction

Aggregate surface course Ditch reconditioning

Field office

4-inch depth Turf establishment

Roadbed reconditioning

WI ERFO 2016 1(4)

FR 378, Site W11A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 378, Site W12A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 378, Site W51: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 378, Site W15A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 378, Site C29: Looking at a pipe culvert area washout

FR 378, Site C29: Looking at the displaced pipe culvert

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 4,250 Lnft 5 710 yd³ 6 1,240 yd² 7 2,500 Ton 8 3,150 Lnft 9 All Lpsm 10 1 Each

W3A (Lat 46.32150, Lon -91.12260), W4A (Lat 46.31800, Lon -91.12200)

Mobilization Construction survey and staking

Aggregate surface course

Field office

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON OTTO OLSON ROAD, ROUTE FR 376

DSR REPORT: W1A W2A W3A W4A W5A W35-FS376-H

Embankment construction Roadbed reconditioning

Temporary traffic control (signs, barricades, etc.)

LOCATION: W1A (Lat 46.32360, Lon -91.12270), W2A (Lat 46.32300, Lon -91.12300) W5A (Lat 46.31400, Lon -91.12300), W35 (Lat 46.30500, Lon -91.13300)

Ditch reconditioning

Soil erosion control, silt fence

Item

FR 376, Site W1A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 376, Site W3A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 376, Site W4A: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 376, Site W35: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 50 Lnft 5 10 Ton 6 Ton 7 200 Lnft 8 60 Lnft 9 2 Each

10 60 Lnft 11 All Lpsm

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

MINOR REPAIR ON CAMP EIGHT ROAD, ROUTE FR 377

DSR REPORT: W36 W6A W7A W8A W9A W10A B3 W7C W8C C6C W9C-FS377-H

LOCATION: W9A (Lat 46.32819, Lon -91.06566), C6C (Lat 46.32700, Lon -91.02100), W9C (Lat 46.32800, Lon -91.00900)

B3 (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.03900), W7C (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.03000), W8C (Lat 46.32600, Lon 91.02400)

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing

WORK HAD BEEN COMPLETED: W36 (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.08300), W6A (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.08000), W7A (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.07700), W8A (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.07300), W10A (Lat 46.32800, Lon 91.05900), R

End section for 24-inch equivalent pipe culvert

Soil erosion control, silt fence

Aggregate surface course Ditch reconditioning 24-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

Cleaning culverts in place Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

FR 377, Site W9A: Looking at low point of the road that in need of new pipe culvert

FR 377, Site W9C: Looking at pipe culvert cleaning area

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 7,500 Lnft 5 35 Lnft 6 2,150 yd³ 7 10 Ton 8 4,120 yd² 9 3,130 Ton

10 7,500 Lnft 11 35 Lnft 12 2 Each 13 35 Lnft 14 1,700 yd² 15 1,700 yd² 16 All Lpsm 17 1 Each

Embankment construction Placed riprap, method A, class 3 Roadbed reconditioning

4-inch depth Turf establishment Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

Field office

Ditch reconditioning

End section for 30-inch equivalent pipe culvert Cleaning culverts in place

Contractor testing

R

Soil erosion control, silt fence

Aggregate surface course

30-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

Removal of pipe culvert

Item Mobilization

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON SNAKE TRAIL ROAD, ROUTE FR 194

DSR REPORT: W11-W13 C15 C16-FS194-C

LOCATION: BEGIN WORK (Lat 46.29544, Lon -90.94970)

Construction survey and staking

FR 194, Site W13: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 194, W12: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 300 Lnft 5 90 yd³ 6 270 yd² 7 Ton 8 400 Lnft 9 All Lpsm

Aggregate surface course Ditch reconditioning Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

R

Roadbed reconditioning

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence Embankment construction

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON DEER LICK LAKE ROAD, ROUTE FS 371

DSR REPORT: W95-FS371-D

LOCATION: W95 (Latitude 46.31774, Longitude -91.14441)

FS 371, Site W95: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FS 371, Site W95: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 10,000 Lnft 5 20 Lnft 6 200 yd³ 7 12,000 yd³ 8 10 Ton 9 700 yd² 10 900 Ton 11 20 Lnft

12 2 Each

13 All Lpsm 14 1 Each

Removal of pipe culvert

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON FOREST SERVICE TRAIL, NORTHEAST OF DRUMMOND AND WEST OF FS ROUTE 811

DSR REPORT: T1T2-TRAIL-D

LOCATION: Latitude 46.35714, Longitude -91.21973

R

Item Mobilization Construction survey and staking Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

Embankment construction Roadway excavation (Slope stabilization)

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

24-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert End section for 24-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

Field office

S

Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course

FS Trail, Site T1: Looking at trail washout

FS Trail, Site T1: Looking at the washout on top of the pipe culvert area

WI ERFO 2016-1(4)

FS Trail, Site T2: Looking at the major washout of the trail

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 1,667 Lnft 4 3,100 yd² 5 970 Ton 6 All Lpsm

Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

R

Item Mobilization Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON N. DELTA ROAD, ROUTE FR 228

DSR REPORT: W31-FS228-D

LOCATION: Latitude 46.39368, Longitude -91.33644

FR 228, Site W31: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FR 228, Site W31: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 1,667 Lnft 4 490 yd³ 5 2,620 yd² 6 830 Ton 7 All Lpsm

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON HORSE PASTURE GRADE ROAD, ROUTE FS 396

DSR REPORT: W48 W49-FS396-D

LOCATION: Latitude 46.35368, Longitude -91.31829

Item Mobilization Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

Roadbed reconditioning Aggregate surface course

R

Embankment construction

Temporary traffic control (signs, cones, etc.)

FS 396, Site W48: Looking at road and shoulder washout

FS 396, Site W48: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 450 Lnft 4 5 yd³ 5 Ton 6 8 Hour

Item Mobilization

Aggregate surface course Temporary traffic control, flagger

Embankment construction

Contractor testing Soil erosion control, silt fence

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR SHOULDER WASHOUTS ON ROUTE FS 231

DSR REPORT: W33-FS231-C

LOCATION: Latitude 46.44420, Longitude -91.35420

FS 231, Site W33: Looking at water ponding on right side of roadway

FS 231, Site W33: Looking at road and shoulder washout

1 All Lpsm 2 All Lpsm 3 All Lpsm 4 80 Lnft 5 170 Lnft 6 50 Lnft 7 50 yd³ 8 700 Ton 9 40 Ton

10 150 Ton 11 4,000 Lnft 12 100 Lnft 13 50 Lnft 14 2 Each 15 140 yd² 16 140 yd² 17 All Lpsm

W22 (Lat 46.29000, Lon -91.02300), S9 (Lat 46.27600, Lon -91.03100), C23A (Lat 46.29800, Lon -91.01500)

Soil erosion control, fiber roll

SCOPING COST ESTIMATE

PROJECT ERFO 2016-1(4)

CHEQUAMEGON-NICOLET NATIONAL FOREST, BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN

REPAIR ON OLD GRADE ROAD, ROUTE FR 202

DSR REPORT: S8 W22 S9 C23A-FS202-H

Soil erosion control, silt fence

LOCATION: S8 (Lat 46.28700, Lon -91.02400) - WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY THE FS IN OCT. 2017

CULVERTS W22 and C23A REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT

Item Mobilization

End section for 24-inch equivalent pipe culvert

Removal of pipe culvert

Construction survey and staking Contractor testing

Embankment construction

Placed riprap, method A, class 4 Aggregate surface course

Placed riprap, method A, class 3

Ditch reconditioning

Temporary traffic control (signs, barricades, etc.)

R

Ditch reconditioning (regrade inlet and outlet ditch) 24-inch equivalent diameter arch or elliptical pipe culvert

4-inch depth Turf establishment

FR 202, Site S9: Looking at the inlet side of the existing pipe culvert

FR 202, Site S9: Looking at the outlet side of the existing pipe culvert

FR…