578-26_Score_Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 56 KB Posted

Attached to
Competitive Selection OH|DOT57826-1
Contract number
DOT57826-1
Issued by
Ohio

About this file

The document is a 578-26 Score Sheet for a state and local contract, specifically an evaluation of marketing and communication services proposals for the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). The scoring sheet includes technical evaluations for 18 different vendors, including Creative Marketing Resources, Inc., Fahlgren Mortine LLC, ForeSight Communications, Heart and Hunter Inc, Murphyepson Inc, Paul Werth Associates Inc, Voice of your customer LLC, and others. The evaluation process assesses vendors across multiple criteria including prior experience with marketing campaigns, public sector clients, stakeholder engagement, website development, staff qualifications, and proposed work plans.

The contract appears to be an indefinite delivery vehicle for marketing and communication services, with a minimum technical score requirement of 215 points. Vendors were scored on weighted criteria across work requirements, proposer qualifications, staffing plans, and proposed work approaches. Some vendors like Creative Marketing Resources, Fahlgren Mortine, ForeSight Communications, Heart and Hunter Inc, Murphyepson Inc, and Sevell + Kropp, Inc. exceeded the minimum technical score and qualified for cost proposal review. The final vendor selection will be based on the lowest cost per quality point, with submitted total prices ranging from $99,000 to $318,896.70. Vendors scoring below 215 points were disqualified from further consideration, and their cost proposals were not opened.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
251002_ME_ODOT_Transit_Technical_Proposal_2.pdf PDF
578-26.pdf PDF
_578-26_Pricing_Document__578Pricing__1_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Signature.pdf PDF
_578-26_Marketing_Support__Affirmation_and_Disclosure.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

578-26

VendorAmerican Structurepoint Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.530
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet1

VendorBlueprint Creative Group, LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.212
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.318
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet2

VendorBrennSys Technology LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.530
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet3

VendorCreative Marketing Resources, Inc.
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.550
2Prior experience with public sector clients.212
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points12
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points50
Grand Total Score230

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$218,329.64/Grand Total Techincal Score230
Cost Per Quality Point:$949.26
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet4

VendorDCC Marketing, LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.212
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.530
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points42
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score210

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score210
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet5

VendorFahlgren Mortine LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.550
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.220
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points70
Grand Total Score238

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$215,730.18/Grand Total Techincal Score238
Cost Per Quality Point:$906.43
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet6

VendorForeSight Communications
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.220
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.550
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points70
Grand Total Score238

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$198,510.62/Grand Total Techincal Score238
Cost Per Quality Point:$834.08
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet7

VendorHeart and Hunter Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.220
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points208
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points20
Grand Total Score228

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$318,896.70/Grand Total Techincal Score228
Cost Per Quality Point:$1,398.67
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet8

VendorInVerve Marketing, Incorporated
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.530
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet9

VendorMarquee Creatives
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.212
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.530
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points42
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score210

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score210
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet10

VendorMurphyepson Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.550
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.550
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points144
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points100
Grand Total Score244

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$100,206.00/Grand Total Techincal Score244
Cost Per Quality Point:$410.68
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet11

VendorOrigo Branding Company Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.530
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet12

VendorPaul Werth Associates Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points224
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score224

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$171,043.20/Grand Total Techincal Score224
Cost Per Quality Point:$763.59
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet13

VendorRecess Creative, LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.530
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet14

VendorRobles Designs
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.636
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points36
Column Subtotal of Meets Points176
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score212

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score212
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet15

VendorSevell + Kropp, Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.550
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.550
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points144
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points100
Grand Total Score244

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price

tc={B338F309-8A1E-444F-8AEF-0284B5BE72E5}: [Threaded comment]

Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924

Comment:

Non-responsive. Vendor didn’t fill out pricing page correctly or complete./Grand Total Techincal Score244
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Non-responsive. Vendor didn’t fill out pricing page correctly or complete.

Sheet16

VendorTraci Jones Design, LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.530
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points30
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score214

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score214
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet17

VendorVendi Advertising LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.636
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points36
Column Subtotal of Meets Points176
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score212

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score212
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Sheet18

VendorVoice of your customer LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
1Prior experience with marketing campaigns, marketing strategy, event planning, and branding.540
2Prior experience with public sector clients.216
3Prior experience with stakeholder engagement.540
4Prior experience with website development.324
STAFFING PLAN
5Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training). Resumes including identification of Contract Manager.648
6Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
7The proposer has provided a clear and detailed response in terms of approach to transit agency and ODOT as clients and desired contract outcomes.540
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points224
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score224

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$99,000.00/Grand Total Techincal Score224
Cost Per Quality Point:$441.96
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .