557-26_Score_Sheet.xlsx

31 KB Posted

Attached to
Competitive Selection OH|DOT55726-2
Contract number
DOT55726-2
Issued by
Ohio

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a scoring sheet for a competitive bid evaluation for a transit planning and research indefinite delivery contract. The evaluation involves multiple vendors including Alfred Benesch & Company, Arcadis US Inc, Cambridge Systematics, Flexlynqs LLC, HDR Engineering Inc, Metro Analytics PLLC, Michael Baker International Inc, RLS & Associates Inc, and Transystems Corporation of Ohio. The document details a technical scoring process with weighted evaluation criteria across understanding and approach categories, as well as organizational structure and experience assessments.

The contract appears to be for comprehensive transit research and planning services, with specific focus areas including transit technology, medical services, workforce development, regional coordination, rural transit agency support, data reporting and analysis, project management for FTA-funded construction projects, and assistance for small urban transit agencies. The minimum technical score required was 215 points, with HDR Engineering Inc (258 points), Michael Baker International (238 points), and Transystems Corporation of Ohio (228 points) being the only vendors meeting the threshold. Transystems Corporation of Ohio submitted the lowest cost per quality point at $1,206.19, with a total submitted price of $275,011.00, potentially positioning them as the recommended awardee.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Affirmation_and_Disclosure2.pdf PDF
Signature.pdf PDF
557-26.pdf PDF
ODOT_Planning___Research_557-26_Michael_Baker.pdf PDF
ODOT_Planning___Research_557-26_Michael_Baker.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Alfred Benesch

VendorAlfred Benesch & Company
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.424
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.324
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.212
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting318
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.216
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points54
Column Subtotal of Meets Points152
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score206

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score206
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Arcadis

VendorArcadis US Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.424
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.324
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.212
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting324
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.212
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.212
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)530
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points66
Column Subtotal of Meets Points128
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score194

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score194
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Cambridge

VendorCambridge Systematics
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.432
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.324
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.20
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting318
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.216
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points18
Column Subtotal of Meets Points184
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score202

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score202
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Flexlynqs

VendorFlexlynqs LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.432
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.324
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.216
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting324
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.20
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.20
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points192
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score192

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score192
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

HDR

VendorHDR Engineering Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.440
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.330
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.216
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting330
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.220
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)550
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points88
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points170
Grand Total Score258

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$621,800.00/Grand Total Techincal Score258
Cost Per Quality Point:$2,410.08
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Metro

VendorMetro Analytics, PLLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.424
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.318
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.212
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting324
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.212
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.212
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.20
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points78
Column Subtotal of Meets Points104
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score182

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score182
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Michael Baker

VendorMichael Baker International Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.432
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.330
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.216
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting324
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.220
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.220
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points168
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points70
Grand Total Score238

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$578,859.00/Grand Total Techincal Score238
Cost Per Quality Point:$2,432.18
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

RLS

VendorRLS & Associates Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.424
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.318
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.216
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting318
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.216
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.216
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points60
Column Subtotal of Meets Points144
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score204

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score204
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Transystems

VendorTransystems Corporation of Ohio
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
1Understanding and approach to transit research and planning for fares, transit technology, medical services, workforce development, and regional coordination.432
2Understanding and approach to transit planning for both localized issues and a statewide transit plan.324
3Understanding and approach to assessing rural transit agencies for deploying alternative fuels.216
4Understanding and approach to data reporting and analysis for service data, demographic data, performance measure development and monitoring, standardized data reports utilizing transit system scheduling and dispatching software, and financial reporting324
5Understanding and approach to project management for FTA funded construction projects.216
6Understanding and approach to assisting small urban transit agencies.220
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIENCE
7Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience, and training)540
8Resumes including identification of Contract Manager and task leads.324
9Proposer’s staff plan connects qualified staff to each individual task and is appropriately staffed for expertise and experience.216
10Proposer’s staff availability.216
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points208
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points20
Grand Total Score228

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 215 points?

YESXNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$275,011.00/Grand Total Techincal Score228
Cost Per Quality Point:$1,206.19
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .