NSF Past Performance Survey 20240223.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Antarctic Research Vessel (ARV) Integrator, Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
49100423R0010
Issued by
National Science Foundation

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Antarctic Research Vessel (ARV) Integrator, Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 6 ARV Oral Presentation Questions 20240507.pdf PDF
ARV RFP QA (SAM) 20240506.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240506.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0011 EX.pdf PDF
Room W2170 General Configuration.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240506 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 0010 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240418.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240418 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 0009 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240417.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240417 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240327 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240327.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0008 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240322.pdf PDF
ARV RFP QA (SAM) 20240322.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 ARV Oral Presentation Questions 20240322.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0007 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240322 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 0006 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240319 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
ARV RFP QA (SAM) 20240319.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240319.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0005 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240318.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240318 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6 ARV Oral Presentation Questions.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240312 Track Changes.docx DOCX document
49100423R0010 0004 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240312.pdf PDF
ARV RFP QA (SAM).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 3 Attachments 20240304.zip ZIP file
49100423R0010 0003 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240223.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0002 EX.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0001 EX.pdf PDF
NSF Past Performance Letter 20240223.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR 20240223 (Word).docx DOCX document
Section J Attachment 5 NSF Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
49100423R0010 0001 ARV.pdf PDF
Project Execution Plan (PEP).zip ZIP file
Preliminary Design Drawings.zip ZIP file
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR.pdf PDF
Preliminary Design Reports Part 2 of 2.zip ZIP file
49100423R0010 ARV INTEGRATOR (Word).docx DOCX document
ARV Attachment List (SAM).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Preliminary Design Reports Part 1 of 2.zip ZIP file
Show all 48

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

49100423R0010 Attachment 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:SAM Unique Entity ID Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor ☐ Joint Venture ☐ Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #/Email):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: ☐ Firm Fixed Price ☐ Cost Reimbursement ☐ Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Performance Location(s):

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) (if applicable):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) (if applicable):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work☐ High☐ Med☐ Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE OFFEROR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING
DEFINITION
NOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not

performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's

proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious

magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

PAGE BREAK

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E
VG
S
M
U
N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E
VG
S
M
U
N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E
VG
S
M
U
N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E
VG
S
M
U
N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E
VG
S
M
U
N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E
VG
S
M
U
N
c) Government Property Control
E
VG
S
M
U
N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E
VG
S
M
U
N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
E
VG
S
M
U
N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E
VG
S
M
U
N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution, and response to Government changes
E
VG
S
M
U
N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E
VG
S
M
U
N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users’ rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E
VG
S
M
U
N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .