Past Performance Reference Attachment A2.pdf
PDF 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Levin Capital Security Project- Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47PF0022R0013
About this file
This document contains a past performance reference form and a presolicitation notice for construction manager as constructor services. The past performance reference form requests information on offeror and reference details, contract and project information, whether projects met size, location, and completion definitions, and performance details. The presolicitation notice is for capital security project services at the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse involving accessible entrance work, security screening upgrades, and queuing areas. The procurement will be set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 236220 and $36.5 million size standard. The solicitation will be available on SAM.gov and proposals are due on the date specified. Technical factors will be more important than price in the evaluation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amdt 0006_47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| Amdt 0005_47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| Amdt 0004_47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| Amdt 0004_47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| Amdt 0004_47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| Reference Attachment B .pdf | ||
| Levin CSP- CMc Preproposal agenda.pdf | ||
| CMc Pre-proposal Sign-in sheet.pdf | ||
| 47PF0022R0013 Amdt 0003.pdf | ||
| 47PF0022R0013 Amdt 0003.pdf | ||
| 47PF0022R0013 Amdt 0002.pdf | ||
| Amdt 0001.pdf | ||
| Pre-Proposal Conference Attendence Form 030222pdf.pdf | ||
| CMc Reps and Certs 47PF0022R0013.pdf | ||
| SF24-16d.pdf | ||
| 47PF0022R0013 Levin CMc.pdf | ||
| GSA527-21.pdf | ||
| Pre-Proposal Conference Attendence Form.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance & Past Experience
Attachment A.2
Note: In accordance with Section II.D Technical Proposal of the RFP, offerors shall ensure they submit the required amount of Past Experience references and Past Performance references. This form shall be used if a past performance reference also meets the past experience requirements. Offerors shall review the RFP requirements thoroughly.
1. OFFEROR (COMPANY NAME) 2. REFERENCE # OF
3. THIS PAST PERFORANCE & PAST EXPERIENCE COMBINED REFERENCE IS FOR (select one) NOTE TO OFFEROR: The Government reserves the right to approve or disapprove any changes in key personnel and/or subcontractor proposed by the Contractor after award.
OFFEROR
PREDECESSOR COMPANY(S): IDENTIFY NAME(S) OF COMPANY(S)
KEY PERSONNEL:WHO HAVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE - IDENTIFY NAME(S) OF KEY PERSONNEL
SUBCONTRACTOR(S) – IDENTIFY NAME(S) OF SUBCONTRACTOR(S)
4. CONTRACT STATUS AND TYPE
CURRENT PREVIOUS
GOVERNMENT NON-GOVERNMENT
5. PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION (BUILDING, CITY, STATE)
6. CONTRACT NUMBER 7. PROJECT TITLE
8. CUSTOMER (COMPANY NAME OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY)
9. CONTACT PERSON (NAME AND TITLE)
10. CONTACT PHONE NUMBER 11. CONTACT E-MAIL ADDRESS
12. THE PROJECT WAS IN A GOVERNMENT-OWNED OR COMMERCIAL FACILITY.
YES NO
13. THE PROJECT WAS AT LEAST $3.0 MILLION DOLLARS
14. THE PROJECT IS AT LEAST 90% COMPLETE.
Past Experience on Comparable Projects
Definition of Similar Project: A "similar” project is defined as one which includes renovation/buildout of construction projects within occupied historic facilities with a minimum project cost of $3 Million. The work shall generally include demolition of existing structural, architectural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, abatement of hazardous materials, structural system modifications, new architectural improvements, and modifications to mechanical, electrical, plumbing, elevator, and fire protection systems
15. Was project for Construction Manager as Constructor services?
16. The Project met the definition of “similar project”?
Past Performance & Past Experience
Attachment A.2
18. WAS PROEJCT COMPLETED ON TIME?
YES NO (If No, explain on back)
N/A (If N/A, explain on back)
18A. START DATE 18B. COMPLETION
DATE
18C. NUMBER OF
DAYS
19. IF CURRENT PROJECT, THE PROJECT
IS ON SCHEDULE.
YES NO (If No, explain on back)
N/A (If N/A, explain on back)
19A. START DATE 19B. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
20. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND COMPLEXITY
21. LIST WHICH ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT WERE SUBCONTRACTED
22. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .