Tuscaloosa asbestos report.pdf
PDF 638 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 3695--Tuscaloosa, AL Laundry Procurement
- Solicitation number
- 36H79720R0011
About this file
This document contains an annual asbestos reinspection report for Building 18 at the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center. The report details 20 homogeneous areas that were inspected for asbestos-containing materials. For each area, the report provides the inspection date, describes the material, indicates whether asbestos was detected, and notes any previous inspection findings and recommended response actions. Appendices include sample location plans and PLM laboratory reports showing no asbestos was detected in two samples collected from insulation materials.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center to procure a non-production 100/110 lb washer extractor and a semi-automatic cart washer/dryer to be installed at the facility. The procurement will be set aside as a small business opportunity under NAICS code 333318 with a size standard of 1000 employees. The request for proposals is scheduled for release on or around October 13, 2020, with Delano Talley listed as the point of contact.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36H79720R0011 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36H79720R0011 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36H79720R0011 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Technical Performance Specifications Tuscaloosa .docx | DOCX document | |
| PAST PERFORMANCE.pdf | ||
| 36H79720R0011_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| ACH Form.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX L
BUILDING 18
LAUNDRY
INCLUDED IN APPENDIX L:
L‐1 – Annual Asbestos Re‐inspection Documentation
L‐2 – Homogeneous Area / Sample Summary Table
L‐3 – Sample/ACM Location Plans
L‐4 – PLM Laboratory Reports
L‐5 – Photographic Documentation
L‐6 – Estimated Asbestos Abatement Costs
L‐7 – Additional VAMC Supplied Notes/Information
APPENDIX L‐1
Annual Asbestos Re‐inspection
Documentation
BUILDING 18 HOMOGENEOUS AREA LIST
HA 01 = 12” FLOOR TILE (MULTI BROWN) ‐ REMOVED
HA 02 = 12” FLOOR TILE (LIGHT BROWN) ‐ REMOVED
HA 03 = LINOLEUM (GREEN THROW MATS – NOT STATIONARY) ‐ NAD
HA 04 = CEILING TILE – 2’ X 4’ GROOVE AND PINHOLE (NEW) – NAD
HA 05 = CEILING TILE – 2’ X 4’ WHITE – NAD
HA 06 = ROOFING TAR (BUILT UP ROOF) ‐ REMOVED
HA 07 = DUCT INSULATION – ROOF DUCTING ‐ REMOVED
HA 08 = TAN INSULATION (TWO TANKS) ‐ NAD
HA 09 = HEAT EXCHANGER DEBRIS ‐ REMOVED
HA 10 = PIPE FITTING INSULATION (HARD) ON FIBERGLASS RUNS ‐ REMOVED
HA 11 = PIPE INSULATION (CARDBOARD‐TYPE) DOMESTIC WATER PIPING ‐ REMOVED
HA 12 = PIPE INSULATION (MAGNESIA‐TYPE) STEAM PIPING ‐ REMOVED
HA 13 = DEBRIS (CONTAMINATED SOIL) ‐ REMOVED
HA 14 = FLEXIBLE DUCT CONNECTOR ‐ REMOVED
HA 15 = GASKET MATERIAL ON WASHER AND DRYERS – NAD
HA 16 = FLEXIBLE EXHAUST HOSE ON WASHER 3 ‐ NAD
HA 17 = DOWNSPOUT TAR ‐ REMOVED
HA 18 = UNKNOWN
HA 19 = ROOFING FELT UNDER SLATE SHINGLES ‐ NAD
HA 20 = DUCT INSULATION (BLACK MASTIC) ‐ NAD
HA = HOMOGENEOUS AREA
HA = ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL
NAD = NO ASBESTOS DETECTED
Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center Annual Asbestos Re-Inspection Documentation
Physical Assessment (check all that apply) Damaged or significantly damaged TSI, ACM or ACE Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage Any remaining friable ACM or ACE X No asbestos detected
Classification of Hazard Potential (circle one)
Hazard Rank ACM Condition ACM Disturbance Potential
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage 2 Good Potential for Damage 1 Good Low Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Removed/abated. Newer 12” black VCT present in Room 1.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: ACM/ACE with potential for damage. Room 1 (110 SF) – follow up indicates HA 01 has been abated.
Recommendation Response Action (circle applicable actions) O&M Remove/Enclose/Encapsulate Evacuate/Restrict
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 01 Date: 7/16/14 Description: 12” x 12” Floor tile (multi-brown) and mastic Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Removed/abated. Newer 12” black VCT present in Room 11.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: ACM/ACE with potential for damage. Room 11 (435 SF) – follow-up documents indicated HA 02 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 02 Date: 7/16/14 Description: 12” x 12” Floor tile (light brown) and mastic Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: According to VAMC personnel, Building 18 has been re-roofed.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: Report indicates HA 06 is likely still present
1991 Inspection Note: Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM or ACE. Built up roof
(325 SF)
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 06 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Roofing Tar Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Abated, per previous reports, from roof.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM or ACE. Roof ducting (290 SF) - follow-up documents indicated HA 07 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 07 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Duct insulation (grey) Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Abated, per previous reports.
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACM or ACE. Room B4 (mechanical room) – 40 SF - follow-up documents indicated HA 09 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 09 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Heat exchanger debris Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
2002 Inspection Note: N/A – abated
1991 Inspection Note: Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACM or ACE. On fiberglass runs, 12 each, Room 4A (break room) - follow-up documents indicated HA 10 was abated
Explain:
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 10 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Pipe fitting insulation (hard) on fiberglass runs Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Abated, per previous reports. Currently insulated on straight runs by plastic covered fiberglass. One hot water supply fitting (elbow) in poor condition (plastic elbow broken). Fitting insulated with hard grey over white insulation. No asbestos detected in confirmation sample of this material (B18-1) collected by SELC.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACM or ACE. Partial basement (765 LF), 1st floor (145 LF) - follow-up documents indicated HA 11 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 11 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Pipe insulation – cardboard type – domestic water Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Abated, per previous reports. Steam piping observed by SELC is covered with metal jacketing in crawlspace, inside building, and on exterior of building. No asbestos detected in confirmation sample (B18-2) collected by SELC from exterior steam piping, below metal jacketing.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACM or ACE. Partial basement 1,600 LF), 1st floor (58 LF) - follow-up documents indicated HA 12 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 12 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Pipe insulation – magnesia type – steam piping Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: Abated per previous reports. Crawlspace piping in good condition.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: N/A – abated
1991 Inspection Note: Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM or ACE. Crawlspace (6,890 sf) - follow-up documents indicated HA 13 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 13 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Debris (contaminated soil) Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
2002 Inspection Note: N/A - abated
1991 Inspection Note: Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM or ACE. Room 5 (1 each) - follow-up documents indicated HA 14 was abated
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 14 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Flexible duct connector Inspector: E. Hyde
Damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACM Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM or ACE Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM or ACE ACM or ACE with potential for damage ACM or ACE with potential for significant damage
7 Significantly Damaged Any 6 Damaged Potential for Significant Damage 5 Damaged Potential for Damage 4 Damaged Low Potential for Damage 3 Good Significant Potential for Damage
Current Inspection Comments/Condition if Changed: No suspect tar associated with downspouts observed.
2009 Inspection Note: Not re-inspected / Building outside scope of work
2002 Inspection Note: ACM/ACE with potential for damage. Downspout joints (2 each). Good condition
1991 Inspection Note: ACM/ACE with potential for damage. Downspout joints (2 each)
Explain: N/A
Building #: 18 Homogeneous Area #: 17 Date: 7/16/14 Description: Downspout tar Inspector: E. Hyde
APPENDIX L‐2
Homogeneous Area / Sample Summary Table
HOMOGENEOUS AREA / SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLE
PROJECT: 2014-1108 – BUILDING 18
HOMG.
AREA
(HA#)
HOMOGENEOUS AREA (HA)
DESCRIPTION & LOCATION
HA TYPE (AHERA)
EPA/OSHA CATG. (IF ACM)
CONDITION (IF ACM)
SAMPLE
NO.
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
SAMPLE
LOCATION
11**
Confirmation sample only. Records indicate this HA, cardboard-like inspection on domestic water piping, has been abated. Sample collected from hot water supply elbow in basement mechanical room. Material is hard grey insulation over white insulation.
TSI Material Not ACM
B18-1 None Detected Basement mechanical room
12**
Confirmation sample only. Records indicate this HA, magnesia-type inspection on steam piping, has been abated.
Sample collected from presumed steam pipe on exterior of building. This pipe is covered with metal jacketing. Material sampled (below metal jacketing is white, compacted fibrous insulation.
TSI Material Not ACM
B18-2 None Detected Exterior of building
END OF
TABLE
Notes: 1. ** = Homogeneous area # previously identified by others.
2. If not demarked with an **, this is a new homogeneous area identified by SELC during this re-inspection
APPENDIX L‐3
Sample/ACM Location Plans
APPENDIX L‐4
PLM Laboratory Reports
Safety Environmental Laboratories and Consulting, Inc.
Page 1 of 2 Analyst Kris Parker – Asbestos Analyst
Technical Review Brian Ray – Asbestos Analyst
Quality Review Carol Findlay – Microscopy Manager
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Report 989 Yeager Pkwy. Phone: (205) 823-6200 Pelham, AL 35124 Fax: (205) 823-9066
Customer:
989 Yeager Parkway Pelham, AL 35124
Sample Receipt Date: 08/04/2014
Sample Analysis Date: 08/06/2014
Telephone: 205-823-6200 Fax: 205-823-9066 Sample Report Date: 08/07/2014
Project Name:
Project Location:
VAMC Tuscaloosa Building 18
Asbestos Identification in Bulk Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy
EPA/600/R-93/116 July 1993 – Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
SELC Project #: 2014-1108 Note: See Attached Notes and Descriptions Sheet for Applicable Abbreviations and Notes
Customer Sample No.
Lab Sample
No.
Sub-sample
No.
Layer No. Sample Location / Description
Homo-geneous (yes/no)
Asbestos % and Type
% Non-Asbestos Fibers
% Non- Fibrous Material
B18-1 17 N/A 1 Pipe Elbow Insulation – Basement Mechanical Room Insulation – Gray, Fibrous
N None Detected 5% Cellulose Fibers 40% Mineral Wool
55%
B18-2 18 N/A 1 Steam Pipe Insulation below Metal Jacket on Exterior of Building Insulation – White, Fibrous
N None Detected 40% Cellulose Fibers 60%
This report is FINAL This report is PRELIMINARY – pending final QC
Page 2 of 2 Analyst Kris Parker – Asbestos Analyst
Technical Review Brian Ray – Asbestos Analyst
Quality Review Carol Findlay – Microscopy Manager
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Report 989 Yeager Pkwy. Phone: (205) 823-6200 Pelham, AL 35124 Fax: (205) 823-9066
PLM Notes and Descriptions
1. Upper detection limit: 100%. Lower detection limit: <1%.
2. Bulk Samples will be stored for 3 months and will then be disposed of in an approved EPA landfill.
3. Analysis of floor tile or any other resinously bound materials by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using EPA Method 600/R-93/116 dated July 1993 may yield false-negative results because of method limitations in separating closely bound fibers from matrix material and in detecting fibers of small length and/or diameter. When analysis of such materials by the EPA PLM Method yields negative results for the presence of asbestos we recommend utilizing alternative methods of identification such as Gravimetry, XRD or AEM.
4. Samples are not homogenized by SELC prior to analysis. Distinct material layers within a sample are analyzed and reported separately by SELC. When multiple products are submitted by the customer under one sample number, SELC indicates those distinct products as sub-samples. SELC retains all samples numbers but will designate a sample number to those that are not given a sample number by the customer.
5. Percentages given are based on a visual estimated calibration.
6. Safety Environmental Laboratories and Consulting, Inc. is a NVLAP accredited laboratory, Lab Code: 200873-0 (ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005 Compliant).
7. Results relate only to the samples tested. All tests were performed under the scope of SELC’s NVLAP accreditation, unless indicated otherwise.
8. All samples were received in a condition suitable for analysis (“Good”), unless otherwise noted.
9. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
10. Analytical Instrument: Olympus Polarized Light Microscope Series BH-2 Model BHT-002
APPENDIX L‐5
Photographic Documentation
Photographic Documentation – 3 Year Asbestos Re-inspection – Building 18
SELC Project #2014-1108 VAMC Tuscaloosa – Building 18 Page 1
PHOTOGRAPH 2
View of crawlspace piping.
PHOTOGRAPH 1
Hot water supply fitting insulation in mechanical room B4. No asbestos detected in Sample B18-1 of this material.
PHOTOGRAPH 3
View (from back of building) of newer roofing materials.
PHOTOGRAPH 4
Exterior steam pipe. No asbestos detected in Sample B18-2 of this insulation below metal jacketing.
APPENDIX L‐6
Estimated Asbestos Abatement Costs
BUILDING 18
ESTIMATED ASBESTOS ABATEMENT COSTS
HA
NUMBER(S) TYPE OF ACM
FRIABLE/
NON-
FRIABLE
APPROXIMATE
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED
ABATEMENT
COSTS
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Notes:
1. HA = Homogeneous area
2. ACM = Asbestos containing material
3. NP = Not provided
4. Costs provided are general estimates for information purposes only. A complete and specific cost estimate should be obtained from Alabama accredited asbestos abatement contractors prior to any abatement project.
5. Quantity and cost estimates are provided only for observable ACM/homogeneous area. Cost estimates are not provided for inaccessible portions/quantities of a homogeneous group.
APPENDIX L‐7
Additional VAMC Supplied Notes/Information
| Building 18 Reinspection Documents.pdf |
| BUILDING 18 HOMOGENEOUS AREA LIST |
| HA 01 |
| HA 02 |
| HA 06 |
| HA 07 |
| HA 09 |
| HA 10 |
| HA 11 |
| HA 12 |
| HA 13 |
| HA 14 |
| HA 17 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .