36C24918R0163-014.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct Parking Garage on West Lot - Project 614-320 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24918R0163
About this file
36C24918R0163 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24918R0163-00004000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-00003008.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-00003006.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-00003007.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-00002000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-011.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-016.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-008.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-015.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C24918R0163-006.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-010.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C24918R0163-007.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-004.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-005.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-009.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-012.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-013.pdf | ||
| 36C24918R0163-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24918R0163-000.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
| Solicitation Number |
| 36C24918R0163 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Construct Parking Garage on West Lot - Project 614-320 |
| Customer/Agency |
| Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, 1639 Medical Center Parkway Murfreesboro, TN 37129 |
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s______________________________________
| Name and Address: | ______________________________________ | |
| ______________________________________ | ||
| ______________________________________ |
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code):___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract: ________________________________________________________________________
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Signature)
| _____________________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) | (Date) |
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable (A) |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the |
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
| Unacceptable (U) |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the |
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. A U
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. A U
2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) A U
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). A U
3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. A U
4. Rate the contractors responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. A U
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| ______ | Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| ______ | Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.
______Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
| ________________________________________ | __________________________ | (Signature) | (Date) | |
| ________________________ | __________________________ | |||
| (Typed or Printed Name) | (Organization Name) | |||
| ____________________________ | ______________________________ | |||
| (Phone Number) | (Organization) |
File details come from the government source that posted it.