NASW Questions RFP 280.doc
DOC document 36 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 280-09-0292
About this file
Questions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Backup of 280-09-0292 RFP coverletter.wbk | — | |
| QASP-0292.docm | DOCM document | |
| NASW SOW-0292.docm | DOCM document | |
| 280-09-0292 RFP .doc | DOC document | |
| Schedule of Deliverables-0292.docm | DOCM document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NASW Questions RFP 280-09-0292 Language in the RFP:
1. Refers to psychiatrists and / or APIRE. Can you clarify?
Answer: Corrective action taken, Revised RFP sent on 6/2/09.
Indirect Cost Rates:
1. Can you provide guidance in how to interpret “reasonableness of the proposed rate”?
Answer: To be discussed with auditor and comparisons made on historical data for similar work and current rates.
2. Our current indirect rate is 29.7%; this is extremely low based on the costs to the Project and increasing this rate is critical to our being able to submit a proposal for the contract. What steps are necessary in the next few weeks to ensure the criteria for ‘reasonableness’ is met?
Answer: Per telephone discussion the offeror was directed to contact knowledgeable audit officers to obtain current indirect rates.
Letters of Commitment:
1. To be clear – we need a LOC from each member of the Advisory Committee, the Project Evaluator, and any identified consultants?
Answer: Letters of commitment are required from the Project Evaluator, and any identified consultants, but not committee members.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .