26332.MDL Addendum 1.pdf

DTMB-0414 RFP (Rev 2/22)

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

State Facilities Administration Design and Construction Division

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

ADDENDUM NO. 1

This form identifies an Addendum to a Request for Proposal for Professional Services, and incorporates interpretations or clarifications, modifications, and other information into the Request for Proposals.

Addenda will be numbered by the Project Director and distributed through SIGMA Vendor VSS as an attachment.

TO:

ALL PROPOSERS

DATE ISSUED

07/28/2026

PROJECT NAME

DeTour State Harbor Fuel Tanks

FILE NUMBER

751/26332.MDL

PROJECT DIRECTOR

Michael Lusk

PROPOSAL DUE DATE:

07/30/2026 at 2:00pm

ADDENDUM ITEMS: (attach additional sheets and drawings if required)

1. Pre-Proposal Meeting Attendance Record

2. Pre-Proposal Meeting Agenda

Questions asked via email:

Q1: Project Description States: “... is seeking a Professional Services Consultant (PSC) requesting professional engineering services for the assessment of two aged underground fuel tanks that are at the extent of their useful lifespan.”

Question: Is the DNR requesting a separate deliverable for assessment of the tanks and whole system prior to the replacement of the USTs?

A1: Assessment would provide a clear idea of the current condition of the existing tanks allowing the MDNR to prioritize funding for their replacement within the statewide system. It’s tough to determine a removal and replacement strategy without having a good grasp of what is existing and the condition it is in.

Q2: Why type of “recreational fuel” will the tank support?

A2: 90 Octane Non-Ethanol

Q3: What type of “diesel” fuel will the tank support? (e.g. on-road diesel, off-road diesel, fuel oil...etc.)

A3: On-road grade diesel

Q4: Please provide the compliance records for the tank system.

A4: They will be provided at a later date

Q5: Have any repairs or upgrades been completed on the UST system since 2004?

A5: There were repairs and upgrades to the cathodic system (2018) and veeder root controls (2025).

Q6: Have any suspected or confirmed releases occurred at the site?

A6: NO

Q7: The Project Statement states the fuel lines to the docks, spill buckets/sumps, fuel pumps, and cathodic protection “shall be reviewed.” At the mandatory site visit, the State indicated scope is limited to the tanks and lines up to the junction vault, with everything past the junction vault excluded. Please confirm the downstream limit of the PSC scope, specifically whether any components past the junction vault (dock fuel lines, dispensers, dock-side spill containment, fuel pumps) are included.

A7: As indicated above, and as discussed at the site meeting, everything beyond the main junction vault will be http://www.buy4michigan.com/ excluded in the scope. The focus will be on the tanks, cathodic protection, sensors, associated lines, etc to the vault.

Q8: The scope calls for assessing the two existing tanks and also states the PSC “shall recommend and design two new fuel tanks.” Please confirm whether the State has already determined that both tanks will be replaced, or whether that determination is an outcome the PSC is expected to reach and support through the assessment.

A8: See response to question 1. The tanks do need to be replaced as they are beyond their recommended lifespan.

Q9: The Project Statement notes that, based on the PSC’s assessment and recommendation, above ground tanks would be considered. Please confirm the State is open to an aboveground storage tank (AST) configuration so this option can be carried into the assessment and design.

A9: Yes, they need to be replaced and the MDNR is interested in both above and below ground options. Placement of above ground tanks will need to be further verified with the project team to assure they aren’t an eyesore to the public and neighbors.

Q10: Does the State expect the PSC to perform testing of the existing fuel system as part of the assessment (e.g., annual line leak detection, tank tightness testing, cathodic protection testing), or is a visual and engineering condition review sufficient?

A10: No. Those items are already checked annually by park staff and/or by LARA.

Q11: Please confirm the applicable DTMB design phase requirements and standard Michigan specifications governing the Phase 100, 300, and 500 deliverables, including any detailed description of what each design phase must include.

A11: As listed in the RFP Section I-1 Purpose “The service to be completed should encompass as a minimum the following phase(s) from the DTMB Sample Standard Contract for Professional Services:” with a link to sample contracts on our website under I-4 Contract Award.

http://www.michigan.gov/dmb/0,4568,7-150-41516-269818--,00.html The Standard Billing Rate Contract example has descriptions for the phases.

Q12: Section II-5 asks the PSC to analyze the proposed project budget for adequacy. Has the State established a construction budget or set-aside for this work? If so, please share it so the PSC can provide a professional opinion on its adequacy.

A12: A proposed budget is not available at this time for construction.

APPROVED BY:

Michael Lusk

PROJECT DIRECTOR DATE 07/27/2026

http://www.michigan.gov/dmb/0,4568,7-150-41516-269818--,00.html

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET

LANSING

MICHELLE LANGE

DIRECTOR

PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING AGENDA

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Design and Construction Division

3111 W. St. Joseph Street Lansing, MI 48917

Project: DeTour State Harbor – Fuel Tanks File Number: 472/26332.MDL Meeting Date and Time: Wednesday July 15, 2026 at 2:00pm local time Meeting Place: DeTour State Harbor

PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES

Project Director: Field Representative:

Michael Lusk Brian Guigue

DTMB-DCD DTMB-DCD

3111 W St Joseph St 3111 W St Joseph St Lansing, MI 48917 Lansing, MI 48917 906-322-9002 517-281-4994 luskm@michigan.gov guigueb@michigan.gov

Facility Representatives:

Julia Cogger Department of Natural Resources EUP Planner 1990 US Highway 41 S Marquette, Michigan 49855 517-420-9749 coggerj@michigan.gov

Introductions and Sign-In Sheet

A. Request for Proposals – Standard Not-to-Exceed RFP, with Part I Technical portion and

Part II Cost portion.

mailto:luskm@michigan.gov mailto:guigueb@michigan.gov mailto:coggerj@michigan.gov

1. Technical – Qualification format includes: General Information; Understanding of the Project and Tasks; Personnel; Management Summary, Work Plan & Schedule; Budget Analysis and References.

2. Cost – Not to Exceed Billable Rate plus reimbursables format.

3. Proposals must include Phase 100 Study, Phase 300 Design, and Phase 500 Final

Design. For budgeting purposes, an estimate of Phase 600 and 700 services shall be provided.

4. Include consultants and testing as reimbursable expenses.

5. Include signed Certification of a Michigan Based Business and Responsibility

Certification forms.

6. Proposals will be evaluated by an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee and scored based on the combined 80% Technical portion and 20% Cost portion.

B. Project Scope

1. Study and Design services for Phases 100, 300, and 500. The DeTour State Harbor is requesting professional architectural and engineering services to asses, design and provide probable construction cost to asses two aged underground fuel tanks and support infrastructure that are at the extent of their lifespan.

2. Reference Project Statement for anticipated scope of work

3. Proposals shall include, but are not limited to:

a. Travel reimbursements and billing rates

b. Clear documentation of the number of meetings for each phase

c. Coordination description for all field work

d. Detailed lists of all reimbursable expenses for each phase

C. Site Visits

1. Accessibility to the site – consider this as your only opportunity to walk the site before bidding, unless otherwise discussed.

D. Schedule

1. E-mail questions to luskm@michigan.gov no later than 2:00 p.m., Thursday, June

11, 2026. DO NOT send questions in through SIGMA as they do not get to the project directors from SIGMA.

2. If necessary, an addendum will be posted on the SIGMA VSS website no later than COB, June 11, 2026.

3. Proposals are due on Thursday, July 30, 2026, no later than 2:00 p.m. EST to issuing office and on SIGMA VSS.

4. Investigation and Design Summer/Fall 2026 mailto:luskm@michigan.gov

E. Other Items

1. Access to Site Upon Contract Award

a. Normal business hours for facility, or hours in which work can take place.

b. Provide notice to the facility prior to any site visits.

F. RFP Questions