Amendment_04_SF30_17-102-SOL-00012_Rapid_City.pdf

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. Contract ID Code Page of Pages

1 2

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

6 May 2017

4. Requisition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No. (if applicable)

6. Issued By Code

Indian Health Service DES 701 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600 M/S-24 Seattle, WA 98104

7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

Same as block 6

8. Name and Address of Contractor (No., Street, County, and Zip Code)

(X) 9A. Amendment of Solicitation No.

17-102-SOL-00012

X 9B. Date (See Item 11)

08 April 2017 10A. Modification of Contract/Order No.

10B. Date (See Item 13)

Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG- MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT

IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. This change order is issued pursuant to: (Specify authority) The changes set forth in item 14 are made in the Contract Order No. in item 10A.

B. The above numbered Contract/Order is modified to reflect the administrative changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

Set fourth item 14, pursuant to the authority of FAR 43.103 (b)

C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. Description of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Initial Design and Scope Development (Statement of Architecture Engineer Services) for Rapid City Service Unit Prepared by: Fannon, John

17-102-SOL-00012

************************Description of this amendment begins on page 2****************

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print) 16A. Name and title of Contracting Officer (Type or Print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. Date Signed

SF30 Continuation of Block Narrative 2 2Page of

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The Request for Qualification is hereby amended to address the following:

1. Respond to Pre-Qualification Inquiries (PQI) received in addressing the Request for Qualification (RFQ) package.

PPI RESPONSE:

INQUIRY 0011

The POR references a Historic Preservation Consultation Report “under Tab C. Section V, part A, 34.” This report appears to be a description of the existing buildings on the Sioux San campus, and it appears that it comes to the conclusion that there are no structures on the campus that can fulfill the needs of this new outpatient services facility. Considering this new structure will be located near historic buildings, has there been any further coordination with the South Dakota SHPO to give their guidelines on matters such as sympathetic design and/or making sure that this new structure does not impede the view of other historic buildings?

a) If yes, will we receive a copy of the report at Notice to Proceed?

b) If no, will we need to plan for that compliance in our work on this project?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

Yes. The past and current efforts related to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) accomplished by the IHS associated with this project will be addressed in the detailed Statement of Architect Engineer Services (SAES) issued to the selected AE Firm.

INQUIRY 0012

In addition to the Resource Requirement Methodology (RRM) workload study, has the IHS to date provided for any cultural coordination for space and design important to the tribal peoples served by this facility? Examples:

Is there a provision for a non-denominational chapel/worship space which can also serve as a place of ceremonial smudging?

Would we also make provision on the grounds for a sweat lodge or other traditional healing structure to be erected (presuming this would be desired by the people).

a) If yes, will we receive the names of leaders to contact at Notice to Proceed?

b) If no, will we need to plan for that coordination as well as time for ceremonies in our work on this project?

SF30 Continuation of Block Narrative 2 2Page of

Rationale: If we were constructing a new hospital for CHI (Catholic Health Initiatives), we would likely invite a priest to the kick-off meeting to provide a blessing, then we would consult with recognized leaders in that faith to weigh in on facilities as well as iconography that is important to their sense of healing. Even though there would be a non-denominational “feel” to the facility, the underlying design would be reflective of Euro-American Christian faith.

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

The Program of Requirements Amendment #1 included in this solicitation reflects the currently approved space program. As referenced in the RFQ, there will be an IHS POR validation accomplished as part of Predesign. This activity will be further detailed in the SAES issued to the selected AE Firm

INQUIRY 0013

Can we use CPARS in lieu of the PPQ?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

No, the RFQ requirements is a Past Performance Questionnaire.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. The RFQ proposal due date IS NOT EXTENDED as a result of this Amendment.