Amendment_01_SF30_17-102-SOL-00012_Rapid_City.pdf

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. Contract ID Code Page of Pages

1 3

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

12 April 2017

4. Requisition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No. (if applicable)

6. Issued By Code

Indian Health Service DES 701 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600 M/S-24 Seattle, WA 98104

7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

Same as block 6

8. Name and Address of Contractor (No., Street, County, and Zip Code)

(X) 9A. Amendment of Solicitation No.

17-102-SOL-00012

X 9B. Date (See Item 11)

08 April 2017 10A. Modification of Contract/Order No.

10B. Date (See Item 13)

Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG- MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT

IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. This change order is issued pursuant to: (Specify authority) The changes set forth in item 14 are made in the Contract Order No. in item 10A.

B. The above numbered Contract/Order is modified to reflect the administrative changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

Set fourth item 14, pursuant to the authority of FAR 43.103 (b)

C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. Description of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Initial Design and Scope Development (Statement of Architecture Engineer Services) for Rapid City Service Unit Prepared by: Fannon, John

17-102-SOL-00012

************************Description of this amendment begins on page 2****************

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print) 16A. Name and title of Contracting Officer (Type or Print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. Date Signed

SF30 Continuation of Block Narrative Page 2 of 3

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The Request for Qualification is hereby amended to address the following:

1. Respond to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) received in addressing the solicitation package.

PPI RESPONSE:

INQUIRY 0001:

Will the awarded A/E firm for this work be allowed to bid on the Design Build portion?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

The successful A/E firm that receives the contact for this work will not be able to bid on the Design Build portion nor be a member of a competing Design Build firm.

INQUIRY 0002:

Regarding item S. It reads as if there are services that will extend beyond the schematic design phase? If so, shall we prepare all of the consultants required to perform these services at this time or can this wait? And for clarification purposes… the scope is kind of like a 3rd party reviewer/owner's rep. Is this correct? Any clarification or additional information would be helpful.

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

As described in the RFQ, general summary of requirements (paragraph S), optional services will be considered with the successful AE firm. The Statement of Architecture Engineer Services (SAES) issued to the top rated firm will include optional requirements, which may be negotiated and included in the resulting contract awarded contract.

These optional services would then be executable at the Government’s option at a later date (within a limited window of time from completion of the base work under the SAES). They are intended to support the Governments execution of a resulting Design Build Contract (based on the product delivered by the successful AE firm under this contract) and are reasonably described as being 3rd party reviewer/owner's rep.

INQUIRY 0003:

Regarding the commissioning portion of the scope… will a 3rd party commissioning agent be required? OR can the MEP design firm serve as the commissioning agent as well?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

Yes, a 3rd party commissioning agent be required. No, the MEP design firm cannot serve as the commissioning agent as well.

SF30 Continuation of Block Narrative

INQUIRY 0004:

May we use PPQ’s that have been previously prepared by clients within the last three years and is there a specific form that we should be using?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

How your firm elects to put your SF330 package together is up to you. Yes, there is a Past Performance Questionnaire posted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) with this RFQ.

INQUIRY 0005:

Where is the Past Performance Questionnaire? I didn’t find it to be attached to the request. We’d appreciate being able to get started on those.

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

It is posted with this RFQ on the bottom right hand side in FBO.

INQUIRY 0006:

If I understand this correctly, you’d like us to send the PPQs only to the POCs on projects that were completed in the last 3 years? Or is it possible for interim PPQs on projects that are still in progress (i.e., might have been initiated in the past 3 years)?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

CRITERION 4: States the offeror and any major subcontractors' past performance on related relevant contracts, similar in size and scope, in whole or in part, to the instant requirement herein over the last 3 years. The decision to utilize interim PPQs is at your discretion.

INQUIRY 0007:

If I understand this correctly, this reference to projects “over the last 3 years” is only for the PPQs. It does not relate to projects listed in the resumes or in the project examples of Section F, am I correct?

RESPONSE PROVIDED:

You are correct.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. The RFQ proposal due date IS NOT EXTENDED as a result of this Amendment.