Attachment_(6)_Training_Evaluation_Form_(Blank).doc
DOC document 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Quality Assurance Services
- Solicitation number
- 15JPSS18R00000002
About this file
Attachment 6 - Training Evaluation Form (Blank)
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP_15JPSS18R00000002_AMD_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_(14)_Questions_and_Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment_(12)_Wage_DOL_No._2015-4281v9.pdf | ||
| Attachment_(5)_Image_QA_Review_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(14)_Questions_and_Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(9)_Centralized_records_Management_QA_Review_Procedures.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP_15JPSS18R00000002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_(13)_Subcontracting_Plan.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_(1)_Pricing_Table.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_(10)_Qualifications_for_Labor_Categories.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_(4)_Database_Accuracy.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(2)_E-Media_Completeness_Report.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(3)_Accuracy_Standards.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(8)_Case_Classification_and_Documentation_Procedures.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_(11)_Confidentiality_Agreement.pdf | ||
| Attachment_(7)_Quality_Assurance_Review_Procedures.doc | DOC document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Training Session Evaluation Form
| Contractor Name: |
| Case Name: |
| Training Date: |
| Training Location: |
| Trainer Name: |
| OLS Case Manager: |
| Present: |
| Contractor Project Manager: |
| Present: |
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
No
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
No
| Contractor Representative(s): |
| Title: |
| Number of Coders: |
| Coder Experience (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Experienced FORMCHECKBOX Not Experienced FORMCHECKBOX Mixed Experience
Type of Coding (Check One): FORMCHECKBOX Mini (4-Field) FORMCHECKBOX Header FORMCHECKBOX Bibliographic FORMCHECKBOX Other:
Section I. Training Environment Evaluates the physical conditions of the training that may impact participant attention.
| Comfort: Sufficient space and a work surface were provided for each participant. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
Fair
FORMCHECKBOX
Poor
FORMCHECKBOX
Not applicable
| Temperature: The temperature in the room was comfortable (not too hot or too cold). |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Controlled Environment: Distractions or disruptions were controlled to prevent interruption of the training session. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Visual: The Instructor and any visual aids used were clearly visible to all participants. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Sound: There was no difficulty hearing the instructor, regardless of a participant's location in the room (i.e., participants in the back of the room could hear as clearly as the participants in the front). |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Section II. Presentation of Training Material Evaluates the presentation of the documentation, the approach of the Instructor and training tools utilized.
Documentation
| A manual was provided to every participant. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
No
Comment:
| Sample Documents were provided in the manual. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
| The sections in the manual were discussed in a logical sequence. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Each section in the manual was reviewed thoroughly. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Special Considerations for the specific document collection were identified and thoroughly reviewed. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Each Sample Document was thoroughly reviewed and case specific coding practices were identified. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Instructor
| The Instructor demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the coding procedures applicable to this case's document collection. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The Instructor was organized in their presentation of the material. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The Instructor encouraged questions from the coders and adequately responded to all questions. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The Instructor maintained control over the course of the session. Unrelated tangents were avoided and the focus was directed on the training. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The Instructor presented the material at a level consistent with the level of the coders' experience. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The Instructor successfully achieved the active participation of the coders in the training session. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Training Tools
| Training tools, such as practice documents or visual aids (e.g. overhead slides) were utilized. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Please describe:
| The training tools utilized sufficiently demonstrated the coding procedures and rules applicable to this document collection. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Section III. Coder Comprehension Evaluates how well the coders understood the case specific documentation presented.
| The coders were attentive to the Instructor and the material being presented throughout the training session. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The coders appeared to fully comprehend all sections of the manual and the coding procedures applicable to each section. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The coders asked questions about areas not clearly explained in the manual or illustrated in the Sample Documents. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Section IV. Time Usage Evaluates how well the scheduled training time was used.
| A training agenda/schedule was provided at the start of the session. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
| The training session was completed within the scheduled time frame. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
| Sufficient time was allocated to the review of each section of the manual. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| All topics were fully reviewed without rushing to maintain the training schedule. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Following break periods, all participants returned to the session on time and were ready to continue. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| The length of the training was appropriate for the experience level of the coders participating. |
| Rating (Check One): |
FORMCHECKBOX
Comment:
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Section V. Pending Issues
| Coding Alerts are to be issued to address specific problem areas. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Please list the pending Alerts below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
| Additional Sample Documents are to be issued to address specific documents or issues. |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Yes
FORMCHECKBOX
Please list the pending Samples below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Other Action Items. Please use the space provided below to identify any other items needing to be addressed by the LS Contractor or the Case Manager.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Summary of Observations or Comments. Please use the space below to provide any other general observations or comments the Case Manager may find relevant.
U.S. Department of Justice
Quality Assurance Services
File details come from the government source that posted it.