Attach_6_Jupiter_Inlet_Q_A_0001.pdf

JUPITER INLET SOUTHSIDE PARKING LOT

Solicitation No: 140L0623Q0002

Form 1510-56 (December 1985)

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

SITE INSPECTION TOUR / PREBID CONFERENCE RECORD

1. Solicitation No.: 140L0623Q0002 4. Meeting Place: PROJECT LOCATION

2. Title: JUPITER INLET SOUTHSIDE PARKING LOT 5. Conducted by:

3. Date and Time: 11/30/22 0900 HRS EST

7. Attended By:

Name and Firm Address (include zip code) Phone No.

(Include area code)

Carl Morsch – Ramshorn Contracting carl@ramshorncontracting.com

DREW PENG – BLM COR/ENG APENG@BLM.GOV 703-558-7720

PETER DEWITT – BLM PM PDEWITT@BLM.GOV 561-295-5955

NATE ROUSH – BLM CO NROUSH@BLM.GOV 303-236-2211

DAVID FENNELL – BLM CS DFENNELL@BLM.GOV 850-598-8282

8. Questions asked, and responses given: Contractors were instructed to submit all questions in writing to CO.

Pre-Bid Conference | Site Visit Questions & Answers

Q1. Will the contractor be required to import LBR 40 Material if the existing onsite subgrade soils do not meet this requirement, if so we would like to request that a line item be added for the export of the existing material and the import and placement of the appropriate materials (Morsch).

A1. That would be considered a differing site condition. It is unlikely to not meet the Standards as all project work has so far.

However, if for some reason it did not, we would not require the removal of the material off-site it could be used for other projects. In that instance, it would just be the excavation, piling, and import of new material.

Q2. Will the government accept a double v groove design for the rope barrier posts or must it be the single groove design as shown in the details?

A2. Negative

Solicitation No: 140L0623Q0002

9. Was a complete site inspection made? Yes No. (If “No,” explain)

By (Name) Title Date