PP_Evaluation.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Dental Restorative Care
Solicitation number
W91364-14-R-0024
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Evaluation

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
PWS_04_Nov_14.docx DOCX document
Admin_QA_04_Nov_14.docx DOCX document
Technical_QA_04_Nov_14.doc DOC document
Dental_Care_Pricing_Spreadsheet_28_Oct_14.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Basis_for_Award.docx DOCX document
Dental_PWS_01_Oct_14.docx DOCX document
Evaluation_Criteria.docx DOCX document
Dental_Care_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Synopsis-Solicitation_W91364-14-R-0024.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

E=EXCELLENT, VG-VERY GOOD, S=SATISFACTORY, M=MARGINAL, U=UNSATISFACTORY, NA=NOT APPLICABLE

Company being evaluated:

Company completing the evaluation:

Name, e-mail, and phone number of person completing this evaluation:

_________________________________________________________
NameE-MailPhone

E V G S M U N A )1. How responsive was the contractor’s quality program in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies?

REMARKS:

E V G S M U N A )2. How would you rate the quality of workmanship overall?

V G S M U N A )3. How would you rate timeliness in meeting requirements and adhering to contract schedules?

V G S M U N A )4. Were reports/records submitted completely and accurately and did they satisfy requirements?

V G S M U N A )5. Rate the adequacy of the contractor’s environmental program, oversight, compliance and management.

V G S M U N A )6. Did the contractor provide adequate, competent and qualified management, key personnel and technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract?

V G S M U N A )7. How well did the contractor work independent of government guidance, oversight and assistance?

V G S M U N A )8. How effectively did your contractor’s key management personnel support the initial contract startup, management of contingency situation, and respond to problems and changes?

9. Was the site manager always present on site when work was performed? Did he/she have sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during an event?

E V G S M U N A )( ) yes ( ) no

V G S M U N A )10. Overall, how would you rate this contractor’s business practices, customer relationship, and ability to successfully perform? Did the contractor demonstrate a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the government’s contract management personnel?

V G S M U N A )11. How innovative was the contractor in performing the technical aspects of this contract and resolving problems? How well did the contractor respond to and act on customer feedback?

V G S M U N A )12. Did the contractor demonstrate the ability to execute multiple projects at the same time?

V G S M U N A )13. How effective was the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations? Did the contractor implement and follow their safety plan and run a safe jobsite? ( ) yes ( ) no

V G S M U N A )14. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

15. What were the contractor’s top documented strengths, if any, in performing the contract requirements?

16. What were the contractor’s top documented weaknesses, if any, in performing the contract requirements?

17. Please provide any additional information you feel is important that is not covered elsewhere.

Return completed evaluation to directly LTC Laura L. Monteith at Laura.L.Monteith.mil@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .