Attachment_7_-_PAST_PERFORMANCE_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_FORM.docx

DOCX document 49 KB Posted

Attached to
NG-J3 Joint Exercise Life Cycle Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9133L-16-R-0084
Issued by
Department of the Army National Guard

About this file

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NG-J3 Joint Exercise Life Cycle Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_8_-_Answers_to_Questions.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_PAST_PERFORMANCE_EVALUATION_QUESTIONNAIRE_FORM.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_-_Facility_Clearance_Worksheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Price_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_DD_254.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-__PWS_Technical_Exhibits_3-20.pdf PDF
W9133L-16-R-0084_P00001_CONFORMED_COPY.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-__Staffing_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_Facility_Clearance_Worksheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Price_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9133L-16-R-0084.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-__Staffing_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-__PWS_Technical_Exhibits_3-20.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_DD_254.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:_______________________ Contract No:_____________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_____________________________________ POC:__________________________Title:_____________________

(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

NOTE: The Government respondents shall only provide one response per requested past performance or current contract record. For example, if the Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form was sent to both the responsible contracting office and the technical representative, the entities should coordinate and only submit one response. If NGB-AQ receives more than one response, NGB-AQ will only review the response that is first received by NGB-AQ.

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name: Title: Date:

Telephone Number: Address:

E- mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

W9133L-16-R-0084: Attachment 7

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization: Name:

Title: Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail Steven.D.Arora.Civ@Mail.mil, Paul.M.Lauro.Civ@Mail.mil and Leafay.A.Jones.Mil@Mail.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .