EVALUATION CRITERIA GUARDIAN ANGEL TRNG.doc
DOC document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9133L-12-T-0039
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
EVALUATION CRITERIA
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EVALUATION_CRITERIA_GUARDIAN_ANGEL_TRNG.doc | DOC document | |
| W9133L-12-T-0039.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Technical Evaluation Matrix
Offeror: ___________________
Overall Rating: _______________
| Evaluation Factor |
| Significant Strengths/Weaknesses/Deficiencies |
Area 1:
Technical Rating
Factor 1: Program Assessment: Demonstrating knowledge and experience to provide CBRN Training and Exercises for Type II and III sources. .
Strengths -
Weaknesses –
Deficiencies –
Factor 2: Execution Plan: Illustrating the technical approach to project execution, proposed team composition, team member qualifications, draft quality control plan, performance metrics and measurement plan, subject matter knowledge and experience.
Strengths -
Weaknesses –
Factor 3: Past Performance evaluation
Strengths –
Weaknesses –
Area 2: Cost
Completeness
Reasonableness
** LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: THE CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED BASED ON LPTA.
EXCELLENT: Proposal demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements and approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards has exceptional strengths that will significantly benefit the Government.
GOOD: Proposal demonstrates good understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards has one or more strengths that will benefit the Government.
SATISFACTORY: Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards acceptable solution few or no strengths.
MARGINAL: Proposal demonstrates shallow understanding of requirements and approach that only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance.
UNSATISFACTORY: Fails to meet performance or capability standards. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .