EVALUATION CRITERIA GUARDIAN ANGEL TRNG.doc

DOC document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Black Diamond Modular Tactical Minicomp Training For Guardian Angel Operators
Solicitation number
W9133L-12-T-0039
Issued by

About this file

EVALUATION CRITERIA

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EVALUATION_CRITERIA_GUARDIAN_ANGEL_TRNG.doc DOC document
W9133L-12-T-0039.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Technical Evaluation Matrix

Offeror: ___________________

Overall Rating: _______________

Evaluation Factor
Significant Strengths/Weaknesses/Deficiencies

Area 1:

Technical Rating

Factor 1: Program Assessment: Demonstrating knowledge and experience to provide CBRN Training and Exercises for Type II and III sources. .

Strengths -

Weaknesses –

Deficiencies –

Factor 2: Execution Plan: Illustrating the technical approach to project execution, proposed team composition, team member qualifications, draft quality control plan, performance metrics and measurement plan, subject matter knowledge and experience.

Strengths -

Weaknesses –

Factor 3: Past Performance evaluation

Strengths –

Weaknesses –

Area 2: Cost

Completeness

Reasonableness

** LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: THE CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED BASED ON LPTA.

EXCELLENT: Proposal demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements and approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards has exceptional strengths that will significantly benefit the Government.

GOOD: Proposal demonstrates good understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards has one or more strengths that will benefit the Government.

SATISFACTORY: Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards acceptable solution few or no strengths.

MARGINAL: Proposal demonstrates shallow understanding of requirements and approach that only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance.

UNSATISFACTORY: Fails to meet performance or capability standards. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .