EVALUATION_CRITERIA_GUARDIAN_ANGEL_TRNG.doc
DOC document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9133L-12-T-0039
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
The attached Technical Evaluation Matrix replaces the existing iteration. Additionally for clarification There will be two (2) Training Sites Moffett Federal Airfield CA and Suffolk County Airfield NY.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EVALUATION CRITERIA GUARDIAN ANGEL TRNG.doc | DOC document | |
| W9133L-12-T-0039.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Technical Evaluation Matrix
Offeror: ___________________
Overall Rating: _______________
| Evaluation Factor |
| Significant Strengths/Weaknesses/Deficiencies |
Area 1:
Technical Rating
Factor 1: Program Assessment: Demonstrating knowledge and experience to provide Black Diamond Modular Tactical Mini-comp training for Guardian Angel Operators.
Strengths -
Weaknesses –
Deficiencies –
Factor 2: Execution Plan: Illustrating the technical approach to project execution, proposed team composition, team member qualifications, draft quality control plan, performance metrics and measurement plan, subject matter knowledge and experience.
Strengths -
Weaknesses –
Factor 3: Past Performance evaluation
Strengths –
Weaknesses –
Area 2: Cost
Completeness
Reasonableness
** LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE: THE CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED BASED ON LPTA.
EXCELLENT: Proposal demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements and approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards has exceptional strengths that will significantly benefit the Government.
GOOD: Proposal demonstrates good understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards has one or more strengths that will benefit the Government.
SATISFACTORY: Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards acceptable solution few or no strengths.
MARGINAL: Proposal demonstrates shallow understanding of requirements and approach that only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance.
UNSATISFACTORY: Fails to meet performance or capability standards. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .