W912PL-18-R-0042_Amendment0003.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Please review Standard Form 30 Continuation Page for details and purpose of aforementioned amendment.

USACE, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CESPL-CTE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

P.O. BOX 532711

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

W912PL-18-R-0042

06/22/2018

05/11/2018

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code). Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date).

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By). Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor). For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data).

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B. The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting officer's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13. Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification).

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document

Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

(i) Total contract price increased by $

(ii) Total contract price decreased by $

(iii) Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

(g)

(h)

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

(i) A reference to the letter determination; and

(ii) A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

STANDARD FORM 30 CONTINUATION PAGE

The purpose of this amendment is to:

Remove/Replace Section 00 22 16 (Factors have been revised) Remove/Replace Section 00 73 00 (Period of Performance Clarification)

The following attachments are being provided to address inquiries submitted via PROJNET:

Add Section 05 73 50 Perforated Metal Panels Add Section 08 33 23 Overhead Coiling Doors Add Section 09 22 36 Lath Add Section 09 24 23 Cement Stucco Add Section 10 70 50 Exterior Sun Control Devices Add Section 23 07 00 Thermal Insulation for Mechanical Systems Add Section 32 31 13 Chain Link Fences and Gates

*PLEASE REVIEW ALL OF PROJNET’S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFIs) AND GOVERNMENT

RESPONSES PRIOR TO SUBMITTING YOUR PROPOSAL.

*THIS PROCUREMENT IS NOT A DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT, IT IS A DESIGN-BID-BUILD PROJECT.

PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THIS AMENDMENT AND INCORPORATE ALL OF ITS CHANGES

WHEN GENERATING YOUR PROPOSAL.

*THE DAVIS-MONTHAN DESIGN COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES (DCG) IS PROVIDED AS A

COMPLEMENT TO THE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS. IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE DMAFB DCG HAS

A MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENT, THE REQUIREMENT OF THE DMAFB DCG SHALL BE USED.

Amendment 0003

Section 00 22 16- 1

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND THEIR RELATIVE WEIGHTS

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

V. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

VI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

VII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

Section 00 22 16- 2

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

The Government will make award to the offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The Government will first review non-cost technical proposals to determine which are acceptable to the Government.

Responses that the offeror understands, or will comply with the specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications, and general or overly broad responses such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, will be rated unacceptable.

The objective of the Government is to award a contract to an offeror who submits a proposal that when evaluated is determined to meet the acceptability levels established in the solicitation for each non-cost evaluation factor. Each non-cost evaluation factor will receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The award will be made to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated proposed price.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

A. In order to be considered technically acceptable, proposals must meet the following minimum acceptable requirements:

FACTOR 1: OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR 2: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 3: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR 4: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT

STRUCTURE

FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

Section 00 22 16- 3

FACTORS 1 THRU 5 RATING SCHEME RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria. Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation.

Performance risk is an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts relative to the past performance factor.

NOTE: For purposes of evaluating Offeror Experience and Offeror Past Performance, Offeror is defined as the firm identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. If more than one firm is listed in Block 14, then a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the Joint Venture/partnership shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. However, each party of the Joint Venture/partnership must submit its own DUNS number with the Joint Venture/partnership proposal. Submitted projects performed by other entities than the Offeror, such as teaming joint venturers or partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated as Offeror experience or Offeror past performance, unless those other entities are part of a Joint Venture/partnership Offeror as demonstrated by a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement.

Also, cited project examples must identify its role in the project if the Offeror was not the prime contractor – i.e., it was acting as a subcontractor at any tier.

FACTOR #1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the offeror for its experience in successful completion of construction projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity completed within the past five years. Projects completed over five years ago may be submitted to demonstrate ability, but they will carry little weight in the evaluation and will not be used to meet the standard for acceptability.

Evaluation Factor: Offeror shall identify all projects of a similar scope, magnitude and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years. Offeror shall demonstrate experience in the construction of similar type facilities, and shall demonstrate successful completion and ICD 705/ICS 705-1 certification of secure spaces (SCIF, SAPF, etc.) within at least one project. Provide

Section 00 22 16- 4 a description of the project, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion, and the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Offeror may include projects completed by predecessor companies, as long as the relationship of the predecessor company is clearly documented in the proposal.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror can demonstrate successful completion of two or more projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity within the past five years, including demonstration of successful completion and ICD 705/ICS 705-1 certification of secure spaces (SCIF, SAPF, etc.) within at least one project. At least one of the projects must have been completed by the construction contractor.

FACTOR #2 PAST PERFORMANCE

This factor will assess the offeror’s past performance, evaluate whether the offeror’s past performance is relevant or not relevant to that effort to be acquired, and determine contractor capability to successfully perform the proposed effort.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate contractor capability to perform the proposed effort. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant and how well the Contractor performed on the contracts will be based upon the efforts of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity of projects successfully completed within the past five years (projects in Tab #1) and projects substantially completed. In the event of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or of whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor.

1. Identify all contracts, including Federal, State, local government and private/commercial, for efforts similar to the Government requirement of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity which are either successfully completed within the past five years (Tab #1) or substantially completed. Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on Federal contracts. Offeror(s) are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. Important Note: See paragraph 5. below regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

a. Furnish a Performance Assessment Report for each referenced contract. If an official written performance evaluation/rating was not received, so indicate. A past performance questionnaire must be sent to the reference if a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the Performance Assessment Report. The Offeror(s) is also encouraged to submit any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence that the Contractor received from the Owner/Customer at the time of contract performance/completion. However, the Offeror(s) is neither required nor requested to have the Owner/Customer write such a letter for the purpose of this solicitation. Formats for the Performance Assessment Report has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Performance Assessment Report.

b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal (if no official written performance rating or evaluation is

Section 00 22 16- 5 not available) for Factor 2 for PAST PERFORMANCE where a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the performance assessment report. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mr. Otse Adikhai via email at otse.a.adikhai@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count.

Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

3. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror(s)— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

5. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offeror(s), the Offeror(s) must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offeror(s). If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Section 00 22 16- 6

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror can demonstrate an overall satisfactory performance rating for each recent, relevant project within the last 5 years.

FACTOR #3: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to perform and to satisfy all construction contract requirements. Responses to this factor must discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements and their commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and integrated construction schedule.

Evaluation Factor: Proposals must discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements and their construction methods / approach to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and schedule. The quality of the offeror’s approach and methodology, and the workability of the approach and technical feasibility to perform successfully will all be evaluated. The construction quality control system must be presented, as well as a description of Red Zone activities for the contract. The offeror shall also address the operability and maintainability of the proposed project.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror’s narrative demonstrates a commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements, including the proposed schedule. The Offeror’s narrative must address, at a minimum: their understanding of and adherence to the basic RFP requirements for civil/site, architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and waste water treatment system, their construction Quality Control plan for the work to be performed, their understanding and implementation of Red Zone activities and operability/maintainability of the project.

FACTOR #4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to satisfy all contract requirements within its Corporate Management Structure. The Government will review the corporate decision-makers support for the construction contract execution team and the construction management structure.

Evaluation Factor: The offeror must demonstrate their ability to manage and control this contract.

The offeror must provide an organization chart that shows the corporate organization and reporting chain for key personnel and details the communications flow for the proposed team and the customer. The offeror shall provide resumes for persons directly responsible for carrying out the day to day operations of this contract, including the project manager, site superintendent, construction quality control manager, and safety manager. The resumes should be detailed enough to show adherence to the RFP requirements and/or abilities to perform the job by specifically describing education, professional qualifications and years of relevant experience. The offeror must explain its present workload and the availability of a team to execute the contract. The offeror must explain a succession plan for replacement of key personnel, including project management, site superintendence, construction quality control manager, and safety manager.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides an organization chart that clearly shows authorities and lines of communications, the resumes provided show that the staff is qualified and meets the RFP requirements (where applicable), the present workload for the Offeror is discussed, the availability of the proposed team is discussed, and a replacement plan for key personnel is provided.

Section 00 22 16- 7

FACTOR #5: SCHEDULE

The Offeror shall provide a narrative that includes, as a minimum, discussion of proposed sequence of work activities, bid item phasing, interim and final acceptance. Offers shall include a schedule bar chart reflecting the major construction activities with the completion period from the applicable contract Notice to Proceed (NTP). The proposal schedule shall be graphically presented, and may be on a maximum paper size of 11" x 17". The schedule shall reflect the major construction milestones, and the sequence of work required for this project. The schedule shall indicate start/finish dates of events, and durations. A detailed network analysis is not required as a proposal submittal item. The schedule must show a logical approach of the activities and durations to accomplish each bid item and each option.

Offerors are cautioned that if they do not meet the schedule completion times shown in Section 00 73 00-3, Clause 52.211-10, of this Request for Proposals their Technical Proposals may be rated Unacceptable for this factor.

Offerors are cautioned that schedules showing shortened government review times for submittals may cause the Schedule evaluation factor to be rated unacceptable.

Offerors are cautioned that the schedule submitted as part of this factor is preliminary in nature and only for use in the evaluation of the logic of the means and methods for accomplishing the contract. As such, the proposed schedule shall not change RFP requirements, and acceptance of the offeror’s proposal does not indicate or include acceptance of changes to the basic RFP that may be present in the proposed schedule.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides a schedule narrative that shows completion within the RFP required time frame and discusses the major milestones for the project, and provides a bar chart schedule that is clear and logical.

FACTOR #6 SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION PLAN

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the extent of participation of small business concerns in performance of this contract opportunity. The Offeror’s Technical Proposal must demonstrate, through the Small Business Participation Plan, that the Offeror will meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business participation goal of 20% based on the total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business).

The work to be performed directly by a small business prime Offeror will also be evaluated as Small Business participation. All Offerors must complete and submit the Small Business Participation Plan form.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the Small Business Participation Plan on the basis of:

(a) The extent to which Small businesses firms are specifically identified in the proposal;

(b) The complexity and variety of the work small business firms are to perform;

(c) Past performance of the offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-

, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (large business only); and

(d) The extent of participation of SB firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition and the extent of which the proposal meets or exceeds small business participation goals for this acquisition.

(e) Small Business Subcontracting Plan: Offerors who are required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall place the plan at Tab #6 of the Price Proposal (Volume I). For evaluation purposes, the Price Evaluation Team will review the plan for consistency with the Small Business Participation Plan and will report the results of the consistency review to the Source Selection Evaluation Board.

Section 00 22 16- 8

Small Business Participation Plan (Form)

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or

{ } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Businesses { } Woman-Owned Small Business { } HUB Zone Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business { } HBCU/MIs

(2) Submit the total combined percentage (must equal 100%) of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Sub-contractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Percentage of Total Contract Dollars/Price

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) % Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) %

(3) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business.

The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Gentleman Concierge (HubZone) and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%);.

SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Businesses % HUB Zone Small Business % Woman Owned Small Business % Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB % Veteran Owned Small Business % HBCU/MIs %

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Section 00 22 16- 9

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small:

Small Disadvantaged Businesses:

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

HBCU/MI:

(5) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either -- written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

Section 00 22 16- 10

(6) Large Business Subcontracting Past Performance: Describe the extent to which you attained applicable goals for contracts that required you to submit a Subcontracting Plan. You may include copies of up to three ISRs (Individual Subcontracting Reports) to validate your past performance. You may also submit an explanation of your efforts, where you failed to meet goals.

Additional Important Note for Large Businesses only.

Small Business Sub-Contracting Plans (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan, large business offerors must also submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-9. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted.

Section 00 22 16- 11

V. VALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Price or cost to the Government will be evaluated and considered in the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) process but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the evaluation.

The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it is realistic for the work to be performed; reflects a clear understanding of the requirements;

and is consistent with the Offerors Technical Proposal. All offers with separately priced line items or sub line items will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

VI. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective contractors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being downgraded and/or being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail, may be downgraded.

-END OF SECTION

General Instruction Building Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, AZ

00 73 00 - 1

SECTION 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

ACCRUALS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

REQUIRED INSURANCE

ER 415-1-15 (OCT 1998) TIME EXTENSION FOR UNSUALLY SEVERE WEATHER

WORK DAYS AND HOURS

ALTERNATE STRUCTURED APPROACH TO WEIGHTED GUIDELINE METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACTS

GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED RFP DRAWINGS, SURVEYS AND SPECIFICATIONS

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

52.236-1 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR (APR 1984)

52.236-25 REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF DESIGNERS (JUN 2003)

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

52.236-5000 DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT ORDER OF PRECEDENCE (AUG 1997)

52.236-5001 PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUTSIDE ASSOCIATES OR CONSULTANTS

PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUTSIDE ASSOCIATES OR CONSULTANTS (MAY 2006)

52.236-5002 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS, SURVEYS, AND SPECIFICATIONS

IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (JUL 2002)

52.236-5003 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2003)

52.236-5004 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR DESIGN (MAY 2002)

52.236-5005 WARRANTY OF DESIGN (MAY 2002)

52.236-5006 DEVIATING FROM THE ACCEPTED DESIGN (JUN 2002)

52.236-5007 CONTRACTOR'S ROLE DURING DESIGN PROCESS (JUN 1998)

52.236-5008 VALUE ENGINEERING AFTER AWARD (JUN 1999)

52.236-5009 PARTNERING (FEB 2000)

52.236-5010 GOVERNMENT RE-USE OF DESIGN (MAY 2006)

WARRANTY OF CONSTRUCTION WORK

SEQUENCE OF DESIGN-CONSTRUCTION

RECOMMENDED INSURANCE COVERAGE (HND MAR 2002)

TRAINING (HND FEB 2000)

DESIGN CONFERENCES (HND AUG 1997)

00 73 00 - 2

SUBMITTAL OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR (HND UNDATED)

INVOICES

252.227-7022 GOVERNMENT RIGHTS (UNLIMITED) (MAR 1979)

252.227-7023 DRAWINGS AND OTHER DATA TO BECOME PROPERTY OF GOVERNMENT. (MAR 1979)

252.236-7000 MODIFICATION PROPOSALS - PRICE BREAKDOWN. (DEC 1991)

252.236-7005 AIRFIELD SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. (DEC 1991)

252.236-7008 CONTRACT PRICES - BIDDING SCHEDULES. (DEC 1991)

00 73 00 - 3

ACCRUALS

In accordance with USACE Engineer Financial Regulation (ER) 37-1-30, and other applicable Federal and DOD financial accounting standards, the Contractor is required to assist government personnel with providing reasonably accurate accrual estimates. The accrual is from the thru date of the period of performance (Eng Form 93, block 9) to the end for the month of the value of goods and/or services rendered/expected to be rendered to the Government pursuant to this contract. This is for each calendar month during which goods and services are delivered. Standard forms with instructions will be provided by the Government to assist with meeting this requirement. These monthly estimates, which facilitate timely entry of accruals, must be received by the Government on or before six (6) business days prior to each calendar month-end.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

The Contract Administration Office for this contract subsequent to award is:

Department of the Army Los Angeles District, Corps of Engineers Tucson Resident Office 5205 E. Comanche St. Bldg. 1605 Tucson, Arizona 85707-6130

Payment will be made by:

USACE Finance Center

ATTN: CEFC-AO-P

5270 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

Submit Invoices to:

REFER TO SF 1442, BLOCK 26 WHICH WILL BE COMPLETED AT TIME OF AWARD

REQUIRED INSURANCE

Insurance is required as follows:

a. Either Workman's Compensation or Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $100,000.00.

b. General Liability. The Contracting Officer shall require bodily injury liability insurance coverage written on the comprehensive form or policy of at least $500,000.00 per occurrence.

c. Automobile Liability Insurance for Bodily Injury and Property Damage with minimum limits of $200,000.00 for injury or death of any one person; $500,000.00 for each accident or occurrence of bodily injury liability; and $20,000.00 for each accident or occurrence for property liability.

d. In every case the insurance coverage shall amount to at least the limits stated above. However, where the Financial Responsibility Compulsory Insurance Law of the State in which the installation is located requires higher limits, the Automobile Liability Insurance Policy should provide coverage of at least those limits.

Prior to the commencement of work hereunder, the Contractor shall furnish to the Contracting Office a certificate or written statement of the above required insurance. The policies evidencing required nsurance shall contain an endorsement to the effect that cancellation or any material change in the policies adversely affecting the interests of the Government in such insurance shall not be effective until 10 days after written notice thereof to the Contracting Officer.

00 73 00 - 4

The Contractor agrees to insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph, in all subcontracts hereunder.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING OFFERS

(a) Envelopes containing offers, cost and technical, etc., must be sealed, marked and addressed follows:

Envelopes containing bids must be sealed, marked and addressed as follows:

MARK ENVELOPES:

RFP No. W912PL-18-R-0042 Proposal Due Date: see SF 1442, Block 13

ADDRESS ENVELOPES TO:

Department of the Army U. S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles ATTN: Contracting Division, CESPL-CT-E C/O: Otse A. Adikhai 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 930 Los Angeles, CA 90017

EXPRESS MAIL ENVELOPES:

Department of the Army U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles ATTN: Contracting Division, CESPL-CT-E C/O: Otse A. Adikhai 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 930 Los Angeles, CA 90017

(b) Hand carried proposals may be deposited prior to the time and date set for receipt of proposals as follows:

US Army Engineer District, Los Angeles Security Office 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101

Los Angeles, California 90017

ER 415-1-15 (OCT 1998) TIME EXTENSION FOR UNSUALLY SEVERE WEATHER

This provision specifies the procedure for the determination of time extensions for unusually severe weather in accordance with the Contract Clause entitled “DEFAULT (FIXED PRICE CONSTRUCTION)”. In order for the Contracting Officer to award a time extension under this clause, the following conditions must be satisfied:

The weather experienced at the project site during the contract period must be found to be unusually severe, that is, more severe that the adverse weather anticipated for the project location during any given month. The unusually severe weather must actually cause a delay to the completion of the project. The delay must be beyond the control and without the fault of negligence of the Contractor.

a. The following schedule of monthly anticipated adverse weather delays is based on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) or similar data for the project location and will constitute the base line for monthly weather time extensions. The contractor’s progress schedule must reflect these anticipated adverse weather delays in all weather dependent activities.

00 73 00 - 5

Monthly Anticipated Adverse Weather Delay Work Days Based on (5) Day Work Week

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

5 3 3 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 5

b. Upon acknowledgement of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) and continuing throughout the contract, the Contractor will record the daily CQC report, the occurrence of adverse weather and resultant impact to normally scheduled work. Actual adverse weather delay days must prevent work on critical activities for 50 percent or more of the Contractor’s scheduled work day.

c. The number of actual adverse weather delay days shall include days impacted by actual adverse weather (even if adverse weather occurred in previous month), be calculated chronologically from the first to the last day of each month, and be recorded as full days. If the number of actual adverse weather delay days exceeds the number of days anticipated in paragraph (b), above, the Contracting Officer will convert any qualifying delays to calendar days, giving full consideration for equivalent fair weather work days, and issue a modification in accordance with the contract clause entitled “Default (Fixed Price Construction)”.

WORK DAYS AND HOURS

The normal workdays and hours for this project will be Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays, from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Access to the work site may be restricted to these hours and days. Work during other than normal hours and days must be coordinated in advance with the Administrative Contracting Officer.

ALTERNATE STRUCTURED APPROACH TO WEIGHTED GUIDELINE METHOD FOR

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

The following alternate structured approach shall be used for all fixed-price construction contract actions.

Factor Rate Weight Value

Degree of risk 20 Relative difficulty of work 15 Size of job 15 Period of performance 15 Contractor's investment 5 Assistance by Government 5 Subcontracting 25

Total 100%

Based on the circumstances of the procurement action, each of the above factors shall be weighted from .03 to .12 as indicated below. "Value shall be obtained by multiplying the rate by the weight. The Value column when totaled indicates the fair and reasonable profit percentage under the circumstances of the particular procurement. The profit percentage should be multiplied by the total contract costs, including general and administrative costs.

(1) Degree of risk. Where the work involves no risk or the degree of risk is very small, the weighting should be .03; as the degree of risk increases, the weighting should be increased up to a maximum of .12. Lump sum items shall generally have a higher weight than unit price items; other things to consider include the nature of the work and where it is to be performed. Consider the portion of the work to be done by subcontractors, amount and type of labor included in costs, whether the negotiation is before or after performance of the work, etc. Modifications settled before the fact have much greater risk than those settled after the fact. A weight of .03 is appropriate for after the fact equitable adjustments and/or settlements.

00 73 00 - 6

(2) Relative Difficulty of Work: If the work is difficult and complex, the weight should be .12 and should be proportionately reduced to .03 on the simplest of jobs. This factor is tied in to some extent with the degree of risk.

Some other things to consider are the nature of the work, by whom it is to be done (i.e., subcontractors, consultants), what is the time schedule.

(3) Size of Job. Work of $100,000 or less shall be weighted at .12. Work estimated between $100,000 and $5,000,000 shall be proportionately weighted from .12 to .05. Work from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 shall be weighted at .04. Work in excess of $10,000,000 shall be weighted at .03. It should be noted that control of fixed expenses generally improves with increased job magnitude.

(4) Period of Performance. Work not to exceed one month is to be proportionately weighted at .03. Work in excess of 24 months is to be weighted at .12. Durations between one month and 24 months are to be proportionately weighted between .03 and .12.

(5) Contractor's Investment. To be weighted from .03 to .12 on the basis of below average, average and above average. Things to consider include amount of subcontracting, Government-furnished property or data such as surveys, soil tests, method of making progress payments, and any mobilization payment items.

(6) Assistance by Government. To be weighted from .12 to .03 on the basis of average to above average.

Consider use of Government-owned property, equipment and facilities, and expediting assistance.

(7) Subcontracting. To be weighted inversely proportional to the amount of subcontracting. Where 80% or more of the work is to be subcontracted use .03. The weighting should be increased proportionately to .12 where all the work is performed by the contractor's own forces.

GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED RFP DRAWINGS, SURVEYS AND SPECIFICATIONS

a. The Contractor shall

(1) Check all Government-furnished drawings and surveys immediately upon receipt;

(2) Compare all drawings and surveys and verify the figures before laying out the work;

(3) Promptly notify the Contracting Officer of any discrepancies; and

(4) Be responsible for any errors which might have been avoided by complying with this paragraph.

(5) Verify and use latest edition of required design references.

b. Large scale drawings shall, in general, govern small scale drawings. Figures marked on drawings shall, in general, be followed in preference to scale measurements.

c. Omissions from the drawings or specifications or the misdescription of details of work which are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent of the drawings and specifications, or which are customarily performed, shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or misdescribed details of the work, but shall be performed as if fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and specifications.

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 10 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 540 calendar days after the contractor receives the Notice to Proceed. The project duration will be adjusted to the Contractor’s proposed number of calendar days for the project duration in its response to Evaluation Factor 5 of Section 00 22 16, so long as the proposed duration does not exceed 540 calendar days. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

00 73 00 - 7

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $1536 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

52.236-1 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall perform on the site, and with its own organization, work equivalent to at least fifteen (15%) percent of the total amount of work to be performed under the contract. This percentage may be reduced by a supplemental agreement to this contract if, during performing the work, the Contractor requests a reduction and the Contracting Officer determines that the reduction would be to the advantage of the Government.

52.236-25 REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF DESIGNERS (JUN 2003)

Architects or engineers registered to practice in the particular professional field involved in a State, the District of Columbia, or an outlying area of the United States shall prepare or review and approve the design of architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, or other engineering features of the work.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for—

7 June 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

For instructions contact:

Troy Morris, 520-584-1676

FAX NO. 520-584-1690

Troy.A.Morris@usace.army.mil

(c) Offerors or quoters desiring to attend the site visit shall provide the following information: each individual’s full name (last name, first name, middle initial), date of birth, driver’s license number and state and social security number. Please fill the information into the attached spreadsheet (Site Visit Required Information) and email back to the address shown above.