W912PL-18-R-0042_Amendment0001.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

The purpose of this amendment is to:

Revise STANDARD FORM 1442; Add Section 00 22 00 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS; Add Section 00 22 16 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS; Revise Section 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS (SITE VISIT INFO.); Add DMAFB Design Compatibility Guidelines 2017 to appendix; Add Special Event EAL Sample (for site visit, must complete)

USACE, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CESPL-CTE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

P.O. BOX 532711

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

See

W912PL-18-R-0042

05/23/2018

05/11/2018

1 320

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code). Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date).

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By). Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor). For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data).

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B. The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting officer's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13. Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification).

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document

Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

(i) Total contract price increased by $

(ii) Total contract price decreased by $

(iii) Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

(g)

(h)

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

(i) A reference to the letter determination; and

(ii) A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

W912PL-18-R-0042

X

11 May 2018 1 OF 2650

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 930 Attn: CESPL-CT-E Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325

See Item 7

Otse A. Adikhai (213) 452-3248

General Instruction Building, Davis Montahan Air Force Base:

Construct a General Instruction Building (GIB) to include classrooms, conference rooms, training space, instructor offices, supply rooms, team rooms for training, administrative space, elevator, building information systems, and covered training area. Energy Monitoring Control Systems (EMCS) connections, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) installation, fire protection and alarm systems will be provided. Supporting facilities include utilities, information systems, paving, parking, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, storm drainage to include low impact development measures, landscaping, access roads, site improvements, and Antiterrorism/Force Protection measures. Heating and cooling will be provided by self-contained systems. Measures in accordance with the Department of Defense (DoD) Minimum Antiterrorism for Buildings standards will be provided.

Facilities will be designed to a minimum life of 40 years in accordance with DoD's Unified Facilities Code (UFC 1-200-02) including energy efficiencies, building envelope and integrated building systems performance. Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required. Access for individuals with disabilities will be provided. Cyber Security Measures will be incorporated into this project. Sustainability/Energy measures will be provided.

The estimated cost range of this procurement is $10,000,000-$25,000,000. This is an unrestricted request for proposal; all responsible sources may submit an offer.

10 See 001000

X X *Section 00 10 00

X 10

3 2 PM

13 June 2018 x

AMENDMENT 0001

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

( ) - ; FAX ( ) -

SEE PRICING SCHEDULE

GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING W912PL-18-R-0042

DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, AZ Amendment 0001

00 22 00 -Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: …………..…………………………

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: ..……………………………………………………...2

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: ………………………………………………………………………….2

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT: ………………………………………………………………………………….2

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE: ……………………………………………………………………………2

1.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME ): …………………………..3

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET: …………………………………………………………………………5

00 22 00 -Page 2

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors in Section 00 22 16.

1.1.2. Each Offeror must submit a Price Proposal, Volume I, and a Technical Proposal Volume II as separate distinct volumes. The Price Proposal, and Technical Proposal, must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

1.1.3. All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. No proposed price information should be included in the response to the technical evaluation factors.

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1.2.1. All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” size sheets (e.g., fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. W e e x p e c t 1 1 ” x 1 7 ” s i z e s h e e t s f o r s c h e d u l e a n d d r a w i n g s , b u t n o t h i n g e l s e . Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

1.2.2. All drawing sheets: 22” x 34” (1/2 size 11”x17”), 24" x 36" or 30" x 42" format. Full or half- size sets are acceptable, but must include a minimum of one (1) full-size set; half-size sets must be readable.

1.2.3. Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

1.2.4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

1.2.5. Offerors must provide one (1) CD Rom disk of all the following Design Technical Criteria (AutoCAD 2000 & MS WORD 2000) and Offerors Performance Capability with technical proposal. Offerors will not be required to submit electronic copies of catalog cuts.

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT:

1.3.1. Offeror(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

00 22 00 -Page 3

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE:

1.4.1. Offers shall be received by the Los Angeles District COE no later than the time and date specified as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

1.5. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

1.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only

1.5.2. Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs: The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

1.6. CONTENT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.6.1. TAB 1 – OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

(VOLUME II):

Factor 1: Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.2. TAB 2 – OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME II)

Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.3 TAB 3 – TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES (VOLUME II)

1.6.4. TAB 4 – CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE (VOLUME II)

1.6.5. TAB 5 – SCHEDULE (VOLUME II)

TAB #1 SF 1442

TAB #2

The Completed Pricing Schedule with the Offeror’s proposed contract line item prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for the Base Bid Items. Do not round off to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

TAB #3 A Bid Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”) TAB #4 Representations & Certifications TAB #5 Teaming Agreement or Irrevocable Subcontractor Offer (if applicable) TAB #6 Small Business Utilization Plan

00 22 00 -Page 4

1.6.7 DRAWINGS – NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT

Must be submitted in accordance with Section 00 22 16 and are included in the requirements under Factor 3, Technical Approach. All drawings shall be either full size (22" x 34") or half size (11" x 17") as described in Section 01012.

1.7. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.7.1. Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal: Submit the original and 4 additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format.

1.7.1.1. Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart. The main tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is thirty-six (36) pages, or 18 pages double sided for Factors 1 through 4. P a g e s s u b m i t t e d p a s t t h i s l i m i t w i l l n o t b e e v a l u a t e d . T h e P a s t P e r f o r m a n c e Q u e s t i o n n a i r e s ( P P Q ) a n d u p t o t e n ( 1 0 ) p a g e s o f R e s u m e s ( s i n g l e s i d e d ) w i l l n o t b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e a b o v e p a g e c o u n t . P e r f o r m a n c e A s s e s s m e n t R e p o r t s ( P A R ) w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e p a g e c o u n t , h o w e v e r , a t t a c h m e n t s s u c h a s a n y l e t t e r s o f a p p r e c i a t i o n o r s i m i l a r c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i l l n o t c o u n t a g a i n s t t h e p a g e l i m i t a t i o n .

1.7.1.2. Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Offeror(s) must submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the following volumes and tabs:

00 22 00 -Page 5

VOLUME TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME II

TAB #1

OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

(Factor 1 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #2

OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE

(Factor 2 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #3 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

(Factor 3 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II TAB #4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

(Factor 4 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #5 SCHEDULE

(Factor 5 in Section 00 22 16)

Instructions regarding responses to the evaluation factors are detailed in Section 00 22 16, entitled, “Proposed Evaluation and Contract Award”

00 22 00 -Page 6

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Hybrid (explain)

Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. LEED Certification Building Construction:

10. Warranty or other problems encountered and how resolved:

11. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable): Check one of the following blocks:

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A performance questionnaire has been sent to the reference(s) listed in Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

00 22 00 -Page 7

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

1.8.1. Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 22 00.

The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-18-R-0042

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

00 22 00 -Page 8

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL

CONTENTS NUMBER REQUIRED

VOLUME I

PRICE PROPOSAL/

PRO-FORMA

REQUIREMENTS

--PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

-- SF 1442 AND AMENDMENTS

--PRICING SCHEDULE

--OFFER GUARANTEE (“BID BOND”)

--REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

--SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION PLAN

1 ORIGINAL ONLY

CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE ON

SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

PROJECTS OF SIMILAR TYPES, SCOPES

AND COMPLEXITY

-RECENT RELEVANT TEAMING

EXPERIENCES

ORIGINAL + 4 SETS

VOLUME II PAST

PERFORMANCE ON

RECENT RELEVANT

CONTRACTS

-PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE

CHECK

-RELEVANT PROJECT SUMMARY

-RECENT RELEVANT PROJECT

INFORMATION

TECHNICAL

APPROACH,

METHODS AND

PROCEDURES

- NARRATIVE

CORPORATE

MANAGEMENT

STRUCTURE

- PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

- CONSTRUCTION KEY PERSONNEL’S

RESUME

- ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

SCHEDULE

-PROJECT SCHEDULE NARRATIVE

-PROPOSAED SCHEDULE

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance. you may provide the requested information by email to Otse Adikhai Otse.A.Adikhai@usace.army.mil. or call at (213) 452-3248.

• The Government is requesting receipt of this information by 2:00 p.m. on proposal due date.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance.

Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Mr. Otse Adikhai by telephone

(213) 452-3248.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address:DUNs Number: Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explaind ifferences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE

WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST

REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to E VG S M U N

Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

(please attach additional pages if necessary):

W912PL-18-R-0042

Amendment

Section 00 22 16- 1

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND THEIR RELATIVE WEIGHTS

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

V. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

VI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

VII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

Amendment 0001

Section 00 22 16- 2

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

The Government will make award to the offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The Government will first review non-cost technical proposals to determine which are acceptable to the Government.

Responses that the offeror understands, or will comply with the specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications, and general or overly broad responses such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, will be rated unacceptable.

The objective of the Government is to award a contract to an offeror who submits a proposal that when evaluated is determined to meet the acceptability levels established in the solicitation for each non-cost evaluation factor. Each non-cost evaluation factor will receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The award will be made to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated proposed price.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

A. In order to be considered technically acceptable, proposals must meet the following minimum acceptable requirements:

FACTOR 1: OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR 2: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 3: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR 4: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT

STRUCTURE

FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

FACTOR 6. SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION PLAN

Section 00 22 16- 3

FACTORS 1 THRU 5 RATING SCHEME RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria. Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation.

Performance risk is an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts relative to the past performance factor.

NOTE: For purposes of evaluating Offeror Experience and Offeror Past Performance, Offeror is defined as the firm identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. If more than one firm is listed in Block 14, then a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the Joint Venture/partnership shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. However, each party of the Joint Venture/partnership must submit its own DUNS number with the Joint Venture/partnership proposal. Submitted projects performed by other entities than the Offeror, such as teaming joint venturers or partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated as Offeror experience or Offeror past performance, unless those other entities are part of a Joint Venture/partnership Offeror as demonstrated by a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement.

Also, cited project examples must identify its role in the project if the Offeror was not the prime contractor – i.e., it was acting as a subcontractor at any tier.

FACTOR #1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the offeror for its experience in successful completion of design/build projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity completed within the past five years. Projects completed over five years ago may be submitted to demonstrate ability, but they will carry little weight in the evaluation and will not be used to meet the standard for acceptability.

Evaluation Factor: Offeror shall identify all projects of a similar scope, magnitude and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years. Offeror shall demonstrate experience in the construction of similar type facilities, and shall demonstrate successful completion and ICD 705/ICS 705-1 certification

Section 00 22 16- 4 of secure spaces (SCIF, SAPF, etc.) within at least one project. Provide a description of the project, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion, and the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Offeror may include projects completed by predecessor companies, as long as the relationship of the predecessor company is clearly documented in the proposal.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror and his design partner can demonstrate successful completion of two or more projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity within the past five years, including demonstration of successful completion and ICD 705/ICS 705-1 certification of secure spaces (SCIF, SAPF, etc.) within at least one project. At least one of the projects must have been completed by the construction contractor.

FACTOR #2 PAST PERFORMANCE

This factor will assess the offeror’s past performance, evaluate whether the offeror’s past performance is relevant or not relevant to that effort to be acquired, and determine contractor capability to successfully perform the proposed effort.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate contractor capability to perform the proposed effort. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant and how well the Contractor performed on the contracts will be based upon the efforts of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity of projects successfully completed within the past five years (projects in Tab #1) and projects substantially completed. In the event of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or of whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor.

1. Identify all contracts, including Federal, State, local government and private/commercial, for efforts similar to the Government requirement of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity which are either successfully completed within the past five years (Tab #1) or substantially completed. Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on Federal contracts. Offeror(s) are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. Important Note: See paragraph 5. below regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

a. Furnish a Performance Assessment Report for each referenced contract. If an official written performance evaluation/rating was not received, so indicate. A past performance questionnaire must be sent to the reference if a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the Performance Assessment Report. The Offeror(s) is also encouraged to submit any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence that the Contractor received from the Owner/Customer at the time of contract performance/completion. However, the Offeror(s) is neither required nor requested to have the Owner/Customer write such a letter for the purpose of this solicitation. Formats for the Performance Assessment Report has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Performance Assessment Report.

b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal (if no official written performance rating or evaluation is not available) for Factor 2 for

Section 00 22 16- 5

PAST PERFORMANCE where a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the performance assessment report. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mr. Otse Adikhai via email at otse.a.adikhai@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count. Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

3. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror(s)—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

5. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offeror(s), the Offeror(s) must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offeror(s). If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror can demonstrate an overall satisfactory performance rating for each recent, relevant project within the last 5 years.

Section 00 22 16- 6

FACTOR #3: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to perform and to satisfy all construction contract requirements. Responses to this factor must discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements and their commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and integrated construction schedule.

Evaluation Factor: Proposals must discuss the offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements and their construction methods / approach to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and schedule. The quality of the offeror’s approach and methodology, and the workability of the approach and technical feasibility to perform successfully will all be evaluated. The construction quality control system and design quality control procedures must be presented, as well as a description of Red Zone activities for the contract.