projnet_05.30.18.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contracting Officers Report All Inquiries

Project: HPASS Review: HPASS Inquiries (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 47 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

7480377 Other rfp

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can you provide incumbent contract information?

By: Daniel Jung; Connexus Hub; (9494154364). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No, there is no incumbent because it is a new requirement. However, some of the work is currently being performed by Phacil Inc under contract # W912DY-13-F-0321 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No, there is no incumbent because it is a new requirement. However, some of the work is currently being performed by Phacil Inc under contract # W912DY-13-F-0321 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

2-0 Evaluation Concurred. No, there is no incumbent because it is a new requirement. However, some of the work is currently being performed by Phacil Inc under contract # W912DY-13-F-0321 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480378 Other RFP

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is a transition plan required in the technical proposal?

By: Daniel Jung; Connexus Hub; (9494154364). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. Please see section 1-5.20 of PWS By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. Please see section 1-5.20 of PWS By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480379 Other rfpDoes the prime need to have facility clearance to be eligible for award?

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the prime need to have facility clearance to be eligible for award?

By: Daniel Jung; Connexus Hub; (9494154364). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. Please see section 21.11 of PWS By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. Please see section 21.11 of PWS By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480381 Other rfp

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the prime and subcontractor both need to have ISO 9001 of CMMI certifications prior to submission of proposal to be eligible for award?

By: Daniel Jung; Connexus Hub; (9494154364). On: May 21 2018.

Page 1 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

5/30/2018https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminReportA...

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480648 Program

Management

(W912DY-17-R-0071) HPASS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question 1:

Will the Government accept CPARS in lieu of Past Performance Questionnaires?

Reference: SECTION L PROPOSAL SUBMISSION – VOLUME II-FACTOR 2 PAST PERFORMANCE: "Offerors shall submit a minimum of two (2) and maximum of three (3) past client completed Past Performance Questionnaires – PPQs."

Rationale: CPARS contain critical contract performance information that will allow the government to make an informed assessment of contract execution capabilities. Additionally, as proposals are due less than three weeks from the solicitation release date, submitting CPARS will place less burden on vendors' customer agencies and allow the government to receive prompt past performance information.

Question 2:

To clarify, are the resumes of the Key Personnel identified in PWS 1.5.2 Key Personnel required to be submitted with the proposal?

Reference: PWS 1.5.2 states: "Resumes for the Program Manager and Alternate Program Manager shall be included and considered as key personnel only in the technical proposal detailing the qualifications and experience. All other resumes submitted with the technical proposal will not be considered key personnel during evaluation of proposal."

However, SECTION L - PROPOSAL CONTENT requires bidders to "Identify the prime offeror and major subcontractor/team key personnel as described in the PWS, Section 1.5.2."

Rationale: There are ten separate positions identified as Key Personnel identified in PWS 1.5.2; as proposals are due less than three weeks from the solicitation release date, obtaining all required information for each individual, including letters of commitment, places significant burden on most qualified bidders and may unduly restrict competition.

Question 3:

We respectfully request an extension of the proposal due date by at least one calendar week to June 12, 2018 at 2

PM CST.

Reference: SECTION L – DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS: "Proposal is due 05 June 2018 at 02:00

PM CST."

Rationale: As the current proposal due date is less than three weeks from the solicitation release date (with a requirement for a CD-ROM copy to be mailed to the contracting office), granting at least a one-week extension would encourage greater competition from qualified vendors.

Question 4:

We respectfully request the Government to remove the requirement for a mailed CD-ROM copy of the proposal and accept proposals submitted via AMRDEC SAFE.

Reference: SECTION L – DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS: "SUBMIT PROPOSALS

ELECTRONICALLY VIA CD AND THE AMRDEC SAFE WEBSITE."

Rationale: Accepting proposals only via AMRDEC would allow the Government to streamline the proposal review process; it would also encourage competition by eliminating the need for bidders to spend shipping and production costs.

By: Holly Knouff; Ardent Technologies; (9373121345). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0

Page 2 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

Evaluation Concurred. 1. No. See section L

2. Yes, the only resumes that will be considered key personnel in the submittal will only be the PM and APM. If these key personnel come from subcontractors/team members, then their resume must be submitted. Qualifications of other key personnel will be submitted for review after award during transition in accordance with PWS 1.5.2 and 9.1.

3. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer

4. No, please follow submission requirements By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. 1. No. See section L

2. Yes, the only resumes that will be considered key personnel in the submittal will only be the PM and APM. If these key personnel come from subcontractors/team members, then their resume must be submitted. Qualifications of other key personnel will be submitted for review after award during transition in accordance with PWS 1.5.2 and 9.1.

3. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer

4. No, please follow submission requirements By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480826 Contracting N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question 3 - RFP Page 110, RFP Text: Section 1.5.2, Resumes for the Program Manager and Alternate Program Manager shall be included and considered as key personnel only in the technical proposal detailing the qualifications and experience. Question - Will the Resumes be excluded from the page count of 20 for Element 1: Technical and Management Approach?

By: Brenda Dickerson; Bowhead; (703-578-6245). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480831 Contracting N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question 4 - RFP Page 236 - RFP Text - Proposal is due 05 June 2018 at 02:00 PM CST - Question - We would like to request an extension to the HPASS proposal. The proposal requirements are sizable and include resumes and past performance. The proposal is also due right after Memorial Day Holiday and we would like to request the due date to be extended to July 2, 2018.

By: Brenda Dickerson; Bowhead; (703-578-6245). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480840 Contracting N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question 1 - RFP Page 238, Page, 242, and Page 249, Question - Will the Government please clarify if it is within three years or five years for when the work was performed?

By: Brenda Dickerson; Bowhead; (703-578-6245). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Five years is correct. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Page 3 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

1-1 Government Response. Five years is correct. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480841 Information

Management Page 112 - Section 1.5.7 Meetings and Travel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Given that the solicitation states that the contractor is responsible for providing training at their own expense, will the government provide an estimation of the anticipated training expenses so that the contractor can provide accurate pricing based on the requirements?

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Refer to certification training required per PWS. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Refer to certification training required per PWS. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480844 Other RFP Page 241, Element 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Qualification. If an Offeror is not proposing subcontractors, is a summary matrix depicting the planned level of support by prime and subcontract required?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. Summary matrix also includes hours by functional area and shall be included in the proposal. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

1-1 Government Response. Yes. Summary matrix also includes hours by functional area and shall be included in the proposal. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480845 Contracting N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question 2 - Page 234 - RFP Text - Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES - Attachment 3 DD254 - Question - Attachment 3, DD254, was not included with the documents on FBO, will the Government please provide the DD254?

By: Brenda Dickerson; Bowhead; (703-578-6245). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. an omission. DD254 will be added with upcoming amendment. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. an omission. DD254 will be added with upcoming amendment. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480848 Information

Management Page 176 - Section 1.3 Commercial

General Liability

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The insurance requirements in the solicitation seems higher than normal based on the work requirements. Smaller 8

(a) firms in the 541611 NAICS may have a difficult time in increasing limits of liability to $3,000,000 thus reducing

Page 4 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User competition. Would the government consider adjusting the commercial general liability and errors and omission to $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate?

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. no By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480849 Other RFP Page 241, Element 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Technical Qualification and page xxx, Volume II – Factor 2 Past Performance. Volume II requires at least 2 but no more than 3 completed Past Performance Questionnaires. We understand that if a contract is referenced in the Element 2 – Technical Qualification section, a corresponding reference and PPQ MUST be included in Volume II.

Can the Offeror present more than 3 references in the technical qualification section? It is highly likely that Offerors will have multiple projects that focus on one of the PWS areas and would like to use that project to show relevancy, however, there is a risk of going over the 3-reference limit. Please provide clarification.

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. yes. Will amend. At least two (2) PPQs but no more than five (5) PPQs. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. yes. Will amend. At least two (2) PPQs but no more than five (5) PPQs. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480850 Other RFP Page 245, B. Factors to be

Evaluated

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The instructions for Volume 3, Factor 3 detail Section I: General Information with 3 tabs and then Section II: and 1 tab. Can the Government please clarify in which section and which tab the required Financial Capability should be placed? Also, behind what tab would the Government like Technical Exceptions and Deviations?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Financial capability Under Volume 3, Factor 3, Section II- will amend to add this information.

Technical Exceptions and Deviations under Volume 1, Factor 1 Technical - will amend. This is to be done as a standalone page/paragraph on its own capturing all exceptions and deviations at once/in one place.

By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Financial capability Under Volume 3, Factor 3, Section II- will amend to add this information.

Technical Exceptions and Deviations under Volume 1, Factor 1 Technical - will amend. This is to be done as a standalone page/paragraph on its own capturing all exceptions and deviations at once/in one place.

By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480852 Other RFP General

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is it the Government's intent that Offerors submit a completed Schedule B with their proposal?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes, submit schedule B as required under Volume 3, Factor 3, Section II, Tab 1 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Page 5 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

1-1 Government Response. Yes, submit schedule B as required under Volume 3, Factor 3, Section II, Tab 1 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480853 Information

Management Page 236 - Proposal Due Date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

To ensure that bidders are able to prepare and submit a proposal for this effort, will the government consider extending the submission timeline to 18 June?

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No extension will be granted at this time due to the immediate need of the customer By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480854 Other RFP Page 112, PWS Section 1.5.9

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Quality Control Program states "The contractor shall include an initial QCP with their proposal." Is it a requirement that a QCP be submitted with the proposal? If so, can the Government provide which volume the QCP should be submitted or should it be submitted under separate cover? If the QCP is to be submitted as part of the proposal, is it excluded from page count?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. QCP is required to be submitted with the proposal. Submitted under Volume I, Factor 1 Technical- clearly identified as QCP separated from other narrative for Factor 1. Yes, Excluded from page count. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. QCP is required to be submitted with the proposal. Submitted under Volume I, Factor 1 Technical- clearly identified as QCP separated from other narrative for Factor 1. Yes, Excluded from page count. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480855 Information

Management Page 238 - Proposal Format

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The solicitation states that a minimum of 2 and maximum of three past performance questionnaires (PPQ) are required for submittal. To provide the best past performance information relevant to the various areas of work, will the government consider revising the requirement to allow 4 PPQ's instead of 3?

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. yes. Will amend. At least two (2) PPQs but no more than five (5) PPQs. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. Will amend. At least two (2) PPQs but no more than five (5) PPQs. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480856 Other RFP Page 246, Evaluation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 6 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

The Evaluation criteria includes "Available Facilities/Assets: The offeror's proposal provides a well-defined strategy that demonstrates a complete understanding of the facilities/asset utilization." This statement is only in the Evaluation criteria and not in the Instructions. Does the Government want Offerors to respond to these criteria?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes. Instructions state to respond to the tasks in the PWS. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes. Instructions state to respond to the tasks in the PWS. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480859 Other RFP Page 245

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government please clarify the statement at the bottom of Page 245 in the Evaluation Criteria: "Additional credit will be given if procedures and processes described to execute the contract support creation of their CDRLs."

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Descriptions of offerors procedures and processes to meet requirements result in creation of CDRL items are indicative of offerors technical capability to perform. CDRLs were devised to be meaningful with respect to information collected by the vendor and provided to the government about the HPCMP, and overall HPCMP project management, and its vital metrics to help in strategic decision making and ensure that all requirements are being met. This is related to their technical ability to perform the tasks and meet the requirement. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Descriptions of offerors procedures and processes to meet requirements result in creation of CDRL items are indicative of offerors technical capability to perform. CDRLs were devised to be meaningful with respect to information collected by the vendor and provided to the government about the HPCMP, and overall HPCMP project management, and its vital metrics to help in strategic decision making and ensure that all requirements are being met. This is related to their technical ability to perform the tasks and meet the requirement. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480861 Other RFP Page 238

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The instructions state "NOTE: The proposal cover, cover letter, glossaries or indices, title page; the list of tables/figures, acronyms, separator tabs, cross-reference to the solicitation paragraphs, past performance reference sheets, subcontractor commitment letters (if required), questionnaires and supporting past performance documents, and cost or pricing data in support of the price proposal, are excluded from the page limitation count" Can Offerors provide a 1 page cover letter with the Technical proposal?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480868 Other RFP Page 242, Volume II

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government confirm that there is no narrative required in Volume II? Offerors only need to provide the names and phone numbers of PPQ recipients? Can Offerors provide copies of CPARS?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0

Page 7 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

Evaluation Concurred. Clients shall provide the complete PPQ only (attachment included with the solicitation). No CPARS will be accepted at this time. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Clients shall provide the complete PPQ only (attachment included with the solicitation). No CPARS will be accepted at this time. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480871 Other RFP Page 240, Key Personnel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can that Government confirm that resumes of key staff should address the bulleted list at the bottom of page 240?

Please confirm if this is outside of page count, given the significant amount of information required with the tight page constraints. If it is outside of page count, can Offerors provide resumes as an Appendix to Volume I?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The key personnel information submitted for the PM and APM should include items in the list provided on page 240. Resumes will not be counted against the page count. Resumes can be organized as an appendix By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. The key personnel information submitted for the PM and APM should include items in the list provided on page 240. Resumes will not be counted against the page count. Resumes can be organized as an appendix By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480873 Other RFP Page 240, Key Personnel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government confirm that the only narrative in the Key Personnel section is the Program Manager qualification discussion?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The overall Program Manager qualifications shall be discussed in the narrative.

However, the Key Personnel section also includes the list of information required for PM and APM, which can be submitted via resume or in the narrative. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. The overall Program Manager qualifications shall be discussed in the narrative.

However, the Key Personnel section also includes the list of information required for PM and APM, which can be submitted via resume or in the narrative. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480876 Other RFP Page 117-118

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government please describe the difference between the Integrated Master Schedule (Section 4.1.3, Page 117; CDRL A018) and the Program Master Calendar (Section 4.1.6, Page 118; CDRL A019)?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Integrated Master Schedule: How the contract tasks are done and how they are related to each other.

Program Master Calendar: The calendar documenting the activities for the entire HPCMP organization. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Integrated Master Schedule: How the contract tasks are done and how they are related to each other.

Program Master Calendar: The calendar documenting the activities for the entire HPCMP organization. By:

Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 8 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480878 Other RFP Page 148, Section 13.4

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government clarify the discrepancy between potential performance locations shown in Section 13.4 and the locations of Historical Performance in Section 5.0, Technical Exhibit 1? Is it likely that the historical locations of support will remain in tact or are they likely to change to either the primary locations (Lorton; Vicksburg) or the secondary locations in Section 13.4? This would likely affect pricing. Also, can Offerors propose Remote locations for functions currently / historically performed remotely?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 13.4 identifies major HPCMP installations where temporary work may be required.

5.0 identifies locations where H-PASS contractors will regularly work.

In technical exhibit 1, "Remote" identifies locations for functions currently / historically performed remotely.

Offerors can propose remote locations for those positions. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. 13.4 identifies major HPCMP installations where temporary work may be required.

5.0 identifies locations where H-PASS contractors will regularly work.

In technical exhibit 1, "Remote" identifies locations for functions currently / historically performed remotely.

Offerors can propose remote locations for those positions. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480880 Other RFP Page 112, Section 2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Period of Performance is listed at December 2018 – December 2023? This implies, absent specific dates, that the contract runs for 61 months rather than 60 months (base year + 4 option years fully executed), which would affect pricing. Can the Government please clarify the specific period of performance?

By: Natalia Czapski; Technik, Inc.; (7033106088). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Dates for POP are estimated. The POP will be 60 months. (For example: 14 December 2018-13 Dec 2023) By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Dates for POP are estimated. The POP will be 60 months. (For example: 14 December 2018-13 Dec 2023) By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480890 Information

Management Page 242 - Volume II - Factor 2

Past Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will past performance questionnaires from supporting subcontractors be evaluated, or will the government only be evaluating past performance from prime offerors?

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Up to five (5) total PPQs from the Prime and the subcontractors will be evaluated By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Up to five (5) total PPQs from the Prime and the subcontractors will be evaluated By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480894 Section L & H

Page 9 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

Information Management

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

There is a conflict in the definition of Key Subcontractors, page 180 states "performing more than 20% of the total cost" and page 240 states "performing more than 10% of the work". Please clarify which percentage is correct.

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Both percentages are correct- they are different measures. Will amend both definitions to include both references. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652- 5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Both percentages are correct- they are different measures. Will amend both definitions to include both references. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480909 General Section 1.3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On Page 107 of 250, it states that the following, "the contractor shall possess one or more of the following credentials; ISO 9001:2008, ISO 9001:2015; CMMI Level II (or higher) - DEV or CMMI Level II (or higher) - SVC."

Within Section L - Proposal Submission, this is not listed as a shall within Element 1. Will the government remove this requirement for this contract?

2. If not, will the government permit the offeror to respond to this requirement by stating within the proposal submission that they will commit resources to obtain the certification within the base year of the contract, to demonstrate their commitment to the quality standard.

3. If the government requires this standard remains, can offeror demonstrates its commitment to the quality standard through its teaming partner CMMI / ISO credentials?

By: Tina Wilson; T47 International, Inc.; (301-580-2656). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 1. no

2. no

3. no By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. 1. no

2. no

3. no By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480912 Contracting Section L - General

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is there an incumbent?

If so, what is the company name and contract number?

By: Tina Wilson; T47 International, Inc.; (301-580-2656). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No, there is no incumbent because it is a new requirement. However, some of the work is currently being performed by Phacil Inc under contract # W912DY-13-F-0321 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No, there is no incumbent because it is a new requirement. However, some of the work is currently being performed by Phacil Inc under contract # W912DY-13-F-0321 By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 10 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

7480917 Contracting Section 1.3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question:

On Page 107 of 250, it states that the following, "the contractor shall possess one or more of the following credentials; ISO 9001:2008, ISO 9001:2015; CMMI Level II (or higher) - DEV or CMMI Level II (or higher) - SVC."

Within Section L - Proposal Submission, this is not listed as a shall within Element 1. Will the government remove this requirement for this contract?

2. If not, will the government permit the offeror to respond to this requirement by stating within the proposal submission that they will commit resources to obtain the certification within the base year of the contract, to demonstrate their commitment to the quality standard.

3. If the government requires this standard remains, can offeror demonstrates its commitment to the quality standard through its teaming partner CMMI / ISO credentials?

By: Tina Wilson; T47 International, Inc.; (301-580-2656). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. 1. no

2. no

3. no By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. 1. no

2. no

3. no By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480921 Information

Management Transition/Phase-in

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide specific details on the Physical Infrastructure (i.e. number of locations, types of infrastructure) required for the Transition/Phase-in.

By: Gabriel Mena; Enlogica Solutions, LLC; (2567152009). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Physical infrastructure includes Physical security and office equipment. Location will be at the office in Lorton, VA seating 42 staff members. Office in Vicksburg, currently seating one contractor. Equipment, such as laptops, monitors, VTCs, phones etc..., will be checked in by the outgoing vendor and checked out by the incoming vendor.

Office equipment such as the large printer/copiers, tables, chairs shall be inventoried and turned over during the transition.

The contractor will be responsible for physical security. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Physical infrastructure includes Physical security and office equipment. Location will be at the office in Lorton, VA seating 42 staff members. Office in Vicksburg, currently seating one contractor. Equipment, such as laptops, monitors, VTCs, phones etc..., will be checked in by the outgoing vendor and checked out by the incoming vendor.

Office equipment such as the large printer/copiers, tables, chairs shall be inventoried and turned over during the transition.

The contractor will be responsible for physical security. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7480930 Contracting Volume 3: Factor 3: Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 5.1 provides the Estimated Workload Data. Will the government please identify which positions are SCA and Non-SCA?

From the estimated workload data, if the positions are incumbent positions, will government provide the historical

Page 11 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User number of years that the incumbent personnel providing services within that position have been working and not had a break in service? This helps industry calculate a realistic cost for projecting paid-time off. Thank you.

By: Tina Wilson; T47 International, Inc.; (301-580-2656). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Consult with the Department of Labor regarding labor categories. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Consult with the Department of Labor regarding labor categories By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481041 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: Price Worksheet

QUESTION:

The excel Price Worksheet does not include the ODC plugs listed in Section B. Can the Government please provide an updated Price_Worksheet with these values?

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes-will provide with upcoming amendment By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Yes-will provide with upcoming amendment By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481048 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: PWS 4.7.5.1 and PWS 4.2.4

QUESTION: These two sections (Senior and Enterprise-Wide Meeting Logistics Support) appear to be the same requirements. Should 4.2.4 be removed, or is there a difference in expectations?

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Senior meetings support high level HPCMP leadership staff and stakeholder meetings. These tend to be medium sized meetings or smaller. Enterprise-wide meetings support meetings that span the entire DoD HPCMP organization. These tend to be larger, and tend to require registration or additional logistics. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Senior meetings support high level HPCMP leadership staff and stakeholder meetings. These tend to be medium sized meetings or smaller. Enterprise-wide meetings support meetings that span the entire DoD HPCMP organization. These tend to be larger, and tend to require registration or additional logistics. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481052 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: PWS 5.0 and PWS 13.2

QUESTION:Technical Exhibit 1 notes some FTEs as being remote, historically. Will these positions continue to be remote, upon award and subsequent approval by the Government? Or will all telework no longer be permitted, per section 13.2?

Page 12 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. For those that have a seat in the office, regular telework is not permitted.

Historically remote positions can remain remote. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. For those that have a seat in the office, regular telework is not permitted.

Historically remote positions can remain remote. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912- 652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481059 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: Directions for Submitting Proposals, Content, Volume 1, Element 2

QUESTION:In order to provide a "comprehensive description of each member's significant capabilities," all subcontractors must include relevant corporate experience; this conflicts with the requirement that "Any identified corporate experience performed within the past three years must be traceable to the information provided in Volume II, Past Performance" as that Volume only allows information from the Prime. Will the government consider removing this traceability requirement from Volume 1, Element 2?

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No. Relevant corporate experience is acceptable from subcontractors as well.

See previous questions/answers. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No. Relevant corporate experience is acceptable from subcontractors as well.

See previous questions/answers. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481063 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: PWS 4.2.2.4

QUESTION: Would the Government please clarify the following expectation, "Ensures that all website content is up-to-date and accurate and uses ITIL techniques configuration managements."

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. All approved changes to the website must be changed within 24 hours. A structured process must be used to ensure the most current information is shared with the HPCMP customers at all times. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

1-1 Government Response. All approved changes to the website must be changed within 24 hours. A structured process must be used to ensure the most current information is shared with the HPCMP customers at all times. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481066 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: PWS 5.2

Page 13 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User

QUESTION: To ensure fair competition, would the Government consider removing or revising Allowable Substitution for Education "I. General experience is any experience" as it is an overly broad description.

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No. The government will not remove or revise this requirement. The contractor can propose certain education requirements for certain job categories. The government acknowledges that these are acceptable substitutes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. No. The government will not remove or revise this requirement. The contractor can propose certain education requirements for certain job categories. The government acknowledges that these are acceptable substitutes. By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On:

May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481072 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: PWS Evaluation Factors, Section M, A. Basis for Award

QUESTION: Would the Government please clarify what is meant by the "C-type contract" is in the following sentence:

"One C-type contract is anticipated to be awarded to an offeror whose proposal is found to be responsible in accordance with FAR 9.1 and are rated at least "Acceptable in the Evaluation criteria as described in section B below."

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. C-type is a single, stand- alone contract, without task orders or delivery orders.

By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. C-type is a single, stand- alone contract, without task orders or delivery orders.

By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481075 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: DD254

QUESTION: The solicitation references a DD254; however, it does not appear to have been included in the documentation. Will the Government kindly provide the draft DD254?

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Omitted- will add with upcoming amendment By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

1-1 Government Response. Omitted- will add with upcoming amendment By: Gosia Thompson; Contracting Directorate - CT; (912-652-5901) On: May 30 2018

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7481078 Program

Management

W912DY-17-R-0071

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP Reference: Instructions; Element 2, Technical Qualifications

QUESTION: The Government's language appears to infer that the Government wishes to review information pertaining to the entire team being proposed; however, the instructions direct that any information must be traceable to Volume II, Past Performance. Volume II, Past Performance, only permits submission of projects from the Prime

Page 14 of 16ProjNet: Logged In User contractor. Including any information about major team members and their significant experience supporting HPCMP in response to Element 2 would cause an offeror to not be compliant with traceability to Volume II.

Will the Government kindly consider removing the sentence that requires traceability to Volume II, Past Performance from this section as to allow for a complete and detailed explanation of qualifications from both the prime and the prime's team members?

By: Louis Tominack; Tripoint Solutions LLC; (2569648250). On: May 21 2018.

Requires Amendment.

Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. No. Will amend. At least two (2) PPQs but no more than five (5) PPQs.

Subcontractor's PPQs are allowed. Traceability is absolutely required.