W912DW18R0004_MMDF_Amendment_0001_12JUN18.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purposes of this amendment are to:

1. Extend the date Contractor Entry Authorization List (CEAL) Rosters are due for the site visit from 12 June 2018 by 1300 MDT to 15 June 2018 by 1300 MDT. Prospective offerors are reminded that the CEAL Rosters must be typed and sent to shaw na.w est@usace.army.mil.

2. Revise Section 00 22 16, Supplementary Instructions to Proposers, w hich replaces its previous version in its entirety.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW18R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Jun-2018

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Construct a new 4,047 square meter (SM) Missile Maintenance Dispatch Facility (MMDF). The MMDF requires indoor space to manage maintenance personnel and maintenance functions as well as stage personnel, equipment and vehicles for dispatch to remote worksites. In addition, space is required to inspect and repair components and equipment to be used/installed at ICBM Launch and Launch Control Facilities. Maintenance teams utilize a fleet of various types of vehicles to repair/maintain/replace these components.

Indoor vehicle parking space is required for maximum efficiency in dispatch preparation, regardless of weather, some of which is severe enough to limit outdoor exposure to 15 minute work periods. Indoor vehicle storage is required for standby resources to meet contingencies, especially in winter when vehicles have to meet specific environmental parameters prior to loading mission specific components/equipment. Indoor vehicle parking slows degradation of hoses, seals, wiring, and tires of vehicles that were purpose built for missile maintenance tasks.

Controlled exterior mission vehicle parking area is required for parking of mission vehicles not housed within the facility. The parking area must be located adjacent to the MMDF. Adequate circulation around the facility is required to accommodate all mission vehicles.

Requirement includes demolition of existing site features [(e.g., existing asphalt pavement (parking lot)], new access points, curb cuts, and utility stub-outs) are incidental to site development.

The completion date is 690 calendar days after receipt of the Notice to Proceed (NTP).

1.2. DISCLOSURE OF MAGNITUDE

Proposed project will be a Firm Fixed-Price construction project. In accordance with DFARS 236.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects, the order of magnitude for this project is estimated to be in the range of $10,000,000 to $25,000,000. 100 percent payment and performance bonds will be required.

1.3. SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS

FAR Clause 52.232-18 Availability of Funds (APR 1984): Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government’s obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

1.4. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Seattle District (NWS) District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at US Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124-3755 if it does not contain a return mailing address. There will be no exceptions.

1.5. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at: www.fbo.gov W912DW18R0004.

It shall be the offeror’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the Federal Business Opportunities web site (registration required) with the solicitation announcement.

1.6. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Administrative questions and/or comments relative to these documents shall be submitted via e-mail or mailed to:

Contract Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District ATTN: Shawna West Mailing Address:

PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Phone: 206-764-6575 Email: shawna.west@usace.army.mil

Note: All questions and/or comments should reach the above referenced Contracting Office no later than five (5) calendar days before proposal due date, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

1.6.1. Bidder Inquiry

1.6.1.1. Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder

Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

1.6.1.1.1. To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

1.6.1.1.2. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

1.6.1.1.3. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

1.6.1.1.4. The Solicitation Number is: W912DW18R0004

1.6.1.1.5. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 6QZT5E-AM5FCC

1.6.1.2. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries three (3) days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

http://www.fbo.gov/ mailto:shawna.west@usace.army.mil http://www.projnet.org/projnet

1.6.1.3. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

1.6.1.4. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

1.6.1.5. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

1.7. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

See Section 00 45 00, FAR 52.204-8 for the small business size standard/NAICS Code.

1.8. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.9. SITE VISIT

1.9.1. Site visit meeting will be held at 1000 am MDT on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at Building 770, 7218 Goddard

Drive, Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402.

1.9.2. Contractors interested in attending the pre-proposal site visit will need to apply for access to Malmstrom AFB. They must submit the attached information on the "CEAL Roster.” Please see attachment 1 at the end of this Section.

1.9.3. Please fill out your information and email to shawna.west@usace.army.mil by 1300 MDT on 1513 June 2018. Security Forces requires at least ten (10) calendar days to perform background checks.

1.9.4. IMPORTANT: The information provided in the CEAL Roster MUST MATCH your ID. Nicknames, misspellings will result in being disapproved for access. Contractors must submit information for EVERYONE that will attend the site visit; there is no exceptions.

1.9.5. Attendees are required to have picture identification (valid ID) to access the base.

1.9.6. Participants must provide their own transportation. USACE POC is Win Wang (Project Manager) at (206) 605-7608 or win.wang@usace.army.mil.

1.9.7. Please allow yourself enough time to find parking.

1.9.8. OFFERORS ARE URGED and expected to inspect the site where construction is to be performed and to satisfy themselves as to all general and local conditions which may affect the cost of performance of the contract, to the extent, such information is reasonably obtainable.

1.10. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.11. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

Due to heightened security at Government installations, those offerors who have their proposals hand-delivered shall contact Procurement Technician, Sonia Frees at 206-764-3516 or Contract Specialist, Shawna West at 206-764-6575 prior to delivering to the address shown below. At the time specified below, it will be announced that receipt of proposals is closed.

mailto:win.wang@usace.army.mil

Recent terrorist threats have resulted in more time-consuming sign-in and escort procedures and may impact the timely delivery of offers. See FAR 52.215-1 for rules concerning late proposals.

See Box 13 of the Standard Form 1442 for the time and date proposal(s) are due.

EMAIL: Emailed Proposal will NOT be accepted.

FAX: Faxed Proposal will NOT be accepted.

FED-EX/UPS: Shawna West, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CENWS-CTA

4735 E. Marginal Way S., Bldg # 1202

Seattle, WA 98134-2385 Note: Commercial Carriers will not deliver to PO Boxes

MAIL: Shawna West, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CENWS-CTA

PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755

HAND DELIVERY: Shawna West, Contract Specialist, Building 1202 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District

CENWS-CTA

4735 E. Marginal Way S., Bldg # 1202

Seattle, WA 98134-2385

The method of Hand Deliver has changed and takes longer than the previous method of arriving at the Federal Center South building lobby to deliver your Offer. Please allow sufficient time to allow for heightened security at Government installations and to get to our new location in Building #1202. Allow time to park, pass through a metal detector, sign in, and receive a building pass at the Federal Center South Building. From there, you will be directed to the new USACE Oxbow Building (#1202) which sits behind the Federal Center South Building. Allow additional time.

Report to the Security Desk in the lobby of the USACE Oxbow Building and call Sonia Frees, Procurement Technician at 206-764-3516, or Shawna West, Contract Specialist at 206-764-6575. A Contracting representative will come down and accept your Proposal.

Note: If delivery is by any means other than Hand Delivery, please check prior to the due date and time to ensure that your Proposal arrives on time. The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be marked:

”Proposals for Solicitation Number: W912DW18R0004, DO NOT OPEN”

1.12. PROPOSAL FORMAT

1.12.1. All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders or folders with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified. Each volume should be submitted in a clearly marked envelope separate from each other.

1.12.2. Please refer to Section 00 22 16 for submission requirements.

1.12.3. Number of copies: Offerors shall submit one (1) original and five (5) copies printed for Volume I and one

(1) original printed for Volume II. Volume II shall be completely separated from Volume I, sealed in an envelope, and appropriately marked. Offerors shall also submit one (1) CD in read-only format, preferably using one (1) .pdf file.

1.12.4. Volume I - Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the general format specified below:

• Table of Contents for Volume I - (Listing of all sections of the technical proposal)

• Tab A/Factor A – Company Experience

• Tab B/Factor B – Past Performance

1.12.5. Volume II – Offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

• Price Proposal Format; Volume II

• SF 1442 and Price Schedule, Section 00 10 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Bid Guarantee

• Pre-Award Information found at back of Section 00 45 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications

1.12.6. The prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, a signature of the official that can bind the firm and a telephone number shall appear in the lower left corner of the title page of any document/volume to be evaluated.

1.12.7. Volume number, section and date submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number for the amended page, if necessary).

1.13. JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS

Joint Venture Agreements are allowable on competitive 8(a) set-asides and must be received by the SBA prior to the proposal due date and approved before award of a resulting contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project you must advise your assigned Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your BOS has adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR CHANGES ARE ALLOWED

AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF COST PROPOSAL/BID.

1.14. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. The 8(a) joint venture offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

1.15. GEOGRAPHICAL LIMITATION

There is NO geographical limitation for this competitive 8(a) set-aside. All qualified 8(a) concerns are invited to compete.

END OF SECTION 00 21 16

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the technically acceptable responsible Offeror submitting the lowest priced offer – Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). This acquisition will result in the award of a firm-fixed price, construction contract.

The technical evaluation of each proposal will be solely on the basis of Technical Evaluation Factors found in this section. The Government will evaluate each proposal on a technically acceptable/unacceptable basis only with respect to the technical evaluation factors (criteria) described herein. Award will be to the Offeror who presents the technically acceptable proposal with the overall total lowest price. It is the intent of the Government to award off initial offers without discussions.

2.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

2.1 Technical Evaluation:

Acceptability will be based on all factors receiving an acceptable rating. The proposal will be evaluated according to the CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors of this section.

Proposals will receive either an ACCEPTABLE or an UNACCEPTABLE rating for each of the evaluation factors.

Find the description of these ratings in Table 1.

TABLE 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating: Description:

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2.3 Price Evaluation:

In accordance with FAR provision 52.217-5, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Additionally, the prices for the base and option line items will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The prices for the base and option items will also be checked for unbalancing of line items.

The low offeror shall be determined as follows—

1) Those offerors whose non-priced proposals were determined to be technically acceptable and their offered prices determined fair and reasonable will be eligible for award consideration.

2) The Government will award to the technically acceptable lowest priced offeror and lowest price is determined by totaling the base items and option items.

3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS:

The evaluation process consists of three parts:

1) Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete and that a complete proposal is received. An initial review of each of the proposals will be conducted to check for apparent errors, omissions and areas that require clarification. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will ensure that each proposal contains the Price Volume II and the correct number of copies.

2) Company Experience and Past Performance. Company Experience and Past Performance will be evaluated according to the CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors found in this section.

3) Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate price for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. Price will also be verified for unbalancing of line items.

3.1 Definitions:

a) Clarification is a limited exchange with an Offeror for the sole purpose of eliminating minor irregularities, informalities, or apparent clerical mistakes in the proposal or to address adverse past performance not previously addressed with the Offeror. Clarifications do not give an Offeror the opportunity to revise or modify its proposal and are used, as necessary, when not opening discussions.

b) Communications are a limited exchange with an Offeror used to assist in determinations of the competitive range. Communications are limited to enhancing Government understanding of proposals and addressing adverse past performance information not previously addressed if said information is the determining factor preventing an Offeror from being included in the competitive range. Such communications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, or otherwise revise the proposal.

c) Discussions offer the opportunity to resolve deficiencies or weaknesses in the proposals, based on the requirement and the evaluations factors set forth in the solicitation. If the Contracting Officer determines it is necessary to open discussions, they must discuss with all Offerors in the competitive range. Offerors have the opportunity to revise their proposals at the conclusion of discussions.

d) Year: A “year” is 365 consecutive calendar days.

3.2 Bid Guarantee:

The Offeror is required to submit a bid guarantee along with its proposal. The bid guarantee shall be included in Volume II of the proposal. Any proposal received without a bid guarantee will be rejected and is ineligible for review by the Government. The amount of the Bid Guarantee shall be twenty (20) percent of the Offeror’s proposed price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less.

3.3 Submission Format: (Please refer to Section 00 21 16 for number of required copies)

All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below. In Volume I, Technical Proposal, there shall be a tabbed section for each Non-Price Evaluation factor. Volume II, Price Proposal, shall be submitted in a clearly marked envelope.

3.3.1 Volume I - Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the general format specified below:

• Table of Contents for Volume I - (Listing of all sections of the technical proposal)

• Tab A which contains submittal for Factor A – Company Experience, Attachment 1 and 2.

• Tab B which contains submittal for Factor B – Past Performance, Attachment 3.

3.3.2 Volume II – Offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

• SF 1442 and Bid Schedule, Section 00 10 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Bid Guarantee

• Pre-Award Information found at back of Section 00 45 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications

NOTE: Offeror’s Price Proposal is due AT THE SAME TIME as Technical Proposal.

4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.1 CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Proposals shall concisely, accurately, and completely provide the information required for each of the following non-price evaluation factors. NOTE: Absence of complete information will be deemed as if no support information was provided for that factor. Proposals that do not meet the minimum requirements of all of the non-price evaluation factors shall be determined to be UNACCEPTABLE and are not eligible for award consideration.

NO assumptions may be made by the Government. Your proposal must CLEARLY demonstrate the requisite technical experience and qualifications to receive an ACCEPTABLE rating for each of the following criteria:

TABLE 2: EVALUATION

FACTORS: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION:

FACTOR A VOLUME 1, TAB A COMPANY EXPERIENCE

FACTOR B VOLUME 1, TAB B PAST PERFORMANCE

5.0 FACTOR A (TAB A) – Company Experience

5.1 DEFINITIONS FOR FACTOR A (Definitions for the purposes of this factor):

Complexity means construction of a new building with sequencing of multiple elements of work. Examples of work elements include structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and architectural work.

Concrete Grade Beam Supported by Drilled Concrete Pier Foundation: Experience constructing a facility foundation that included concrete grade beams supported on drilled concrete piers.

Function means new construction of a commercial building.

Magnitude means projects equal to or greater than Contract amount of $5,000,000.00.

Military Operations Facility: A facility such as or similar to a “Vehicle Maintenance Facility”, “Vehicle Storage Facility”, and/or “Munitions Maintenance Handling Facility”.

Relevant means that present or past performance effort involved with projects similar in function, scope, magnitude, and complexity.

Similar Geographic Location: Experience constructing projects in Climate Zone 6 or higher as defined by the International Energy Conservation Code 2016.

5.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR FACTOR A:

For this Factor, the Offeror shall submit at least two (2), but no more than five (5), projects which clearly demonstrate that they meet the requirements for this Factor A using Attachment 1 (no more than one (1) form for each project), Offeror or Key Subcontractor Experience Form, or using no more than three (3) type written pages for each project (minimum 10 point font and double spaced) that include at a minimum the same information as Attachment 1. Offeror should describe each project with enough detail to ensure that the Government can meaningfully assess whether the projects submitted are recent and relevant to this project. If more than five (5) projects are submitted, only the first five will be evaluated, starting with the most recent and working backwards in time.

Submitted projects shall be 100% construction progress completed and accepted by the client. Project(s) submitted for Paragraph 5.2.1, 5.2.2, and 5.2.3 of this Section and shall have been completed within six (6) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Project(s) submitted for Paragraph 5.2.4 of this Section shall have been completed within ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Two of the submitted projects shall have been performed by the Offeror acting as the Prime Contractor (See paragraph 5.2.1 and 5.2.3). Any other projects submitted (but no more than a cumulative of five (5)) may have been performed by the Offeror acting as a Key Subcontractor or a Key Subcontractor on your team for this project. If submitting a project performed by a Key Subcontractor, Attachment 2, Letter of Commitment for Key Subcontractor, shall also be provided. Submit projects with characteristics matching the following:

5.2.1 At least one (1) project shall be construction of a new Military Operations Facility valued over $5M on a Military Installation where the Offeror was the general/prime contractor.

5.2.2 At least one (1) project shall show experience with either:

5.2.2.1 Building Information Modeling (BIM) experience constructing a facility that required BIM modeling, coordinating and resolving conflicts in the work prior to fabrication and installation of the work similar to the requirements of Specification Sections 01 78 25 of this solicitation.

5.2.2.2 Or Construction Operations Building Information Exchange (COBIE): Experience constructing a facility that required COBIE deliverables similar to the requirements of Specification Sections 01 79 00 of this solicitation.

5.2.3 At least one (1) project shall be new construction or renovation of a facility valued over $5M in a Similar Geographic Location, the Offeror shall have been the general/prime contractor.

5.2.4 At least one (1) project shall be construction of a facility valued over $5M that included a Concrete Grade Beam Supported by Drilled Concrete Pier Foundation.

The total of two (2) and up to five (5) submitted projects combined, must meet all four elements of the especially relevant experience areas listed above, although all four elements do not necessarily need to be present in any one project. However, each project submitted must demonstrate at least one of the four elements indicated above and in Table 2 below.

Using a Relevant Experience Matrix similar to that shown below in Table 2, clearly identify to which experience area(s) each project example pertains (i.e. Project 1 for the Prime Offeror demonstrating experience with Military Operations Facility and in a Similar Geographic Area; Project 5 demonstrating experience of a Key Subcontractor with Drilled Concrete Pier and Concrete Grade Beam Foundation; etc.):

Table 2: Factor A – Relevant Experience Matrix

Project Title

Military Operations Facility Para. 5.2.1

BIM and/or

COBIE

Para. 5.2.2

Similar Geographic

Location Para. 5.2.3

Concrete Grade Beam Supported by

Drilled Concrete Pier Foundation Para. 5.2.4

Prime Offeror, Project 1 X X

Prime Offeror, Project 2 X X X

Prime Offeror, Project 3 X X

Prime Offeror or Key Sub, Project 4

X X X

Prime Offeror or Key Sub, Project 5

X

5.3 EVALUATION METHOD FOR FACTOR A:

5.3.1 This Factor A will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements of this Factor. If any of the required information is not provided in the Offeror’s proposal the Contractor may be considered nonresponsive and evaluated as Unacceptable.

Table 3: Factor A – Company Experience Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable The proposal clearly demonstrates how the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 5.2.

Unacceptable The proposal does not clearly demonstrate how the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 5.2.

6.0 FACTOR B (TAB B) – Past Performance

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR FACTOR B:

The Offeror shall provide past performance information for each of the projects submitted for Factor A, Company Experience. DO NOT provide past performance references for projects other than those project examples provided for Factor A.

If a completed interim and/or final Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal. Offeror shall not submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) when a completed CPARS evaluation is available. If both are submitted, only the CPARS will be evaluated.

Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal ONLY if a CPARS evaluation is not available. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offeror should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

If the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Shawna West, via email at shawna.west@usace.army.mil prior to the proposal closing date. The Offeror shall instruct the clients to refer to the solicitation number in the subject line. The PPQs are Source Selection materials. All successfully submitted PPQs will receive an e-mail confirmation upon receipt. If the Offeror does not receive the confirmation, it is their responsibility to follow up to ensure the government has received the information.

Offeror shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted past performance information in the past performance evaluation.

Offeror may provide explanation on problems encountered on past projects and the corrective actions taken by the Offeror.

6.2 EVALUATION METHOD FOR FACTOR B:

The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s past performance based on a demonstrated record of performance. Past performance information is an indicator of an Offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully.

The Government will evaluate the successful completion of all project examples for the past six (6) years. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction.

The Government may review other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the PPIRS, including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members mailto:shawna.west@usace.army.mil

(partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), FAPIIS, telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability, and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. This information may involve the Offeror as submitted for relevant experience in paragraph 5.2.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Table 4: Factor B – Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available; the Offeror’s past performance may not be evaluated as favorable or unfavorable. [Ref:

FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)]. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

7.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS:

The following representations and certifications apply to this solicitation. The Offeror submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation shall fill in the appropriate information and/or check the appropriate boxes for each provision listed below and complete the Pre-Award Information which can be found in Section 00 45 00. This information shall be submitted with the Offerors Proposal.

Contractors are required to be registered in the System for Awards Management (SAM) for awards resulting from solicitations.

This rule more efficiently implements the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, as it requires contractors to be registered in SAM for consideration of future solicitations, awards, and payment. Registration is required prior to award of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchase agreement from a solicitation issued after May 31, 1998.

LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL MAKE AN OFFER INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

The web site may be accessed at www.sam.gov.

http://www.sam.gov/

SECTION 00 22 16 - ATTACHMENT 1

OFFEROR or KEY SUBCONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE FORM

USE ONE FORM PER PROJECT

Note: A separate Word version of this document will be accessible on fedbizopps at fbo.gov

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last six (6) years indicating experience with recent and relevant projects.

1. Type of Construction Represented: ______________________________________________________

2. Name of Offeror: ____________________________________________________________________

3. Project Title: _______________________________________________________________________

4. Contract/Project Number: _____________________________________________________________

5. Project Owner and Location: ___________________________________________________________

6. Total Contract Value: $ _____________________________

7. If Offeror performed as Subcontractor, the $-value of Subcontract: $ ___________________________

8. Construction Phase Start Date (Month/Day/Year): __________________________________________

9. Original Construction Phase Completion Date (Month/Day/Year): _____________________________

10. Actual Construction Phase Completion Date (Month/Day/Year): _____________________________ (Actual date if project has been completed)

11. Name of Owner/Client POC: __________________________________________________________

12. Telephone Number of Owner/Client POC: _______________________________________________

13. Email Address of Owner/Client POC: ___________________________________________________

14. General Scope of Construction Project: __________________________________________________

ATTACHMENT 1 CONTINUED:

15. Describe/demonstrate how the project is relevant to the solicitation in the following areas, as stated in the Factor A Definitions:

(a) Function: _____________________________________________________________________

(b) Magnitude of effort: _____________________________________________________________

(c) Complexity:____________________________________________________________________

16. If applicable, explain how the project is relevant to the solicitation in the following areas, as defined in Factor A:

(a) Military Operations Facility as general/prime contractor: ________________________________

(b) Building Information Modeling (BIM):______________________________________________

(c) Construction Operations Building Information Exchange (COBIE) Deliverables_____________

(d) Similar Geographic Location as general/prime contractor:________________________________

(e) Concrete Grade Beam Supported by Drilled Concrete Pier Foundation:______________________

17. Describe your role and responsibility during construction of the project (indicate whether your firm performed as a prime or subcontractor and what percentage of work you self-performed and/or type of work you subcontracted out, if applicable):

18. Summarize your performance evaluation by Customer/Client, if known:

19. Were you issued a Cure Notice, Show Cause Letter, Terminated for Default and/or Assessed Liquidated Damages? (If “Yes” provide an explanation):

ATTACHMENT 2

LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUB-CONTRACTOR

(USE SUB-CONTRACTOR’S COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer:

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for:

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby indicate my commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Offeror), (insert name of subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on project).

Sincerely, (Signed by Authorized Official)

Date: __________

W912DW18R0004

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. [PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information:

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.):

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ATTACHMENT 3: CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact’s Phone Number:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

(E) Exceptional:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory:

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal:

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory:

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable: No information or did not apply to your contract. Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk. (Please attach additional pages if necessary)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

(End of Summary of Changes)