W92DR19R0017_Amendment__2.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Feb-2019

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE

2 HOPKINS PLAZA

03-G-04

BALTIMORE MD 21201

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W912DR19R0017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jan-2019

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT

TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The above referenced solicitation is hereby amended to provide the following in Amendment 2.

1. Provide Responses to "Request for Information" (RFI's)

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

23-Jan-2019

W912DR19R0017

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

RFI'S AMENDMENT 2

QUESTION 1: At the site visit it was indicated that the Army Corps would be open to alternate locations for the new tank. Please confirm that a location closer to the existing Well House building will be acceptable.

ANSWER: Yes. A location closer to the Well House is acceptable.

QUESTION 2: If a new location for the new tank is agreed upon, closer to the existing Well House, will it be acceptable to bury the existing tank foundation rather than removing and disposing of the existing concrete foundation?

ANSWER: The tank foundation could be broken up and buried as long as there are two feet of top soil over it and it has been compacted to prevent excessive settling.

QUESTION 3: During the site visit the Corps representatives indicated that, to their knowledge, there are no

Existing Hazardous Materials (asbestos, lead pant etc.) to be demolished, removed and disposed of. Should our bid assume no disposal, abatement, or remediation of Hazardous Materials?

ANSWER: The tank was installed in 1989, so it was not included in the project Asbestos Plan. It was tested for lead in 2008, which came back negative and was then repainted.

QUESTION 4: Please provide the Sign In list from the Site Visit.

ANSWER:

QUESTION 5: What is the size and the material (PVC, Stainless Steel, Carbon steel) and the Class of the current piping running between the well house and the tank? Is the Corps of Engineers satisfied with the flow rates that this produces?

South Shore Water Tank

Site Visit Attendees

Contractor Attendee

Statewide Aquastore Charlie Gage

J.S. General Contractors Mike Harkenrider

J.L. Watts Scott Livermore

Schuler-Haas James Boyles

W912DR19R0017

ANSWER: The Blueprints state that the inflow pipe is 1.5 inches and the return pipe is 3 inch. Blueprint does not state the Class of pipe or material used for either the inflow or return pipe. After consulting with the operators it is determined that flow rates were sufficient.

QUESTION 6: What is the size and the material and the Class of the current piping running from the water tank and hooked into the distribution network to the user stations? Is the Corps of Engineers satisfied with the flow rates that this produces?

ANSWER: The Blueprints state that the inflow pipe is 1.5 inches and the return pipe is 3 inch. Blueprint does not state the Class of pipe or material used for either the inflow or return pipe. After consulting with the operators it is determined that flow rates were sufficient. Supply pipes running from the Well House to user stations is not being replaced and not covered by this solicitation.

QUESTION 7: To assist in selecting the precise location for the new water tank, are there any soil analysis/boring reports available?

ANSWER: Original soil analysis for the existing water tank is available.

QUESTION 8: The scope of work states that the Contractor is responsible for coordinating access to the site the

"the property owner". Does this refer to the USACE or some other party?

ANSWER: USACE is the property owner.

QUESTION 9: Is the Solicitation for a water tank of exactly 25,000 gallons or is a somewhat larger water tank acceptable? Is this 25,000 useable gallons or a 25,000 gallon capacity?

ANSWER: As covered in the site visit, the proposed water tank could be of smaller capacity (MINIMUM 20,000

GL) or larger in capacity (NOT TO EXCEED 32,000 GL).

QUESTION 10: What is the height of the existing fence around the existing water tank? Does the height include the barbed wire atop the fence? Is a similar height suitable to USACE?

ANSWER: Total height of security fence is 7 foot, this includes the offset arms for the barbed wire. New fence should be of same height or greater.

QUESTION 11: Can Contractor propose a concrete slab upon which to place the foundation and the new water tank in order to provide greater ground clearance?

ANSWER: Any concrete slab or foundation should be designed in accordance to the proposed water tank.

(End of Summary of Changes)