AM_02.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The Solicitation for JBSA B-200 DISA Facility Repair and Upgrades; San Antonio, Texas is amended as follows:

See SF30 Continuation Sheet(s)

NOTE: Proposal Receipt has been extended to 1 June 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Central Time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9126G18R0037

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-May- 2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended,X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9- May -2018

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A19

P.O. BOX 17300

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9126G18R0037

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

CHANGES TO PROPOSAL RECEIPT DATE

1. Proposal Receipt Date: Change the proposal receipt date from "24 May 2018, 12:00 p.m. local time" to "1 June 2018, 12:00 p.m. local time ".

CHANGES TO DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

2. Section 00 22 11 LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) PROPOSAL PREPARATION, Section 00 22 11 has been replaced in its entirety bearing the notation W9126G18R0037-0001.

CHANGES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS

3. Replacement Sections: The following section has been replaced with the accompanying new section of the same number and title bearing the notation W9126G18R0037-0001:

01 10 00 - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 10

SECTION 00 22 11

LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

PROPOSAL PREPARATION

PART I – GENERAL INFORMATION

1. INQUIRIES

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail or mailed to:

Contract Specialist – Primary POC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District ATTN: Douglas Terrell Federal Building 819 Taylor Street, Rm 2A17 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300

Phone: (817) 886-1220 Fax: (817) 886-6403

Email: Douglas.D.Terrell@usace.army.mil

Bidder Inquiry Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via:

Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9126G18R0037 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: RD48EX-A9X2XA

Last day to submit ProjNet questions is 25 MAY 2018 in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

W9126G18R0037-0001

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 11

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Standard Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.

2. DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

a. Offers MUST be sent on or before bid proposal date through AMRDEC Safe website.

b. OFFERS BY TELEGRAPH. Offers received by telegraph, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

c. FACSIMILE OFFERS. Facsimile offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

d. EMAIL. Modifications and cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted. Only the AMRDEC submitted proposal will be accepted and evaluated by the Government.

3. PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE / SITE VISIT

SITE VISIT. See FAR clause 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) –

ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

IMPORTANT NOTES. (1) Remarks and explanations addressed during the conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 12

PART II -- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS.

(1) Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that the outside of each separate volume is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the Offeror.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisitions. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Cost or Pricing Data with their offers.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Submit only the electronic-documents. Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages shall be numbered.

(2) PDF pages should be formatted to print on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper size, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Spreadsheets must fit to (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10 or unusual font style such as script, SECTION 00 22 11 Page 13 or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers of the solicitation, project title and company.

(3) Hard copies will not be submitted.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215- 1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

(6) For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page.

Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

(7) Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision.

Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED” and shall show the date of revision.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

(1). Submit the price proposal as one separate PDF file titled:

W9126G18R0037_COMPANY NAME_PRICE

*Enter your firm’s name for Offeror’s Name

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages in PDF format. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 14

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

#1

The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2

The SF1442 and SF 30 Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3

Section 00 11 00, Pricing Schedule

#4

Section 00 45 00, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors or Clause 52.204-8 if Offeror has electronic certifications in

SAM

#5

JV Agreement and/or Articles of Organization for LLC, if applicable.

#6

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Required.

(4) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all Offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W9126G18R0037

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror (and electronic address if available):

3. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

4. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

TAB 2: The SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award is to be completed by all Offerors and duly executed with an electronic or PDF scanned signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 15

TAB 3: Section 00 11 00.02, Pricing Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors.

See Section 00 11 00.02 with attached notes, for further instructions.

TAB 4: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the “System for Award Management” (SAM) website or respond with the completed representations / certifications found in the solicitation. The Offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete.

Additionally, the Offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in the solicitation. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete the SAM Representations and Certifications.

TAB 5: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV Agreement. If a JV Agreement has not yet been finalized /approved, indicate its status. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties. If the Offeror or any member of the JV is a Limited Liability Company, include a copy of the Articles of Organization.

TAB 6: Provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.

Submit a scanned copy of the complete Bid Bond, Standard Form 24, with the proposal. Mail the original bond to the Contracting Officer post marked no later than the date the proposals are due.

d. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. In an effort to reduce paperwork and cost, ALL proposals shall be submitted electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx.

At the AMRDEC SAFE website, select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as the Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, notification should be submitted to Contract Specialist, Douglas Terrell, email Douglas.Terrell@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer, Patricia Jackson, email Patricia.A.Jackson@usace.army.mil.

Submit the technical proposal in a searchable, unsecured PDF file titled:

“W9126G18R0037”_*OFFERORS NAME_”TECHNICAL”

* Enter your firm’s name for Offeror’s Name

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 16

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

1 – Factor #1

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

2 – Factor #2

DESIGNER’S EXPERIENCE

3 - Factor #3 ORGANIZATION AND

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

APPROACH

4 - Factor #4

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

5 - Factor #5

PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor #1, Construction Experience – Construction Experience form plus Two (2) additional 8½” x 11” pages.

Factor #2, Designer’s Experience – Designer’s Experience form plus Two (2) additional

8½” x 11” pages.

Factor # 3 Organizational and Management Effectiveness Approach – limited to six (six) 8½” x 11” pages, Factor #4, Limited to ten (10) 8 ½” x 11” pages total or five (5) 11" x 17"fold-out pages.

Factor #5, Past Performance – No page limitation.

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 17

All pages after the page limitations described above will be deleted from the proposal for evaluation purposes!

Part III. EVALUATION OF OFFEROR PROPOSALS

1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD. In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

2. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICE, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performed on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the acceptability standards for non-cost factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

3. BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

4. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

b. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced Offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

5. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions.

Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 18

6. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PRE-AWARD COSTS

The Request for Proposal does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of the initial and/or any subsequent proposals.

7. EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

The technical proposal will be evaluated based on the criteria identified in the individual attachments for the factors.

8. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be UNACCEPTABLE.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered UNACCEPTABLE. The Offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included in the proposal may result in the offer being found deficient.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an UNACCEPTABLE determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that offeror and all offerors and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION

TAB 1: FACTOR #1, CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE:

Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including subcontractors on projects same/similar in SIZE, SCOPE, and COMPLEXITY to that described in the solicitation.

All submitted projects must be building renovation/restoration/repair. If using subcontractors as team members in demonstrating experience describe the roles the prime contractor and sub-contractors will play in the project and the percentage and type of work each will perform.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Construction Experience Form”, (See Attachment 1), in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete for current on-going projects and for projects that are 100% complete, these projects must have been completed within the last five (5) years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $1,000,000 each.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and specialized construction experience cannot be provided as a JV, each partner can submit no more than five (5) projects each. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete.

If any of the information required is not included in the form then the contractor may

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 19 be considered nonresponsive and evaluated as “UNACCEPTABLE”.

FACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE WILL BE EVALUATED BASED

ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The Government will review the project construction experience of the offeror on projects provided in response to the Construction Experience Factor. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

Relevancy is established with the following items:

(1) Offeror must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar in size, scope, and complexity to that of the work described in this solicitation;

(2) At least two (2) of the same/similar type projects submitted must be valued at over

$1,000,000 each, and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 5 years as of the closing date of this RFP, AND;

(3) All “Construction Experience” Forms submitted under Factor 1 much be completely filled out.

Recency is established with the following item:

(1) All projects submitted under this Factor 1 must be at least 50% complete for current on-going projects and for projects that are 100% complete, these must have been completed within the last five (5) years from the date of this RFP.

Relevancy and Recency are not separately rated. A single rating will be assigned for the submission under Factor 1.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 20

ATTACHMENT 1 –

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE FORM

(To be completed for each project submitted)

CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR PROJECT #_

Offeror:

Project and Location:

Was this project performed by the division or unit of the company submitting the offer for W916G-17-R-0129

D Yes D No

Owner:

Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference: Telephone:

Awarded Construction Cost: Final Construction Cost:

Explain Cost Growth, if any:

Date of Award: Original Completion Date: Revised Completion Date: Percent Complete:

Explain Time Growth, if any:

General Scope of Construction and Offeror’s Role:

Work Your Company Self-Performed: Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out:

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 21

Describe extent of relevancy and complexity of the project by checking all applicable boxes below. RELEVANCY:

Offeror must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar in size, scope, and complexity to that of the work described in this solicitation;

At least two (2) of the same/similar type projects submitted must be valued at over $1,000,000 each, and must be at least substantially complete * within the last 5 years as of the closing date of this

RFP, AND;

All “Construction Experience” Forms submitted under Factor 1 much be completely filled out.

Describe extent of Recency and complexity of the project by checking all applicable boxes below. RECENCY:

All projects submitted under this Factor 1 must be at least 50% complete for current on-going projects and for projects that are 100% complete, these must have been completed within the last five (5) years from the date of this RFP.

Provide any additional narrative to support relevancy assessment (in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the scope of the RFP).

Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known :

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 22

TAB 2: FACTOR 2, DESIGNER’S EXPERIENCE: The designer of record shall demonstrate experience, including subcontractors, on projects same/similar in SIZE, SCOPE, and COMPLEXITY to that described in the solicitation. All submitted projects must be building renovation/restoration/repair. If using subcontractors as team members in demonstrating experience describe the roles the prime contractor and sub-contractors will execute in the project and the percentage and type of work each will perform.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Designer Experience” forms, (See Attachment 2), in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be for projects that are 100% complete, these projects must have been completed within the last five (5) years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $1,000,000 each.

If any of the information required is not included in the form then the contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as “UNACCEPTABLE”.

(SEE DESIGNER EXPERIENCE FORM IN ATTACHMENT 2)

FACTOR 2: DESIGNER’S EXPERIENCEWILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING

CRITERIA:

The Government will review the project experience of the designer of record, including subcontractors, on projects provided in response to the Designer’s Experience Factor. The designer of record must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

Relevancy is established with the following two items:

(1) The designer must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar in SIZE, SCOPE and COMPLEXITY to that of the work found in this solicitation. All submitted projects must be building renovation/restoration/repair. The proposal shall describe how the design was same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation, AND

(2) At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $1,000,000 each, and same/similar to the project contained in this RFP, AND

(3) All “Experience Information” forms submitted under Factor 2 must be completely filled out.

Recency is established with the following item:

(1) All projects submitted under this Factor 2 must be at for projects that are 100% complete, these must have been completed within the last five (5) years as of the date of this RFP.

Relevancy and Recency are not separately rated. A single rating will be assigned for the submission under Factor 2.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 23

ATTACHMENT 2 –

DESIGNER EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed for each project submitted)

CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR PROJECT #_

Offeror:

Project and Location:

Was this project performed by the division or unit of the company submitting the offer for W9126G-17-R- 0129?

D Yes D No

Owner:

Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference: Telephone:

Awarded Construction Cost: Final Construction Cost:

Explain Cost Growth, if any:

Date of Award: Original Completion Date: Revised Completion Date: Percent Complete:

Explain Time Growth, if any:

General Scope of Construction and Offeror’s Role:

Work Your Company Self-Performed: Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out:

SECTION 00 22 11 Page 24

Describe extent of relevancy and complexity of the project by checking all applicable boxes below. RELEVANCY:

The designer must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar in SIZE, SCOPE and COMPLEXITY to that of the work found in this solicitation.

All submitted projects must be building renovation/restoration/repair. The proposal shall describe how the design was same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation, AND

At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $1,000,000 each, and same/similar to the project contained in this RFP, AND

All “Designer Experience Information” forms submitted under Factor 2 must be completely filled out.

Describe extent of recency and complexity of the project by checking all applicable boxes below.

RECENCY:

All projects submitted under this Factor 2 must be at for projects that are 100% complete, these must have been completed within the last five (5) years as of the date of this RFP.

Provide any additional narrative to support relevancy assessment (in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the scope of the RFP).

Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known :

TAB 3 – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

APPROACH. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s organization and management effectiveness approach by considering the Offeror’s understanding and capability to successfully manage RFP requirements to completion. The following elements will be evaluated:

Organizational Chart or Structure Preliminary Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQC Plan).

Contract Closeout Plan.

Organizational Chart or Structure Information. Provide an organizational chart that clearly shows lines of authority and communication chain of the organization, including but not limited to, Project Manager, Construction Quality Control System Manager, Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer(s) (SSHO). Refer to specification sections 01 35 26 and 01 45 00.00 01 for SSHO and Contractor Quality Control staff minimum qualifications and responsibilities.

(1) Describe Offeror’s team members, their roles and responsibilities to include major sub-contractors. Identify the number of Project Manager(s), Construction Quality Control System Manager(s), Superintendent(s) and Site Safety and Health Officer(s) assigned to execute RFP requirements.

(2) Explain how the Offeror will communicate and coordinate construction issues and other concerns identified by the Offeror throughout the construction period with major sub-contractors and the Government.

Preliminary Contractor Quality Control Plan (CQC Plan). Provide preliminary plan for quality control of all work in accordance with sections 01 45 00.00 10 and 01 45 00.10 10. After award, the successful Offeror will be required to expand this preliminary plan to comply with contract requirements for Quality Control. The preliminary plan must address the following as a minimum:

(1) CQC organizational chart identifying the chain of command of the CQC organization, number of individuals required to comply with RFP requirements and disciplines of qualified CQC staff.

(2) Authority and functions of the CQC Manager and each key CQC position.

(3) Maintenance of As-builts: Describe procedures for maintaining up-to-date plans and specifications on the job site and for preparation and submittal of as-builts. Include narrative describing document control and production of electronic “as-built” drawings and their transfer to the Government. Describe how the Offeror’s CQC staff will assist the Government with providing updated information on completed contract modifications. In addition, explain how the CQC staff will assist the Government in the development of the DD1354 Transfer Document (see section 01 78 00 - Closeout Submittals for DD1354 requirements).

(4) Explain CQC staff’s corrective procedures for construction deficiencies and/or discrepancies.

(5) Explain CQC staff’s system for tracking Requests for Information (RFI) submitted to the Government.

(6) Describe the Offeror’s plans and procedures for internal completion inspections, prior to scheduled joint inspections with the Government QA personnel.

(7) Describe Offeror’s quality control approach, corporate systems that will be used to monitor quality and capabilities for maintaining quality control throughout construction.

(8) Describe how Offeror plans to integrates sub-contractors into quality control process.

Contract Closeout Plan. A Closeout Plan shall be provided showing Offeror’s compliance with Section 01 78 00 requirements. Minimum items to be included:

(1) Testing of equipment and systems.

(2) Equipment instruction and training schedules.

(3) O&M Manuals completion schedule and transfer.

(4) Record as-built drawings completion schedule and transfer.

(5) Pre-final and final inspection procedures and correction of deficiencies.

(6) Warranty data submission and planned implementation.

(7) Closeout of administrative deficiencies.

ORGANIZATION AND MANGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH WILL BE

EVALUATION BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

Organizational Chart or Structure. The Offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated for chain of command, lines of communication and logical management structure. The Offeror shall identify the personnel fulfilling the roles of Project Manager, Construction Quality Control System Manager, Superintendent and Site Safety and Health Officer and the number of assigned personnel in each role.

Contractor Quality Control Plan. The Offeror’s Quality Control (CQC) Plan will be evaluated to ensure the Offeror meets all quality control requirements per sections 01 45 00.00 10 and 01 45 00.10 10.

Closeout Plan. All items discussed in Contract Closeout Plan above will be evaluated to determine if the Offeror meets RFP closeout requirements per section 01 78 00.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptable criteria under this factor may result in an “UNACEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 4: FACTOR #4, CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: The Offeror shall provide a Narrative and a time scaled Gantt Chart summary network construction schedule.

Indicate the total contract duration in calendar days on the Schedule. The Schedule shall fully demonstrate how the Offeror plans to complete all contract work, within the specified period of performance from the receipt of contract Notice-to Proceed (NTP) in accordance with Section 01 00 00.00 44 Construction Schedule. The submitted schedule is to include sequencing of work for demolition, construction activities, mandatory tasks, specified time for Government required review and approval periods for construction submittals and RFIs, long lead procurement items, all required construction phasing of work, and contract closeout requirements as specified in Section 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule, Section 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures and Section 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals. The submitted Schedule shall identify and include any specified phasing of work in accordance with the Contract Line Item Schedule, Section 00 11 00.02. Offerors are to base proposed schedule start date on an anticipated AWARD date of 30 August 2018.

The Narrative shall include discussion of any construction challenges the Offeror foresees that may jeopardize the successful completion of all contract work to include required construction phasing and Option work items. The Offeror shall describe the plans for overcoming these challenges. If no challenges are foreseen then state so. (Any deviations from the solicitation requirements will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable).

OFFEROR’S WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The narrative and time scaled Schedule will be evaluated by the Government based on the Offeror’s demonstrated understanding of the solicitation scope of work, logical sequencing/scheduling of work activities, to include time periods for required Government submittal approvals and construction phasing as specified.

STANDARD FOR ACCEPTABILITY: This standard is met when the Offeror demonstrates a logical approach and a schedule to complete the project within the specified construction duration(s).

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and may be eliminated from further consideration for contract award.

TAB 5: FACTOR #5, PAST PERFORMANCE:

The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation (Attachment 3) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror included in its proposal for Factors 1 and 2. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If any negative past performance information is received, and the contractor has not yet been given an opportunity to provide a response, the contractor will be given an opportunity to provide a response. If the client request, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Contract Specialist, at: douglas.d.terrell@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposals PPQ’s previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

NOTE: Do not request past performance questionnaires (PPQ) on projects that have final Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations. If a CPARS evaluation exists and a PPQ is provided for the same project, the CPARS evaluation will be reviewed as the official past performance record for the project, and the PPQ will not be considered by the Source Selection Board, Contracting Officer, or the Source Selection Authority (if applicable).

For USACE or other DoD projects which are underway but do not yet have an interim or final CPARS evaluation, one PPQ per contract may be submitted; to be considered, the PPQ shall be signed by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) for the contract.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last six (6) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluation past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (Partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquires of owner representative(s), Federal Awardees Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rest with the Offeror.

New entities that have no past customers shall notify the KO in writing, prior to the date and time established for the Solicitation or Request for Proposal closing, that they have had no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided; It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided and accurate, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references.

The Government will review all CPARS and the Government wide Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) evaluations regardless of project and past performance questionnaires for projects submitted under the Factor for Experience. The Government may contact points of contacts listed on the “Experience Information” forms submitted.

FACTOR #5: PAST PERFORMANCE WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE

FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

Each contractor and designer shall provide no more five ten (5) past performance ratings. Any rating an offeror has in CPARS and PPIRS will count toward this requirement. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the Contracting Officer has received any completed questionnaires prior to the closing date/time.

All past or current references must have overall ratings of satisfactory or above in order to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” rating.

In accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(1), if the Contracting Officer determines that a small business' past performance is not acceptable, the matter is referred to the Small Business Administration for a Contracting Officer’s Compliance determination.

In accordance with FAR 15.305 (iv), in the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Offerors with no past performance information will receive an “Unknown” or NEUTRAL rating for this factor.

Therefore, an Offeror receiving an “Unknown” rating may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "Unknown" shall be considered "Acceptable".

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptable criteria under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and elimination from further consideration for contract award.

If the Government does not obtain past performance information and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, a rating of Unknown (Neutral) confidence will be assigned.

If negative information is received, the Offeror will be given an opportunity to provide input as required by FAR 15. CPARS that are part of the official record will be utilized as if the Offeror has already had an opportunity to respond.

ATTACHMENT 3

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Past Performance Questionnaire included in this solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for this factor. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal.

If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Douglas Terrell via email at douglas.terrell@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

FOR OFFICIAL SOURCE SELECTION FAR

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ‐0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1‐4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5‐8)

5. Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTES

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub‐element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s…