Prequal_Questions_20170531_Final_b.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9126G-17-R-ECSO5
About this file
Prequalification of Sources List Establishment Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PreQual_of_Sources_Industry_Day_Presentation_20170606_(004).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Prequal Questionnaire
| FT Worth District ~ US Army Corps of Engineers |
| Prequalification of Sources |
| List Establishment Questionnaire |
| Please submit to Border.Infrastructure@usace.army.mil not later than 1700 CDT 30 June 2017 |
Section 1: General
1. Company Name:
2. Company Point of Contact:
3. POC email:
4. Company Address:
5. DUNS Number:
6. Please select all of the following categories that apply to your firm:
Small Business Woman Owned Small Business Large business
8(a) Service Disabled Owned Small Business HUBZone
| Section 2: Capability & Experience | |
| Please answer by selecting Yes or No from the drop down list in the gray box, or provide the required narrative. |
| 1. | Bonding Capability: |
| (In accordance with the Prequalification of Sources List Announcement on www.FBO.gov, your firm will be required to provide a surety letter confirming this bonding capability.) |
1a. Does your firm have an aggregate bonding capability of at least $300 million?
1b . Does your firm have an single contract bonding capability of at least $100 million?
2. Can your firm perform at least three $100 million construction contracts concurrently?
3. Has your firm completed a Horizontal Construction contract in the Contiguous United States with a contract price of at least $100 million in the last 5 years?
3a. Contract #:
3b. Name of Project:
3c. Project Location:
3d. Project Value:
| 3e. | Project Reference: | |
| (Name, email, & Phone #) |
3f. Brief Project Description:
| 3g. | Performance Rating (if any) Assigned by the Project Owner: ________________________________________________ |
| Past Performance Rating of Satisfactory or above on horizontal construction projects submitted in response to this announcement. | |
| Standard of Acceptabilty: | |
| Satisfactory or better ratings in all evaluated past performance elements and no legitimate derogatory reference comments. |
4. Does your firm have an accounting system that can support Fixed-Price Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA) and Fixed-Price Incentive Firm Target (FPIP) contracts? Provide a narrative description of two pages or less supporting the response per the standard of acceptability below.
| Standard of Acceptability: |
| A "yes" answer indicates that the offeror has and uses an accounting system that is adequate for providing data to support negotiation of final cost and incentive price revision and tha the system and related internal controls provide reasonable assurance that applicable laws and regulations are complied with, the system and cost data are reliable, risk of misallocations and mischarges are minimized, and contract allocations and charges are consistent with invoice procedures. |
5. Can your firm successfully comply with the provisions of FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?
6. Implementation Approach: Please prepare a narrative (30 pages or less) describing how your firm would successfully perform the following aspects (6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e and 6f) for a construction contract under each of two geographic scenarios (below)
| Scenario 1. Remote sites in the Southwestern United States adjacent to the International Border with Mexico including areas with inherent terrain challenges typical of the region | |
| Scenario 2. Sites in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas near the International Border with Mexico including locations requiring modification levees and within floodplains. | |
| Note that Narrative may reference sections to avoid repeating common information for scenarios. |
6a. Schedule: The Offeror shall describe typical sequence of design-build construction work, typical phasing requirements, interim and final acceptance. Assume a 365 day period of performance.
| Standard of Acceptability: | |
| 1. | The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates a ability to schedule activities in a manner that allows for all key aspects of a Design-Build construction project to be completed in a logical manner. |
6b. Management Team: The offeror shall describe the management team that the would be utilized to support a design-build construction project. The offeror shall include information about the design and construction team members that will be utilized on this contract, their technical competencies, roles and responsibilities, and experience.
| Standard of Acceptability: | |
| 1. | The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates the project manager has a technical degree and at least 5 years experience working on horizontal construction projects. |
2. The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates the construction superintendent has at least 10 years experience working on horizontal construction projects.
3. The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates the lead designer is a registered professional engineer and/or architect.
4. The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates proposed design team has representation by licensed civil, architectural, structural, electrical, and mechanical disciplines.
6c. Quality Control Procedures: The Offeror shall describe the firm's standard Quality Control Procedures and how those procedures would be applied to a Design-Build Construction Project.
| Standard of Acceptability: | |
| 1. | The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates the ability to develop and follow a quality control plan sufficient for a design-build construction project in a remote area throughout the life of the construction project. The quality control plan and described proedures should conform to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers standards for constrution projects including use of automated systems. |
6d. Remote Work: The offeror shall describe how the firm would mobilize to a remote construction site and maintain a consistent flow of supplies, equipment, and personnel to the remote work site without causing any delay to the construction schedule
| Standard of Acceptability: | |
| 1. | Standard of acceptability is met with the offeror demonstrates ability to implement a horizontal construction project several miles in length on schedule in remote areas with no more than two access routes for heavy equipment traffic and restricted laydown facilities with no existing utility infrastructure. |
6e. Safety Protocols and Procedures: The offeror shall describe the firms standard safety procedures and how those procedures would be applied to a USACE design-build construction project.
| Standard of Acceptability: | |
| 1. | The standard is met when the offeror demonstrates the ability to comply with the USACE Safety Manual EM385-1-1. |
6f. Relevant Past Performance: The offeror shall provide details (narrative) for 2 previous projects demonstrating relevant experience in support of their implementation approach in response to items 6a through 6e. The 30 page total is inclusive of this information. Referenced projects shall include the same identification information requested for item 3 above.
| Standard of Acceptabilty: |
| Satisfactory or better ratings in all evaluated past performance elements and no legitimate derogatory reference comments. |
| 7. | The following statement shall be signed by a principal of your firm: |
| "I certify that the answers which are provided in in response to this Prequalification of Sources Announcement are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief." |
7a. Name:
7b. Position:
7c. Signature:
Information provided in this document will not be disclosed outside the Government's Project Delivery Team and will be kept strictly confidential.
&P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .