SF_30_Form_for__AMENDMENT_02_-_Document.pdf

0010866123 FN-6-2J

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

a. The purpose of this Amendment is to add Questions and Answ ers from the Site Visit held Thursday, 18 August 2016 @ Hunter Army Airfiled, GA.

b. See Continuation Page.

c. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 26-Aug-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9124M-16-B-0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Aug-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Aug-2016

CODE

MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING CMND

MICC-FORT STEWART

976 WILLIAM H WILSON AVE SUITE 100

FORT STEWART GA 31314-3425

W9124M 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9124M-16-B-0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Site Visit – Questions and Answers for Renovate Bldg 128, HAAF, GA

RFI #1‐ The CLIN schedule for this solicitation (Section B) has five (5) pricing lines which are to be broken‐out as part of the proposal submission. Can you please clarify why costs are to be illustrated for CLIN item 005 "Contract Manpower Reporting (CMR)"? Is this simply administrative costs anticipated for tracking weekly certified payroll reports to ensure compliance with Davis Bacon Wage Act requirements?

*Refer to Section H Contract Manpower Reporting (CMR) with details of this requirement.

“As part of its submission, the Contractor shall provide the estimated total cost (if any) incurred to comply with this reporting requirement.”

The statement above is listed in the CMR statement in Section H meaning that if you will occur any cost for providing the information then you will add that cost to the CMR Clin.

RFI #2‐ Per the project specifications section 13900 the new fire suppression system is to comply with "Governing codes and regulations". Under the "compliance" section the only codes listed are NFPA 13 and NFPA. Please verify that there are no UFC code requirements which are anticipated to be included within the fire suppression scope.

*YES – UFC codes shall apply to this project.

RFI #3‐ Is a submittal register available which will illustrate the pre‐construction submittal expectations? It appears the solicitation illustrates the submittal expectations for division 2 ‐ Division 16 within the submittal schedule) beginning on page 193

*The Submittal List located in Section J outlines the submittal requirements.

RFI #4 ‐ Per specification section 15900 the DDC controls are required to interface with the existing Metasys EMCS installed on the HAAF site. Can you please provide the name of the DDC contracting company who currently supports HAAF to ensure the new DDC is able to interface with the existing system?

*Johnson Controls, Inc; Mark Zip (C)...843-261-4609

RFI #5 ‐ Per the solicitation "MICC Requirements" section 52.236.06 ‐ Superintendence by the Contractor a resume of the proposed superintendent is required upon notice of award. Please provide the requirements for a superintendent to be deemed acceptable for this project.

*The Superintendent must speak English, Experienced in Construction, and have OSHA 30 Safety.

W9124M-16-B-0013

RFI #6‐ Blast Mitigation is specified for the alum. Windows (Section 08520) and includes the requirement for the awarded contractor to "Submit window anchorage calculations prepared and stamped by a qualified licensed engineer" along with "Provide glass and framing calculations prepared by Professional Engineer". Per 08520 section 1.3 C it appears that UFC 4‐010‐01 is the requirement which must be met for the windows and the anchoring plan. Please verify there are no other ATFP or UFC references applicable to this requirement. Since this is a Federal installation we assume any PE is appropriate but if the PE must be licensed in the State of Georgia please let us know as well.

*As far as the blast mitigation requirements for windows, UFC 4‐010‐01(9 Feb., 2012 w/Change 1, 1 October 2013) is the standard that must be met. The UFC outlines the methods, standards and other criteria that must be met.

General (generic) blast test reports on manufacturers stock windows will not be accepted unless the proposed window matches the composition of each specified window (W x H, framing material, anchorage substrate, etc.)And was tested with the same or greater explosive weight at a distance equal to or closer than that specified on the plans.

If the above cannot be provided by the manufacturer then blast mitigation window calculations must be provided via a submittal indicating that the requirements for glazing, window frame and anchorage have been met. The calculations must be provided by a PE licensed in the State of Georgia.

RFI #7‐ Per 08710 Section 1.2 the awarded contractor is required to submit a key bitting chart and per section

1.3 conduct a "Key Conference". Please verify that the awarded contractor is to provide all cores and keys (not provide cores to the lock‐shop for keying).

*The contractor shall provide all cores and blank keys and will be responsible for having the cores keyed but will not be in possession of them after the cores have been keyed. All cores and keys shall be sent directly to the government (COR) after the keying process has been completed.

RFI #8‐ Per 03300 Section 1.4 B it is the awarded contractor’s responsibility to employ an independent testing agency acceptable to the Government to perform material testing of the cast‐in‐place concrete. Is there a current list of testing firms that the Government will find acceptable related to this project?

*There is no list of acceptable testing agencies. There is an agency in this area that has been used quite frequently on FS and HAAF construction projects but because of “sole sourcing” restrictions, the agency will not be named. As long as the testing agency has the credentials to prove that they qualify, the contractor can choose.

RFI #9 ‐ Roof drawing shows EPDM roofing and specs call for TPO roof. Please clarify.

*TPO, as indicated in the specifications.

RFI #10 - I want to inquire about this job and if the abatement and selective demo will be bid separately or will the whole job go to one general contractor?

*There will be no separate bids for this project. All bids will go through the bidding General Contractor.

(End of Summary of Changes)