W91236-10-R-0007-0003.pdf

W26GLG00067262

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0003 is hereby issued to incorporate the following LEED information and extend the proposal due date to Monday, 8 February 2010 at 2:00pm EST.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 1

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Feb-2010

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91236-10-R-0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-Jan-2010

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-Feb-2010

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, NORFOLK

CONTRACTING OFFICE

803 FRONT STREET

NORFOLK VA 23510-1096

W91236 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION 8 – SUSTAINABLE DESIGN REPORT

INTRODUCTION

This is the sustainable design RTA design submittal for the project. This report docu-ments the progress towards LEED certification for the SCOE EOD project. The project proposes to construct 1 one-story building and to provide multiple ranges on a 2566± acre site. The project requirement is to achieve LEED Silver with minimum 33 points. The project achieves LEED Silver with 33 points.

W91236-10-R-0007

AMENDMENT 0003

(page left intentionally blank for double sided printing)

SCOE EOD, Fort AP Hill, VA LEED DESIGN/PLANNING PROJECT SUMMARY W91236-08-D-0010

LE

E

D C re di t P ar ag ra ph

LEED 2.2 Project Checklist M a xi m u m P o in ts A ch ie va b le

R E

S P

O N

S

IB

L E

D

IS

C

IP

L

IN

E

PAR FEATURE Yes TBD No REMARKS

CATEGORY 1 - SUSTAINABLE SITES

SSPR1

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention (PREREQUISITE) R R CE

The project meets this requirement. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) Plan will be provided.

SS1 Site Selection 1 1 CE

The project site meets this criteria. The project site is not considered prime farmland, is not lower than 5 feet above the elevation of the 100-year flood, is not previously undeveloped land that is within 50 feet of a water body, is not public parkland, is not a habitat for endangered species, and is not within 100 feet of any wetlands (TBD).

SS2

Development Density & Community

Connectivity 1 1

The project site does not meet this criteria. The project will construct 1 building and multiple ranges on an undeveloped site and in not in a community with a minimum density of 60,000 square feet per acre net.

Exemplary Performance: Double Density Requirements The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 1 The project site does not meet this criteria as the site is not considered a Brownfield site.

SS4.1

Alternative Transportation: Public

Transportation Access 1 1 The project site does not meet this criteria. Project is not located within 1/2 mile of public transportation.

Exemplary Performance: Double Public Transit Access The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS4.2

Alternative Transportation: Bicycle

Storage & Changing Rooms 1 1 CE/A The project meets this criteria. Project will provide secure bicycle racks and shower and changing facilities.

Exemplary Performance: Show quantifiable reduction in automobile use 1 The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS4.3

Alternative Transportation: Low

Emitting & Fuel Efficient Vehicles 1 1 CE The project site meets this criteria. Preferred parking for low-emitting and fuel-efficient vehicles will be provided.

Exemplary Performance: Show quantifiable reduction in automobile use 1 The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS4.4

Alternative Transportation: Parking

Capacity 1 1 CE The project site meets this criteria. Parking capacity does not exceed Installation requirements.

Exemplary Performance: Show quantifiable reduction in automobile use 1 The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS5.1

Site Development: Protect or Restore

Habitat 1 1 The project site does not meet this criteria.

Exemplary Performance: Protect or restore

75% site area 1 The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS5.2

Site Development: Maximize Open

Space 1 1 CE The project site meets this criteria. ATFP setback requirements of 82' clear between building and roads/parking provides the open space required.

Exemplary Performance: Double open space requirement

CE

The project site meets this criteria. ATFP setback requirements of 82' clear between building and roads/parking provides the open space required. See ID Credit 1.1

SS6.1 Stormwater Design: Quantity Control 1 1 CE The project site meets this criteria.

SS6.2 Stormwater Design: Quality Control 1 1 CE The project site meets this criteria.

SS7.1 Heat Island Effect: Non-Roof 1 1 The project site does not meet this criteria.

Exemplary Performance: 100% of hardscape 1 The project site does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS7.2 Heat Island Effect: Roof 1 1 A The project does meet this criteria. The metal roof color will be white or near white to meet the minimum solar reflectance index of 29.

Exemplary Performance: 100% green roof system 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

SS8 Light Pollution Reduction 1 1 EE

The project site meets this criteria. Site and building mounted luminaires producing a maximum initial illuminance value no greater than 0.20 horizontal and vertical footcandles at the site boundary and no greater than

0.01 horizontal footcandles 15 feet beyond the site will be provided.

CATEGORY 2 – WATER EFFICIENCY

WE1.1

Water Efficient Landscaping: Reduce by 50% 1 1 CE

The project site meets this criteria. Landscaping is minimal and will not use potable water for irrigation. A permanent irrigation system will not be provided.

WE1.2

Water Efficient Landscaping: No

Potable Water Use or No Irrigation 1 1 CE

The project site meets this criteria. Landscaping is minimal and will not use potable water for irrigation. A permanent irrigation system will not be provided.

WE2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1 1 The project meets this criteria. Septic system is provided and no sewer system is required.

S C

O E

E O

D

F o rt A

P H il l, V ir g in ia

W91236-10-R-0007

E

D C re di t P ar ag ra ph

LEED 2.2 Project Checklist M a xi m u m P o in ts A ch ie va b le

R E

S P

O N

S

IB

L E

D

IS

C

IP

L

IN

E

PAR FEATURE Yes TBD No REMARKS

S C

O E

E O

D

F o rt A

P H il l, V ir g in ia

Exemplary Performance: 100% reduction or treatment The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

WE3.1 Water Use Reduction: 20% Reduction 1 1 A/P

The project meets this criteria. The project plumbing fixtures (inlcuding waterless urinals) specified will provide a minimum 20% water use reduction.

WE3.2 Water Use Reduction: 30% Reduction 1 1 A/P The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

Exemplary Performance: 40% reduction or reduce process and non-regulated water 10% The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

CATEGORY 3 – ENERGY AND ATMOSPHERE

EAPR1

Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems

(PREREQUISITE) R R GC

The project meets this requirement. The project will provide commissioning of the building energy systems.

EAPR2

Minimum Energy Performance

(PREREQUISITE) R R ME/A/EE

The project meets this requirement. The building is designed to comply with ASHRAE 90.1 requirements.

EAPR3

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

(PREREQUISITE) R R ME The project meets this requirement. No CFCs are used in project.

EA1 Optimize Energy Performance 10 6 ME/A/EE

The project meets this criteria. The project is required to provide a minimum 30% improvement in the proposed building performance rating compared to the baseline building performance rating per ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. Project exceeds ASHRAE by approx. 30% and achieves approximately 28% energy savings using LEED Option 1 resulting in 6 credit points.

of 45.5% new buildings, 38.5% existing buildings 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

EA2.1 On-Site Renewable Energy: 2.5% 1 1 On-Site Renewable Energy is not achievable.

EA2.2 On-Site Renewable Energy: 7.5% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EA2.3 On-Site Renewable Energy: 12.5% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

Exemplary Performance: 17.5% on-site renewable energy 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

EA3 Enhanced Commissioning 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EA4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EA5 Measurement & Verification 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EA6 Green Power 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

Exemplary Performance: Double requirements (70% or 4 years) The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

CATEGORY 4 – MATERIALS AND RESOURCES

MRPR1

Storage & Collection of Recyclables

(PREREQUISITE) R R GC

The project meets this criteria. Storage and collection of recyclables will be provided in the building and on site.

MR1.1

Building Reuse: Maintain 75% of

Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. The building does not renovate an existing building.

MR1.2

Building Reuse: Maintain 95% of

Existing Walls, Floors & Roof 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. The building does not renovate an existing building.

MR1.3

Building Reuse: Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1 1

The project does not meet this criteria. The building does not renovate an existing building.

MR2.1

Construction Waste Management:

Divert 50% From Disposal 1 1 GC The project meets this criteria. At least 50% of construction waste will be diverted from disposal in landfills and incinerators.

MR2.2

Construction Waste Management:

Divert 75% From Disposal 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

Exemplary Performance: Divert 95% 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

MR3.1 Materials Reuse: 5% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

MR3.2 Materials Reuse: 10% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

MR4.1

Recycled Content: 10% (post-consumer + 1/2 pre-consumer) 1 1 A/GC

The project meets this criteria. Specifications will be provided and materials will be selected that provide a recycled content of 10% (post-consumer + 1/2 pre-consumer).

MR4.2

Recycled Content: 20% (post-consumer + 1/2 pre-consumer) 1 1 A/GC

The project meets this criteria. Specifications will be provided and materials will be selected that provide a recycled content of 20% (post-consumer + 1/2 pre-consumer).

Exemplary Performance: Recycled Content 30% The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

W91236-10-R-0007

E

D C re di t P ar ag ra ph

LEED 2.2 Project Checklist M a xi m u m P o in ts A ch ie va b le

R E

S P

O N

S

IB

L E

D

IS

C

IP

L

IN

E

PAR FEATURE Yes TBD No REMARKS

S C

O E

E O

D

F o rt A

P H il l, V ir g in ia

MR5.1

Regional Materials:10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally 1 1 A/GC

The project meets this criteria. Specifications will be provided to require 10% of materials proposed to be extracted, processed and manufactured regionally.

MR5.2

Regional Materials:20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally 1 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

Exemplary Performance: Regional Materials

40% The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

MR6 Rapidly Renewable Materials: 2.5% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. Rapidly renewable materials are not cost effective for the project.

Exemplary Performance: Rapidly Renewable Materials: 5% 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

MR7 Certified Wood: 50% 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. Certified wood is not cost effective for the project.

Exemplary Performance: Certified Wood 95% 1 The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

CATEGORY 5 – INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

EQPR1

Minimum IAQ Performance

(PREREQUISITE) R R GC The project meets this requirement.

EQPR2

Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS)

Control (PREREQUISITE) R R GC The project meets this requirement. Tobacco Smoke will not be allowed during construction and is not allowed in federal buildings.

EQ1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1 1 The project meets this requirement.

EQ2 Increased Ventilation 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EQ3.1

Construction IAQ Management Plan:

During Construction 1 1 GC The project meets this requirement.

EQ3.2

Construction IAQ Management Plan:

Before Occupancy 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. TBD

EQ4.1

Low Emitting Materials: Adhesives &

Sealants 1 1 A The project meets this criteria. Specifications will be provided to require low emitting adhesives & sealants.

EQ4.2

Low Emitting Materials: Paints &

Coatings 1 1 A The project meets this criteria. Specifications will be provided to require low emitting paints and coatings.

EQ4.3

Low Emitting Materials: Carpet

Systems 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria. Carpet will not be used on project.

EQ4.4

Low Emitting Materials: Composite

Wood & Agrifiber Products 1 1 The project meets this criteria. Composite wood & agrifiber products will be specified for the project.

EQ5

Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source

Control 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EQ6.1 Controllability of Systems: Lighting 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria.

EQ6.2

Controllability of Systems: Thermal

Comfort 1 1 EE/ME

The project meets this criteria. A high level of thermal confort system controlled by individual occupants or by specific groups in multi-occupant spaces (i.e. classrooms or conference areas) is provided.

EQ7.1 Thermal Comfort: Design 1 1 ME The project meets this criteria. A confortable thermal environment is provided.

EQ7.2 Thermal Comfort: Verification 1 1 The project does not meet this criteria as it is not cost effective.

EQ8.1

Daylight & Views: Daylight 75% of

Spaces 1 1 A Daylight is feasible for 75% of spaces based on LEED 2.2 calculations.

Exemplary Performance: Daylight 95% of Spaces The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

EQ8.2

Daylight & Views: Views for 90% of

Spaces 1 1 A Views are feasible for 90% of spaces based on LEED 2.2 calculations.

Exemplary Performance: Case-by-case Basis The project does not meet this exemplary criteria.

CATEGORY 6 – FACILITY DELIVERY PROCESS

IDc1.1 Innovation in Design 1 1 A Exemplary Performance: SS5.2 Maximize Open Space. The project site meets this exemplary criteria.

IDc1.2 Innovation in Design 1 1 IDc1.3 Innovation in Design 1 1 IDc1.4 Innovation in Design 1 1

IDc2 LEED Accredited Professional 1 1 A The project meets this criteria. The AE Architect is a LEED accredited professional.

TOTAL 69 34 1 41

W91236-10-R-0007

Page left intentionally blank.

(for double sided printing)

W91236-10-R-0007

LEED Calculations

Maximize Open Space LEED Credit 5.2 – Option 2

Site Area The project is located in Fort AP Hill in Port Royal, VA. The project site is 2566 acres.

Development Footprint The total impervious post-development area is approximately 83 acres. Other areas that are not included in open space are the 6 acres of the Range Operations Center and the 3 acres of mobile site work. Approximately 74 acres is attributed to the existing gravel roads.

Open Space This leaves approximately 2483 acres of open space. See attached plan sheets.

W91236-10-R-0007

Stormwater Design Quantity Control LEED Credit 6.1 – Option 1.b

Project Site Conditions

The project is located in Fort AP Hill in Port Royal, VA. The site is 2566 acres.

The existing terrain consists of heavy vegetation and trees. There are a number of existing gravel access roads and several wet and dry streams, as well as several wetland areas that have been delineated on the site plan. Slopes on the site range from 2% to 10%. The site drains, roughly, from the northwest to the southeast.

The project being constructed will include a Range Operations Center with parking lot and remote site development.

Pre-development Q for the entire site is 115 cfs. Post-development Q for the site is 116 cfs, without taking measures and controls to prevent stream erosion into account. See attached stormwater calculations.

Measures Taken to Prevent Stream Erosion

For areas near the wetlands and streams, certain sequences of construction were specified for the contractor in order to eliminate sediment in runoff and therefore minimize erosion to the stream banks.

Usual control measures for erosion control were taken as well, such as requirements to seed, mulch, and stabilize all denuded areas within 7 days after the land is brought to final grade. This vegetation requirement will reduce runoff significantly. Silt fence and straw bale barriers will also be used during construction in order to minimize sediment in runoff and thus prevent stream erosion.

Controls Taken to Prevent Stream Erosion

Runoff from the building and parking lot constructed on-site will be detained with the use of a vegetated swale. The swale will hold up to 1 inch of runoff and will slowly release it into the ground through infiltration.

The newly built entrance roads will be gravel rather than asphalt, which will allow some infiltration of rainfall and therefore less runoff. The roads will drain to ditches at the roadside. These ditches will contain rock check dams, which will be installed in conjunction with the ditches. The rock check dams will filter runoff during construction and will remain after construction to continue to slow runoff, thus allowing time for sediment to settle out and be filtered out. This reduction in

W91236-10-R-0007 sediment will reduce erosion, and the time taken for the runoff to flow through rock check dams reduces the peak hydrologic flow.

LEED Credit 6.1 - Option 1.b Stormwater Design Quantity Control

Design: NMT Date: 30-Jul-09

Checked:

Date:

Total Site Area, A 2566.0 Acres

Pre-development Runoff Coefficient, C pre

C pre

(Acres) (Percent of Total) (unitless) ExistingGravel Roads 74.0 2.88% 0.800 Wooded Area 2492.0 97.12% 0.300 Weighted Average 0.314

Post-development Runoff Coefficient, C post

C post

(Acres) (Percent of Total) (unitless) Existing Gravel Roads 74.0 2.88% 0.800 Added Gravel Road 0.00% 0.800 Added Impervious Area 9.0 0.35% 0.900 Wooded Area 2483.0 96.77% 0.300 Weighted Average 0.317

Intensity, i From VDOT Drainage Manual, for Caroline County (2 yr):

b = 65.9 d = 12.8 e = 0.9

Time of Concentration, Tc Tc = 0.225L0.42S-0.19C-1.0 minutes

L(ft) = 8181.28084

Assumed based upon avg.

dist. of DA high point from roadway

Spre = 6.50% Assumed, based upon average slope of land.

C = 0.2 Dense Grass/Woodland

Tc = 83 minutes i = b/((Tc+d)^e) 6 i = 0.14

Area, A

Area, A

W91236-10-R-0007

Pre-development Flow, Q pre

Qpre = Cpre · i · A Qpre = 115.248 cfs 115

Post-development Flow, Q post

Qpost = Cpost · i · A Qpost = 116.019 cfs

Difference = 0.771 cfs

W91236-10-R-0007

Stormwater Design Quality Control LEED Credit 6.2

Vegetated Swale

Description:

A vegetated swale captures runoff from the building and parking lot area and allows it to infiltrate into the ground.

Runoff Capture:

The swale is sized to capture the first 1” runoff from the associated drainage area, containing the building and parking lot. See attached calculations.

Infiltration:

The soil in the swale is a combination of Kempsville-Emporia complex and Slagle-Kempsville complex. Both of these soils are fine, sandy loams with a minimum infiltration rate of 1.02 in/hr (see Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, 3.10).

Treatment:

Since the swale has been sized to capture 100% of the runoff, it is considered 100% treated and the requirement is met.

Ditches and Rock Check Dams

Description:

Vegetated ditches on the sides of the gravel roadway capture runoff from the road. These ditches contain rock check dams which slow runoff flow and allow infiltration. Runoff that is not infiltrated is filtered by the rock check dams, which have allows sediment to settle out. This runoff is discharged onto undeveloped, wooded area.

Runoff Capture:

The amount of runoff from the gravel roadway was calculated using a typical section of roadway and ditch. Using this section, the ditch captures 100% of the runoff without overflow. See attached calculations.

Infiltration:

The soil in the ditches is a combination of Kempsville-Emporia complex and Slagle-Kempsville complex. Both of these soils are fine, sandy loams with a minimum infiltration rate of 1.02 in/hr (see Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, 3.10).

Treatment:

W91236-10-R-0007

Roadside ditches, without rock check dams accounted for, is large enough to handle 1” runoff from the roadway. Therefore, runoff does not leave the site and 100% of the runoff from the roadway is treated.

W91236-10-R-0007

LEED Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design Quality Control

NMT

30-Jul-09

Vegetated Swale Q = f · I · SA

(1) f 1.02 in/hr

(2) f d 0.51 in/hr

(3) I 1.00

(4) T max 48 hr

(5) A impervious 261360.0 ft2

(6) Vol wq 21780.0 ft3

(7) SA min 10676.5 ft2

(8) SA actual 12000 ft2

Vegetated Swale has surface area sufficient to infiltrate 1" of runoff from ROC site.

Vegetated Ditch Calcuations done using a 10 ft long, one-lane section of roadway.

Q = f · I · SA

(1) f 1.02 in/hr

(2) f d 0.51 in/hr

(3) I 1.00

(4) T max 48 hr

(5) A impervious 80.0 ft2

(6) Vol wq 6.7 ft3

(7) SA min 3.3 ft2

(8) SA actual 10 ft2

Grassy ditches on sides of roads have a surface area sufficient to infiltrate 1" of runoff from the roadway.

Reference: Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook 3.10B

(1) Minimum Infiltration Rate (f) See Table 3.10-2

(2) Design Infiltration Rate = 0.5f

(3) Hydraulic Gradient I, assumed = 1. See 3.10-15.

(4) Maximum allowable drainage time, typically 48 hrs

(5) Impervious area to be captured by swale

(6) Volume water treated, assuming 1" runoff

(7) Minimum Surface Area of Swale

(8) Actual Surface Area of Swale

Design:

Date:

Checked:

Date:

W91236-10-R-0007

Page left intentionally blank.

(for double sided printing)

W91236-10-R-0007

LEED NC 2.2 EA Credit 1 Summary Report 0855 EOD Fac Energy Model Final 07/30/2009 Allsbrook Goodman, Inc 06:12PM

General Information Simulation Program Name and Version Hourly Analysis Program v4.41 Simulation Weather File Name Richmond, Virginia (TM2) Total Conditioned Floor Area 14,663 ft² Total Floor Area 14,663 ft²

Building Designations Proposed Building Proposed Building Baseline - 0 degrees [B000] Baseline Building Baseline - 90 degrees [B090] Baseline Building Baseline - 180 degrees [B180] Baseline Building Baseline - 270 degrees [B270] Baseline Building

Window-to-Wall Ratios

Proposed Design Baseline Window to Wall Ratio 6 % 6 %

Gross Wall Area (ft²) 4,861 4,861

Vertical Window Area (ft²) 273 273

Advisory Messages

Proposed Building

Baseline Building (0 deg. rotation) Difference

Number of hours heating loads not met 0 0 0

Number of hours cooling loads not met 0 48 -48

Table 1.5. Energy Type Summary

Energy Type Utility Rate Description Units of Energy Units of Demand Electric Electric Rate kWh kW

Energy Units: Demand Units:

1 kBTU = 1,000 BTU 1 MBH = 1,000 BTU/h 1 kWh = 3.412 kBTU 1 kW = 3.412 MBH

Table 1.8.1. Baseline Performance - Performance Rating Method Compliance

End Use Process Baseline Design

Energy Type

Units of Annual Energy & Peak

Demand

Baseline (0 deg rotation)

Baseline (90 deg rotation)

Baseline (180 deg rotation)

Baseline (270 deg rotation)

Baseline Design

Interior Lighting No Electric Energy kWh 109,720 109,720 109,720 109,720 109,720

Demand kW 33.8 33.8 33.8 33.8 33.8

Space Heating No Electric Energy kWh 30,710 31,885 31,767 30,771 31,283

Demand kW 107.0 107.2 107.7 107.0 107.2

Space Cooling No Electric Energy kWh 94,904 94,309 94,366 94,163 94,436

Demand kW 59.1 58.9 58.9 58.7 58.9

Pumps No Electric Energy kWh 0 0 0 0 0

Demand kW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Heat Rejection No Electric Energy kWh 0 0 0 0 0

Demand kW 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Fans - Interior No Electric Energy kWh 101,427 100,507 100,518 100,455 100,727

Demand kW 21.0 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.9

Receptacle Equipment Yes Electric Energy kWh 101,647 101,647 101,647 101,647 101,647

Demand kW 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4

Water Heater and pumps No Electric Energy kWh 7,609 7,609 7,609 7,609 7,609

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 1 of 3

W91236-10-R-0007

Allsbrook Goodman, Inc 06:12PM

Demand kW 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9

Misc elec to be 25% process Yes Electric Energy kWh 10,436 10,436 10,436 10,436 10,436

Demand kW 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5

Baseline Energy Totals Total Annual Energy Use kBTU 1,557,418 1,556,257 1,556,087 1,551,783 1,555,386 Annual Process Energy kBTU 382,426 Process Cost accounts for 25% of Baseline Performance. Process cost must equal at least 25% of Baseline Performance or the narrative at the end of this form must document why this building's process costs are less than 25%.

Table 1.8.1(b). Baseline Energy Costs

Energy Type Baseline Cost

(0 deg rotation)

Baseline Cost (90 deg rotation)

Baseline Cost (180 deg rotation)

Baseline Cost (270 deg rotation)

Baseline Building Performance

Electric 42,907 42,875 42,870 42,751 42,851

Total Baseline Costs 42,907 42,875 42,870 42,751 42,851

Table 1.8.2. Performance Rating Table - Performance Rating Method Compliance

End Use Process Proposed

Design Energy Type

Proposed Design Units

Proposed Building Results

Baseline Building Units

Baseline Building Results

Percent Savings

Interior Lighting No Electric Energy kWh 96,981 Energy kWh 109,720 12 %

Demand kW 30.0 Demand kW 33.8 11 %

Space Heating No Electric Energy kWh 11,214 Energy kWh 31,283 64 %

Demand kW 30.6 Demand kW 107.2 71 %

Space Cooling No Electric Energy kWh 49,562 Energy kWh 94,436 48 %

Demand kW 30.2 Demand kW 58.9 49 %

Pumps No Electric Energy kWh 19,864 Energy kWh 0 n/a

Demand kW 3.9 Demand kW 0.0 n/a

Heat Rejection No Electric Energy kWh 0 Energy kWh 0 n/a

Demand kW 0.0 Demand kW 0.0 n/a

Fans - Interior No Electric Energy kWh 20,386 Energy kWh 100,727 80 %

Demand kW 4.7 Demand kW 20.9 78 %

Receptacle Equipment Yes Electric Energy kWh 101,647 Energy kWh 101,647 0 %

Demand kW 24.4 Demand kW 24.4 0 % Water Heater and pumps No Electric Energy kWh 7,609 Energy kWh 7,609 0 %

Demand kW 2.9 Demand kW 2.9 0 % Misc elec to be 25% process Yes Electric Energy kWh 10,436 Energy kWh 10,436 0 %

Demand kW 2.5 Demand kW 2.5 0 %

Energy Totals Total Annual Energy Use kBTU 1,083,987 1,555,386 30 % Annual Process Energy kBTU 382,426 382,426 0 %

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 2 of 3

W91236-10-R-0007

Allsbrook Goodman, Inc 06:12PM

Table 1.8.2(b). Energy Cost and Consumption by Energy Type - Performance Rating Method Compliance

Proposed Design Baseline Design Percent Savings Energy Type Energy Use Cost ($) Energy Use Cost ($) Energy Use Cost Electric 317,698 kWh 29,864 455,858 kWh 42,851 30.3 % 30.3 %

Subtotal (Model Outputs) 1,083,987 kBTU 29,864 1,555,386 kBTU 42,851 30.3 % 30.3 %

On Site Renewable Energy Energy Generated Renewable Energy Cost

Exceptional Calculations Energy Savings Cost Savings

Proposed Design Proposed Design Baseline Design Baseline Design Percent Savings Percent Savings Energy Use Cost ($) Energy Use Cost ($) Energy Cost

Total: kBTU kBTU % % Note: In Table 1.8.2(b), On-Site Renewable, Exceptional Calculation and amended total results at bottom of table are to be filled in manually if these separate calculations were performed.

LEED NC 2.2 EA Credit 1 Points Reference Table

New Construction % Cost Savings

Existing Building Renovations

% Cost Savings

LEED NC 2.2

Points Awarded

10.5 % 3.5 % 1 pt

14.0 % 7.0 % 2 pts

17.5 % 10.5 % 3 pts

21.0 % 14.0 % 4 pts

24.5 % 17.5 % 5 pts

28.0 % 21.0 % 6 pts

31.5 % 24.5 % 7 pts

35.0 % 28.0 % 8 pts

38.5 % 31.5 % 9 pts

42.0 % 35.0 % 10 pts

Hourly Analysis Program v.4.4 Page 3 of 3

W91236-10-R-0007