MATOC RFP_SF30_W50S90D22R50020003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Submission of RFI Q&As, minor clarifiations.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Feb-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W50S9D22R5002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jan-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Feb-2023

CODE

USPFO WA 141 MSC

1320 W WAINWRIGHT BLVD

FAIRCHILD AFB WA 99011-9439

W50S9D 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W50S9D22R5002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 20 00 - INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00110

SECTION 00110 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:

1.1. These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposal data. They are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals. Carefully review this section prior to commencing proposal preparation. In order for proposals to receive full consideration for award, offerors should ensure that the information furnished in support of the proposal is factual, accurate, and complete.

1.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and elimination from consideration for award. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with FAR Provision 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition.

2. PROPOSAL CONTENT:

2.1 Prospective offerors shall submit the proposal in two separate binders.

Submit Volume 1, Price proposal, pro forma documents, in one (1) original, three (3) hard copies, and one

(1) electronic copy on a CD in accordance with the instructions contained herein.

Submit Volume 2 in one (1) original, three (3) hard copies, and one (1) electronic copy on a CD in accordance with the instructions contained herein.

Volume 2, PART I - Technical Capability Proposal - limited to 20 single pages, exclusive of table of contents, tabs, and dividers. Resumes limited to 2 pages each. Resumes, Organizational Chart, letters of Intent, and Gantt chart do not count toward the 20 page total. Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated.

Subfactor 1 – Experience and Capability Subfactor 2 – Organization and Key Personnel Subfactor 3 – Scheduling Methodology

Volume 2 – PART II - Past Performance Information

2.1.1. Although the assessment of Past Performance as a specific evaluation factor is separate and distinct from the Determination of Responsibility required by FAR Part 9, Past Performance information obtained herein will be used during the Government’s responsibility determination. In addition contractors shall submit a single copy of the following information in a sealed envelope with their name on the outside. This information is sought pursuant to FAR 9.105-1 and will be opened and utilized only if the contractor is selected for award.

Information will be used in determining the contractor responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9. If an award is not being offered the envelope will be filed unopened with the original proposal.

2.1.2. Offerors are cautioned to carefully review the proposal requirements for these Volumes and ensure a complete proposal is submitted.

2.2. PROPOSAL DUE DATE SCHEDULE:

2.2.1. The entire proposal (Volumes 1 and 2 and the CD/DVD copy) are due by the date and time set for the receipt of proposals shown in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Past performance references should provide questionnaire responses to the Contracting Officer not later than the closing date of the receipt of proposals.

2.3. After compiling all required information, submit original and specified number of copies to the following office: 141 ARW Contracting Office. Mark the front of the envelope/box with the following: “PROPOSAL NO.

W50S9D22R5002, DO NOT OPEN – COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.”

2.4. PROPOSAL FORMAT:

2.4.1. Purpose: These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposed data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation.

2.4.2. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

2.4.3. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each offeror’s capability to perform all of the requirements contemplated by this solicitation. All commitments made in the proposal may become a part of the resultant contract. The data submitted with each proposal should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged.

2.4.4. Written proposals shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper (charts may be landscaped but must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper) and shall be in a legible font size (10 min.) with at least 1 inch margins on all sides. All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered, and identified with the RFP number. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering with tabs is required. Type size for graphics, charts, diagrams and tables shall be of an appropriate font and size for the application, and must be clearly readable without magnification assistance to the normal eye. Text lines will be no less than single-space. To the maximum extent practicable, proposal submission shall be double sided. Where page limits exist a page is defined as one single side of a page. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Unless otherwise stated, tabs, indexes and dividers do not count in the page count.

2.4.5. Binding: Elaborate format and binding are neither necessary nor desirable. All binders will be capable of lying flat when opened. Three ring binders are preferred. The cover and spine of each binder will clearly identify the offeror’s name, Volume and Part number, RFP number, RFP title and copy number, (e.g. copy 2 of 3). The original for each volume will be clearly identified on the cover and the spine. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages.

2.4.6. Indexing: Each volume will contain a “Table of Contents” for that volume. The “Table of

Contents” will identify major areas, paragraphs and subparagraphs by number and title as well as by page number and volume locations. Tab indexing will be used to identify sections as appropriate.

2.4.7. Electronic Copy: Provide one (1) electronic copy of all of the proposal information.

Electronic copies are to be submitted on DVD or CD-ROM saved in Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat format.

Data provided on a flash drive or any other USB read/write media are not acceptable.

2.4.8. The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in his/her proposal, including that provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected or removed from the competition.

3. PROPOSAL VOLUME CONTENTS: Each offeror’s proposal shall be submitted as set forth below and all information shall be confined to the appropriate part to facilitate independent evaluation. Proposals which do not include the requested minimum information may be eliminated from further consideration for award.

3.1. VOLUME 1, PRICE/COST INFORMATION AND PRO FORMA DOCUMENTS:

3.1.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for

Government's analysis and examination of price/cost for the prototypical project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation. The Government is not, and does not intend on, requesting certified cost or pricing data. Offerors may be required during the overall evaluation process to provided sufficient price/cost information that will enable the Government to perform a meaningful price examination.

3.1.2. Provide an introductory page to include CAGE Code, DUNS Number, Tax Identification Number (TIN), points of contact, authorized negotiators, contact phone, facsimile numbers, and email addresses.

Also, include your business socioeconomic status, e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, HUBZone small business, etc.

3.1.3. Offer and Section 00010 – Complete in its entirety the “Offeror” portion of the Standard Form (SF) 1442. An official having the authority to contractually bind your company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with FAR 4.102.

3.1.4. Section 00010 – Areas of Consideration. Mark your selection(s) for the Areas in which you want consideration.

3.1.5. Representations and Certifications- Section 00600 - insert the required certifications and representations and return only those shown in section 00600. Return the entire Section 00600 with your proposal.

All other required representations and certifications are to be completed on line in the System for Award Management (SAM), www.sam.gov.

3.1.6. Exhibit D, Prototypical Project Requirements: All offerors, regardless of the areas of consideration on location, shall price the prototypical project for examination purposes. Failure to provide a priced Exhibit D will be considered non-compliant with the solicitation requirements and grounds for elimination from consideration/evaluation. *Note: The prototypical project will be examined on price only to determine price fair and reasonable. This price examination will not be applicable to the overall evaluation of proposals and award decision.

3.1.6.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and examination of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation.

3.1.6.2. One original copy and three copies in a single sealed envelope (one for each proposal copy) of documentation of adequate financial resources: Provide letters of reference from financial institution(s) concerning credit worthiness and from bonding companies indicating capability to bond to the maximum task order value for this solicitation.

3.1.6.3. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.

Applicable to set-aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1).

Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party is not a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration (IAW FAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer.

3.2. VOLUME 2, Part I, OFFEROR TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROPOSAL

Volume 2, Part I is comprised of three (3) subfactors:

Subfactor 1 - Experience and Capability Subfactor 2 - Organization and Key Personnel Subfactor 3 - Scheduling Methodology

3.2.1. The Technical proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions contained in the solicitation.

The Government acknowledges that the technical proposal will involve discussion of some of the same projects/contracts discussed in the Past Performance volume. While Past Performance examines how an offeror performed in the past, so as to determine the probability of success on future projects, this subfactor examines the offeror’s experience with complex multidiscipline project management and execution and how the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the contract’s requirements taking this experience into consideration. The Government intends to use Exhibit A Part 1 information in the evaluation of experience for Subfactor 1. A reiteration of the information provided in Exhibit A is neither required nor desired. Offeror should reference this information by providing a short summation of their relevant experience to meet the submission requirements of this subfactor.

3.2.2. In order for the Government to evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the contract requirements, offerors are required to discuss their technical and administrative capabilities in a manner that clearly demonstrates these are adequate to meet contract requirements. Offerors shall submit information related to each subfactor in a logical manner within the proposal. Be sure to “tab” each of the subfactors: Experience and Capability, Key Personnel, etc.

in a logical manner.

3.2.3. Offerors are cautioned to read FAR Clause 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting. The contracts resulting from this solicitation are not intended for management firms or construction firms who self-perform only administrative or management functions.

3.2.4. Subfactor 1. Experience and Capability: Proposal must include narratives for up to 5 projects that demonstrate technical experience and capability to perform projects involving: interior and exterior renovations, heating and air-conditioning, HVAC controls, plumbing, fire suppression, interior and exterior electrical and lighting, fire and intrusion alarms, communications, limited utilities, site-work, landscaping, fencing, masonry, roofing, concrete, asphalt paving, storm drainage, environmental remediation related to primary construction, construction of new facilities, surveys, studies, and other related work. The narrative discussions should address familiarity with construction at Fairchild AFB, Camp Murray and WADS, relationships with local subcontractors, familiarity with issues pertaining to work in this/these area(s) including involvement of the local workforce. The narrative discussions should address capability and plans for meeting government requirements; specifically referencing Division 01 Special Contract Requirements.

*This subfactor is limited to 2 pages per project narrative, for a total of 10 pages maximum.

3.2.5. Subfactor 2. Organization and Key Personnel: Include an Organizational Chart listing company personnel and their roles for Fairchild AFB, Camp Murray and WADS. Include a narrative describing personnel to include their names, duties and level of responsibility for the following key personnel: Project Manager, Site Superintendent(s), Quality Control Manager and Safety Manager. State the lines of authority and duties such as overall project management, site superintendence, quality control, and safety. Provide resumes for each of the following key personnel: Project manager(s), site superintendent(s), quality control manager(s), and safety manager(s). The detailed background, education, and experience provided must meet any applicable experience qualifications included in the special contract requirements specifications. If proposed personnel are not currently on the offeror’s staff, letters of intent should be provided. Include a narrative describing the experienced key personnel’s ability to manage multi- disciplined construction projects, which is comparable to the work requirements of this solicitation at the locations requested. Refer to Specification Division 01, Special MATOC Contract Requirements, Section 01000 for minimum qualifications for these key personnel and requirements for substitution and dual roles. *In accordance with Exhibit A, Offerors will provide a list of all subcontractors planned to work the MATOC, and will be evaluated according to Section 00120, Evaluation Approach of Subfactor 2. The proposed subcontractors should be verifiable, and information provided indicates a good professional relationship with Electrical, Mechanical, Roofing, Horizontal disciplines, and Civil Site Work subcontractors. Subcontractors shall have completed Exhibit B in Volume 2, to be considered. This list of contractors is part of Exhibit A and does not count towards this subfactor page limit.

*This subfactor is limited to 3 pages maximum (Resumes, Letter of Intent, and Organizational Chart do not count).

3.2.6. Subfactor 3. Scheduling Methodology: Provide a narrative discussing scheduling processes and resource allocation strategy. Provide a narrative of five potential issues that could delay or impact the critical path and the applicable mitigation techniques and corrective actions to ensure completion and control of schedule progress from beginning to the end of a project. Issues that would be specific to the planned locations may be rated higher.

3.3. VOLUME 2, Part II, PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

3.3.1. Volume 2 Part II is obtained for the purpose of evaluating Past Performance. Past Performance includes current/on-going performance that is complete to 90% or greater. Volume 2 includes the offeror’s Performance Relevance Questionnaire, Exhibit A, Parts 1 and 2; and any discussion and or additional information, awards, letters, etc. concerning past performance the offeror includes. Offerors are cautioned to complete all the questions on the Exhibit A Parts 1 and part 2. Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit A.

3.3.2. Offerors shall use the Reference Package, Exhibit C, to obtain references from past and present clients.

3.3.3. Offerors shall discuss their performance using the Performance Relevancy Questionnaire format, Exhibit A, Part 1. Prepare a minimum of three (3) but not more than five (5) of these documents. Contractors should select their projects carefully because the quality of the contractor’s relevant performance is more important than the quantity of projects submitted.

3.3.4. Use the Exhibit A format to provide information that demonstrates a history of performance on contracts that are similar in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude to this project’s plans and specifications. Explain what aspects of the contract you find relevant to the proposed effort and identify how each contract ranks, in terms of relevancy, with respect to the other contracts addressed in proposal.

3.3.5. Offerors should consider the currency and relevancy of the past performance information to be considered, the performance must have been completed during the past five (5) years. The period begins five (5) years prior to the solicitation release date and includes current performance. Performance that is more current may have greater impact than older performance.

3.3.6. In determining relevancy to the solicitation requirement, offerors should consider the similarity of construction methods employed, size, scope, cost magnitude, location, client type (e.g. federal government) and complexity of work performed to those required for the proposed effort. Location should also be considered.

3.3.7. Offerors are encouraged to include with their proposal information any problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror's correction actions.

3.3.8. Offerors lacking relevant present/past performance experience may submit information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement if such information is relevant to this acquisition. Such information shall, as a minimum, include:

Name(s) of Predecessor Company/Subcontractor and/or Key Personnel Complete Address Telephone, Fax Number and email address Brief synopsis of the experience- A resume may be submitted for "Key Personnel" Describe relevancy to this project

3.3.9. Provide three (3) references, for each Predecessor Company, Subcontractor or Key Personnel. Clearly identify the contractor/individual for whom the reference information concerns.

3.3.9.1. Each proposed subcontractor/Teaming Partner must also complete an Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form”, to be considered.

3.3.10. Past Performance References – REQUIRED – A “Final” Performance Evaluation (Construction) (also referred to as a CPARS Evaluation) issued for a project may be included in lieu of sending out reference package for the project OR Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior client(s) of all the projects listed on your Exhibit A submission a Reference Package (Exhibit C) (Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit C Package). This includes correspondence explaining the requirement to obtain an independent evaluation of prior contract performance, and the Past Performance Questionnaire for use in evaluating Present/Past Performance. Inform references that completed Performance Questionnaire should be returned to the Contracting Officer via email at:

141.MSG.MSC@us.af.mil prior to the closing date for receipt of proposals. Offeror must not review the Present/Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They are to be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Officer. Offeror's should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner.

3.3.11. In assessing past performance, the Government may also consider the past performance of the offeror’s key personnel, Project Manager, Quality Control Manager and Site Superintendent as it relates to previous projects. In the event the intended key personnel for this solicitation’s project do not have demonstrated past performance in the project(s) submitted in the Exhibit As, the Government reserves to obtain reference information additional information is required.

3.3.12. Each key person without prior past performance history demonstrated on the submitted Exhibit A shall provide a summary of experience or a resume. In the event the intended person is not part of the offeror’s organization at the time the proposal is submitted then a completed Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form” AND Letter of Intent, is also required or the information will not be considered.

The Government may seek additional references and reserves the right to use the information provided to obtain additional references.

3.3.13. Offerors are advised that the Government may use all data provided by the offeror in this volume and data obtained from any other sources, to include, but not limited to, data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror.

The Government reserves the right to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

END OF SECTION 00110

(End of Summary of Changes)