Att 2 - Past Perf..doc
DOC document 53 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SSA-RFP-10-1051
- Issued by
-
Social Security Administration
About this file
Attachment # 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Questions-Agency Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| Att 1 - WD - Nationwide.txt | TXT text file | |
| SOW Rev 14- MK.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP Cover Letter 8(a) .doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SSA-RFP-10-1051
Attachment 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART 1: To be completed by Offeror:
Name of Offeror: _________________________________________________________
Name of Vendor/Agency providing Past Performance Information:
Contract Number or Project Title: ____________________________________________ Contract/Project Period of Performance: _______________________________________
PART 2: To be completed by person providing reference:
Name: __________________________________
Phone: _________________________
Agency/Organization: _____________________________________________________________ Position/Title: ____________________________________________________________________ Relationship to Contract (Contracting Officer, Project Officer, Etc.)__________________________ Brief Description of Services Provided: _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________
Assign one of the below ratings and provide comments for each of the areas for which information is requested.
You may attach additional comments if desired.
4 - Outstanding- There are no issues/problems.
3 - Good- Issues/problems are slight and do not impact achievement of contract requirements.
2 - Satisfactory- Issues/problems require minor agency resources to achieve contract requirements.
1 - Unsatisfactory- Issues/problems require major agency resources to achieve contract requirements.
0 - Poor- Issues/problems compromise achievement of contract requirements despite use of agency resources.
N/A - Not Applicable- Reference has no direct knowledge of the area being rated and is therefore not able to provide an objective evaluation.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the contract requirements?
Rating:
N/A
Comments:
2. Were the services delivered of high quality?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If no, explain:
Comments:
3. How would you rate the contractor’s commitment to customer satisfaction?
Rating
N/A
Comments:
COST CONTROL
4. Did the contractor submit their invoices/bills timely and accurately?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If no, explain:
Comments:
5. Was this contractor cost efficient?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If no, explain:
Comments:
6. Did this contractor have discrepancies between the negotiated costs and actual costs submitted?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If yes, explain:
Comments:
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
7. How would you rate the contractor's adherence to contract schedules, including timeliness?
Rating:
N/A
Comments:
8. How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness to technical direction?
Rating
N/A
Comments:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
9. How would you rate the contractor’s business relations? (effective and efficient management, businesslike correspondence, responsiveness, notification/resolution of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexibility, proactive, effective and efficient recommended solutions, etc.)
Rating
N/A
Comments:
10. Was this contractor assessed liquidated damages or performance penalties; given a cure notice or show cause letter; or terminated for any reason?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If yes, explain:
Comments:
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
11. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in management of personnel? (Effective and efficient management of work force; work force properly trained and given proper directions, responsive to contract requirements, reasonable/cooperative behavior; etc.)
Rating
N/A
12. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to recruit and maintain qualified and reliable personnel?
Rating
N/A
Comments:
13. On-site Contract Manager’s level of authority:
A. Could he/she make immediate, appropriate decisions regarding the project?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If no, explain:
Comments:
B. Did this person have to elevate it to a higher authority?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If yes, explain:
Comments:
14. Has the contractor provided comprehensive supervision and quality control?
YES ( )
NO ( ) If no, explain:
Comments:
SUBCONTRACTOR UTILIZATION
15. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in management of subcontractors? (effective and efficient management of subcontractors, utilization of quality subcontractors, etc.)
Rating
N/A
Comments:
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
16. How would you rate the contractor's OVERALL PERFORMANCE on this effort?
Rating
17. Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor another similar contract?
YES ( )
NO ( )
Comments:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME
Please email your completed questionnaire to: Melissa.Kloman@ssa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .