SPECS_MPMG_BidFinal_R2_20200124.pdf

Prepared by

Prepared for

Ohio Army National Guard

BID FINAL DESIGN

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range

Camp Ravenna Joint Military

Training Center, Ohio

Project No. 390285

FY 19

Date: 5 April 2019

For Official Use Only (FOUO)

Specifications

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range (MPMG) Project No. 390285 FY 19

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOUO TOC - 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

SECTION TITLE

003126 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION

003126.1 HAZMAT REPORT ATTACHMENT

003132 GEOTECHNICAL DATA

003132.1 GEOTECHNICAL DATA SOILS REPORT ATTACHMENT

003132.2 GEOTECHNICAL DATA SOILS REPORT VERIFICATION ATTACHMENT

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION TITLE

010000 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

010000.1 AGOH Pamphlet 210-1 (ARMY), SECTION 16 ANNEX E

011000 SUMMARY

012200 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES

012300 OPTIONS

012900 PAYMENT PROCEDURES

013100 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION

013200 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DOCUMENTATION

013300 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

013300.1 SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTALS

014000 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

014200 REFERENCES

015000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

017310 CUTTING AND PATCHING

017700 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES

017820 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

017839 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS

018200 DEMONSTRATION AND TRAINING

DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS

SECTION TITLE

024116 STRUCTURE DEMOLITION

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOUO TOC - 2

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

033000 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

DIVISION 04 - MASONRY

042200 CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY

047200 CAST STONE MASONRY

DIVISION 05 - METALS

051200 STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING

053100 STEEL DECKING

054400 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

055000 METAL FABRICATIONS

055119 METAL GRATING STAIRS

055313 BAR GRATINGS

DIVISION 06 – WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES

061000 ROUGH CARPENTRY

062023 INTERIOR FINISH CARPENTRY

DIVISION 07 – THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

072100 THERMAL INSULATION

074113.16 STANDING-SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS

074113.23 INSULATED METAL ROOF PANELS

074213.13 FORMED METAL WALL PANELS

074213.19 INSULATED METAL WALL PANELS

074213.53 METAL SOFFIT PANELS

076200 SHEET METAL FLASHING AND TRIM

077253 SNOW GUARDS

079200 JOINT SEALANTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOUO TOC - 3

DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS

081113 HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES

083313 COILING COUNTER DOORS

085113 ALUMINUM WINDOWS

087100 DOOR HARDWARE

088000 GLAZING

089119 FIXED LOUVERS

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

092216 NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

092900 GYPSUM BOARD

096513 RESILIENT BASE AND ACCESSORIES

099113 EXTERIOR PAINTING

099123 INTERIOR PAINTING

095113 ACOUSTIC PANEL CEILINGS

DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES

107516 GROUND-SET FLAGPOLES

DIVISION 12 – FURNISHINGS

129300 SITE FURNISHINGS

DIVISION 23 - HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING

230510 BASIC HVAC MATERIALS AND METHODS

230513 COMMON MOTOR REQUIREMENTS FOR HVAC EQUIPMENT

233423 HVAC POWER VENTILATORS

238113 PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR-CONDITIONERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOUO TOC - 4

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

260500 COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR ELECTRICAL

260508 TESTING, ACCEPTANCES, AND CERTIFICATIONS

260513 MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLES

260519 LOW VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL POWER CONDUCTORS AND CABLES

260526 GROUNDING AND BONDING FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

260529 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

260533 RACEWAYS AND BOXES FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

260553 IDENTIFICATION FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

261221 SINGLE PHASE PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS

261316 5KV PAD MOUNTED SWITCHGEAR

262416 PANELBOARDS

262417 LOADCENTERS

262726 WIRING DEVICES

262813 FUSES

262816 ENCLOSED SWITCHES AND CIRCUIT BREAKERS

264113 LIGHTNING PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES

264313 SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICES

265119 LED INTERIOR LIGHTING

265600 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

DIVISION 27 - COMMUNICATIONS

271500 COMMUNICATIONS HORIZONTAL CABLING

272110 FIBER OPTIC DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

275116 PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

311000 SITE CLEARING

312000 EARTH MOVING

312513 EROSION CONTROLS

313116 SOIL TREATMENT FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE CONTROL

DIVISION 32 – EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

321313 CONCRETE PAVING

321373 CONCRETE PAVING JOINT SEALANTS

329200 TURF AND GRASSES

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOUO TOC - 5

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

330513 PRECAST STRUCTURES

334100 STORM UTILITY DRAINAGE PIPING

337101 OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION

EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION FOUO 003126 - 1

SECTION 003126 - EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION

1.1 EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFORMATION

A. This Document with its referenced attachments is part of the Procurement and Contracting

Requirements for this Project. They provide Owner's information for Bidders' convenience and are intended to supplement rather than serve in lieu of Bidders' own investigations. They are made available for Bidders' convenience and information, but are not a warranty of existing conditions. This Document and its attachments are not part of the Contract Documents.

B. An existing asbestos report for this Project was prepared by Michael Baker Jr., Inc. and is dated

September 3, 2013. The report is available for viewing at the office of the Owner and as appended to this Document.

C. An existing lead paint report for this Project was prepared by Michael Baker Jr., Inc. and is dated September 3, 2013. The report is available for viewing at the office of the Owner and as appended to this Document.

D. An existing PCB (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) information report for this Project was prepared by

Michael Baker Jr., Inc. and is dated September 3, 2013. The report is available for viewing at the office of the Owner and as appended to this Document.

E. No evidence of mold was observed or reported at the time of the August 9, 2013 fieldwork for this project.

F. Related Requirements:

1. Section 003132 "Geotechnical Data" for reports and soil-boring data from geotechnical investigations that are made available to bidders.

2. Section 012200 “Environmental Procedures” for items related to environmental and waste generation requirements.

3. Section 024116 "Structure Demolition"" for notification requirements if materials suspected of containing hazardous materials are encountered.

END OF DOCUMENT 003126

Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

A Unit of Michael Baker Corporation

Airside Business Park 100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

(412) 269-6300

FAX (412) 375-3996

September 3, 2013

Elaine Farabee Contracting Officer USPFO for Ohio 2811 West Dublin -Granville Road' Columbus, OH 43235-2788

Re: Hazardous Material Building Inspections Machine Gun Range

Dear Ms. Farabee, I am pleased to provide you with this letter report, detailing the environmental sampling services that Michael Baker Jr. Inc. (Baker) has recently provided for your department.

SCOPE OF WORK

Baker was requested to conduct a limited hazardous material inspection for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-containing paint (LCP), and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing paint within three earth-covered magazine bunkers and a shell of a building at the Machine Gun Range of the Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center (CRJMTC) within Portage County, Ohio. The purpose of the inspection was to meet the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), State of Ohio - Department of Health, and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standards. The NESHAP standard (40 CFR, Part 61) requires that an asbestos inspection be conducted prior to renovation/demolition activities of any structure or dwelling. The buildings that were inspected are located on the Machine Gun Range that is planned to undergo renovation. The buildings investigated are labeled Building 1601, 1602, 1603, and a building shell (unlabeled).

FIELD SITE INVESTIGATION

The survey was conducted on August 9, 2013 by an Ohio-licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist (Gary R. Case - Ohio License ES 33548). The Baker field inspector identified three (3) suspected asbestos-containing building materials from the buildings. The bulk material samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of asbestos. Samples were submitted using chain-of-custody documentation to EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. EMSL is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST/NVLAP) for bulk material analysis for asbestos. The bulk asbestos samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), EPA Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, EPA/600/R-93/116 (7/93 Edition). Table 1 presents the specific information for all of the building components that were sampled as suspected ACM.

Elaine Farabee, Contracting Officer USPFO for Ohio September 3, 2013

The Baker field inspector also identified seven (7) suspected paints from the buildings. The bulk paint samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of lead and PCBs. Samples were submitted using chain-of-custody documentation to EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. The bulk paint samples were analyzed by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), EPA Method SW846 3050B/7000B for lead and EPA Method SW846 3540C/8082 for PCBs. Table 2 presents the specific information for all of the paint that was sampled.

FINDINGS

Asbestos

As for the building materials recorded in Table 1, the laboratory analyses of the material samples indicated that three (3) of the sampled materials contained asbestos greater than the EPA criteria level of 1% asbestos by weight and/or in accordance with EPA NESHAP regulations.

According to NESHAP, materials that are found to contain less than 10% asbestos by PLM analysis must also be assumed to be ACM, unless they are re-analyzed by point count methods and it is demonstrated that the material contains <1% asbestos.

The three ACM are listed below:

1.) Building 1602 - Material #01 – cement board (17 square feet) 2.) Building Shell - Material #01 – cement board (440 square feet) 3.) Building Shell - Material #02 – caulk (13 windows)

The final laboratory analytical report for these samples is submitted to confirm this determination and is contained in Attachment I.

Paint

As for the paint recorded in Table 2, the laboratory analyses of the paint samples indicate that all of the paint samples contained at least trace amounts of lead. Thus, all of the paint is considered LCP. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Lead Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) is applicable where paints that contain any amount of lead will be disturbed. OSHA considers all paint (since all paint has some level of lead within it) as LCP.

Also, as shown in Table 2, the laboratory analyses of the paint samples indicate that one (1) of the paint samples contained PCBs greater than EPA criteria level of 50 mg/Kg (which equals 50 parts per million).

The final laboratory analytical reports for the paint samples are submitted to confirm this determination and are contained in Attachment II.

Attachment II contains photographs of the buildings, asbestos-containing materials, and PCB paint.

Elaine Farabee, Contracting Officer USPFO for Ohio September 3, 2013

RECOMMENDATIONS

While the ACM can be managed in-place with little potential hazard, due to the proposed demolition project, all of the ACM that will be impacted or disturbed should be properly removed and disposed of, accordingly, by an asbestos abatement firm that is licensed by the State of Ohio. Abatement plans for the regulated ACM should be designed in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other federal, state, and local regulations and/or using appropriate guidelines by an Ohio-licensed Asbestos Hazard Abatement Project Designer and reviewed by a Certified Industrial Hygienist.

All abatement activities should be overseen and managed by an experienced and Ohio-licensed Asbestos Hazard Abatement Specialist. Removal notifications, activities, and disposal must be completed in accordance with USEPA (40 CFR Part 61), OSHA (29 CFR 1926.1101), and Ohio (Administrative Code 3701-34) regulations, as well as other applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

Currently, the LCP and PCB-containing paint can also be managed in-place with little potential hazard.

However, due to the proposed demolition project, all of the painted material that will be impacted or disturbed should be properly handled, removed and disposed of, accordingly, by an experienced contractor that is licensed by the State of Ohio. Removal plans for the regulated materials should be designed in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and other federal, state, and local regulations and/or using appropriate guideline and reviewed by a Certified Industrial Hygienist. All removal activities should be overseen and managed by experienced personnel.

FURTHER STUDIES

Due to the proposed demolition project, it is recommended that the proposed waste stream of Building 1602 be characterized for PCBs using Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedures (TCLP) prior to the demolition to ensure proper disposal of PCB-containing paint. Baker will schedule the additional testing with CRJMTC and conduct the testing for further documentation on this matter.

Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at

(412) 269-6381.

Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC.

Gary R. Case Project Manager

Attachment(s)

Disclaimer The information that is presented in this report reflects the conditions that were observed in the building(s) during the time frame this inspection was conducted. Although every effort was made to identify the potential suspect building materials and components, there is no guarantee that additional building materials in these damaged buildings are not present. Conditions may exist in the building(s), such that inaccessible materials may only become apparent during demolition activities. If any hidden, suspicious material is encountered, it is recommended that the material be analyzed to confirm its asbestos and/or paint content.

TABLES

TABLE 1

ASBESTOS SURVEY MATERIAL SUMMARY

MACHINE GUN RANGE

CAMP RAVENNA JOINT MILITARY TRAINING CENTER

Homogeneous Material Number

Material Type

Material Description

Material Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results Sample

Locations

Asbestos- Containing

Material

Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of Material

01 No 0713-1602-01 15% Chrysotile Right side of door

Yes 17 Square Feet Damaged

Homogeneous Material Number

Material Type

Material Description

Material Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results Sample

Locations

Asbestos- Containing

Material

Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of Material

01 No 0713-Shell-01 15% Chrysotile Right side of window

Yes 440 Square Feet Damaged

02 No 0713-Shell-02 2% Chrysotile Frame #1 Yes 13 windows Damaged

Each frame = 32 linear feet

No Suspected Materials Found Within This Building.

No Suspected Materials Found Within This Building.

Building 1602

Building Shell

Cement Board

Gray Transite Located on perimeter of exterior garage door

Building 1603

Caulk Gray Located on window frames

Building 1601

Cement Board

Gray Transite Located on perimeter and roof of storage room

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains less than 10% asbestos is considered positive, unless re-analyzed by PLM point count.

TABLE 2

PAINT SURVEY SUMMARY

MACHINE GUN RANGE

CAMP RAVENNA JOINT MILITARY TRAINING CENTER

Homogeneous Paint Number

Material Description

Material Locations Sample Numbers

Sample Results for Total Lead

Lead- Containing

Paint

Sample Results for Total PCBs

PCB-

Containing

Paint

Approximate Quantity

Condition of Paint

01 Tan Paint Metal Roll-up Garage Doors

0713-1601-P01 <0.017 % wt Yes Not Analyzed - - - 17 Square Feet Damaged

Homogeneous Paint Number

Material Description

Material Locations Sample Numbers

Sample Results for Total Lead

Lead- Containing

Paint

Sample Results for Total PCBs

PCB-

Containing

Paint

Approximate Quantity

Condition of Paint

01 Green Paint Interior Concrete Wall in Room 1

0713-1602-P01 0.25 % wt Yes 27 mg/Kg Yes 270 Square Feet Damaged

01 White Paint Interior Concrete Wall in Room 1

0713-1602-P02 0.12 % wt Yes 12 mg/Kg Yes 575 Square Feet Damaged

01 Green Paint Interior Wood Wall in Room 1

0713-1602-P03 0.13 % wt Yes 13.4 mg/Kg Yes 190 Square Feet Damaged

01 White Paint Interior Wood Wall in Room 1

0713-1602-P04 0.45 % wt Yes 82 mg/Kg Yes 160 Square Feet Damaged

01 White Paint Exterior Wooden Doors

0713-1602-P05 5.8 % wt Yes None Detected No 125 Square Feet Damaged

Building 1601

Building 1602

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

TABLE 2

PAINT SURVEY SUMMARY

MACHINE GUN RANGE

CAMP RAVENNA JOINT MILITARY TRAINING CENTER

Homogeneous Paint Number

Material Description

Material Locations Sample Numbers

Sample Results for Total Lead

Lead- Containing

Paint

Sample Results for Total PCBs

PCB-

Containing

Paint

Approximate Quantity

Condition of Paint

01 Green Paint Metal Man Door 0713-1603-P01 <0.095 % wt Yes Not Analyzed - - - 35 Square Feet Damaged

Building 1603

No Suspected Paints Found Within This Building.

Building Shell

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

ATTACHMENT I

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.emsl.com cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041321184 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 10:10 AM

CAMP RAVENNA

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

8/8/2013Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

0713-1602-01

041321184-0001

Gray Fibrous Homogeneous

Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%

1THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 8/9/2013 12:14:47 AM

Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367

Initial report from 08/09/2013 00:14:47

Brittany Brown (1) http://www.emsl.com mailto:cinnasblab@EMSL.com

Phone/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.emsl.com cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041321182 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 10:10 AM

CAMP RAVENNA

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

8/8/2013Analysis Date:

Collected:

Sample Description Appearance % Type AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

0713-SHELL-01

041321182-0001

Gray Fibrous Homogeneous

Chrysotile15%Non-fibrous (other)85%

0713-SHELL-02

041321182-0002

Gray/Tan Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Chrysotile2%Non-fibrous (other)98%

1THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.Test Report PLM-7.28.9 Printed: 8/9/2013 12:13:47 AM

Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Analyst(s)

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1% Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367

Initial report from 08/09/2013 00:13:47

Brittany Brown (2) http://www.emsl.com mailto:cinnasblab@EMSL.com

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 11:23 AM

Camp Ravenna / S.O.# 135950-Task 110

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)

201307788 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

00010713-1601-P01 <0.017 % wt8/9/2013

Julie Smith - Laboratory Director NJ-NELAP Accredited:03036 or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 8/9/2013 3:14:50 PM

Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.

* slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 08/09/2013 15:14:50 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 11:22 AM

Camp Ravenna / S.O# 135950-Rask 110

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)

201307786 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

00010713-1602-P01 0.25 % wt8/9/2013 00020713-1602-P02 0.12 % wt8/9/2013 00030713-1602-P03 0.13 % wt8/9/2013 00040713-1602-P04 0.45 % wt8/9/2013 00050713-1602-P05 5.8 % wt8/9/2013

Julie Smith - Laboratory Director NJ-NELAP Accredited:03036 or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 8/9/2013 3:17:59 PM

Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.

* slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 08/09/2013 15:17:59

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 11:23 AM

Camp Ravenna/ S.O# 135950- Task 110

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)

201307790 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

00010713-1603-P01 <0.095 % wt8/9/2013

Julie Smith - Laboratory Director NJ-NELAP Accredited:03036 or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 8/9/2013 3:15:05 PM

Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.

* slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 08/09/2013 15:15:05

Julie Smith - Laboratory Director

Reviewed and Approved By:

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 8/8/2013. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project:

135950 - Task 110 / Camp Ravenna

The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011303730. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500.

8/13/2013Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC and/or the specific certification program that is applicable, unless otherwise noted.

NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367

The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the NELAP, unless specifically indicated. All results for soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis, unless otherwise noted. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: jsmith@emsl.com mailto:jsmith@emsl.com

Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com jsmith@emsl.com

011303730 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Analytical Results

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 10:10 AM

135950 - Task 110 / Camp Ravenna

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

Client Sample Description Lab ID:0713-1602-PCB1 0001Collected: 7/31/2013

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 EA27 mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20139.9 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

Client Sample Description Lab ID:0713-1602-PCB2 0002Collected: 7/31/2013

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 EA12 mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.99 8/12/2013 AB

Client Sample Description Lab ID:0713-1602-PCB3 0003Collected: 7/31/2013

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 EA4.2 mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 EA9.2 mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20131.0 8/12/2013 AB

Page 2 of 3ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.21.0 Printed:

Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com jsmith@emsl.com

011303730 CustomerID: BAKE51 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Analytical Results

Attn: Gary Case Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Received: 08/08/13 10:10 AM

135950 - Task 110 / Camp Ravenna

Fax: (412) 375-3996 Phone: (412) 269-6300

Project:

Client Sample Description Lab ID:0713-1602-PCB4 0004Collected: 7/31/2013

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 EA39 mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 EA43 mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20138.1 8/12/2013 AB

Client Sample Description Lab ID:0713-1602-PCB5 0005Collected: 7/31/2013

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 EAND mg/Kg 8/13/20130.95 8/12/2013 AB

ND - indicates that the analyte was not detected at the reporting limit RL - Reporting Limit

Definitions:

Page 3 of 3ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.21.0 Printed:

ATTACHMENT II

MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC. – PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD

SITE IDENTIFICATION: Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center

PHOTOGRAPH

Machine Gun Range

PHOTOGRAPHS

BY

Baker

Comments: Building 1601

Comments: Building 1602

Comments: Building 1603

Comments: Building Shell

Comments: Building 1602 – Asbestos-Containing Cement Board (transite along garage door)

Comments: Building Shell - Asbestos-Containing Cement Board (transite siding and roofing)

Comments: Building Shell - Asbestos-Containing Caulk (on window frames)

Comments: Building 1602 – Lead-Containing and PCB-Containing Paint

GEOTECHNICAL DATA FOUO 003132 - 1

DOCUMENT 003132 - GEOTECHNICAL DATA

1.1 GEOTECHNICAL DATA

A. This Document with its referenced attachments is part of the Procurement and Contracting

Requirements for this Project. They provide Owner's information for Bidders' convenience and are intended to supplement rather than serve in lieu of Bidders' own investigations. They are made available for Bidders' convenience and information but are not a warranty of existing conditions.

B. The Contractor shall adhere to the Recommendation section of this Document unless Bidder’s own investigation dictates otherwise.

C. Soil-boring data, obtained by Professional Service Industries, Inc. dated July 30, 2013 appended to this document.

D. A geotechnical investigation report, prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. dated

July 30, 2013 appended to this document.

E. A geotechnical verification of the July 30, 2013 report has been performed by Michael Baker

International, dated November 9, 2017, and appended to this document.

1.2 EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Site Preparation and Earthwork Construction

1. Prior to placing any engineered fill on this site, general site area clearing should be carried out. All existing grass, topsoil, excessively wet soils, and soft/loose or obviously compressible materials, should be completely removed from the proposed construction areas. In addition, the existing fill materials as evidenced at the test boring location B-3 should be completely removed from the building areas and replaced with compacted structural fill in accordance with the Engineered Fill section of the attached report. The decision in connection with the precise extent of required cut and fill should be determined in the field by a representative of PSI following observation of the exposed subgrades and proofrolling operations.

2. Following the site clearing, stripping and undercutting, and prior to placing engineered fill, the exposed subgrades should be critically proofrolled with a loaded 20-ton tandem-axle dump truck until the grade offers a relatively unyielding surface. Areas of excessive yielding, as observed by an OHARNG representative, should be excavated and backfilled with compacted engineered fill and/or the unstable soils can be stabilized by choking the exposed bearing surface with crushed limestone or similar coarse aggregate. After the existing subgrade materials are excavated to design grade, proper control of subgrade compaction and the placement and compaction of new fill materials should be observed and tested by a representative of the OHARNG.

GEOTECHNICAL DATA FOUO 003132 - 2

3. It is recommended that the site preparation, proofrolling and earthwork activities should be performed during a period of dry weather, which can significantly reduce the required extent of soil stabilization, drainage and surface repairs.

4. During site preparation, burn pits, trash pits or other isolated disposal areas may be encountered. All too frequently such buried materials occur in isolated areas outside boring locations. Any such materials encountered during site work or construction should be completely excavated and removed from the site.

B. Engineered Fill

1. Engineered fill materials should consist of non-expansive materials. Materials selected for use as engineered fill should generally contain less than 3 percent by weight of organic matter, waste construction debris, or other deleterious materials. Fill materials should generally have a Standard Proctor maximum dry density greater than 110 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), an Atterberg Liquid Limit less than 40, a Plasticity Index of less than

20, and a maximum particle size of 3 inches or less.

2. Based on our laboratory analysis of the materials encountered at the test boring locations, the on-site natural soils are suitable for engineered fill. Representative samples of the proposed fill materials should be collected at least one week prior to the start of the filling operations. The samples should be tested to determine the maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, particle size distribution and plasticity characteristics. These tests are needed to determine if the material is acceptable as structural fill and for quality control during the compaction process. The type of engineered fill material should be verified and approved by the project’s geotechnical engineer prior to placement.

3. The fill should be placed in layers of not more than 8 inches in thickness, with each layer being compacted to a minimum density of 98 percent of the maximum dry density and within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content, as determined by the Standard Proctor

Method ASTM D-698. Moisture control (increasing or decreasing the natural moisture content) of the engineered fill materials may be necessary for compaction.

C. Foundation Recommendations

1. Considering the subsurface conditions and the proposed construction, the proposed building structures can be founded on conventional shallow bearing isolated and/or continuous spread footing members.

2. Foundations supporting the proposed building structures can bear on the natural soils or compacted engineered fill, and can be designed utilizing a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. All perimeter footings must be placed at a minimum depth of 42 inches below the finished grade in order to protect against frost action. Interior foundations may be placed at a depth of 18 inches below the floor slab, provided they will be bearing on acceptable soils.

3. Footing bearing surfaces evaluations should be performed by a representative of the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of reinforcing steel and concrete. The foundation areas should be critically inspected and tested to verify consistency and

GEOTECHNICAL DATA FOUO 003132 - 3

compatibility with subsurface exploration data, and to assure that the recommended bearing capacity is being achieved. Any unsuitable, excessively soft/loose or wet soils encountered during foundation excavation and construction should be removed and replaced with compacted engineered fill, or the foundations can be extended to bear on the underlying higher strength soils. A representative of the OHARNG should be present at the site during foundation excavation and construction in order to determine the extent of remedial measures that may become necessary should unsuitable soils be encountered.

4. Based on the assumed structural loads, it is anticipated that total and differential foundation settlements will be less than 1-inch and ½-inch, respectively. However, actual settlements will be dependent upon the depth of the foundations, column spacing, structural loads and other related factors. The structural and architectural design should include provisions for liberally spaced, vertical control joints to minimize the effects of potential settlement.

END OF DOCUMENT 003132

July 30, 2013

Mr. Duncan Nickles, P.E.

Michael Baker Jr. Corporation, Inc.

100 Airside Drive Moon Township, Pennsylvania 15108

Re: Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration

Proposed Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range (MPMG) Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG) Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio PSI Project No. 01391134

Dear Mr. Nickles:

Per your request, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) is pleased to submit this Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the above referenced project. Included in this presentation are the results of the subsurface exploration and recommendations concerning the design and construction of the proposed MPMG range at the OHARNG facility, in Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio.

We appreciate the opportunity to have provided you with our geotechnical engineering services and look forward to participation in the construction phase of this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further service in any manner, please contact our office.

Respectfully submitted, Professional Service Industries, Inc.

A. Veeramani, P.E.

District Manager

Randy Daub, P.E.

Project Engineer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Authorization ...................................................................................... Page 1 Project Description ......................................................................................... Page 1 Purpose and Scope of Services ..................................................................... Page 2

SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

Site Location and Description ........................................................................ Page 2 Site Geology ................................................................................................... Page 2 Subsurface Conditions ................................................................................... Page 3 Water Level Measurements ........................................................................... Page 4

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Site Preparation and Earthwork Construction ............................................... Page 5 Engineered Fill ................................................................................................ Page 5 Foundation Recommendations ...................................................................... Page 6 Seismic Site Class .......................................................................................... Page 7 Floor Slab Design and Construction .............................................................. Page 7 Groundwater Control ...................................................................................... Page 8 Drainage ......................................................................................................... Page 8 Excavations .................................................................................................... Page 8 Weather Considerations ................................................................................. Page 9

GEOTECHNICAL RISK ............................................................................................ Page 9

REPORT LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................... Page 10

APPENDIX

Site Vicinity Map Boring Location Plan General Notes Boring Logs (B-1 through B-11) Grain Size Analysis (3) Atterberg Limits’ Determination (2) USCS Soil Classification Chart

Proposed MPMG Range – OHARNG Facility - Ravenna, Ohio PSI File No. 01391134

- 1 -

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Authorization

This report presents the results of a geotechnical subsurface exploration and evaluation conducted for the MPMG range at the OHARNG facility, in Ravenna, Ohio.

Authorization to perform this exploration and analysis was in the form of a Subconsultant Agreement between Professional Service Industries, Inc. and Michael Baker Jr Corporation, Inc (Baker), dated June 7, 2013.

Project Description

Based on the provided information, it is understood that the project will consist of the construction of a new multi-purpose machine gun range within the existing Ohio Army National Guard facility in Ravenna, Ohio. Specifically, the new MPMG range will be located at the site of the existing Range #19. However, the new range will have a slightly larger footprint than the existing range. The new range will have seven (7) small support buildings, the largest of which will be about 800 square feet. These buildings will be single story, slab-on-grade construction, and will include a range tower, range operations and storage building, ammo breakdown building, latrine, classroom facility, mess shelter, and bleacher enclosure structures. The proposed range will also include the construction of berms along the sides and end of the range, acting as backstops.

No other information is available at the time of this report, however we have assumed maximum column, wall and floor loads of approximately 50 kips, 3 kips per lineal foot and 100 pounds per square foot (psf), respectively, for this submittal.

Based on a PSI representative visiting the site, the site areas are relatively level within the proposed building areas. Therefore, it is assumed that maximum cut and fill operations of less than 3 feet will be required for the proposed building structures.

However, based on the top-of-hole elevations provided to PSI by the surveying crew from Baker, the overall MPMG range slopes downward from west to east, with a maximum difference in elevation of about 87 feet (996’-1083’ MSL).

The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information, the proposed location and orientation of the buildings on the site and the subsurface materials described in this report. If any of the information we have be given or assumed is incorrect, please contact us so that we may amend the recommendations presented accordingly. PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project.

- 2 -

Purpose and Scope of Services

The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and to prepare recommendations for foundations, floor slab construction, site preparation, and other construction considerations. Our scope for this service included a project site reconnaissance, drilling and sampling eleven (11) soil test borings, completing a laboratory testing program and submitting an engineering analysis and evaluation of the surface materials.

The scope of services for the geotechnical exploration did not include an environmental assessment for the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater or air, on or below or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors or unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for the information of the client.

PSI’s scope also did not provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence or the amplification of the same. The Client should be aware that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. The Client should also be aware that site conditions are outside of PSI’s control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or reoccurrence of mold amplification.

SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

Site Location and Description

The project site for the proposed development is located within the existing OHARNG Camp Ravenna facility, in the City of Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio. Specifically, the proposed MPMG range will be located at the site of the existing Range #19. No topographical information and/or site grading plans were provided for the proposed construction areas. However, based on the top-of-hole elevations provided to PSI by the surveying crew from Baker, the overall MPMG range slopes downward from west to east, with a maximum difference in elevation of about 87 feet (996’-1083’ MSL). Surface drainage was fair at the time of the field drilling operations. We recommend that any existing utility lines be checked and marked prior to construction activities.

Site Geology

Based on the glacial and physiographic geologic maps for Ohio, the unconsolidated deposits of loam sheets consist of ground moraine of the Lavery Till from the

- 3 -

Wisconsinan Age over Mississippian-age shales, siltstones, sandstones, coal, and limestones of the Pottsville and Allegheny Formation.

Subsurface Conditions

The subsurface conditions at the site were explored with a total of eleven (11) soil test borings, including five (5) test borings drilled for the proposed building structures to depths of about 15 feet each and six (6) test borings for the proposed berms/backstop areas drilled to depths of about 15 feet each below the existing surface grades. The approximate boring locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan presented in the Appendix of this report. The test boring locations were selected and field located by others. In addition, the top-of-hole elevations at each test boring location were provided to PSI and added to the boring logs.

It should be noted that paths to each boring location were cleared for unexploded ordinance (UXO) by representatives from Quality Geosciences Company from Grantville, PA (1-717-979-6237).

The borings were advanced utilizing 2¼ inch inside diameter, hollow-stem auger drilling methods. Soil samples were routinely obtained during the drilling process. Select soil samples were later tested in the laboratory to obtain soil material properties for the foundation, floor slabs and pavement recommendations. Drilling, sampling, and laboratory testing was accomplished in general accordance with ASTM procedures.

The types of subsurface materials encountered in the test borings have been visually classified. The results of the visual classifications, Standard Penetration tests, moisture contents and water level observations are presented on the boring logs in the Appendix of this report. Representative samples of the soils were placed in sample jars, and are now stored in the laboratory for further analysis, if requested.